Advanced search
Publication Cover
Thinking & Reasoning Volume 28, 2022 - Issue 3: Thinking about Climate Change
Submit an article Journal homepage
3,733
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Introduction

Thinking about climate change: look up and look around!

Colin J. DavisUniversity of Bristol, Bristol, UKCorrespondence[email protected]
&
Stephan LewandowskyUniversity of Bristol, Bristol, UKORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-1655-2013
ORCID Icon
Pages 321-326 | Received 24 Jan 2022, Accepted 07 Feb 2022, Published online: 21 Feb 2022

References

  • Angill-Williams, A., & Davis, C. J. (this issue). Increasing climate efficacy is not a surefire means to promoting climate commitment. Thinking & Reasoning, 28(2), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2021.1979651
  • Beament, E. (2019). Tory chancellor 'saving world too expensive'. https://theecologist.org/2019/jun/07/tory-chancellor-hints-saving-world-too-expensive
  • Bergquist, P., Goldberg, M. H., Gustafson, A., Leiserowitz, A., Rosenthal, S. A., & Marlon, J. (this issue). Information about the human causes of climate change influences climate causal attribution, risk perceptions, and policy support. Thinking & Reasoning, 28(2), 1–13.
  • Brulle, R. J. (2014). Institutionalizing delay: foundation funding and the creation of US climate change counter-movement organizations. Climatic Change, 122(4), 681–694. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-013-1018-7
  • Caddick, Z. A., & Feist, G. J. (this issue). When beliefs and evidence collide: Psychological and ideological predictors of motivated reasoning about climate change. Thinking & Reasoning, 28(2), 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2021.1994009
  • Dunlap R. E, & McCright A. M. (2011). Organized climate change denial. In J. S. Dryzek, R. B. Norgaard, & D. Schlosberg (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of climate change and society (pp. 144–160). Oxford University Press.
  • Erdelyi, M. H. (1974). A new look at the New Look: Perceptual defense and vigilance. Psychological Review, 81(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0035852
  • Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford University Press.
  • Gifford, R., Scannell, L., Kormos, C., Smolova, L., Biel, A., Boncu, S., Corral, V., Güntherf, H., Hanyu, K., Hine, D., Kaiser, F. G., Korpela, K., Lima, L. M., Mertig, A. G., Mira, R. G., Moser, G., Passafaro, P., Pinheiro, J. Q., Saini, S., Sako, T., Sautkina, E., Uzzell, D. (2009). Temporal pessimism and spatial optimism in environmental assessments: An 18-nation study. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.06.001
  • Hornsey, M. J., Chapman, C. M., & Oelrichs, D. M. (this issue). Why it is so hard to teach people they can make a difference: Climate change efficacy as a non-analytic form of reasoning. Thinking & Reasoning, 28(2), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2021.1893222
  • Kahan, D. M. (2015). Climate‐science communication and the measurement problem. Political Psychology, 36, 1–43. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12244
  • Kikstra, J., Waidelich, P., Rising, J., Yumashev, D., Hope, C., & Brierley, C. (2021). The social cost of carbon dioxide under climate-economy feedbacks and temperature variability. Environmental Research Letters, 16(9), 094037. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac1d0b
  • Kruglanski, A. W. (1996). Motivated social cognition: Principles of the interface. In E. T. Higgins & A. W. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 493–520). Guilford Press.
  • Kunda, Z. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108(3), 480–498. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.108.3.480
  • Lewandowsky, S. (2021). Climate change disinformation and how to combat it. Annual Review of Public Health, 42, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-090419-102409
  • McKay, A. (Director). (2021). Don’t Look Up [Film]. Hyperobject Industries.
  • Molden, D. C., Bayes, R., & Druckman, J. N. (this issue). A motivational systems approach to investigating opinions on climate change. Thinking & Reasoning, 28(2), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2021.1982003
  • Oreskes, N., & Conway, E. M. (2011). Merchants of doubt: How a handful of scientists obscured the truth on issues from tobacco smoke to global warming. Bloomsbury Publishing USA.
  • Supran, G., & Oreskes, N. (2017). Assessing ExxonMobil’s climate change communications (1977–2014). Environmental Research Letters, 12(8), 084019. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aa815f
  • Swim, J. K., Geiger, N., & Guerriero, J. G. (2021). Not out of MY bank account! Science messaging when climate change policies carry personal financial costs. Thinking & Reasoning, 28(2), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2021.1957710
  • Velautham, L. & Ranney, M. A. (this issue).
  • Wolsko, C., Ariceaga, H., & Seiden, J. (2016). Red, white, and blue enough to be green. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 65, 7–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2016.02.005

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.