Communication and use of climate scenarios for climate change adaptation in Finland, Sweden and Norway

References

• Benestad, R., 2010. Downscaling precipitation extremes. Correction of analog models through PDF predictions. Theoretical and Applied Climatology, 100 (1), 1–21. doi: 10.1007/s00704-009-0158-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter, T.R., 2007. Suomen kyky sopeutua ilmastonmuutokseen: FINADAPT. Yhteenveto päättäjille [Assessing the adaptive capacity of the Finnish environment and society under a changing climate: FINADAPT. Summary for Policy Makers] [online]. Available from: https://helda.helsinki.fi/handle/10138/38397 [Accessed 22 May 2014].
   Google Scholar
• Carter, T., et al., 2002. The FINSKEN global change scenarios. In: J. Käyhkö and L. Talve, eds. Understanding the global system, The Finnish perspective. Turku: Finnish Global Change Research Programme, 27–40.
   Google Scholar
• Cash, D., et al., 2002. Salience, credibility, legitimacy and boundaries: linking research, assessment and decision making. KSG Working Papers Series RWP02-046. Available from: SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=372280 [Accessed 30 February 2013].
   Google Scholar
• Cimorelli, A.J. and Stahl, C.H., 2005. Tackling the dilemma of the science-policy interface in environmental policy analysis. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 25 (3), 276–284. doi: 10.1177/0270467605277412
   Google Scholar
• Cubasch, U., et al., 2001. Projections of future climate change. In: J.T. Houghton, et al., eds. Climate change 2001: the scientific basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel, 526–582.
   Google Scholar
• Dannevig, H., Rauken, T., and Hovelsrud, G., 2012. Implementing adaptation to climate change at the local level. Local Environment, 17 (6–7), 597–611. doi: 10.1080/13549839.2012.678317
   Google Scholar
• Dessai, S. and Hulme, M., 2007. Assessing the robustness of adaptation decisions to climate change uncertainties: a case study on water resources management in the East of England. Global Environmental Change, 17 (1), 59–72. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.11.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dessai, S., et al., 2009. Do we need better predictions to adapt to a changing climate? Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union, 90 (13), 111–112. doi: 10.1029/2009EO130003
   Google Scholar
• Driessen, P., Leroy, P., and van Vierssen, W., 2010. From climate change to social change: perspectives on science-policy interactions. Utrecht: International Books.
   Google Scholar
• Ekelund, N., 2007. Adapting to climate change in Stockholm. City of Stockholm: Environment and Health Administration.
   Google Scholar
• Engels, A., 2005. The science-policy interface. Integrated Assessment, 5 (1), 7–26.
   Google Scholar
• Engen-Skaugen, T., Haugen, J., and Tveito, O., 2007. Temperature scenarios for Norway: from regional to local scale. Climate Dynamics, 29 (5), 441–453. doi: 10.1007/s00382-007-0241-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engen-Skaugen, T., Haugen, J., and Hanssen-Bauer, I., 2008. Dynamically downscaled climate scenarios available at the Norwegian Meteorological Institute – per December 2008. Oslo, Norway: Norwegian Meteorological Institute, Met.no report no 24/2008.
   Google Scholar
• Guston, D.H., 2001. Boundary organizations in environmental policy and science: an introduction. Science, Technology & Human Values, 26 (4), 399–408.
   Google Scholar
• Hallegatte, S., 2009. Strategies to adapt to an uncertain climate change. Global Environmental Change, 19 (2), 240–247. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.12.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanger, S., et al., 2013. Knowledge and information needs of adaptation policy-makers: a European study. Regional Environmental Change, 13 (1), 91–101. doi: 10.1007/s10113-012-0317-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanssen-Bauer, I., et al., 2009. Survey of regional and local scale climate projections available for climate impact, adaptation and vulnerability studies in Finland, Norway and Sweden. Oslo, Norway: Norwegian Meteorological Institute, Met.no report no 13/2009.
   Google Scholar
• Heikinheimo, P. and Kanninen, M., 1995. The Finnish research programme on climate change SILMU. In: S. Zwerwer, et al., eds. Climate change research: evaluation and policy implications. Proceedings of the International Climate Change Research Conference, 6–9 December 1994. Maastricht, The Netherlands: Elsevier Science, 1419–1422.
   Google Scholar
• Hoppe, R., 2010. Lost in translation? A boundary work perspective on making climate change governable. In: P. Driessen, P. Leroy, and W. van Vierssen, eds. From climate change to social change. Perspectives on science-policy interactions. Utrecht: International Books, 109–130.
   Google Scholar
• HSY, 2012. Helsinki metropolitan area climate change adaptation strategy. Helsinki, Finland: Helsinki Region Environmental Services Authority.
   Google Scholar
• IPCC, 2007. Climate Change 2007: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (M.L. Parry, O.F. Canziani, J.P. Palutikof, P.J. van der Linden, and C.E. Hanson, eds.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 976pp.
   Google Scholar
• IPCC, 2014. Climate Change 2014: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, R.N., 2001. An environmental risk assessment/management framework for climate change impact assessments. Natural Hazards, 23 (2–3), 197–230. doi: 10.1023/A:1011148019213
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, S.A., Fischhoff, B., and Lach, D., 1999. Evaluating the science-policy interface for climate change research. Climatic Change, 43 (3), 581–599.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kjellström, E. and Lind, P., 2009. Changes in the water budget in the Baltic Sea drainage basin in future warmer climates as simulated by the regional climate model RCA3. Boreal Environment Research, 14 (1), 114–124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein, R.J.T. and Juhola, S., 2013. A framework for Nordic actor-oriented climate adaptation research. Nordic Centre of Excellence for Strategic Adaptation Research, No. 2013-1.
   Google Scholar
• Kriegler, E., et al., 2010. Socio-economic scenario development for climate change analysis. Nogent-sur-Marne, France: Centre International de Recherche sur l'Environnement et le Développement, CIRED Working Paper DT/WP No 2010–23.
   Google Scholar
• Leroy, P., Driessen, P., and van Vierssen, W., 2010. Climate, science, society, and politics: multiple perspectives on interactions and change. In: P. Driessen, P. Leroy, and W. van Vierssen, eds. From climate change to social change. Perspectives on science-policy interactions. Utrecht: International Books, 15–30.
   Google Scholar
• Lorenzoni, I., et al., 2000a. A co-evolutionary approach to climate change impact assessment: Part I. Integrating socio-economic and climate change scenarios. Global Environmental Change, 10 (1), 57–68. doi: 10.1016/S0959-3780(00)00012-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorenzoni, I., et al., 2000b. A co-evolutionary approach to climate change impact assessment – part II: a scenario-based case study in East Anglia (UK). Global Environmental Change, 10 (2), 145–155. doi: 10.1016/S0959-3780(00)00016-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miljøverndepartementet, 2007. Norsk klimapolitikk, No. St.meld. nr. 34.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, 2005. Finland’s national strategy for adaptation to climate change. Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry of Finland. Publication No. 1a/2005.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, 2009. Evaluation of the implementation of Finland’s national strategy for adaptation to climate change 2009, No. 4a.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, 2011. Action plan for the adaptation to climate change of the Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry 2011–2015 – security of supply, sustainable competitiveness and risk management.
   Google Scholar
• MMM, 2012. Miten väistämättömään ilmastonmuutokseen voidaan varautua? – yhteenveto suomalaisesta sopeutumistutkimuksesta eri toimialoilla (in Finnish). Maa- ja metsätalousministeriön julkaisuja, No. 6/2011.
   Google Scholar
• Moss, R.H., et al., 2010. The next generation of scenarios for climate change research and assessment. Nature, 463 (7282), 747–756. doi: 10.1038/nature08823
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naess, L.O., et al., 2005. Institutional adaptation to climate change: flood responses at the municipal level in Norway. Global Environmental Change, 15 (2), 125–138. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2004.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakicenovic, N., et al., 2000. Special report on emissions scenarios: a special report of Working Group III of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. IPCC and Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• NOU, 2010. Tilpassing til eit klima i endring – Samfunnet si sårbarheit og behov for tilpassing til konsekvensar av klimaendringane. Oslo, No. NOU 2010:10.
   Google Scholar
• Pilli-Sihvola, K., et al., 2010. Survey on the use of climate scenarios and climate change research information in decision making in Finland, Sweden, and Norway. Finnish Meteorological Institute, No. 2010:2.
   Google Scholar
• PROVIA, 2013. PROVIA guidance on assessing vulnerability, impacts and adaptation to climate change. Nairobi, Kenya: United Nations Environment Programme, Consultation Document.
   Google Scholar
• Räisänen, J. and Räty, O., 2012. Projections of daily mean temperature variability in the future: cross-validation tests with ENSEMBLES regional climate simulations. Climate Dynamics, 41 (5–6), 1553–1568.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Räisänen, J. and Ruokolainen, L., 2008. Ongoing global warming and local warm extremes: a case study of winter 2006–2007 in Helsinki, Finland. Geophysica, 44 (1–2), 45–65.
   Google Scholar
• Regeringskansliet, 2009. En sammanhålllen klimat- och energipolitik. Stockholm, No. 2008/09:162.
   Google Scholar
• Rummukainen, M., et al., 2005. Anpassning till klimatförändringar. Kartläggning av arbete med sårbarhetsanalyser, anpassningsbehov och anpassningsåtgärder i Sverige till framtida klimatförändringar. Norrköping, Sweden: SMHI, No. 106.
   Google Scholar
• Shaw III, C.G., Everest, F.H., and Swanston, D.N., 2000. Working with knowledge at the science/policy interface: a unique example from developing the Tongass Land Management Plan. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 27 (1–3), 377–387. doi: 10.1016/S0168-1699(00)00093-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swedish Commission on Climate and Vulnerability, 2007. Sweden facing climate change – threats and opportunities, No. SOU 2007:60.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, K.E., Stouffer, R.J., and Meehl, G.A., 2012. An overview of CMIP5 and the experiment design. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 93 (4), 485–498. doi: 10.1175/BAMS-D-11-00094.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teutschbein, C. and Seibert, J., 2012. Bias correction of regional climate model simulations for hydrological climate-change impact studies: review and evaluation of different methods. Journal of Hydrology, 456–457, 12–29.
   Google Scholar
• Van der Sluijs, J., 2005. Uncertainty as a monster in the science-policy interface: four coping strategies. Water Science & Technology, 6, 87–92.
   Google Scholar
• Van Oort, B., et al., 2009. Climate change adaptation in Norway, Sweden, and Finland – do research, policy and practice meet? Report on results of Questionnaire 2 – Climate scenario users.
   Google Scholar
• Vogel, C., et al., 2007. Linking vulnerability, adaptation, and resilience science to practice: pathways, players, and partnerships. Global Environmental Change, 17 (3–4), 349–364. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2007.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weaver, C.P., et al., 2013. Improving the contribution of climate model information to decision making: the value and demands of robust decision frameworks. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 4 (1), 39–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Web References
   Google Scholar
• Climateguide, 2014. Available from: climateguide.fi [Accessed 28 March 2013].
   Google Scholar
• Climatools, 2012. Available from: www.foi.se/climatools/ [Accessed 10 May 2014].
   Google Scholar
• Climate Change Adaptation, 2009. Available from: regjeringen.no/en/sub/framtidensbyer/climate-change-adaptation-.html?id=548139 [Accessed 8 May 2014].
   Google Scholar
• Finnish Environment Institute, 2013. Available from: http://www.syke.fi/en-US/Research__Development/Research_and_development_projects/Projects/Assessing_the_adaptive_capacity_of_the_Finnish_environment_and_society_under_a_changing_climate_FINADAPT [Accessed 13 March 2014].
   Google Scholar
• Klimatanpassningsportalen, 2014. Available from: www.klimatanpassning.se/ [Accessed 28 March 2013].
   Google Scholar
• Klimatilpasning.no, 2014. Available from: www.klimatilpasning.no [Accessed 28 March 2013].
   Google Scholar
• Miljodirektoratet.no, 2013. Available from: http://www.miljodirektoratet.no/Custom/Views/Pages/StandardPageTemplate.aspx?id=13748&epslanguage=no [Accessed 8 May 2014].
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, 2014. Available from: mmm.fi/en/index/frontpage/climate_change_energy/adaption.html [Accessed 13 March 2014].
   Google Scholar
• Mistra-SWECIA, 2014. Available from: http://www.mistra-swecia.se/ [Accessed 10 May 2014].
   Google Scholar