References
- Agresti, A. and Coull, B., 1998. Approximate is better than exact for interval estimation of binomial proportions. The American statistician, 52, 119–126.
- Arias, M. and Sangrador, C., 2017. Diagnostic tests with continuous or polytomous results. ROC curves. Evidencias en pediatría, 13, 1–4. https://evidenciasenpediatria.es/articulo.php?lang=en&id=7052&tab=
- Biomarkers Definitions Working Group, 2001. Biomarkers and surrogate endpoints: preferred definitions and conceptual framework. Clinical pharmacology & therapeutics, 69, 89–95.
- Brown, L.D., Cai, T.T., and DasGupta, A., 2001. Interval estimation for a proportion. Statistical science, 16 (2), 101–133. http://www-stat.wharton.upenn.edu/∼lbrown/Papers/2001a%20Interval%20estimation%20for%20a%20binomial%20proportion%20(with%20T.%20T.%20Cai%20and%20A.%20DasGupta).pdf
- Buehler, A.M., et al., (2019) Rational use of diagnostic tests for clinical decision making. Revista da associação médica Brasileira, 65, 452–459. https://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-42302019000300452#:∼:text=Cross%2Dsectional%20studies%20measure%20diagnostic,most%20useful%20for%20clinical%20managemen
- Bossuyt, P.M., and Leeflang, M.M., 2008. Chapter 6: Developing Criteria for Including Studies. In: J.P.T. Handbook Higgins, J. Thomas, J. Chandler, M. Cumpston, T. Li, M.J. Page, V.A. Welch (Eds). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. 2nd Edition. Chichester (UK): John Wiley & Sons.
- Cooper, J., Saracci, R., and Cole, P., 1979. Describing the validity of carcinogen screening tests. British journal of cancer, 39 (1), 87–89.
- Coulthard, M.G. and Coulthard, T., 2019. The leaf plot: a novel way of presenting the value of tests. The British journal of general practice, 69 (681), 205–206.
- Deeks, J.J. and Altman, D.G., 2004. Diagnostic tests 4: likelihood ratios. BMJ (clinical research ed.), 329 (7458), 168–169.
- Fagan, T.J., 1975. Letter: nomogram for Bayes theorem. The New England journal of medicine, 293 (5), 257.
- Feinstein, A.R., 2002. Misguided efforts and future challenges for research on "diagnostic tests”. Journal of epidemiology and community health, 56 (5), 330–332.
- Greenhaigh, T., 1997. How to read a paper: getting your bearings (deciding what the paper is about). BMJ, 315, 243.
- Grimes, D.A. and Schulz, L.F., 2002. Uses and abuses of screening tests. The lancet, 359 (9309), 881–884.
- Holtman, G.A., et al., 2019. Development of practical recommendations for diagnostic accuracy studies in low-prevalence situations. Journal of clinical epidemiology, 114, 38–48.
- Knottnerus, J.A., 2002. Challenges in dia-prognostic research. Journal of epidemiology and community health, 56 (5), 340–341. https://jech.bmj.com/content/jech/56/5/340.full.pdf
- Kraemer, H.C., et al., 1999. Measuring the potency of risk factors for clinical or policy significance. Psychological methods, 4 (3), 257–271.
- Landau, S., Milich, R., and Widiger, T.A., 1991. Predictive power methods may be more helpful for making a diagnosis than sensitivity and specificity. Journal of child and adolescent psychopharmacology, 1 (5), 343–351.
- Loong, T.-W., 2003. Understanding sensitivity and specificity with the right side of the brain. BMJ (clinical research ed.), 327 (7417), 716–719.
- MacKenzie, D., 1981. Statistics in Britain, 1865-1930: the social construction of scientific knowledge. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
- Mackinnon, A., 2000. A spreadsheet for the calculation of comprehensive statistics for the assessment of diagnostic tests and inter-rater agreement. Computers in biology and medicine, 30 (3), 127–134. https://www.biostats.com.au/DAG_Stat/Paper.html
- McCann, J. and Ames, B.N., 1976. Detection of carcinogens as mutagens in the Salmonella/microsome test: assay of 300 chemicals. Proceedings of the national academy of sciences, 73 (3), 950–954.
- Mercaldo, N.D., Lau, K.F., and Zhou, X.H., 2007. Confidence intervals for predictive values with an emphasis to case–control studies. Statistics in medicine, 26 (10), 2170–2183.
- Newcombe, R.G., 2013. Confidence intervals for proportions and related measures of effect size. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman and Hall/CRC Press.
- Parikh, R., et al., 2008. Understanding and using sensitivity, specificity and predictive values. Indian journal of ophthalmology, 56 (1), 45–50.
- Pearson, K., 1904. Mathematical contributions to the theory of evolution. In: XIII. On the theory of contingency and its relation to association and normal correlation. London: Dulau and Co., 426.
- Pepe, M. S., 2003. Study design and hypothesis testing. In: The statistical evaluation of medical tests for classification and prediction. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 214–251.
- Rautaharju, P.M., Blackburn, H.W., and Warren, J.W., 1976. Review: the concepts of sensitivity, specificity and accuracy in evaluation of electrocardiographic, vectorcardiographic and polarcardiographic criteria. Journal of electrocardiology, 9 (3), 275–281.
- Reitsma, J.B., et al., 2009. A review of solutions for diagnostic accuracy studies with an imperfect or missing reference standard. Journal of clinical epidemiology, 62 (8), 797–806.
- Saah, A.J. and Hoover, D.R., 1997. Sensitivity’ and ‘specificity’ reconsidered: the meaning of these terms in analytical and diagnostic settings. Annals of internal medicine, 126 (1), 91–94.
- Smith, A.M., Christodouleas, J.P., and Hwang, W.-T., 2019. Understanding the predictive value of continuous markers for censored survival data using a likelihood ratio approach. BMC medical research methodology, 19 (1), 108.
- Watson, J., Whiting, P.F., and Brush, J.E., 2020. Interpreting a covid-19 test result. BMJ (clinical research ed.), 369, m1808.
- Whiting, P.F., et al., 2008. Graphical presentation of diagnostic information. BMC medical research methodology, 8, 20.
- Yates, F., 1984. Tests of significance for 2 × 2 contingency tables. Journal of the royal statistical society. Series A (general), 147 (3), 426–463.
- Yerushalmy, J., 1947. Statistical problems in assessing methods of medical diagnosis, with special reference to X-ray techniques. Public health reports, 62 (40), 1432–1449.