Conspiracy beliefs in the context of a comprehensive rationality assessment

References

• Anderson, R. C., & Freebody, P. (1983). Reading comprehension and the assessment and acquisition of word knowledge. In B. Huston (Ed.), Advances in reading/language research (Vol. 2, pp. 231–256). JAI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baddeley, A. D., Emslie, H., & Nimmo-Smith, I. (1993). The spot-the-word test: A robust estimate of verbal intelligence based on lexical decision. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 32(1), 55–65. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8260.1993.tb01027.x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Baron, J., Isler, O., & Yilmaz, O. (2023). Actively open-minded thinking and the political effects of its absence. In V. Ottati & C. Stern (Eds.), Divided: Open-mindedness and dogmatism in a polarized world (pp. 162–182). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barron, D., Morgan, K., Towell, T., Altemeyer, B., & Swami, V. (2014). Associations between schizotypy and belief in conspiracist ideation. Personality and Individual Differences, 70, 156–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.06.040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basham, L. (2012). Conspiracy theory and rationality. In C. Jensen & R. Harre (Eds.), Beyond rationality: Contemporary issues (pp. 49–87). Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Batailler, C., Brannon, S. M., Teas, P. E., & Gawronski, B. (2022). A signal detection approach to understanding the identification of fake news. Perspectives on Psychological Science: A Journal of the Association for Psychological Science, 17(1), 78–98. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620986135
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bensley, D. A., Watkins, C., Lilienfeld, S. O., Masciocchi, C., Murtagh, M. P., & Rowan, K. (2022). Skepticism, cynicism, and cognitive style predictors of the generality of unsubstantiated belief. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 36(1), 83–99. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3900
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bost, P. R. (2019). The truth is around here somewhere. In J. E. Uscinski (Ed.), Conspiracy theories and the people who believe them (pp. 269–282). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bowes, S. M., Costello, T. H., & Tasimi, A. (2023). The conspiratorial mind: A meta-analytic review of motivational and personological correlates. Psychological Bulletin, 149(5–6), 259–293. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000392
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowes, S. M., Costello, T. H., Ma, W., & Lilienfeld, S. O. (2021). Looking under the tinfoil hat: Clarifying the personological and psychopathological correlates of conspiracy beliefs. Journal of Personality, 89(3), 422–436. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12588
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brotherton, R., & French, C. C. (2014). Belief in conspiracy theories and susceptibility to the conjunction fallacy. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 28(2), 238–248. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.2995
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brotherton, R., French, C. C., & Pickering, A. D. (2013). Measuring belief in conspiracy theories: The generic conspiracist beliefs scale. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 279. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00279
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruder, M., Haffke, P., Neave, N., Nouripanah, N., & Imhoff, R. (2013). Measuring individual differences in generic beliefs in conspiracy theories across cultures: Conspiracy Mentality Questionnaire. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 225. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00225
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Čavojová, V., Secară, E., Jurkovič, M., & Šrol, J. (2019). Reception and willingness to share pseudo-profound bullshit and their relation to other epistemically suspect beliefs and cognitive ability in Slovakia and Romania. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 33(2), 299–311. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3486
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coady, D. (2007). Are conspiracy theorists irrational? Episteme, 4(2), 193–204. https://doi.org/10.3366/epi.2007.4.2.193
   Google Scholar
• Coady, D. (2023). Conspiracy theory as heresy. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 55(7), 756–759. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2021.1917364
   Google Scholar
• Dagnall, N., Denovan, A., Drinkwater, K., Parker, A., & Clough, P. (2017). Statistical bias and endorsement of conspiracy theories. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 31(4), 368–378. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3331
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dentith, M. R. X. (2019). Conspiracy theories on the basis of the evidence. Synthese, 196(6), 2243–2261. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-017-1532-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dentith, M. R. X. (2021). Debunking conspiracy theories. Synthese, 198(10), 9897–9911. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-020-02694-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dentith, M. R. X. (2023). Some conspiracy theories. Social Epistemology, 37(4), 522–534. https://doi.org/10.1080/02691728.2023.2173539
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dentith, M. R. X., & Orr, M. (2018). Secrecy and conspiracy. Episteme, 15(4), 433–450. https://doi.org/10.1017/epi.2017.9
   Google Scholar
• Douglas, K. M., & Sutton, R. M. (2023). What are conspiracy theories? A definitional approach to their correlates, consequences, and communication. Annual Review of Psychology, 74(1), 271–298. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-032420-031329
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Douglas, K. M., Sutton, R. M., Callan, M. J., Dawtry, R. J., & Harvey, A. J. (2016). Someone is pulling the strings: Hypersensitive agency detection and belief in conspiracy theories. Thinking & Reasoning, 22(1), 57–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2015.1051586
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas, K. M., Uscinski, J. E., Sutton, R. M., Cichocka, A., Nefes, T., Ang, C. S., & Deravi, F. (2019). Understanding conspiracy theories. Political Psychology, 40(S1), 3–35. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12568
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duetz, J. C. M. (2022). Conspiracy theories are not beliefs. Erkenntnis, 89(5), 2105–2119. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-022-00620-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enders, A. M., & Smallpage, S. M. (2019). Who are conspiracy theorists? A comprehensive approach to explaining conspiracy beliefs. Social Science Quarterly, 100(6), 2017–2032. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.12711
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enders, A. M., & Uscinski, J. E. (2021). Are misinformation, antiscientific claims, and conspiracy theories for political extremists? Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 24(4), 583–605. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430220960805
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enders, A. M., Diekman, A., Klofstad, C., Murthi, M., Verdear, D., Wuchty, S., & Uscinski, J. (2023). On modeling the correlates of conspiracy thinking. Scientific Reports, 13(1), 8325. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-34391-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enders, A., Farhart, C., Miller, J., Uscinski, J., Saunders, K., & Drochon, H. (2022). Are Republicans and Conservatives more likely to believe conspiracy theories? Political Behavior, 45, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-022-09812-3
   Google Scholar
• Frenken, M., Bilewicz, M., & Imhoff, R. (2023). On the relation between religiosity and the endorsement of conspiracy theories: The role of political orientation. Political Psychology, 44(1), 139–156. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12822
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goertzel, T. (1994). Belief in conspiracy theories. Political Psychology, 15(4), 731–742. https://doi.org/10.2307/3791630
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagen, K. (2018). Conspiracy theorists and monological belief systems. Argumenta, 3(2), 303–326. https://doi.org/10.1080/02691728.2017.1352625
   Google Scholar
• Husting, G. (2018). Governing with feeling: Conspiracy theories, contempt, and affective governmentality. In M. R. X. Dentith (Ed.), Taking conspiracy theories seriously (pp. 109–123). Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Imhoff, R., & Bruder, M. (2014). Speaking (un–)truth to power: Conspiracy mentality as a generalised political attitude. European Journal of Personality, 28(1), 25–43. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.1930
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imhoff, R., Bertlich, T., & Frenken, M. (2022). Tearing apart the “evil” twins: A general conspiracy mentality is not the same as specific conspiracy beliefs. Current Opinion in Psychology, 46, 101349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2022.101349
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imhoff, R., Zimmer, F., Klein, O., António, J. H. C., Babinska, M., Bangerter, A., Bilewicz, M., Blanuša, N., Bovan, K., Bužarovska, R., Cichocka, A., Delouvée, S., Douglas, K. M., Dyrendal, A., Etienne, T., Gjoneska, B., Graf, S., Gualda, E., Hirschberger, G., … van Prooijen, J.-W. (2022). Conspiracy mentality and political orientation across 26 countries. Nature Human Behaviour, 6(3), 392–403. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-021-01258-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jilani, Z. (2021, May 27). American journalists shielded China and erased the Wuhan lab leak theory. Newsweek. https://www.newsweek.com/american-journalists-shielded-china-erased-wuhan-lab-leak-theory-opinion-1595400
   Google Scholar
• Leman, P. J., & Cinnirella, M. (2013). Beliefs in conspiracy theories and the need for cognitive closure. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 378. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00378
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewandowsky, S., Oberauer, K., & Gignac, G. E. (2013). NASA faked the moon landing–therefore, (climate) science is a hoax: An anatomy of the motivated rejection of science. Psychological Science, 24(5), 622–633. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612457686
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lobato, E., Mendoza, J., Sims, V., & Chin, M. (2014). Examining the relationship between conspiracy theories, paranormal beliefs, and pseudoscience acceptance among a university population. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 28(5), 617–625. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newton, C., Feeney, J., & Pennycook, G. (2023). On the disposition to think analytically: Four distinct intuitive-analytic thinking styles. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 50(6), 906–923. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672231154886
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliver, J. E., & Wood, T. J. (2014). Conspiracy theories and the paranoid style(s) of mass opinion. American Journal of Political Science, 58(4), 952–966. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12084
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennycook, G., Cheyne, J. A., Koehler, D. J., & Fugelsang, J. A. (2020). On the belief that beliefs should change according to evidence: Implications for conspiratorial, moral, paranormal, political, religious, and science beliefs. Judgement and Decision Making, 15(4), 476–498. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-015-0576-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinker, S. (2021). Rationality. Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Poth, N., & Dolega, K. (2023). Bayesian belief protection: A study of belief in conspiracy theories. Philosophical Psychology, 36(6), 1182–1207. https://doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2023.2168881
   Google Scholar
• Rizeq, J., Flora, D. B., & Toplak, M. E. (2021). An examination of the underlying dimensional structure of three domains of contaminated mindware: Paranormal beliefs, conspiracy beliefs, and anti-science attitudes. Thinking & Reasoning, 27(2), 187–211. https://doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2020.1759688
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, K. M., de Wit, I., & Deary, I. J. (2006). Spotting books and countries: New approaches to estimating and conceptualizing prior intelligence. Intelligence, 34(5), 429–436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2005.12.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shermer, M. (2022). Conspiracy. Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Šrol, J. (2022). Individual differences in epistemically suspect beliefs: The role of analytic thinking and susceptibility to cognitive biases. Thinking & Reasoning, 28(1), 125–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2021.1938220
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ståhl, T., & van Prooijen, J.-W. (2018). Epistemic rationality: Skepticism toward unfounded beliefs requires sufficient cognitive ability and motivation to be rational. Personality and Individual Differences, 122, 155–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.10.026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanovich, K. E. (2003). The fundamental computational biases of human cognition: Heuristics that (sometimes) impair decision making and problem solving. In J. E. Davidson & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The psychology of problem solving (pp. 291–342). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stanovich, K. E. (2004). The robot’s rebellion: Finding meaning in the age of Darwin. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stanovich, K. E. (2009). What intelligence tests miss: The psychology of rational thought. Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stanovich, K. E. (2011). Rationality and the reflective mind. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stanovich, K. E. (2021). The bias that divides us: The science and politics of myside thinking. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stanovich, K. E. (2023). Myside bias in individuals and institutions. In H. Samaržija & Q. Cassam (Eds.), The epistemology of democracy (pp. 170–194). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Stanovich, K. E., & Toplak, M. E. (2019). The need for intellectual diversity in psychological science: Our own studies of actively open-minded thinking as a case study. Cognition, 187, 156–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2019.03.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanovich, K. E., & Toplak, M. E. (2023). Actively open-minded thinking and its measurement. Journal of Intelligence, 11(2), 27. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence11020027
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (1997). Reasoning independently of prior belief and individual differences in actively open-minded thinking. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(2), 342–357. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.89.2.342
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (2007). Natural myside bias is independent of cognitive ability. Thinking & Reasoning, 13(3), 225–247. https://doi.org/10.1080/13546780600780796
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanovich, K. E., West, R. F., & Harrison, M. R. (1995). Knowledge growth and maintenance across the life span: The role of print exposure. Developmental Psychology, 31(5), 811–826. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.31.5.811
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanovich, K. E., West, R. F., & Toplak, M. E. (2016). The rationality quotient: Toward a test of rational thinking. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stasielowicz, L. (2022). Who believes in conspiracy theories? A meta-analysis on personality correlates. Journal of Research in Personality, 98, 104229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2022.104229
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stojanov, A., & Halberstadt, J. (2019). The conspiracy mentality scale: Distinguishing between irrational and rational suspicion. Social Psychology, 50(4), 215–232. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000381
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svedholm-Häkkinen, A., & M., Lindeman, M. (2018). Actively open-minded thinking: Development of a shortened scale and disentangling attitudes towards knowledge and people. Thinking & Reasoning, 24(1), 21–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2017.1378723
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swami, V., Barron, D., Weis, L., Voracek, M., Stieger, S., & Furnham, A. (2017). An examination of the factorial and convergent validity of four measures of conspiracist ideation, with recommendations for researchers. PLOS One, 12(2), e0172617. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0172617
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swami, V., Chamorro-Premuzic, T., & Furnham, A. (2010). Unanswered questions: A preliminary investigation of personality and individual difference predictors of 9/11 conspiracist beliefs. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 24(6), 749–761. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1583
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swami, V., Voracek, M., Stieger, S., Tran, U. S., & Furnham, A. (2014). Analytic thinking reduces belief in conspiracy theories. Cognition, 133(3), 572–585. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2014.08.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taibbi, M. (2021, May 24). “Fact-checking” takes another beating. Substack. https://taibbi.substack.com/p/fact-checking-takes-another-beating
   Google Scholar
• Uscinski, J. E. (2018). The study of conspiracy theories. Argumenta, 3(2), 233–245. https://doi.org/10.1080/08913811.2013.843872
   Google Scholar
• Uscinski, J. E., & Enders, A. M. (2023). What is a conspiracy theory and why does it matter? Critical Review, 35(1–2), 148–169. https://doi.org/10.1080/08913811.2022.2115668
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uscinski, J. E., & Parent, J. M. (2014). American conspiracy theories. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Uscinski, J., Enders, A., Diekman, A., Funchion, J., Klofstad, C., Kuebler, S., Murthi, M., Premaratne, K., Seelig, M., Verdear, D., & Wuchty, S. (2022). The psychological and political correlates of conspiracy theory beliefs. Scientific Reports, 12(1), 21672. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-25617-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Prooijen, J. W. (2018). The psychology of conspiracy theories. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• van Prooijen, J., & W., van Vugt, M. (2018). Conspiracy theories: Evolved functions and psychological mechanisms. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 13(6), 770–788. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691618774270
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Prooijen, J.-W., Cohen Rodrigues, T., Bunzel, C., Georgescu, O., Komáromy, D., & Krouwel, A. P. M. (2022). Populist gullibility: Conspiracy theories, news credibility, bullshit receptivity, and paranormal belief. Political Psychology, 43(6), 1061–1079. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12802
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, M. J. (2017). Conspiracy suspicions as a proxy for beliefs in conspiracy theories: Implications for theory and measurement. British Journal of Psychology, 108(3), 507–527. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12231
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu, A. L., Chen, R., Rizzolo, J., & Qian, J. (2023). Perceptions of COVID-19 origins and China’s wildlife policy reforms. Global Ecology and Conservation, 43, e02463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2023.e02463
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, J., Broder, P. K., Shaughnessy, J. J., & Underwood, B. J. (1977). A recognition test of vocabulary using signal-detection measures, and some correlates of word and nonword recognition. Intelligence, 1(1), 5–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/0160-2896(77)90025-3
   Google Scholar
• Zweig, D. (2023, August 7). Anthony Fauci’s deceptions. The Free Press. https://www.thefp.com/p/anthony-faucis-deceptions
   Google Scholar