The multiple communities of low-carbon transition: an assessment of communities involved in forest carbon measurement

References

• Aiken, G., 2012. Community transitions to low carbon futures in the Transition Towns Network (TTN). Geography Compass, 6 (2), 89–99. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-8198.2011.00475.x
   Google Scholar
• Backstrand, K. and Lovbrand, E., 2006. Planting trees to mitigate climate change: contested discourses of ecological modernization, green governmentality and civic environmentalism. Global Environmental Politics, 6 (1), 50–75. doi: 10.1162/glep.2006.6.1.50
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, J.D., et al., 2010. MRV for REDD-plus for classes of countries: requirements, readiness and capacity gaps. Washington: World Bank, Forest Carbon Partnership Facility.
   Google Scholar
• Baldwin, A., 2003. The nature of Boreal Forest: governmentality and forest-nature. Space & Culture, 6 (4), 415–428. doi: 10.1177/1206331203253189
   Google Scholar
• Bijker, W.E. and Law, J., 1992. General introduction. In: W.E. Bijker and J. Law, eds. Shaping technology/building society: studies in sociotechnical change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, B., 2002. The intemperate rainforest: nature, culture, and power on Canada's west coast. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, G., et al., 2012. Holding the future together: towards a theorisation of the spaces and times of transition. Environment and Planning A, 44 (7), 1607–1623. doi: 10.1068/a44608
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bulkeley, H., 2000. Discourse coalitions and the Australian climate change policy network. Environment and Planning C, 18 (6), 727–748. doi: 10.1068/c9905j
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CCBA (The Climate, Community & Biodiversity Alliance), 2013. CCBA home page. Available from: http://www.climate-standards.org/ [Accessed 3 February 2013].
   Google Scholar
• CIFOR, 2012. Forest day 6 conference: living landscapes – solutions for a sustainable world. Available from: http://www.forestsclimatechange.org/events/forest-day.html [Accessed 6 March 2013].
   Google Scholar
• CIGA-UNAM, 2011. Workshop report – linking community monitoring to national measurement, reporting and verification for REDD+. Available from: www.ciga.unam/redd/events [Accessed 12 December 2011].
   Google Scholar
• Clinton Climate Initiative, 2012. Preserving forests: a conversation with Dr. D. James Baker. Available from: http://www.clintonfoundation.org/what-we-do/clinton-climate-initiative/i/preserving-forests-a-conversation-with-dr-d-james-baker [Accessed 18 December 2012].
   Google Scholar
• Dean, M., 1999. Governmentality: power and rule in modern society. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Espeland, W.N. and Stevens, M.L., 1998. Commensuration as a social process. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 313–143. doi: 10.1146/annurev.soc.24.1.313
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FAO, 2010. Strategy for forests and forestry. Available from: http://www.fao.org/docrep/012/al043e/al043e00.pdf [Accessed 12 March 2013].
   Google Scholar
• FCPF, 2011. Linking community monitoring to national measurement, reporting and verification for REDD+. New York: Forest Carbon Partnership Facility (FCPF).
   Google Scholar
• Fogel, C., 2004. The local, the global, and the Kyoto Protocol. In: S. Jasanoff and M.L. Martello, eds. Earthly politics: local and global in environmental governance. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 103–125.
   Google Scholar
• Fogel, C., 2005. Biotic carbon sequestration and the Kyoto protocol: the construction of global knowledge by the intergovernmental panel on climate change. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 5 (2), 191–210. doi: 10.1007/s10784-005-1749-7
   Google Scholar
• Forest Carbon Partnership, 2011. Forest Carbon Partnership Facility 2011 annual report. Available from: http://www.forestcarbonpartnership.org/fcp/sites/forestcarbonpartnership.org/files/Documents/PDF/Oct2011/FCPF_Carbon_AR_FINAL_10_3.pdf [Accessed 6 March 2013].
   Google Scholar
• Geels, F.W., 2004. Technological transitions and system innovations: a co-evolutionary and socio-technical analysis. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• GEO Forest Carbon Tracking, 2010. Report on the concept phase for developing a Global Forest Monitoring Network, Group on Earth Observations (GEO) Forest Carbon Tracking Task.
   Google Scholar
• GFOI, 2010. Global Forest Observations Initiative Concept Phase report. Available from: http://www.gfoi.org/sites/default/files/GFOI_Concept_phase_report.pdf [Accessed 3rd April 2014].
   Google Scholar
• Global Carbon Project, 2013. Global carbon budget 2013 – summary. Available from: http://www.globalcarbonproject.org/carbonbudget/13/hl-compact.htm [Accessed 11 February 2014].
   Google Scholar
• GOFC-GOLD (Global Observation of Forest and Land Cover Dynamics), 2012. Available from: http://www.fao.org/gtos/gofc-gold/REDD_WG.html [Accessed 30 July 2012].
   Google Scholar
• Gough, C. and Shackley, S., 2001. The respectable politics of climate change: the epistemic communities and NGOs. International Affairs, 77 (2), 329–346. doi: 10.1111/1468-2346.00195
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, S. and Marvin, S., 2001. Splintering urbanism: networked infrastructures, technological mobilities and the urban condition. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Guy, S., et al., eds. 2001. Infrastructure in transition: urban networks, buildings, plans. London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Haas, P., 1992. Introduction: epistemic communities and international policy co-ordination. International Organisation, 46 (1), 1–35. doi: 10.1017/S0020818300001442
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hajer, M.A., 1995. The politics of environmental discourse: ecological modernisation and the policy process. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Herold, M., 2009. An assessment of national forest monitoring capabilities in tropical non-annex I countries: recommendations for capacity building. London/Oslo: The Prince's Rainforests Project/The Government of Norway.
   Google Scholar
• Houghton, R., 2012. Carbon emissions and drivers of deforestation and forest degradation. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 4 (6), 8–16. doi: 10.1016/j.cosust.2012.06.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, T.P., 1983. Networks of power: electrification in Western Society 1880–1930. Maryland: The John Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, T.P., 1999. Edison and electric light. In: D. Mackenzie and J. Wajcman, eds. The social shaping of technology. Maidenhead: Open University Press, 50–63.
   Google Scholar
• Hulme, M., 2010. Problems with making and governing global kinds of knowledge. Global Environmental Change, 20 (4), 558–564. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.07.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IIED, 2014. International Institute for Environment and Development. Available from: http://www.iied.org/ [Accessed 3 April 2014].
   Google Scholar
• Kemp, R., et al., 1998. Regime shifts to sustainability through processes of niche formation: the approach of Strategic Niche Management. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 10 (2), 175–195. doi: 10.1080/09537329808524310
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K:TGAL, 2009. Community carbon forestry as a mitigation option under climate change agreements. Available from: http://www.communitycarbonforestry.org/ [Accessed 10 March 2013].
   Google Scholar
• Li, T.M., 2007. The will to improve: governmentality, development, and the practice of politics. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lovell, H., 2004. Framing sustainable housing as a solution to climate change. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 6 (1), 35–56. doi: 10.1080/1523908042000259677
   Google Scholar
• Lovell, H., 2007. The governance of innovation in socio-technical systems: the difficulties of strategic niche management in practice. Science and Public Policy, 34 (1), 35–44. doi: 10.3152/030234207X190540
   Google Scholar
• Lovell, H., 2009. The role of individuals in policy change: the case of UK low energy housing. Environment and Planning C, 27 (1), 491–511.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lovell, H., 2013. Measuring forest carbon. In: J. Stripple and H. Bulkeley, eds. Govering the climate: new approaches to rationality, power and politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 175–196.
   Google Scholar
• Lovell, H., et al., 2009. Converging agendas? Energy and climate change policies in the UK. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 27 (1), 90–109. doi: 10.1068/c0797j
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacKenzie, D., 1990. Inventing accuracy: a historical sociology of nuclear missile guidance. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Markard, J., et al., 2012. Sustainability transitions: an emerging field of research and its prospects. Research Policy, 41 (6), 955–967. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2012.02.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, D. and Rhodes, R.A.W., eds., 1992. Policy networks in British government. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moss, T., 2001. Battle of the systems? Changing styles of water recycling in Berlin. In: S. Guy, S. Marvin, and T. Moss, eds. Infrastructures in transition: urban networks, buildings, plans. London: Earthscan, 43–56.
   Google Scholar
• Mulugetta, Y., et al., 2010. Carbon reduction at community scale. Energy Policy, 38 (12), 7541–7545. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2010.05.050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, R. and Winter, S.G., 1982. An evolutionary theory of economic change. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Penman, J., et al., 2003. IPCC Good Practice Guidance for land use, land-use change and forestry. National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Programme. Institute for Global Environmental Strategies, Kanagawa, Japan.
   Google Scholar
• Pistorius, T., 2012. From RED to REDD+: the evolution of a forest-based mitigation approach for developing countries. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 4 (6), 313–324. doi: 10.1016/j.cosust.2012.07.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson, J., 2000. Government, interest groups and policy change. Political Studies, 48 (5), 1006–1025. doi: 10.1111/1467-9248.00292
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rip, A. and Kemp, R., 1998. Technological change. In: S. Rayner and E. Malone, eds. Human choices and climate change volume 2 – resources and technology. Columbus, OH: Battelle Press, 327–399.
   Google Scholar
• Sabatier, P.A. and Jenkins Smith, H.C., eds., 1993. Policy change and learning: an advocacy coalition approach. Boulder: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schumpeter, J.A., 1961. The theory of economic development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Seyfang, G., 2010. Community action for sustainable housing: building a low-carbon future. Energy Policy, 38 (12), 7624–7633. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2009.10.027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seyfang, G. and Haxeltine, A., 2012. Growing grassroots innovations: exploring the role of community-based initiatives in governing sustainable energy transitions. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 30 (3), 381–400. doi: 10.1068/c10222
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seyfang, G. and Smith, A., 2007. Grassroots innovation for sustainable development: towards a new research and policy agenda. Environmental Politics, 16 (4), 584–603. doi: 10.1080/09644010701419121
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, A., 1997. Policy networks and advocacy coalitions: explaining policy change and stability in United Kingdom industrial pollution policy? Environment and Planning C, 18 (1), 95–114. doi: 10.1068/c9810j
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, A. and Kern, F., 2007. The transitions discourse in the ecological modernisation of the Netherlands (SPRU working paper no. 160). Brighton, SPRU, University of Sussex.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, A., et al., 2005. The governance of sustainable socio-technical transitions. Research Policy, 34 (10), 1491–1510. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2005.07.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephan, B., 2012. Bringing discourse to the market. Environmental Politics, 21 (4), 621–639. doi: 10.1080/09644016.2012.688357
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szarka, J., 2004. Wind power, discourse coalitions and climate change: breaking the stalemate? European Environment, 14 (6), 317–330. doi: 10.1002/eet.367
   Google Scholar
• Timmermans, S. and Epstein, S., 2010. A world of standards but not a standard world: toward a sociology of standards and standardization. Annual Review of Sociology, 36, 69–89. doi: 10.1146/annurev.soc.012809.102629
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tollefson, J., 2009. Climate: counting carbon in the Amazon. Nature, 461, 1048–1052. doi: 10.1038/4611048a
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UN FCCC, 2007. Report of the conference of the parties on its thirteenth session, held in Bali from 3 to 15 December 2007, United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UN FCCC).
   Google Scholar
• UN FCCC, 2009. Technical paper FCCC/TP/2009/1 – cost of implementing methodologies and monitoring systems relating to estimates of emissions from deforestation and forest degradation, the assessment of carbon stocks and greenhouse gas emissions from changes in forest cover, and the enhancement of forest carbon stocks, UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UN FCCC).
   Google Scholar
• UN-REDD Programme, 2008. Role of satellite remote sensing in REDD: issues paper. Rome, FAO, UNDP, UNEP. Available from: http://www.un-redd.org/ [Accessed 3 June 2012].
   Google Scholar
• Visseren-Hamakers, I.J., et al., 2012. Interdisciplinary perspectives on REDD+: editorial overview. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 4 (6), 587–589.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, K.M., 2003. Transforming large socio-technical systems towards sustainability: on the role of users and future visions for the uptake of city logistics and combined heat and power generation. Innovation: the European Journal of Social Science Research, 16 (2), 155–175.
   Google Scholar