“Experts think…” The production and comprehension of propositional attitude generics

References

• Aust, F., Diedenhofen, B., Ullrich, S., & Musch, J. (2013). Seriousness checks are useful to improve data validity in online research. Behavior Research Methods, 45(2), 527–535. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-012-0265-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowker, M. (2023). A problem for generic generalisations in scientific communication. Journal of Applied Philosophy, 40(1), 123–132. https://doi.org/10.1111/japp.12616
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryson, R. (2020, May 30). Experts believe North Essex whale died after impact with ship. Daily Gazette. https://www.gazette-news.co.uk/news/18486157.experts-believe-north-essex-whale-died-impact-ship/
   Google Scholar
• Champely, S. (2020). pwr: Basic functions for power analysis. R package version 1.3-0. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=pwr
   Google Scholar
• Cimpian, A., Brandone, A. C., & Gelman, S. A. (2010). Generic statements require little evidence for acceptance but have powerful implications. Cognitive Science, 34(8), 1452–1482. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-6709.2010.01126.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Declerck, R. (1991). The origins of genericity. Linguistics, 29(1), 79–102. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1991.29.1.79
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeJesus, J. M., Callanan, M. A., Solis, G., & Gelman, S. A. (2019). Generic language in scientific communication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(37), 18370–18377. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1817706116
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeJesus, J. M., Callanan, M. A., Umscheid, V. A., & Gelman, S. A. (2024). Generic language and reporting practices in developmental journals: Implications for facilitating a more representative cognitive developmental science. Journal of Cognition and Development, 25(2), 273–295. https://doi.org/10.1080/15248372.2023.2290504
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeJesus, J. M., Umscheid, V. A., & Gelman, S. A. (2021). When gender matters in scientific communication: The role of generic language. Sex Roles, 85(9-10), 577–586. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-021-01240-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dor, D. (2003). On newspaper headlines as relevance optimizers. Journal of Pragmatics, 35(5), 695–721. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00134-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In Speech acts (pp. 41–58). Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004368811_003
   Google Scholar
• Haigh, M., & Birch, H. A. (2021). When ‘scientists say’ coffee is good for you one day and bad for you the next: Do generic attributions to ‘scientists’ and ‘experts’ amplify perceived conflict? Collabra: Psychology, 7(1), 23447. https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.23447
   Google Scholar
• Haigh, M., Birch, H. A., & Pollet, T. V. (2020). Does ‘scientists believe…’ Imply ‘all scientists believe…’? Individual differences in the interpretation of generic news headlines. Collabra: Psychology, 6(1), 17174. https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.17174
   Google Scholar
• Holtgraves, T., & Bray, K. (2022). US liberals and conservatives live in different (linguistic) worlds: Ideological differences when interpreting business conversations. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 53(7), 674–683. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12930
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemeire, O. (2024). Why use generic language in science? The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science. In press. https://doi.org/10.1086/730387
   Google Scholar
• Leslie, S.-J. (2008). Generics: Cognition and acquisition. The Philosophical Review, 117(1), 1–47.https://doi.org/10.1215/00318108-2007-023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leslie, S.-J., & Lerner, A. (2022). Generic generalizations. In E. N. Zalta & U. Nodelman (Eds.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Fall 2022 Edition) Stanford University. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/generics/
   Google Scholar
• Levinson, S. C. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, M. (2000). Propositional attitude report. In E. N. Zalta & U. Nodelman (Eds.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Spring 2023 Edition). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2023/entries/prop-attitude-reports/
   Google Scholar
• Noveck, I. A., & Reboul, A. (2008). Experimental pragmatics: A Gricean turn in the study of language. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12(11), 425–431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2008.07.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters, U., Krauss, A., & Braganza, O. (2022). Generalization bias in science. Cognitive Science, 46(9), e13188. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.13188
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team. (2023). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
   Google Scholar
• Richard, M. (2006). Propositional attitude ascription. In M. Devitt & R. Hanley (Eds.), The Blackwell guide to the philosophy of language (1st ed., pp. 186–211). Blackwell Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470757031.ch10
   Google Scholar
• Sharpe, D. (2015). Chi-square test is statistically significant: Now what? Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 20(1), 8. https://doi.org/10.7275/tbfa-x148
   Google Scholar
• Van der Linden, S. L., Leiserowitz, A. A., Feinberg, G. D., & Maibach, E. W. (2015). The scientific consensus on climate change as a gateway belief: Experimental evidence. Plos One, 10(2), e0118489. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0118489
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Linden, S., Leiserowitz, A., & Maibach, E. (2019). The gateway belief model: A large-scale replication. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 62, 49–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2019.01.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Tiel, B., & Schaeken, W. (2017). Processing conversational implicatures: Alternatives and counterfactual reasoning. Cognitive Science, 41(S5), 1119–1154. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12362
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Warnes, G. R., Bolker, B., Lumley, T., & Johnson, R. C. (2018). Gmodels: Various R programming tools for model fitting. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/gmodels/
   Google Scholar