Challenging unsustainable development through research cooperation

References

• ARC, 2010. A communication from civil society to the European Union institutions on the future agricultural and rural policy [online]. Brussels: Agricultural and Rural Convention. Available from: http://www.arc2020.eu [Accessed 1 November 2011].
   Google Scholar
• Aubrée, P., Berger, B., and Maréchal, G., 2010. Local agro-food networks and environmental effects in Brittany [online]. Rennes: Fédération Régionale des Centres d'Initiatives pour Valoriser l'Agriculture (FRCIVAM), WP4 report of CREPE project. Available from: http://www.crepeweb.net [Accessed 1 November 2011].
   Google Scholar
• Baker , S. 2007 . Eco-politics beyond the paradigm of sustainability: a conceptual framework and research agenda . Environmental Politics , 16 ( 2 ) : 185 – 205 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blühdorn , I. and Welsh , I. 2007 . Eco-politics beyond the paradigm of sustainability: a conceptual framework and research agenda . Environmental Politics , 16 ( 2 ) : 185 – 205 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boehmer-Christiansen , S. 2002 . The geo-politics of sustainable development: bureaucracies and politicians in search of the holy grail . Geoforum , 33 ( 3 ) : 351 – 365 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradbury , H. 2010 . What is good action research? Why the resurgent interest? . Action Research , 8 ( 1 ) : 93 – 109 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carolan , M. S. 2006 . Sustainable agriculture, science and the co-production of “expert” knowledge: the value of interactional expertise . Local Environment , 11 ( 4 ) : 421 – 431 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CEC . 2006 . Renewed sustainable development strategy , Brussels : Commission of the European Communities .
   Google Scholar
• CEC, 2010a. Europe 2020: a strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth [online]. Brussels: Commission of the European Communities. Available from: http://ec.europa.eu/eu2020 [Accessed 1 November 2011].
   Google Scholar
• CEC, 2010b. Europe 2020 flagship initiative: innovation union [online]. SEC(2010) 1161. Brussels: Commission of the European Communities. Available from: http://ec.europa.eu/eu2020 [Accessed 1 November 2011].
   Google Scholar
• Cerf , M. 2000 . Cow up a tree: knowing and learning for change in agriculture , Edited by: Cerf , M. Paris : INRA .
   Google Scholar
• Connelly , S. 2007 . Mapping sustainable development as a contested concept . Local Environment , 12 ( 3 ) : 259 – 278 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CREPE, 2010. Workshop report: what knowledge for sustainable agriculture? What bio-economy for Europe? [online]. Milton Keynes: Open University. Available from: http://crepeweb.net/?page_id=355 [Accessed 8 August 2011].
   Google Scholar
• Dalgaard , T. , Hutchings , N. J. and Porter , J. R. 2003 . Agroecology, scaling and interdisciplinarity . Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment , 100 ( 1 ) : 39 – 51 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Schutter, O., 2010. Agro-ecology and the right to food [online]. UN General Assembly, Human Rights Council, report submitted by the Special Rapporteur on the right to food, 20 December. Available from: http://www.srfood.org/index.php/en/component/content/article/1174-report-agroecology-and-the-right-to-food [Accessed 1 November 2011].
   Google Scholar
• DG Research, 2009. GoverScience civil society organisations seminar, held in October 2008, EUR 23912 [online]. Brussels: European Commission. Available from: http://ec.europa.eu/research/science-society/document_library/pdf_06/goverscience-civil-society-org-seminar-090610_en.pdf [Accessed 1 November 2011]
   Google Scholar
• DG Research/FAFB . 2011 . FP7 Theme 2: food, agriculture, fisheries and biotechnology, 2012 work programme , Brussels : European Commission .
   Google Scholar
• Diedrich , A. 2011 . Framing environmental sustainability challenges for research and innovation in European policy agendas . Environmental Science and Policy , 14 ( 8 ) : 935 – 939 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dobson , A. 1996 . Environmental sustainabilities: an analysis and a typology . Environmental Politics , 5 ( 3 ) : 40 – 128 .
   Google Scholar
• Econexus, et al., 2007. Agrofuels: towards a reality check in nine key areas [online]. London: Biofuelwatch & Econexus. Available from: http://www.econexus.info/pdf/Agrofuels.pdf [Accessed 1 November 2011].
   Google Scholar
• Fischer , F. 2009 . Democracy and expertise: reorienting policy inquiry , Oxford : Oxford University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Food SovCap, 2010. The missing option for the common agricultural policy post-2013 [online]. Brussels: European Movement for Food Sovereignty and Another CAP. Available from: http://www.europeanfooddeclaration.org. [Accessed 1 November 2011]
   Google Scholar
• Foth , M. 2006 . Network action research . Action Research , 4 ( 2 ) : 205 – 206 .
   Google Scholar
• Franco , J. 2009 . Report on international workshop, ‘Global agrofuels: sustaining what development?’ [online], held 30 August – 3 September 2009, Maputo. Available from: http://www.crepeweb.net [Accessed 1 November 2011]
   Google Scholar
• Franco , J. 2010 . Assumptions in the European Union biofuels policy: frictions with experiences in Germany, Brazil and Mozambique . Journal of Peasant Studies , 37 ( 4 ) : 66198
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gall, E., 2009. Alternative visions: the contributions of civil society organisations to research for sustainable development [online]. Discussion paper for conference on ‘Sustainable development: a challenge for European Research’, Brussels, 26–28 May. Available from: http://ec.europa.eu/research/sd/conference/2009/presentations/14/eric_gall_-_alternative_visions.pdf [Accessed 1 November 2011].
   Google Scholar
• Gall , E. , Millot , G. and Neubauer , C. 2009 . Participation of civil society organisations in research Final report of the Science, Technology and Civil Society (STACS) project. Paris: Fondation Sciences Citoyennes
   Google Scholar
• Haughton , G. and Counsell , D. 2004 . Regions, spatial strategies and sustainable development , London : Routledge .
   Google Scholar
• Heron , J. and Reason , P. 2006 . “ The practice of co-operative inquiry: research “with” rather than “on” people ” . In Handbook of action research: concise paperback edition , Edited by: Reason , P. and Bradbury , H. 151 London : Sage .
   Google Scholar
• Hess , D. 2007 . Alternative pathways in science and industry: activism, innovation and the environment in an era of globalization , Cambridge : MIT Press .
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs , M. 1995 . Reflections on the discourse and politics of sustainable development: part I — faultlines of contestation and the radical model , Lancaster : Centre for the Study of Environmental Change, University of Lancaster .
   Google Scholar
• Levidow , L. 1991 . Cleaning up on the farm . Science as Culture , 2 ( 4 ) : 538 – 568 .
   Google Scholar
• Levidow, L., ed., 2011. Agricultural innovation: sustaining what agriculture? For what European bio-economy? from FP7 project, Co-operative Research on Environmental Problems in Europe (CREPE) [online]. Milton Keynes: Open University. Available from: http://www.crepeweb.net [Accessed 1 November 2011].
   Google Scholar
• Levidow , L. and Paul , H. 2011 . Global agrofuel crops as contested sustainability, part II: eco-efficient techno-fixes? . Capitalism Nature Socialism , 22 ( 2 ) : 27 – 51 .
   Google Scholar
• Levidow , L. , Birch , K. and Papaioannou , T. forthcoming . EU agri-innovation policy: two contending visions of the knowledge-based bio-economy . Critical Policy Studies , 6 ( 1 )
   Google Scholar
• Lyon, F., et al., 2005. Learning and research for sustainable agro-ecosystems by both farmers and scientists: final report [online]. London: Middlesex University. Available from: http://www.web.mdx.ac.uk/ceedr/ESRC/ESRC%20RELU%2030-1-05.pdf [Accessed 1 November 2011].
   Google Scholar
• Maasen , S. and Lieven , M. 2006 . Transdisciplinarity: a new mode of governing science? . Science and Public Policy , 33 ( 6 ) : 399 – 410 .
   Google Scholar
• Martinez-Alier , J. 2011 . Between science and activism: learning and teaching ecological economics with environmental justice organizations . Local Environment , 16 ( 1 ) : 17 – 36 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neubauer, C. and Piasecki, F., 2010. European Research area: agro-environmental priorities [online]. Paris: Fondation Science Citoyennes. WP6 report of CREPE project. Available from: http://www.crepeweb.net [Accessed 1 November 2011].
   Google Scholar
• Oreszczyn, S., Levidow, L., and Hinchliffe, S., 2010. Cooperative research processes in CREPE [online]. Milton Keynes: Open University. WP8 report of CREPE project. Available from: http://www.crepeweb.net [Accessed 1 November 2011].
   Google Scholar
• Peterson , T. R. 1997 . Sharing the earth: the rhetoric of sustainable development , Columbia , SC : University of South Carolina Press .
   Google Scholar
• Pretty , J. 1995 . Participatory learning for sustainable agriculture . World Development , 23 ( 8 ) : 1247 – 1263 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Princen , T. 2010 . Speaking of sustainability: the potential of metaphor . Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy , 6 ( 2 ) : 60 – 65 .
   Google Scholar
• Redclift , M. 1987 . Sustainable development: exploring the contradictions , London : Routledge .
   Google Scholar
• RSP, 2008. Colloque international agroécologie: vers un mouvement européen [online]. Aguillon, France: Reseau Semences Paysans. Available from: http://www.semencespaysannes.org [Accessed 1 November 2011].
   Google Scholar
• SCAR FEG, 2008. 2nd foresight exercise: new challenges for agricultural research: climate change, food security, rural development, agricultural knowledge systems [online]. Brussels: Standing Committee on Agricultural Research (SCAR), Foresight Expert Group (FEG). Available from: http://ec.europa.eu/research/agriculture/scar/foresight_en.htm [Accessed 1 November 2011].
   Google Scholar
• SCAR FEG . 2011 . Sustainable food consumption and production in a resource-constrained world , Brussels : Standing Committee on Agricultural Research, Foresight Expert Group .
   Google Scholar
• Schmid, O., et al., 2009. Strategic research agenda for organic food and farming [online]. Brussels: Technology Platform Organics. Available from: http://www.organic-research.org/index.html [Accessed 1 November 2011].
   Google Scholar
• Stirling , A. 2006 . From science and society to science in society: towards a framework for ‘co-operative research’ [online]. Report of a European Commission workshop, “GoverScience”, 24–25 November 2005 http://eurosfaire.prd.fr/7pc/bibliotheque/consulter.php?id=308 [Accessed 1 November 2011]
   Google Scholar
• Stirling, A., 2009. Direction, distribution and diversity! Pluralising progress in innovation, sustainability and development [online]. Brighton: University of Sussex. Available from: http://anewmanifesto.org/wp-content/uploads/stirling-paper-32.pdf [Accessed 1 November 2011].
   Google Scholar
• Surel , Y. 2000 . The role of cognitive and normative frames in policy-making . Journal of European Public Policy , 7 ( 4 ) : 495 – 612 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torgerson , D. 1995 . “ The uncertain quest for sustainability ” . In Greening environmental policy: the politics of a sustainable future , Edited by: Fischer , F. and Black , M. 3 – 20 . London : Paul Chapman .
   Google Scholar
• Tress , G. , Tress , B. and Fry , G. 2003 . “ Knowledge creation and reflection in integrative and participatory projects ” . In From tacit to explicit knowledge in integrative and participatory research Edited by: Tress , G. , Tress , B. and Bloemmen , M. delta series 3. Delta, Intels, Alterra: Wageningen University, 12–24
   Google Scholar
• Uphoff , N. 2001 . “ Institutional change and policy reforms ” . In Agroecological innovations: increasing food production with participatory development , Edited by: Uphoff , N. 251 – 260 . London : Earthscan .
   Google Scholar
• Vanloqueren , G. and Baret , P. V. 2009 . How agricultural research systems shape a technological regime that develops genetic engineering but locks out agroecological innovations . Research Policy , 38 ( 6 ) : 971 – 983 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar