Development of an expert system for the integration of biomarker responses in mussels into an animal health index

References

• Allen JI, Moore MN. Environmental prognostics: is the current use of biomarkers appropriate for environmental risk evaluation?. Marine Environmental Research 2004; 58: 227–232
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aquatic Toxicology Special Issue. 2006. The Stavanger workshop: Biological Effects of Environmental Pollution (BEEP) in marine coastal ecosystem. Aquatic Toxicology, 78:S1–S128.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Astley KN, Meigh HC, Glegg GA, Braven J, Depledge MH. Multi-variate analysis of biomarker responses in Mytilus edulis and Curcinus maenas from the Tees Estuary (UK). Marine Pollution Bulletin 1999; 39: 145–154
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banni M, Jebali J, Daubeze M, Clerandau C, Guerbej H, Narbonne JF, Boussetta H. Monitoring pollution in Tunisian coasts: application of a classification scale based on biochemical markers. Biomarkers 2005; 10: 105–116
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bebianno MJ, Géret F, Hoarau P, Serafim RA, Coelho MR, Gnassia-Barelli M, Roméo M. Biomarkers in Ruditapes decussates: a potential bioindicator species. Biomarkers 2004; 9: 305–330
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BEEP European Project [Internet]. Bordeaux, FR. Available from:, , http://beep.lptc.u-bordeaux.fr/.
   Google Scholar
• Belaoussoff S, Kevan PG. Toward an ecological approach for the assessment of ecosystem health. Ecosystem Health 1998; 4: 4–8
   Google Scholar
• Beliaeff B, Burgeot T. Integrated biomarker response: a useful tool for ecological risk assessment. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 2002; 21: 1316–1322
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beliaeff B, Bocquené G. Exploratory data analysis of the Mediterranean component of the BEEP programme. Marine Environmental Research 2004; 58: 239–244
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolognesi C, Frenzilli S, Lasagna C, Perrone E, Roggieri P. Genotoxicity biomarkers in Mytilus galloprovincialis: wild versus caged mussels. Mutation Research 2004; 552: 153–162
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broeg K, Westernhagen HV, Zander S, Körting W, Koehler A. The ‘Bioeffect Assessment Index’ – A concept for the quantification of effects of marine pollution by an integrated biomarker approach. Marine Pollution Bulletin 2005; 50: 495–503
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cajaraville MP, Bebianno MJ, Blasco J, Porte C, Sarasquete C, Viarengo A. The use of biomarkers to assess the impact of pollution in coastal environments of the Iberian Peninsula: a practical approach. Science of the Total Environment 2000; 247: 295–311
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chase ME, Jones SH, Hennigar P, Sowles J, Harding GC, Freeman K, Wells PG, Krahforst C, Coombs K, Crawford R, Pederson J, Taylor D. Gulfwatch: monitoring spatial and temporal patterns of trace metal and organic contaminants in the Gulf of Maine (1991–1997) with the blue mussel, Mytilus edulis L. Marine Pollution Bulletin 2001; 42: 491–505
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chèvre N, Gagné F, Blaise C. Development of a biomarker-based index for assessing the ecotoxic potential of aquatic sites. Biomarkers 2003; 8: 287–298
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Decaprio AP. Biomarkers: coming of age for environmental health and risk assessment. Environmental Science and Technology 1997; 31: 1837–1848
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Den Besten PJ. Concepts for the implementation of biomarkers in environmental monitoring. Marine Environmental Research 1998; 46: 253–256
   Google Scholar
• Devier MH, Augagneur S, Budzinski H, Le Menach K, Mora P, Narbonne JF, Garrigues P. One-year monitoring survey of organic compounds (PAHs, PCBs, TBT), heavy metals and biomarkers in blue mussels from the Arcachon Bay, France. Journal of Environmental Monitoring 2005; 7: 224–240
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fung CN, Lam JC, Zheng GJ, Connell DW, Monirith I, Tanabe S, Richardson BJ, Lam PK. Mussel-based monitoring of trace metal and organic contaminants along the east coast of China using Perna viridis and Mytilus edulis. Environmental Pollution 2004; 127: 203–216
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Handy RD, Galloway TS, Depledge MH. A proposal for the use of biomarkers for the assessment of chronic pollution and in regulatory toxicology. Ecotoxicology 2003; 12: 331–343
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyne RV, Maher WA. Invertebrate biomarkers: links to toxicosis that predict population decline. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 2003; 54: 366–374
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalpaxis DL, Theos C, Xaplanteri MA, Dinos GP, Catsiki AV, Leotsinidis M. Biomonitoring of Gulf of Patras, N. Peloponnesus, Greece. Application of a biomarker suite including evaluation of translation efficiency in Mytilus galloprovincialis cells. Environmental Research 2004; 94: 211–220
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lam PKS, Gray JS. The use of biomarkers in environmental monitoring programmes. Marine Pollution Bulletin 2003; 46: 182–186
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leonard P. The role of biological research in supporting policy needs. Marine Environmental Research 2002; 54: 209–213
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Li D, Fu Z, Duan Y. Fish-Expert: a web-based expert system for fish disease diagnosis. Expert System with Applications 2002; 23: 311–320
   Google Scholar
• Livingstone DR, Chipman JK, Lowe DM, Minier C, Mitchelmore CL, Moore MN, Peters LD, Pipe RK. Development of biomarkers to detect the effects of organic pollution on aquatic invertebrates: recent molecular, genotoxic, cellular and immunological studies on the common mussel (Mytilus edulis L.) and other mytilids. International Journal of Environmental Pollution 2000; 13: 56–91
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowe DM. Alterations in the cellular structure of Mytilus edulis resulting from exposure to environmental contaminants under field and experimental conditions. Marine Ecology Progress Series 1988; 46: 91–100
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marine Ecology Progress Series Special. 1988. Biological effects of pollutants. Results of a practical workshop. BL Bayne, Clarke, KR, Gray, JS, editors., , Marine Ecology Progress Series, vol 46. Ameling (Oldendorf/Luhe), (Fed Rep of). Germany: Inter-Research.
   Google Scholar
• Moles A, Hale N. Use of physiological responses in Mytilus trossulus as integrative bioindicators of sewage pollution. Marine Pollution Bulletin 2003; 46: 954–958
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monirith I, Ueno D, Takahashi S, Nakata H, Sudaryanto A, Subramanian A, Karuppiah S, Ismail A, Muchtar M, Zheng J, Richardson BJ, Prudente M, Hue ND, Tana TS, Tkalin AV, Tanabe S. Asia-Pacific mussel watch: monitoring contamination of persistent organochlorine compounds in coastal waters of Asian countries. Marine Pollution Bulletin 2003; 46: 281–300
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore MN. Cytochemical responses of the lysosomal system and NADPH-ferrihemoprotein reductase in molluscs to environmental and experimental exposure to xenobiotics. Marine Ecology Progress Series 1988; 46: 81–89
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore MN, Viarengo A. Lysosomal membrane fragility and catabolism of cytosolic proteins: evidence for a direct relationship. Experientia 1987; 43: 320–323
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moore MN, Depledge MH, Readman JW, Leonard P. An integrated biomarker-based strategy for ecotoxicological evaluation of risk in environmental management. Mutation Research 2004a; 552: 247–268
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, MN, Lowe, D, Köhler, A. 2004b. Measuring lysosomal membrane stability. ICES Techniques in Marine Environmental Sciences. No 36. Copenhagen, DK: International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES).
   Google Scholar
• Moore MN, Allen JI, McVeigh A. Environmental prognostics: an integrated model supporting lysosomal stress responses as predictive biomarkers of animal health status. Marine Environmental Research 2006; 61: 278–304
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Narbonne JF, Daubèze M, Clérandeau C, Garrigues P. Scale of classification based on biochemical markers in mussels: application to pollution monitoring in european coasts. Biomarkers 1999; 4: 415–424
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Narbonne JF, Aarab N, Clerandeau C, Daubeze M, Narbonne J, Champeau O, Garrigues P. Scale of classification based on biochemical markers in mussels: application to pollution monitoring in Mediterranean coasts and temporal trends. Biomarkers 2005; 10: 58–71
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nasci C, Nesto N, Monteduro RA, Da Ros L. Field application of biochemical markers and a physiological index in the mussel, Mytilus galloprovincialis: transplantation and biomonitoring studies in the lagoon of Venice (NE Italy). Marine Environmental Research 2002; 54: 811–816
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Regoli F, Principato G. Glutathione, glutathione-dependent and antioxidant enzymes in mussel, Mytilus galloprovincialis, exposed to metals under field and laboratory conditions: implications for the use of biochemical biomarkers. Aquatic Toxicology 1995; 31: 143–164
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slingsby D, Cook C. Practical Ecology. MacMillan Education Ltd, LondonUK 1986
   Google Scholar
• UNEP (United Nations Environment Programme). 1999. Manual on the biomarkers recommended for the MED POL biomonitoring programme. 1st ed. Athens, GR: UNEP.
   Google Scholar
• Van der Oost R, Beyer J, Vermeulen NPE. Fish bioaccumulation and biomarkers in environmental risk assessment: a review. Environmental Toxicology and Pharmacology 2003; 13: 57–149
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viarengo A, Canesi L. Mussels as biological indicators of pollution. Aquaculture 1991; 94: 225–243
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viarengo A, Canesi L, Pertica M, Livingstone DR. Seasonal variations in the antioxidant defence systems and lipid peroxidation of the digestive gland of mussels. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology – Part C: Pharmacology. Toxicology and Endocrinology 1991; 100: 187–190
   Google Scholar
• Viarengo A, Canesi L, Pertica M, Mancinelli G, Accomando R, Smaal AC, Orunesu M. Stress on stress response: a simple monitoring tool in the assessment of general stress syndrome in mussels. Marine Environmental Research 1995; 39: 245–248
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viarengo A, Burlando B, Dondero F, Marrò A, Fabbri R. Metallothionein as a tool in biomonitoring programmes. Biomarkers 1999; 4: 455–466
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viarengo A, Lafaurie M, Gabrielides GP, Fabbri R, Marro A, Romeo M. Critical evaluation of an intercalibration exercise undertaken in the framework of the MED POL biomonitoring program. Marine Environmental Research 2000a; 49: 1–18
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viarengo A, Burlando B, Giordana A, Bolognesi C, Gabrielides GP. Networking an expert-system analysis: next frontier in biomonitoring. Marine Environmental Research 2000b; 49: 483–486
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wedderburn J, McFadzen I, Sanger RC, Beesley A, Heath C, Hornsby M, Lowe D. The field application of cellular and physiological biomarkers, in the mussel Mytilus edulis, in conjunction with early stage bioassays and adult hystopatology. Marine Pollution Bulletin 2000; 40: 257–267
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Widdows J, Donkin P, Staff FJ, Matthiessen P, Law RJ, Allen YT, Thain JE, Allchin CR, Jones BR. Measurement of stress effects (scope for growth) and contaminant levels in mussels (Mytilus edulis) collected from the Irish Sea. Marine Environmental Research 2002; 53: 327–356
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization (WHO). 1993. Biomarkers and risk assessment: concepts and principles. GenevaSwitzerland: WHO.
   Google Scholar