What motivates men to offer sperm donation via the internet?

References

• Bossema, E. R., Janssens, P. M., Landwehr, F., Treucker, R. G., van Duinen, K., Nap, A. W., & Geenen, R. (2013). A taxonomy of possible reasons for and against sperm donation. ACTA Obstetrica et Gynecolologica Scandinavica, 92, 679–685.10.1111/aogs.2013.92.issue-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bossema, E. R., Janssens, P. M., Treucker, R. G., Landwehr, F., van Duinen, K., Nap, A. W., & Geenen, R. (2014). An inventory of reasons for sperm donation in formal versus informal settings. Human Fertility, 17, 21–27.10.3109/14647273.2014.881561
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daniels, K., Blyth, E., Crawshaw, M., & Curson, R. (2005). Short Communication: Previous semen donors and their views regarding the sharing of information with offspring. Human Reprodution, 20, 1670–1675.10.1093/humrep/deh839
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daniels, K. R., Curson, R., & Lewis, G. M. (1996). Semen donor recruitment: A study of donors in two clinics. Human Reproduction, 11, 746–751.10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a019247
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ernst, E., Ingerslev, H. J., Schou, O., & Stoltenberg, M. (2007). Attitudes among sperm donors in 1992 en 2002: A Danish questionnaire survey. ACTA Obstetrica et Gynecolologica Scandinavica, 86, 327–333.10.1080/00016340601133913
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frith, L., Blyth, E., & Farrand, A. (2007). UK gamete donors reflections on the removal of anonymity: Implications for recruitment. Human Reproduction, 22, 1675–1680.10.1093/humrep/dem061
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golombok, S., & Cook, R. (1995). A survey of semen donation: Phase I – the view of UK licensed centres. Human Reproduction, 9, 882–888.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hertz, R., Nelson, M. K., & Kramer, W. (2015). Sperm donors describe the experience of contact with their donor-conceived offspring. Facts, Views & Vision in ObGyn, 7, 91–100.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jadva, V., Freeman, T., Kramer, W., & Golombok, S. (2011). Sperm and oocyte donors experiences of anonymous donation and subsequent contact with their donor offspring. Human Reproduction, 26, 638–645.10.1093/humrep/deq364
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janssens, P. M., Simons, A. H., van Kooij, R. J., Blokzijl, E., & Dunselman, G. A. (2006). A new Dutch law regulating provision of identifying information of donors to offspring: Background, content and impact. Human Reproduction, 21, 852–856.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kop, P. A., Janssens, P. M., & Mochtar, M. H. (2014). Kunstmatige inseminatie met donorsperma in Nederland: toekomstbestendig? [Artificial insemination with donor sperm in the Netherlands: Future-proof?] Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde, 158(A7232), 1–3.
   Google Scholar
• Lampic, C., Skoog Svanberg, A., & Sydsjö, G. (2014). Attitudes towards disclosure and relationship to donor offspring among a national cohort of identity-release oocyte and sperm donors. Human Reproduction, 29, 1978–1986.10.1093/humrep/deu152
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris, J. A., & Gardner, M. J. (1988). Statistics in Medicine: Calculating confidence intervals for relative risks (odds ratios) and standardised ratios and rates. British Medical Journal (Clin Res Ed), 296, 1313–1316.10.1136/bmj.296.6632.1313
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raes, I., Ravelingien, A., & Pennings, G. (2013). The right of the donor to information about children conceived from his or her gametes. Human Reproduction, 28, 560–565.10.1093/humrep/des444
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riggs, D.W., & Russell, L. (2011). Characteristics of men willing to act as sperm donors in the context of identity-release legislation. Human Reproduction, 26, 266–272.10.1093/humrep/deq314
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shenfield, F., de Mouzon, J., Pennings, G., Ferraretti, A. P., Andersen, A. N., de Wert, G., Goossens, V. ESHRE Taskforce on Cross Border Reproductive Care, (2010). Cross border reproductive care in six European countries. Human Reproduction, 25, 1361–1368.10.1093/humrep/deq057
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van den Broeck, U., Vandermeeren, M., Vanderschueren, D., Enzlin, P., Demyttenaere, K., & D'Hooghe, T. (2013). A systematic review of sperm donors: Demographic characteristics, attitudes, motivations and experiences of the process of sperm donation. Human Reproduction Update, 19, 37–51.10.1093/humupd/dms039
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winter, H. B., Dondorp, W. J., Ploem, M. C., Woestenburg, N. O. M., Akerboom, C. P. M., Legemaate, J., & de Wert, G. M. W. R. (2012). Evaluatie Embryowet en Wet donorgegevens kunstmatige bevruchting [Evaluation of the Embryo Act and the Donor Information for Artificial Insemination Act]. The Hague: ZonMw.
   Google Scholar