Publication Cover
Local Environment
The International Journal of Justice and Sustainability
Volume 19, 2014 - Issue 7
119
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Technical assessment and public perception of environmental issues: the case of the Municipality of Pisa

, &
Pages 786-802 | Received 02 Oct 2012, Accepted 04 Mar 2013, Published online: 07 May 2013

References

  • Battaglia, M., Daddi, T., and Rizzi, F. 2012. Sustainable tourism planning and consultation: evidence from the project INTER.ECO.TUR. European Planning Studies, 20 (2), 193–211. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2012.650908
  • Bianchi, D. and Berrini, M., 2003. Analisi ambientale e analisi territoriale: gli indicatori [online]. Direzione Ambiente Italia. Available from: http://www2.iuav.it/dp/convegni/2003/bianchi.pdf [Accessed 20 July 2012].
  • Bickerstaff, K. 2004. Risk perception research: socio-cultural perspectives on the public experience of air pollution. Environmental International, 30 (6), 827–840. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2003.12.001
  • Bradbury, J.A., 1989. The policy implications of differing concepts of risk. Science, Technology and Human Values, 14 (4), 380–399.
  • Cohen, B.L. 1998. Public perception versus results of scientific risk analysis. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 59 (1), 101–105. doi: 10.1016/S0951-8320(97)00130-0
  • Cross, F.B. 1998. Facts and values in risk assessment. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 59 (1), 27–40. doi: 10.1016/S0951-8320(97)00116-6
  • De Marchi, B., Pellizzoni, L., and Ungaro, D. 2001. Il rischio ambientale. Bologna: Universale Paperbacks Il Mulino.
  • Douglas, M. 1985. Risk acceptability according to the social sciences. New York: Russel Sage Foundation.
  • Douglas, M., and Wildavsky, A. 1982. Risk and culture: an essay on the selection of technological and environmental dangers. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Federico, T. and Barbabella, A., 2005. Rapporto CNEL. Indicatori per lo sviluppo sostenibile in Italia [online]. Consiglio Nazionale dell'Economia e del Lavoro, Rapporto finale. Available from: http://www.portalecnel.it/portale/documenti.nsf/0/C12575C30044C0B5C125723C004C0163/$FILE/Rapporto%20finale%20indicatori.pdf [Accessed 21 July 2012].
  • Figueiredo, E.et al. 2009. Coping with risk: analysis on the importance of integrating social perceptions on flood risk into management mechanisms – the case of the municipality of Agueda, Portugal. Journal of Risk Research, 12 (5), 581–602. doi: 10.1080/13669870802511155
  • Fischhoff, B., Slovic, P., and Lichtenstein, S. 1982. Lay foibles and expert fables in judgments about risk. The American Statistician, 36 (3), 240–255. doi: 10.2307/2683835
  • Fischhoff, B., Bostrom, A., and Jacobs Quadrel, M. 1993. Risk perception and communication. Annual Review of Public Health, 14, 183–203. doi: 10.1146/annurev.pu.14.050193.001151
  • Fishhoff, B.et al. 1978. How safe is safe enough? A psychometric study of attitudes towards technological risk and benefits. Policy Sciences, 8 (2), 127–152. doi: 10.1007/BF00143739
  • Fraser, E.D.G.et al. 2006. Bottom up and top down: analysis of participatory processes for sustainability indicator identification as a pathway to community empowerment and sustainable development management. Journal of Environmental Management, 78 (2), 114–127. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2005.04.009
  • Freudenburg, W.R. 1988. Perceived risk, real risk: social sciences and the art of probabilistic assessment. Science, 242 (4875), 44–49. doi: 10.1126/science.3175635
  • Funtowicz, S., and Ravetz, J. 1993. Science for the post-normal age. Futures, 25 (7), 735–755. doi: 10.1016/0016-3287(93)90022-L
  • Gray, P.C.R., and Wiedemann, P.M. 1999. Risk management and sustainable development: mutual lessons from approaches to the use of indicators. Journal of Risk Research, 2 (3), 201–218. doi: 10.1080/136698799376808
  • Johnson, B.B., and Covello, V.T. eds., 1987. The social and cultural construction of risk. Dordrecht: Reidel.
  • Lane, S.N.et al. 2011. Doing flood risk science differently: an experiment in radical scientific method. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 36 (1), 15–36. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-5661.2010.00410.x
  • Larson, K.L.et al. 2009. Divergent perspectives on water resource sustainability in a public–policy–science context. Environmental Science & Policy, 12 (7), 1012–1023. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2009.07.012
  • Maiello, A., Battaglia, M., and Frey, M. 2011a. La percezione del rischio nei processi decisionali. Integrazione dei saperi e scelte pubbliche. In: F.D. Moccia, eds. Urbanistica e Politica. Naples: Edizioni Scientifiche Italiane, 149–158.
  • Maiello, A.et al. 2011b. Urban sustainability and knowledge: theoretical heterogeneity and need of a transdisciplinary framework. A tale of four towns. Futures, 43 (10), 1164–1174. doi: 10.1016/j.futures.2011.08.011
  • Mander, S.et al. 2011. Risk from CO2 storage in saline aquifers: a comparison of lay and expert perceptions of risk. Energy Procedia, 4 (8), 6360–6367. doi: 10.1016/j.egypro.2011.02.653
  • Okrent, D. 1998. Risk perception and risk management: on knowledge, resource allocation and equity. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 59 (1), 17–25. doi: 10.1016/S0951-8320(97)00115-4
  • Okrent, D., and Pidgeon, N. 1998. Editorial risk perception versus risk analysis. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 59 (1), 1–4. doi: 10.1016/S0951-8320(97)00345-1
  • Ólafsdóttir, R., and Júliússon, A. 2000. Farmers perception of land cover changes in Iceland. Land Degradation and Development, 11 (5), 439–458. doi: 10.1002/1099-145X(200009/10)11:5<439::AID-LDR406>3.0.CO;2-K
  • Papalia, F., 2004. La percezione e comunicazione del rischio. In: Istituto Italiano di Medicina Sociale (IIMS), ed. Applicazioni di modelli organizzativi originali per la prevenzione del rischio chimico in aziende di discrete dimensioni. Roma: Istituto Italiano di Medicina Sociale, 101–166.
  • Rayner, S. 1992. Cultural theory and risk analysis. In: S. Krimsky and D. Golding, eds. Social theories of risk. Westport, CT: Praeger, 83–115.
  • Reed, M.S., Fraser, E.D.G., and Dougill, A.J. 2006. An adaptive learning process for developing and applying sustainability indicators with local communities. Ecological Economics, 59 (4), 406–418. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.11.008
  • Renn, O. 1997. Discursive methods in environmental decision making. Business Strategy and the Environment, 6 (4), 218–231. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0836(199709)6:4<218::AID-BSE117>3.0.CO;2-G
  • Renn, O. 1998a. The role of risk perception for risk management. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 59 (1), 49–62. doi: 10.1016/S0951-8320(97)00119-1
  • Renn, O. 1998b. Three decades of risk research: accomplishments and new challenges. Journal of Risk Research, 1 (1), 49–71. doi: 10.1080/136698798377321
  • Renn, O. 2001. The need for integration: risk policies require the input from experts, stakeholders and the public at large. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 72 (2), 131–135. doi: 10.1016/S0951-8320(01)00014-X
  • Renn, O. 2004. Perceptions of risks. Toxicology Letters, 149 (1–3), 405–413. doi: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2003.12.051
  • Renn, O., and Rohrmann, B. 2000. Cross-cultural risk perception. A survey of empirical studies, In: O. Renn and B. Rohrmann, eds. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  • Rosa, E.A. 1998. Metatheoretical foundations for post-normal risk. Journal of Risk Research, 1 (1), 15–44. doi: 10.1080/136698798377303
  • Saarikoski, H. 2000. Environmental impact assessment (EIA) as collaborative learning process. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 20 (6), 681–700. doi: 10.1016/S0195-9255(00)00059-7
  • Scholz, R.W.et al. 2006. Transdisciplinarity case studies as means of sustainability learning. Historical framework and theory. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 7 (3), 226–251. doi: 10.1108/14676370610677829
  • Schwarz, M., and Thompson, M. 1990. Divided we stand; redefining politics, technology and social choice. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
  • Shrader-Frechette, K. 1991. Risk and rationality. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Shubik, M. 1991. Risk, society, politicians, scientists and people. In: M. Shubik, eds. Risk, organizations, and society. Dordrecht: Kluwer. 7–30
  • Slovic, P. 1987. Perception of risk. Science, 236 (4799), 280–285. doi: 10.1126/science.3563507
  • Slovic, P. 1997. Public perception of risk (guest commentary). Journal of Environmental Health, 59 (9), 22–23. 54
  • Slovic, P. 1999. Trust, emotion, sex, politics and science: surveying the risk-assessment battlefield. Risk Analysis, 19 (4), 689–701.
  • Slovic, P., Fischhoff, B., and Lichtenstein, S. 1981. Facts and fears: societal perception of risk. In: K.B. Monroe, eds. Advances in consumer research. vol 8. Ann Arbor, MI: Association for Consumer Research, 497–502.
  • Smeets, E. and Weterings, R. 1999. Environmental indicators: typology and overview [online]. European Environment Agency, Technical Report n. 25. Available from: http://www.brahmatwinn.uni-jena.de/fileadmin/Geoinformatik/projekte/brahmatwinn/Workshops/FEEM/Indicators/EEA_tech_rep_25_Env_Ind.pdf [Accessed 21 July 2012].
  • Snary, C. 2004. Understanding risk: the planning officer's perspective. Urban Studies, 41 (1), 33–55. doi: 10.1080/0042098032000155678
  • Starr, C. 1969. Social benefit versus technological risk: what is our society willing to pay for safety?. Science, 165 (3899), 1232–1238. doi: 10.1126/science.165.3899.1232
  • Stern, P. 2000. Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 56 (3), 407–424. doi: 10.1111/0022-4537.00175
  • Stringer, L.C., and Reed, M.S. 2007. Land degradation assessment in southern Africa: integrating local and scientific knowledge bases. Land Degradation and Development, 18 (1), 99–116. doi: 10.1002/ldr.760
  • Sunstein, C.R. 2002. Risk and reason: safety, law, and the environment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Sunstein, C.R., and Zeckhauser, R. 2011. Overreaction to fearsome risks. Environmental and Resource Economics, 48 (3), 435–449. doi: 10.1007/s10640-010-9449-3
  • Tanguay, G.A.et al. 2010. Measuring the sustainability of cities: an analysis of the use of local indicators. Ecological Indicators, 10 (2), 407–418. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2009.07.013
  • Thomas, D.S.G., and Twyman, C. 2004. Good or bad rangeland? Hybrid knowledge, science, and local understandings of vegetation dynamics in the Kalahari. Land Degradation and Development, 15 (3), 215–231. doi: 10.1002/ldr.610
  • Whatmore, S.J., and Landström, C. 2011. Flood apprentices: an exercise in making things public. Economy and Society, 40 (4), 582–610. doi: 10.1080/03085147.2011.602540
  • Wynne, B. 1991. Knowledges in context. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 16 (1), 111–121. doi: 10.1177/016224399101600108
  • Wynne, B. 1992. Risk and social learning: reification to engagement. In: S. Krimsky and D. Golding, eds. Social theories of risk. Westport, CT: Praeger, 275–297.
  • Wynne, B. 2006. Public engagement as a means of restoring public trust in science – hitting the notes, but missing the music?. Community Genetics, 9 (3), 211–220. doi: 10.1159/000092659

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.