ASEAN centrality amidst economic integration in the Asia Pacific region

References

• Acharya, A. 2014. “Foundations of Collective Action in Asia: Theory and Practice of Regional Cooperation.” In The Political Economy of Asian Regionalism, edited by G. Capanelli, and M. Kawai, 19–38. Japan: Springer Japan.
   Google Scholar
• Amador III, J.S. 2009. “ASEAN in the Asia Pacific: Central or Peripheral?” Asian Politics and Policy 2 (4): 601–616.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, J.E., and E. van Wincoop. 2003. “Gravity with Gravitas: A Solution to the Border Puzzle.” American Economic Review 93 (1): 170–192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ASEAN (Association of Southeast Asian Nations). 2008. ASEAN Economic Community Blueprint. Jakarta: ASEAN.
   Google Scholar
• ASEAN (Association of Southeast Asian Nations). 2015. ASEAN International Merchandise Trade Statistics Yearbook 2014. Jakarta: ASEAN.
   Google Scholar
• Baldwin, R., and T. Carpenter. 2010. “A 3 Bloc Dance: East Asian Regionalism and the North Atlantic Trade Giants.” The Singapore Economic Review 55 (10): 27–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barigozzi, M., G. Fagiolo, and D. Garlaschelli. 2010. “Multi-Network of International Trade: A Commodity-Specific Analysis.” Physical Review E 81 (4): 1–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basu Das, S. 2013. “RCEP and TPP: Comparisons and Concerns.” ISEAS Perspective 2: 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Caballero-Anthony, M. 2014. “Understanding ASEAN's Centrality: Bases and Prospects in an Evolving Regional Architecture.” The Pacific Review 27 (4): 563–584.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capanelli, G., and M. Kawai. 2014. “The Political Economy of Asian Regionalism: Issues and Challenges.” In The Political Economy of Asian Regionalism, edited by G. Capanelli, and M. Kawai, 1–18. Japan: Springer Japan.
   Google Scholar
• Choi, B., and K. Lee. 2013. “Future of Trading Architecture in Asia-Pacific: TPP vs. RCEP.” In KERI Brief, 13–24. Seoul: Korea Economic Research Institute.
   Google Scholar
• de Benedictis, L., and L. Tajoli. 2011. “The World Trade Network.” The World Economy 34 (8): 1417–1454.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Benedictis, L., S. Nenci, G. Santoni, L. Tajoli, and C. Vicarelli. 2014. “Network Analysis of World Trade Using the BACI-CEPII Dataset.” Global Economy Journal 14 (3–4): 287–343.
   Google Scholar
• Dueñas, M., and G. Fagiolo. 2013. “Modelling the International-Trade Network: A Gravity Approach.” Journal of Economic Interaction and Coordination 8: 155–178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Everett, M.G., and S.P. Borgatti. 1999. “The Centrality of Groups and Classes.” Journal of Mathematical Sociology 23 (3): 181–201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fagiolo, G., J. Reyes, and S. Schiavo. 2010. “The Evolution of the World Trade Web: A Weighted Network Analysis.” Journal of Evolutionary Economics 20 (4): 479–514.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrarini, B., and D.H. Brooks. 2014 “Vertical Gravity.” Journal of Asian Economics 31–32: 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Fruchterman, T.M.J., and E.M. Reingold. 1991. “Graph Drawing by Force-Directed Placement.” Software – Practice and Experience 21 (11): 1129–1164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garlaschelli, D., and M.I. Loffredo. 2005. “Structure and Evolution of the World Trade Network.” Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications 355 (1): 138–144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Head, K., T. Mayer, and J. Ries. 2008. The Erosion of Colonial Trade Linkages After Independence. CEPII Working Papers 2008–27. Paris: Centre d'Etudes Prospectives et d'Informations Internationales.
   Google Scholar
• HV, V., F. Thompson, and O. Tonby. 2014. “Understanding ASEAN: Seven Things You Need to Know.”Mckinsey & Company. Accessed 23 June 2015. http://www.mckinsey.com/insights/public_sector/understanding_asean_seven_things_you_need_to_know
   Google Scholar
• Jones, L. 2010. “Still in the ‘Drivers’ Seat’, but for How Long? ASEAN's Capacity for Leadership in East-Asian International Relations.” Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs 29 (3): 95–113.
   Google Scholar
• Kamada, T., and S. Kawai. 1989. “An Algorithm for Drawing General Undirected Graphs.” Information Processing Letters 31 (1): 7–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemp, M.C., and H.Y. Wan. 1976. “An Elementary Proposition Concerning the Formation of Customs Union.” Journal of International Economics 6: 95–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le, Q.T., and E.A. San Andres. 2014. Key Trends and Development Relating to Trade and Investment Measures and Their Impact on the APEC Region. Singapore: APEC Policy Support Unit.
   Google Scholar
• Llanto, G.M., and M.K.P. Ortiz. 2013. Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership: Reform Challenges and Key Tasks for the Philippines. PIDS Discussion Paper Series 2013-51. Makati: Philippine Institute for Development Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Meléndez-Ortiz, R. 2014. “Mega-Regionals: What is Going On?” In Mega-Regional Trade Agreements: Game-Changers or Costly Distractions for the World Trading System?, chaired by Anabel Gonzáles, 13–14. Cologny/Geneva: Global Agenda Council on Trade & Foreign Direct Investment, World Economic Forum.
   Google Scholar
• Pauwelyn, J., and W. Alschner. 2014. “Forget About the WTO: The Network of Relations Between Preferential Trade Agreements (PTAs) and ‘Double PTAs’.” In Trade Cooperation: The Purpose, Design and Effects of Preferential Trade Agreements, edited by A. Dür, and M. Elsig, 497–532. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Petri, P.A., and M.G. Plummer. 2012. The Trans-Pacific Partnership and Asia-Pacific Integration: Policy Implications. Peterson Institute for International Economics Policy Brief PB12–16. Washington, DC: Peterson Institute for International Economics.
   Google Scholar
• Petri, P.A., and M.G. Plummer. 2014. ASEAN Centrality and the ASEAN-US Economic Relationship. East-West Center Policy Studies 69. Honolulu, HI: East-West Center.
   Google Scholar
• Petri, P.A., M.G. Plummer, and F. Zhai. 2011. The Trans-Pacific Partnership and Asia-Pacific Integration: A Quantitative Assessment. East-West Center Working Paper Economics Series No. 119. Honolulu, HI: East-West Center.
   Google Scholar
• Schiavo, S., J. Reyes, and G. Fagiolo. 2010. “International Trade and Financial Integration: A Weighted Network Analysis.” Quantitative Finance 10 (4): 389–399.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Severino R.C. 2007. “ASEAN Beyond Forty: Towards Political and Economic Integration.” Contemporary Southeast Asia 29 (3): 406–423.
   Google Scholar
• Shannon, P., A. Markiel, O. Ozier, N.S. Baliga, J.T. Wang, D. Ramage, N. Amin, B. Schwikowski, and T. Ideker. 2003. “Cytoscape: A Software Environment for Integrated Models of Biomolecular Interaction Networks.” Genome Research 13 (11): 2498–2504.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tzekina, I., K. Danthi, and D.N. Rockmore. 2008. “Evolution of Community Structure in the World Trade Web.” The European Physical Journal B 63 (4): 541–545.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UNCTAD (United Nations Conference on Trade and Development). 2014. World Investment Report 2014. Sales No. E.14.II.D.1. New York, NY: United Nations.
   Google Scholar
• UNDP (United Nations Development Programme). 2010. Human Development Report 2010 – The Real Wealth of Nations: Pathways to Human Development. New York, NY: UNDP.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific. 2014. Asia-Pacific Trade and Investment Report 2014 - Recent Trends and Developments. New York, NY: United Nations.
   Google Scholar
• Weisstein, E.W. 2007. “Adjacency Matrix.” MathWorld, a Wolfram Web Resource. Accessed 16 July 2015. http://mathworld.wolfram.com/AdjacencyMatrix.html
   Google Scholar
• Williams, B.A. 2013. Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) Countries: Comparative Trade and Economic Analysis. CRS Report for Congress 7-5700 R42344. Washington, DC: Federation of American Scientists Project on Government Secrecy.
   Google Scholar
• WTO (World Trade Organization). 2013. World Trade Report 2013. Geneva: WTO.
   Google Scholar
• World Trade Organization. 2014. World Trade Report 2014. Geneva: WTO.
   Google Scholar