Prognostic association of routinely measured biomarkers in patients admitted to critical care: a systematic review

References

• Altman, D.G., and Royston, P., 2000. What do we mean by validating a prognostic model? Statistics in medicine, 19 (4), 453–473.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Badrick, T., 2013. Evidence-based laboratory medicine. The clinical biochemist reviews, 34 (2), 43–46.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bazick, H.S., et al., 2011. Red cell distribution width and all-cause mortality in critically ill patients. Critical Care Medicine, 39, 1913–1921.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger, M.L., et al., 2012. Prospective observational studies to assess comparative effectiveness: the ISPOR good research practices task force report. Value in health : the journal of the international society for pharmacoeconomics and outcomes research, 15 (2), 217–230.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breslow, M.J., and Badawi, O., 2012a. Severity scoring in the critically ill: part 1-interpretation and accuracy of outcome prediction scoring systems. Chest, 141 (1), 245–252.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breslow, M.J., and Badawi, O., 2012b. Severity scoring in the critically ill: part 2: maximizing value from outcome prediction scoring systems. Chest, 141 (2), 518–527.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, G.S., et al., 2015. Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis or Diagnosis (TRIPOD): the TRIPOD statement. Journal of clinical epidemiology, 68 (2), 134–143.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ezzie, M.E., Aberegg, S.K., and O'Brien, J.M., 2007. Laboratory testing in the intensive care unit. Critical care clinics, 23 (3), 435–465.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerlach, A.T., 2018. Sepsis Biomarkers…The Long and Winding Road. Critical care medicine, 46 (7), 1194–1195.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gluck, E., et al., 2018. Real-world use of procalcitonin and other biomarkers among sepsis hospitalizations in the United States: a retrospective, observational study. PLoS one, 13 (10), e0205924.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimes, D.A., and Schulz, K.F., 2002. Bias and causal associations in observational research. Lancet (london, England), 359 (9302), 248–252.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Güell, E., et al., 2019. Impact of lymphocyte and neutrophil counts on mortality risk in severe community-acquired pneumonia with or without septic shock. Journal of clinical medicine, 8, 754.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heilmann, E., Gregoriano, C., and Schuetz, P., 2019. Biomarkers of Infection: Are They Useful in the ICU? Seminars in respiratory and critical care medicine, 40 (4), 465–475.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hermans, G., et al., 2019. Five-year mortality and morbidity impact of prolonged versus brief ICU stay: a propensity score matched cohort study. Thorax, 74 (11), 1037–1045.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang, S.Y., et al., 2017. Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio as a prognostic marker in critically-ill septic patients. The american journal of emergency medicine, 35 (2), 234–239.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeffcote, T., et al., 2019. Patient characteristics, ICU-specific supports, complications, and outcomes of persistent critical illness. Journal of critical care, 54, 250–255.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, B.J., Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Prevention Epicenters Program., et al., 2018. Combined Biomarkers Predict Acute Mortality Among Critically Ill Patients With Suspected Sepsis. Critical care medicine, 46 (7), 1106–1113.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, C.H., et al., 2013. An increase in red blood cell distribution width from baseline predicts mortality in patients with severe sepsis or septic shock. Critical care, 17 (6), R282.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koyner, J.L., et al., 2019. The impact of biomarkers of acute kidney injury on individual patient care. Nephrol dial transplant, 35, 1295–1305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lederer, D.J., et al., 2019. Control of confounding and reporting of results in causal inference studies. guidance for authors from editors of respiratory, sleep, and critical care journals. Annals of the American thoracic society, 16 (1), 22–28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leisman, D.E., et al., 2020. Development and reporting of prediction models: guidance for authors from editors of respiratory, sleep, and critical care journals. Critical care medicine, 48 (5), 623–633.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, J., Gao, M., and D'Agostino, R., 2019. Evaluating classification accuracy for modern learning approaches. Statistics in medicine, 38 (13), 2477–2503.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moher, D., et al.,; PRISMA Group. 2009. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS medicine, 6 (7), e1000097.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Opal, S.M., and Wittebole, X., 2020. Biomarkers of Infection and Sepsis. Critical care clinics, 36 (1), 11–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purtle, S.W., et al., 2014. The association of red cell distribution width at hospital discharge and out-of-hospital mortality following critical illness. Critical care medicine, 42, 918–929.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shillan, D., et al., 2019. Use of machine learning to analyse routinely collected intensive care unit data: a systematic review. Critical care, 23 (1), 284.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sjoding, M.W., and Cooke, C.R., 2015. Chronic critical illness: a growing legacy of successful advances in critical care*. Critical care medicine, 43 (2), 476–477.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srisawat, N., and Kellum, J.A., 2020. The role of biomarkers in acute kidney injury. Critical care clinics, 36 (1), 125–140.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Textor, J., et al., 2016. Robust causal inference using directed acyclic graphs: the R package 'dagitty. International journal of epidemiology., 45, 1887–1894.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyler, P.D., et al., 2018. Assessment of intensive care unit laboratory values that differ from reference ranges and association with patient mortality and length of stay. JAMA network open, 1 (7), e184521.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viglianti, E.M., Kruser, J.M., and Iwashyna, T., 2019. The heterogeneity of prolonged ICU hospitalisations. Thorax, 74 (11), 1015–1017.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vincent, J.L., and Moreno, R., 2010. Clinical review: scoring systems in the critically ill. Critical Care, 14 (2), 207.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vincent, J.L., and Teixeira, L., 2014. Sepsis biomarkers. Value and limitations. American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine, 190 (10), 1081–1082.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VON Elm, E., et al.,; STROBE Initiative. 2008. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Journal of clinical epidemiology, 61 (4), 344–349.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ware, L.B., 2017. Biomarkers in critical illness: new insights and challenges for the future. American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine, 196 (8), 944–945.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ware, L.B., et al.,; NHLBI ARDS Clinical Trials Network. 2010. Prognostic and pathogenetic value of combining clinical and biochemical indices in patients with acute lung injury. Chest, 137 (2), 288–296.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wells, G., et al., 2013. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses. Available from: http://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.asp [Accessed 1 Jun 2020].
   Google Scholar
• Wunsch, H., Linde-Zwirble, W.T., and Angus, D.C., 2006. Methods to adjust for bias and confounding in critical care health services research involving observational data. Journal of critical care, 21 (1), 1–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar