“Jumping to conclusions” in delusion-prone participants: an experimental economics approach

References

• Balzan, R., Delfabbro, P., & Galletly, C. (2012). Delusion-proneness or miscomprehension? A re-examination of the jumping-to-conclusions bias. Australian Journal of Psychology, 64, 100–107. doi:10.1111/j.1742-9536.2011.00032.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balzan, R., Delfabbro, P. H., Galletly, C. A., & Woodward, T. S. (2012). Over-adjustment or miscomprehension? A re-examination of the jumping to conclusions bias. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 46, 532–540. doi:10.1177/0004867411435291
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bayes, T. R. (1763). An essay towards solving a problem in the doctrine of chances. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 53, 370–418. doi:10.1098/rst1.1763.0053
   Google Scholar
• Colbert, S. M., & Peters, E. R. (2002). Need for closure and jumping-to-conclusions in delusion-prone individuals. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 190, 27–31. doi:10.1097/00005053-200201000-00007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawes, R. M. (1996). The purpose of experiments: Ecological validity versus comparing hypotheses. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 19, 20. doi:10.1017/S0140525X00041200
   Google Scholar
• Fine, C., Gardner, M., Craigie, J., & Gold, I. (2007). Hopping, skipping or jumping to conclusions? Clarifying the role of the JTC bias in delusions. Cognitive Neuropsychiatry, 12, 46–77. doi:10.1080/13546800600750597
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fischbacher, U. (2007). z-Tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments. Experimental Economics, 10, 171–178. doi:10.1007/s10683-006-9159-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garety, P. A., & Freeman, D. (1999). Cognitive approaches to delusions: A critical review of theories and evidence. The British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 38, 113–154. doi:10.1348/014466599162700
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garety, P. A., Hemsley, D. R., & Wessely, S. (1991). Reasoning in deluded schizophrenic and paranoid patients: Biases in performance on a probabilistic inference task. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 179, 194–201. doi:10.1097/00005053-199104000-00003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greiner, B. (2004). The online recruitment system ORSEE 2.0: A guide for the organization of experiments in economics (Working Paper Series in Economics). Cologne, Germany: University of Cologne, 10.
   Google Scholar
• Hertwig, R., & Ortmann, A. (2001). Experimental practices in economics: A methodological challenge for psychologists? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 383–451.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holt, C. A., & Laury, S. K. (2002). Risk aversion and incentive effects. The American Economic Review, 92, 1644–1655. doi:10.1257/000282802762024700
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huq, S. F., Garety, P. A., & Hemsley, D. R. (1988). Probabilistic judgements in deluded and non-deluded subjects. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 40A, 801–812.
   Google Scholar
• LaRocco, V. A., & Warman, D. M. (2009). Probability estimations and delusion-proneness. Personality and Individual Differences, 47, 197–202. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2009.02.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lincoln, T. M., Ziegler, M., Mehl, S., & Rief, W. (2010). The jumping to conclusions bias in delusions: Specificity and changeability. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 119, 40–49. doi:10.1037/a0018118
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKay, R., Langdon, R., & Coltheart, M. (2006). Need for closure, jumping to conclusions, and decisiveness in delusion-prone individuals. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 164, 422–426. doi:10.1097/01.nmd.0000221353.44132.25
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menon, M., Pomarol-Clotet, E., McKenna, P. J., & McCarthy, R. A. (2006). Probabilistic reasoning in schizophrenia: A comparison of the performance of deluded and nondeluded schizophrenic patients and exploration of possible cognitive underpinnings. Cognitive Neuropsychiatry, 11, 521–536. doi:10.1080/13546800544000046
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moritz, S., & Woodward, T. S. (2005). Jumping to conclusions in delusional and non-delusional schizophrenic patients. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 44, 193–207. doi:10.1348/014466505X35678
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moritz, S., Woodward, T. S., & Lambert, M. (2007). Under what circumstances do patients with schizophrenia jump to conclusions? A liberal acceptance account. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 46, 127–137. doi:10.1348/014466506X129862
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters, E., Joseph, S., Day, S., & Garety, P. A. (2004). Measuring delusional ideation: The 21-item Peters et al. Delusions Inventory (PDI). Schizophrenia Bulletin, 30, 1005–1022. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.schbul.a007116
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Speechley, W. J., Whitman, J. C., & Woodward, T. S. (2010). The contribution of hypersalience to the “jumping to conclusions” bias associated with delusions in schizophrenia. Journal of Psychiatry and Neuroscience, 35, 7–17. doi:10.1503/jpn.090025
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warman, D. M., Lysaker, P. H., Martin, J. M., Davis, L., & Haudenschield, S. L. (2007). Jumping to conclusions and the continuum of delusional beliefs. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 45, 1255–1269. doi:10.1016/j.brat.2006.09.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, L. O., & Mansell, W. (2009). Failing to ponder? Delusion-prone individuals rush to conclusions. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 16, 111–124. doi:10.1002/cpp.607
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitman, J. C., & Woodward, T. S. (2011). Evidence affects hypothesis judgments more if accumulated gradually than if presented instantaneously. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18, 1156–1165. doi:10.3758/s13423-011-0141-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodward, T. S., Munz, M., LeClerc, C., & Lecomte, T. (2009). Change in delusions is associated with change in “jumping to conclusions”. Psychiatry Research, 170, 124–127. doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2008.10.020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, H. F., & Bentall, R. P. (1997). Probabilistic reasoning in deluded, depressed and normal subjects: Effects of task difficulty and meaningful versus non-meaningful material. Psychological Medicine, 27, 455–465. doi:10.1017/S0033291796004540
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar