Big society, little justice? Community renewable energy and the politics of localism

References

• Amin, A. 2005. Local community on trial. Economy and Society, 34 (4), 612–633. doi: 10.1080/03085140500277211
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amin, A., Doreen, D., and Thrift, N. 2003. Decentering the nation: a radical approach to regional inequality. London: Catalyst.
   Google Scholar
• Ares, E., Hawkins, O., and Bolton, P. 2012. Feed-in tariffs: solar PV review. London: House of Commons Library.
   Google Scholar
• Bache, I., and Catney, P. 2008. Embryonic associationalism: new labour and urban governance. Public Administration, 86 (2), 411–428. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9299.2008.00715.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergman, N., and Eyre, N. 2011. What role for microgeneration in a shift to a low carbon domestic sector in the UK?. Energy Efficiency, 4, 335–353. doi: 10.1007/s12053-011-9107-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Big Society Capital, 2012. Big society capital: vision, mission and activities [online]. Available from: http://www.bigsocietycapital.com/pdf/BSC%20Vision,%20mission%20and%20activities.pdf [Accessed 15 April 2012]
   Google Scholar
• Blond, P. 2010. Red tory: how left and right have broken Britain. London: Faber and Faber.
   Google Scholar
• Cameron, D. 2009. ‘The Big Society’ The Hugo Young Lecture [online], 10, November 2009. Available from: http://www.conservatives.com/News/Speeches/2009/11/David_Cameron_The_Big_Society.aspx [Accessed 20 March 2012]
   Google Scholar
• Cameron, D., 2010. Big society speech, transcript of a speech by the Prime Minister on the big society [online], 19 July 2010, Liverpool. Available from: http://www.number10.gov.uk/news/big-society-speech/ [Accessed 20 March 2012].
   Google Scholar
• Catney, P.et al. 2013. Community knowledge networks: an action-orientated approach to energy research. Local Environment, 18 (4), 506–520. doi: 10.1080/13549839.2012.748729
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Phillippis, J., Fisher, R., and Shragge, E. 2010. Contesting community: the limits and potential of local organizing. New Brunswick, NJ: N.J.L Rutgers University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Energy and Climate Change [DECC] 2009a. Amendments to the carbon emissions reduction target: consultation proposals. London: The Stationary Office.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Energy and Climate Change [DECC] 2009b. The low carbon communities challenge. London: The Stationary Office.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Energy and Climate Change [DECC] 2010. The green deal: a summary of the government's proposals. London: The Stationary Office.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Energy and Climate Change [DECC] 2011a. Evaluation of the community energy saving programme. London: The Stationary Office.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Energy and Climate Change [DECC] 2011b. Planning our electric future: a white paper for secure, affordable and low-carbon electricity. London: The Stationary Office.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Energy and Climate Change [DECC] 2011c. Feed-in tariffs scheme: consultation on comprehensive review phase 1 – tariffs for solar PV. London: The Stationary Office.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Energy and Climate Change [DECC] 2011d. Local authorities and the green deal. London: The Stationary Office.
   Google Scholar
• Devine-Wright, P., and Wiersma, B. 2013. Opening up the “local” to analysis: exploring the spatiality of UK urban decentralised energy initiatives. Local Environment, [Early access]. doi:10.1080/13549839.2012.754742
   Google Scholar
• Dorey, P. 2010. British conservatism: the politics and philosophy of inequality. London: IB Taurus.
   Google Scholar
• Ellison, N. 2011. The conservative party and the “big society”. In: C. Holden, M. Kilkey and G. Ramia, eds. Social policy review 23: analysis and debate in social policy 2011. Bristol: Policy Press, 45–62.
   Google Scholar
• Friends of the Earth 2011. Electricity market reform. London: Friends of the Earth.
   Google Scholar
• Friends of the Earth 2012. Time to give power to the people [online], Available from: http://www.foe.co.uk/news/respublica_communityenergy_34875.html [Accessed 9 April 2012]
   Google Scholar
• Fudge, S.et al. 2011. Risk, governance and community: a “reinvention of politics” or political opportunism, Paper presented at UKERC ‘energy and people’ conference, 20–21 September 2011. Oxford: Oxford University
   Google Scholar
• Gamble, A. 2011. Project Cameron. Public policy research, 18 (3), 173–178. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-540X.2011.00660.x
   Google Scholar
• Geels, F.W., and Schot, J. 2007. Typology of socio-technical transition pathways. Research Policy, 36 (3), 399–417. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2007.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. 1998. The third way. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Goodall, C. 2012. The energy company obligation: a pittance that will worsen the finances of the most poor [online], 3rd January 2012. Available from: http://www.carboncommentary.com/2012/01/03/2230 [Accessed 19 April 2012]
   Google Scholar
• Helm, D. 2004. Energy, the state and the market: British energy policy since 1979. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hickson, K. 2009. Conservatism and the poor: conservative party attitudes to poverty and inequality since the 1970s. British Politics, 4 (3), 341–362. doi: 10.1057/bp.2009.11
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HM Government 2012. Social justice: transforming lives. Cm 8314. London: The Stationary Office.
   Google Scholar
• House of Commons Energy and Climate Change Select Committee [HoC] 2011. Solar power feed-in tariffs [online]. Available from: http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201012/cmselect/cmenergy/1605/160504.htm [Accessed 14 April 2012]
   Google Scholar
• Ipsos-Mori 2009. The big energy shift: report from citizens forum. London: Ipsos Mori.
   Google Scholar
• Julian, C., and Dobson, J. 2012. Re-energising our communities: transforming the energy market through local energy production. Lincoln: Respublica.
   Google Scholar
• Marvin, S., and Guy, S. 1997. Creating Myths rather than sustainability: the transition fallacies of the new localism. Local Environment, 2 (3), 311–318. doi: 10.1080/13549839708725536
   Google Scholar
• Massey, D.B. 2004. Geographies of responsibility. Geografiska Annaler B, 86 (1), 5–18. doi: 10.1111/j.0435-3684.2004.00150.x
   Google Scholar
• Mawhood, C. 2012. Feed-in-tariff scheme October 2007 – October 2011: lessons for the future. London: Department of Climate Change and Energy (online). Available from: https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/48487/6124-feedin-tariffs-lessons-for-the-future-report.pdf [Accessed 24 January 2013]
   Google Scholar
• Meredith, S., and Catney, P. 2007. New labour and associative democracy: old debates in new times?. British Politics, 2 (3), 347–371. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.bp.4200063
   Google Scholar
• Middlemiss, L., and Parrish, B. 2010. Building capacity for low-carbon communities: the role of grassroots initiatives. Energy Policy, 38, 7559–7566. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2009.07.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, C. 2008. The political economy of sustainable energy. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Monbiot, G. 2012. The green deal is a useless, middle-class subsidy. The Guardian, 13 January 2012 [online]. Available from: http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/georgemonbiot/2012/jan/13/green-deal [Accessed 19 April 2012]
   Google Scholar
• National Council for Voluntary Organisations [NCVO] 2012. Charities hit by triple whammy of financial pressures during the recession [online]. Available from: http://www.ncvo-vol.org.uk/news/civil-society/charities-hit-triple-whammy-financial-pressures-during-recession [Accessed 16 April 2012]
   Google Scholar
• Norman, J. 2010. The big society: the anatomy of the new politics. Buckingham: Buckingham University Press.
   Google Scholar
• North, P. 2011. Geographies and utopias of Cameron's Big Society. Social & Cultural Geography, 12 (8), 817–827. doi: 10.1080/14649365.2011.618889
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, J.J. 2012. Fostering community energy and equal opportunities between communities. Local Environment, 17 (4), 387–408. doi: 10.1080/13549839.2012.678321
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peck, J. 2010. Constructions of neoliberal reason. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peck, J., and Tickell, N. 2002. Neoliberalising space. Antipode, 34, 380–404. doi: 10.1111/1467-8330.00247
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purcell, M. 2006. Urban democracy and the local trap. Urban Studies, 43 (11), 1921–1941. doi: 10.1080/00420980600897826
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purcell, M., and Brown, J. 2005. Against the local trap: scale and the study of environment and development. Progress in Development Studies, 5 (4), 279–297. doi: 10.1191/1464993405ps122oa
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, R. 2001. Bowling alone. London: Simon and Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Rathouse, K., and Devine-Wright, P. 2010. Evaluation of the big energy shift: final report to DECC and sciencewise-ERC. St Albans: Kathryn Rathouse Social Research and Placewise.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, J.C., Simmons, E.A., Convery, I., and Weatherall, A. 2012. What factors enable community leadership of renewable energy projects? Lessons from a woodfuel heating initiative. Local Economy, 27 (2), 209–222. doi: 10.1177/0269094211429657
   Google Scholar
• Rose, N. 1999. Powers of freedom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, N. 2000. Community, citizenship and the third way. American Behavioral Scientist, 43 (9), 1395–1411. doi: 10.1177/00027640021955955
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, M. 2011. Public policy in the community. 2nd ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Toynbee, P. 2009. David Cameron, social policy butterfly. The Guardian, 10 November 2009 [online]. Available from: http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/nov/10/david-cameron-hugo-young-welfare [Accessed 12 April 2012]
   Google Scholar
• Walker, G. 2008a. Decentralised systems and fuel poverty: are there any links or risks?. Energy Policy, 36, 4514–4517. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2008.09.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, G. 2008b. What are the barriers and incentives for community-owned means of energy production and use?. Energy Policy, 36, 4401–4405. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2008.09.032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, G., and Cass, N. 2007. Carbon reduction, “the public” and renewable energy: engaging with socio-technical configurations. Area, 39 (4), 458–469. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-4762.2007.00772.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, G., and Devine-Wright, P. 2008. Community renewable energy: what should it mean?. Energy Policy, 36, 497–500. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2007.10.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, G.et al. 2007. Harnessing community energies: explaining and evaluating community-based localism in renewable energy policy in the UK. Global Environmental Politics, 7 (2), 64–82. doi: 10.1162/glep.2007.7.2.64
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, G.et al. 2010. Trust and community: exploring the meanings, contexts and dynamics of community renewable energy. Energy Policy, 38, 2655–2663. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2009.05.055
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wenger, E. 1998. Communities of practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Westwood, A. 2011. Localism, social capital and the ‘big society’. Local Economy, 26 (8), 690–701. doi: 10.1177/0269094211422195
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, R., and Pickett, K. 2009. The spirit level. London: Penguin.
   Google Scholar