Both a bioweapon and a hoax: the curious case of contradictory conspiracy theories about COVID-19

References

• Alkali, Y. E., & Amichai-Hamburger, Y. (2004). Experiments in digital literacy. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 7(4), 421–429. https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2004.7.421
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Allington, D., Duffy, B., Wessely, S., Dhavan, N., & Rubin, J. (2021). Health-protective behaviour, social media usage and conspiracy belief during the COVID-19 public health emergency. Psychological Medicine, 51(10), 1763–1769. https://doi.org/10.1017/S003329172000224X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alper, S., Bayrak, F., & Yilmaz, O. (2020). Psychological correlates of COVID-19 conspiracy beliefs and preventive measures: Evidence from Turkey. Current Psychology, 40, 5708–5717. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-020-00903-0
   Google Scholar
• Bertin, P., Nera, K., & Delouvée, S. (2020). Conspiracy beliefs, rejection of vaccination, and support for hydroxychloroquine: A conceptual replication-extension in the COVID-19 pandemic context. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 565128. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.565128
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bierwiaczonek, K., Kunst, J. R., & Pich, O. (2020). Belief in COVID-19 conspiracy theories reduces social distancing over time. Applied Psychology. Health and Well-Being, 12(4), 1270–1285. https://doi.org/10.1111/aphw.12223
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruder, M., Haffke, P., Neave, N., Nouripanah, N., & Imhoff, R. (2013). Measuring individual differences in generic beliefs in conspiracy theories across cultures: Conspiracy Mentality Questionnaire. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 225. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00225
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cialdini, R. B., Trost, M. R., & Newsom, J. T. (1995). Preference for consistency: The development of a valid measure and the discovery of surprising behavioural implications. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(2), 318–328. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.69.2.318
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cokely, E. T., Galesic, M., Schulz, E., Ghazal, S., & Garcia-Retamero, R. (2012). Measuring risk literacy: The Berlin Numeracy Test. Judgment and Decision Making, 7(1), 25–47. http://journal.sjdm.org/11/11808/jdm11808.pdf
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denovan, A., Dagnall, N., Drinkwater, K., Parker, A., & Neave, N. (2020). Conspiracist beliefs, intuitive thinking, and schizotypal facets: A further evaluation. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 34(6), 1394–1405. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3716
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiStefano, C., & Morgan, G. B. (2014). A Comparison of diagonal weighted least squares robust estimation techniques for ordinal data. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 21(3), 425–438. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2014.915373
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epstein, S. (2014). Cognitive-experiental theory: An integrative theory of personality. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Epstein, S., Pacini, R., Denes-Raj, V., & Heier, H. (1996). Individual differences in intuitive–experiential and analytical–rational thinking styles. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(2), 390–405. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.71.2.390
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erceg, N., Galić, Z., & Bubić, A. (2022). Normative responding on cognitive bias tasks: Some evidence for a weak rationality factor that is mostly explained by numeracy and actively open-minded thinking. Intelligence, 90, 101619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2021.101619
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erceg, N., Ružojčić, M., & Galić, Z. (2020). Misbehaving in the Corona crisis: The role of anxiety and unfounded beliefs. Current Psychology, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-020-01040-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, J. S. B. T. (2003). In two minds: Dual-process accounts of reasoning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(10), 454–459. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2003.08.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fonseca, R., Blascovich, J., & Garcia-Marques, T. (2014). Challenge and threat motivation: Effects on superficial and elaborative information processing. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1170. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01170
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frederick, S. (2005). Cognitive reflection and decision making. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19(4), 25–42. https://doi.org/10.1257/089533005775196732
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goertzel, T. (1994). Belief in conspiracy theories. Political Psychology, 15(4), 731. https://doi.org/10.2307/3791630
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hart, J., & Graether, M. (2018). Something’s going on here: Psychological predictors of belief in conspiracy theories. Journal of Individual Differences, 39(4), 229–237. https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-0001/a000268
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haran, U., Ritov, I., & Mellers, B. A. (2013). The Role of Actively Open-Minded Thinking in Information Acquisition, Accuracy, and Calibration. Judgment and Decision Making, 8(3), 188–201.
   Google Scholar
• Imhoff, R., Dieterle, L., & Lamberty, P. (2021). Resolving the puzzle of conspiracy worldview and political activism: Belief in secret plots decreases normative but increases nonnormative political engagement. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 12(1), 71–79. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550619896491
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imhoff, R., & Lamberty, P. (2020). A bioweapon or a hoax? The link between distinct conspiracy beliefs about the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) outbreak and pandemic behavior. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 11(8), 1110–1118. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550620934692
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jokić, B., & Purić, D. (2019). Relating rational and experiential thinking styles with trait emotional intelligence in broader personality space. Europe's Journal of Psychology, 15(1), 140–158. https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.v15i1.1692
   Google Scholar
• Lazić, A., & Žeželj, I. (2021). A systematic review of narrative interventions: Lessons for countering anti-vaccination conspiracy theories and misinformation. Public Understanding of Science, 30(6), 644–670. https://doi.org/10.1177/09636625211011881
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levinson, D. J., & Sanford, R. N. (1944). A scale for the measurement of anti-Semitism. The Journal of Psychology, 17(2), 339–370. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.1944.9917200
   Google Scholar
• Lewandowsky, S., & Cook, J. (2020). The conspiracy theory handbook. Retrieved from http://sks.to/conspiracy
   Google Scholar
• Li, C.-H. (2016). The performance of ML, DWLS, and ULS estimation with robust corrections in structural equation models with ordinal variables. Psychological Methods, 21(3), 369–387. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000093
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindeman, M., & Aarnio, K. (2007). Superstitious, magical, and paranormal beliefs: An integrative model. Journal of Research in Personality, 41(4), 731–744. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2006.06.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindeman, M., & Saher, M. (2007). Vitalism, purpose and superstition. British Journal of Psychology (London, England: 1953), 98(Pt 1), 33–44. https://doi.org/10.1348/000712606x101808
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lindeman, M., Svedholm-Häkkinen, A. M., & Lipsanen, J. (2015). Ontological confusions but not mentalizing abilities predict religious belief, paranormal belief, and belief in supernatural purpose. Cognition, 134, 63–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2014.09.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lobato, E., Mendoza, J., Sims, V., & Chin, M. (2014). Examining the relationship between conspiracy theories, paranormal beliefs, and pseudoscience acceptance among a university population: Relationship between unwarranted beliefs. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 28(5), 617–625. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lukić, P., Žeželj, I., & Stanković, B. (2019). How (ir)rational is it to believe in contradictory conspiracy theories? Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 15(1), 94–107. https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.v15i1.1690
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, J. M. (2020). Do COVID-19 conspiracy theory beliefs form a monological belief system? Canadian Journal of Political Science, 53(2), 319–326. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008423920000517
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milošević Đorđević, J., Žeželj, I., & Đurić, Ž. (2021). Beyond general political attitudes: Conspiracy mentality as a global belief system predicts endorsement of international and local conspiracy theories. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 9(1), 144–158. https://doi.org/10.5964/jspp.5609
   Google Scholar
• Moulding, R., Nix-Carnell, S., Schnabel, A., Nedeljkovic, M., Burnside, E. E., Lentini, A. F., et al. (2016). Better the devil you know than a world you don't? Intolerance of uncertainty and worldview explanations for belief in conspiracy theories. Personality and Individual Differences, 98, 345–354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.04.060
   Google Scholar
• Pennycook, G., Cheyne, J., Barr, N., Koehler, D., & Fugelsang, J. (2015). On the reception and detection of pseudo-profound bullshit. Judgment and Decision Making, 10, 549–563.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennycook, G., McPhetres, J., Bago, B., & Rand, D. G. (2021). Beliefs about COVID-19 in Canada, the U.K., and the U.S.A.: A novel test of political polarization and motivated reasoning. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 48(5), 750-765. 01461672211023652.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, E., Västfjäll, D., Slovic, P., Mertz, C. K., Mazzocco, K., & Dickert, S. (2006). Numeracy and decision making. Psychological Science, 17(5), 407–413. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01720.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petrović, M. B., & Žeželj, I. (2021). Thinking inconsistently: Development and validation of an instrument for assessing proneness to doublethink. European Journal of Psychological Assessment. 1015-5759/a000645. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000645
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team. (2020). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria. Retrieved from https://www.R-project.org/
   Google Scholar
• Rizeq, J., Flora, D. B., & Toplak, M. E. (2021). An examination of the underlying dimensional structure of three domains of contaminated mindware: Paranormal beliefs, conspiracy beliefs, and anti-science attitudes. Thinking & Reasoning, 27(2), 187–125. https://doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2020.1759688
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romer, D., & Jamieson, K. H. (2020). Conspiracy theories as barriers to controlling the spread of COVID-19 in the U.S. Social Science & Medicine (1982), 263, 113356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113356
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roozenbeek, J., Schneider, C. R., Dryhurst, S., Kerr, J., Freeman, A. L. J., Recchia, G., van der Bles, A. M., & van der Linden, S. (2020). Susceptibility to misinformation about COVID-19 around the world. Royal Society Open Science, 7(10), 201199. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.201199
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharot, T., Korn, C. W., & Dolan, R. J. (2011). How unrealistic optimism is maintained in the face of reality. Nature Neuroscience, 14(11), 1475–1479. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.2949
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soloman, S. R., & Sawilowsky, S. S. (2009). Impact of rank-based normalizing transformations on the accuracy of test scores. Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods, 8(2), 448–462. https://doi.org/10.22237/jmasm/1257034080
   Google Scholar
• Šrol, J. (2022). Individual differences in epistemically suspect beliefs: the role of analytic thinking and susceptibility to cognitive biases. Thinking & Reasoning, 28(1), 125–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2021.1938220
   Google Scholar
• Stanley, M. L., Barr, N., Peters, K., & Seli, P. (2021). Analytic-thinking predicts hoax beliefs and helping behaviours in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Thinking & Reasoning, 27(3), 464–414. https://doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2020.1813806
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoica, C. A., & Umbreș, R. (2021). Suspicious minds in times of crisis: Determinants of Romanians’ beliefs in COVID-19 conspiracy theories. European Societies, 1-16, 23(sup1), S246–S261. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616696.2020.1823450
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stojanov, A. (2015). Reducing conspiracy theory beliefs. Psihologija, 48(3), 251–266. https://doi.org/10.2298/PSI1503251S
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutton, R. M., & Douglas, K. M. (2022). Agreeing to disagree: Reports of the popularity of Covid-19 conspiracy theories are greatly exaggerated. Psychological Medicine, 52(4), 791–793. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291720002780
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swami, V., & Barron, D. (2021). Rational thinking style, rejection of coronavirus (COVID-19) conspiracy theories/theorists, and compliance with mandated requirements: Directand indirect relationships in a nationally representative sample of adults from the United Kingdom. Journal of Pacific Rim Psychology, 15, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/183449092110373
   Google Scholar
• Swami, V., Coles, R., Stieger, S., Pietschnig, J., Furnham, A., Rehim, S., & Voracek, M. (2011). Conspiracist ideation in Britain and Austria: Evidence of a monological belief system and associations between individual psychological differences and real-world and fictitious conspiracy theories: Conspiracist ideation. British Journal of Psychology (London, England: 1953), 102(3), 443–463. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.2010.02004.x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Swami, V., Voracek, M., Stieger, S., Tran, U. S., & Furnham, A. (2014). Analytic thinking reduces belief in conspiracy theories. Cognition, 133(3), 572–585. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2014.08.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teovanović, P., Lukić, P., Zupan, Z., Lazić, A., Ninković, M., & Žeželj, I. (2021). Irrational beliefs differentially predict adherence to guidelines and pseudoscientific practices during the COVID‐19 pandemic. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 35(2), 486–496. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3770
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toplak, M. E., West, R. F., & Stanovich, K. E. (2014). Assessing miserly information processing: An expansion of the Cognitive Reflection Test. Thinking & Reasoning, 20(2), 147–168. https://doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2013.844729
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trizano-Hermosilla, I., & Alvarado, J. M. (2016). Best alternatives to Cronbach's alpha reliability in realistic conditions: congeneric and asymmetrical measurements. Frontiers in psychology, 7, 769. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00769
   Google Scholar
• UNICEF. (2017). Znanje, stavovi i prakse u vezi sa imunizacijom dece u Srbiji. [Knowledge, attitudes and practices on immunization of children in Serbia]. https://www.unicef.org/serbia/media/9226/file/Znanje,%20stavovi%20i%20prakse%20.pdf
   Google Scholar
• van Mulukom, V., Pummerer, L., Alper, S., Bai, H., Cavojova, V., Farias, J. E. M., Kay, C. S., Lazarevic, L. B., Lobato, E. J. C., Marinthe, G., Pavela Banai, I., Šrol, J., & Žeželj, I. (2022). Antecedents and consequences of COVID-19 conspiracy beliefs: a rapid review of the evidence. Social Science & Medicine, 114912.
   Google Scholar
• van Prooijen, J.-W., Douglas, K. M., & De Inocencio, C. (2018). Connecting the dots: Illusory pattern perception predicts belief in conspiracies and the supernatural: Illusory pattern perception. European Journal of Social Psychology, 48(3), 320–335. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2331
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, M. J. (2017). Conspiracy suspicions as a proxy for beliefs in conspiracy theories: Implications for theory and measurement. British Journal of Psychology (London, England: 1953), 108(3), 507–527. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12231
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, M. J., Douglas, K. M., & Sutton, R. M. (2012). Dead and alive: Beliefs in contradictory conspiracy theories. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3(6), 767–773. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550611434786
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. (n.d.). Infodemic. https://www.who.int/health-topics/infodemic#tab=tab_1
   Google Scholar
• Zimmer, C., Gorman, J., & Mueller, B. (2021, May 27). Scientists don’t want to ignore the ‘lab leak’ theory, despite no new evidence. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2021/05/27/health/wuhan-coronavirus-lab-leak.html
   Google Scholar