Anti-vaccination attitudes are associated with less analytical and more intuitive reasoning

References

• Ballová Mikušková, E. (2018). Conspiracy beliefs of future teachers. Current Psychology, 37(3), 692–701. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-017-9561-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baron, J., Scott, S., Fincher, K., & Metz, S. E. (2015). Why does the cognitive reflection test (sometimes) predict utilitarian moral judgment (and other things)? Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 4(3), 265–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2014.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barr, N., Pennycook, G., Stolz, J. A., & Fugelsang, J. A. (2015). The brain in your pocket: Evidence that smartphones are used to supplant thinking. Computers in Human Behavior, 48, 473–480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.02.029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benjamini, Y., Krieger, A. M., & Yekutieli, D. (2006). Adaptive linear step-up procedures that control the false discovery rate. Biometrika, 93(3), 491–507. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/93.3.491
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bialek, M., & Pennycook, G. (2018). The cognitive reflection test is robust to multiple exposures. Behavior Research Methods, 50(5), 1953–1959. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-017-0963-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blanco, F., & Matute, H. (2018). The illusion of causality: A cognitive bias underlying pseudoscience. In Allison B. Kaufman, James C. Kaufman (Eds.), Pseudoscience: The Conspiracy against Science, 45–75. MIT Press. DOI:10.7551/mitpress/9780262037426.003.0003
   Google Scholar
• Browne, M., Thomson, P., Rockloff, M. J., & Pennycook, G. (2015). Going against the herd: Psychological and cultural factors underlying the ‘vaccination confidence gap’. PLoS One, 10(9), e0132562. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0132562
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cherry, J. D. (2012). Epidemic pertussis in 2012—the resurgence of a vaccine-preventable disease. New England Journal of Medicine, 367(9), 785–787. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp1209051
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Agostino, R. B. (1986). Goodness-of-fit-techniques (Vol. 68). CRC press.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, J. S. B. T. (2007a). Dual-processing accounts of reasoning, judgment, and social cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59(1), 255–278. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093629
   Google Scholar
• Evans, J. S. B. (2003). In two minds: Dual-process accounts of reasoning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(10), 454–459. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2003.08.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, J. S. B. (2007b). On the resolution of conflict in dual process theories of reasoning. Thinking & Reasoning, 13(4), 321–339. https://doi.org/10.1080/13546780601008825
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fervaha, G., & Remington, G. (2013). Invalid responding in questionnaire-based research: Implications for the study of schizotypy. Psychological Assessment, 25(4), 1355. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033520
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frederick, S. (2005). Cognitive reflection and decision making. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19(4), 25–42. https://doi.org/10.1257/089533005775196732
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gervais, W. M., & Norenzayan, A. (2012). Analytic thinking promotes religious disbelief. Science, 336(6080), 493–496. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1215647
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haigh, M. (2016). Has the standard cognitive reflection test become a victim of its own success? Advances in Cognitive Psychology, 12(3), 145. https://doi.org/10.5709/acp-0193-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horne, Z., Powell, D., Hummel, J. E., & Holyoak, K. J. (2015). Countering antivaccination attitudes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(33), 10321–10324. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1504019112
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hussain, A., Ali, S., Ahmed, M., & Hussain, S. (2018). The Anti-vaccination Movement: A Regression in Modern Medicine. Cureus, 10(7), e2919–e2919. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.2919
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jansen, V. A., Stollenwerk, N., Jensen, H. J., Ramsay, M., Edmunds, W., & Rhodes, C. (2003). Measles outbreaks in a population with declining vaccine uptake. Science, 301(5634), 804. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1086726
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, N. F., Velásquez, N., Restrepo, N. J., Leahy, R., Gabriel, N., El Oud, S., Zheng, M., Manrique, P., Wuchty, S., & Lupu, Y. (2020). The online competition between pro- and anti-vaccination views. Nature, 582(7811), 230–233. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2281-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Kata, A. (2010). A postmodern Pandora’s box: Anti-vaccination misinformation on the internet. Vaccine, 28(7), 1709–1716. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2009.12.022
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kata, A. (2012). Anti-vaccine activists, Web 2.0, and the postmodern paradigm – An overview of tactics and tropes used online by the anti-vaccination movement. Vaccine, 30(25), 3778–3789. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.11.112
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koenig, H. G., & Büssing, A. (2010). The Duke University Religion Index (DUREL): A five-item measure for use in epidemological studies. Religions, 1(1), 78–85. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel1010078
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koenig, H., Parkerson, G. R., Jr, & Meador, K. G. (1997). Religion index for psychiatric research. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 154(6), 885–886. https://doi.org/10.1176/ajp.154.6.885b
   Google Scholar
• Lindeman, M. (2011). Biases in intuitive reasoning and belief in complementary and alternative medicine. Psychology & Health, 26(3), 371–382. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870440903440707
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, L. R., & Petrie, K. J. (2017). Understanding the dimensions of anti-vaccination attitudes: The vaccination attitudes examination (VAX) scale. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 51(5), 652–660. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-017-9888-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinez-Berman, L., McCutcheon, L., & Huynh, H. P. (2020). Is the worship of celebrities associated with resistance to vaccinations? Relationships between celebrity admiration, anti-vaccination attitudes, and beliefs in conspiracy. Psychology, Health & Medicine, 2021 Oct; 26(9), 1063-1072. doi: 10.1080/13548506.2020.1778754. Epub 2020 Jun 18.
   Google Scholar
• McKight, P. E., & Najab, J. (2010). Kruskal‐wallis test. In The corsini encyclopedia of psychology (pp. 1). https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470479216.corpsy0491
   Google Scholar
• Miton, H., & Mercier, H. (2015). Cognitive obstacles to pro-vaccination beliefs. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 19(11), 633–636. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2015.08.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palache, A., Oriol-Mathieu, V., Fino, M., & Xydia-Charmanta, M. (2015). Seasonal influenza vaccine dose distribution in 195 countries (2004–2013): Little progress in estimated global vaccination coverage. Vaccine, 33(42), 5598–5605. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.08.082
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paxton, J. M., Ungar, L., & Greene, J. D. (2012). Reflection and reasoning in moral judgment. Cognitive Science, 36(1), 163–177. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-6709.2011.01210.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearce, A., Law, C., Elliman, D., Cole, T. J., & Bedford, H. (2008). Factors associated with uptake of measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine (MMR) and use of single antigen vaccines in a contemporary UK cohort: Prospective cohort study. British Medical Journal, 336(7647), 754–757. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.39489.590671.25
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennycook, G., Cheyne, J. A., Barr, N., Koehler, D. J., & Fugelsang, J. A. (2014). The role of analytic thinking in moral judgements and values. Thinking & Reasoning, 20(2), 188–214. https://doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2013.865000
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennycook, G., Cheyne, J. A., Seli, P., Koehler, D. J., & Fugelsang, J. A. (2012). Analytic cognitive style predicts religious and paranormal belief. Cognition, 123(3), 335–346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2012.03.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennycook, G., Fugelsang, J. A., & Koehler, D. J. (2015). Everyday consequences of analytic thinking. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 24(6), 425–432. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721415604610
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennycook, G., Ross, R. M., Koehler, D. J., & Fugelsang, J. A. (2016). Atheists and agnostics are more reflective than religious believers: Four empirical studies and a meta-analysis. PLoS One, 11(4), e0153039. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0153039
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phadke, V. K., Bednarczyk, R. A., Salmon, D. A., & Omer, S. B. (2016). Association between vaccine refusal and vaccine-preventable diseases in the United States: A review of measles and pertussis. Jama, 315(11), 1149–1158. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2016.1353
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Primi, C., Morsanyi, K., Chiesi, F., Donati, M. A., & Hamilton, J. (2016). The development and testing of a new version of the cognitive reflection test applying item response theory (IRT). Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 29(5), 453–469. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.1883
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puveendrakumaran, P., Fervaha, G., Caravaggio, F., & Remington, G. (2020). Assessing analytic and intuitive reasoning using the cognitive reflection test in young patients with schizophrenia. Psychiatry Research, 284, 112683. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2019.112683
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Royzman, E. B., Landy, J. F., & Goodwin, G. P. (2014). Are good reasoners more incest-friendly? Trait cognitive reflection predicts selective moralization in a sample of American adults. Judgment and Decision Making, 9(3), 176–190. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2014-22240-001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Senger, A. R., & Huynh, H. P. (2020). Intellectual humility’s association with vaccine attitudes and intentions. In Psychology, Health & Medicine, 26(9), 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Sheskin, D. J. (2020). Handbook of parametric and nonparametric statistical procedures. crc Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, N., & Graham, T. (2019). Mapping the anti-vaccination movement on Facebook. Information, Communication & Society, 22(9), 1310–1327. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2017.1418406
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stagnaro, M., Pennycook, G., & Rand, D. G. (2018). Performance on the cognitive reflection test is stable across time. Judgment and Decision Making, 13(3), 260–267. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3115809.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (2000). Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23(5), 645–665. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00003435
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stieger, S., & Reips, U.-D. (2016). A limitation of the cognitive reflection test: Familiarity. PeerJournal, 4, e2395. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.2395
   Google Scholar
• Storch, E. A., Roberti, J. W., Heidgerken, A. D., Storch, J. B., Lewin, A. B., Killiany, E. M., Baumeister, A. L., Bravata, E. A., & Geffken, G. R. (2004). The duke religion index: A psychometric investigation. Pastoral Psychology, 53(2), 175–181. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:PASP.0000046828.94211.53
   Google Scholar
• Storch, E. A., Strawser, M. S., & Storch, J. B. (2004). Two-week test-retest reliability of the duke religion index. Psychological Reports, 94(3), 993–994. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.94.3.993-994
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swami, V., Voracek, M., Stieger, S., Tran, U. S., & Furnham, A. (2014). Analytic thinking reduces belief in conspiracy theories. Cognition, 133(3), 572–585. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2014.08.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomson, K. S., & Oppenheimer, D. M. (2016). Investigating an alternate form of the cognitive reflection test. Judgment and Decision Making, 11(1), 99–113. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2016-09222-009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toplak, M. E., West, R. F., & Stanovich, K. E. (2011). The Cognitive Reflection Test as a predictor of performance on heuristics-and-biases tasks. Memory & Cognition, 39(7), 1275. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-011-0104-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toplak, M. E., West, R. F., & Stanovich, K. E. (2014). Assessing miserly information processing: An expansion of the cognitive reflection test. Thinking & Reasoning, 20(2), 147–168. https://doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2013.844729
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185(4157), 1124–1131. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.185.4157.1124
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voinson, M., Billiard, S., & Alvergne, A. (2015). Beyond rational decision-making: Modelling the influence of cognitive biases on the dynamics of vaccination coverage. PLoS One, 10(11), e0142990. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0142990
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vujic, A. (2017). Switching on or switching off? Everyday computer use as a predictor of sustained attention and cognitive reflection. Computers in Human Behavior, 72(Issue C), 152–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.02.040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, L., Smith, M., Miller, C. B., & O’Carroll, R. E. (2019). The internal consistency and validity of the vaccination attitudes examination scale: A replication study. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 53(1), 109–114. https://doi.org/10.1093/abm/kay043
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yilmaz, O., Karadöller, D. Z., & Sofuoglu, G. (2016). Analytic thinking, religion, and prejudice: An experimental test of the dual-process model of mind. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 26(4), 360–369. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508619.2016.1151117
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar