Fair fracking? Ethics and environmental justice in United Kingdom shale gas policy and planning

References

• Agyeman, J., 2005. Sustainable communities and the challenge of environmental justice. New York: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Agyeman, J. and Evans, B., 2004. 'Just sustainability': the emerging discourse of environmental justice in Britain? The Geographical Journal, 170 (2), 155–164. doi: 10.1111/j.0016-7398.2004.00117.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnstein, S.R., 1969. A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35 (4), 216–224. doi: 10.1080/01944366908977225
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bentley, G. and Pugalis, L., 2013. New directions in economic development: localist policy discourses and the localism act. Local Economy, 28 (3), 257–274. doi: 10.1177/0269094212473940
   Google Scholar
• Berentzen, P., 2015. Fracking decision in Lancashire to be made by secretary of state. The Blackpool Gazette. Available from: http://www.blackpoolgazette.co.uk/news/business/breaking-fracking-decision-in-lancashire-to-be-made-by-secretary-of-state-1-7593163 [Accessed 5th January 2016]
   Google Scholar
• Bickle, M., et al., 2012. Shale gas extraction in the UK: a review of hydraulic fracturing. London: Royal Society and Royal Academy of Engineering.
   Google Scholar
• Blackpool Gazette, 2015. David Cameron: no rush on fracking. Backpool Gazette, 7 May.
   Google Scholar
• Blowers, A., 2014. A geological disposal facility for nuclear waste – if not Sellafield, then where? Town & Country Planning, (December), p. 545–553.
   Google Scholar
• Blowers, A. and Leroy, P., 1994. Power, politics and environmental inequality: a theoretical and empirical analysis of the process of peripheralisation. Environmental Politics, 3 (2), 197–228. doi: 10.1080/09644019408414139
   Google Scholar
• Bolton, R., Foxon, T. J., and Hall, S., 2015. Energy transitions and uncertainty: creating low carbon investment opportunities in the UK electricity sector. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy: doi:0263774X15619628.
   Google Scholar
• Cass, N., Walker, G., and Devine-Wright, P., 2010. Good neighbours, public relations and bribes: the politics and perceptions of community benefit provision in renewable energy development in the UK. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 12 (3), 255–275. doi: 10.1080/1523908X.2010.509558
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castán Broto, V., et al., 2010. Stigma and Attachment: performance of identity in an environmentally degraded place. Society & Natural Resources, 23 (10), 952–968. doi:10.1080/08941920802705776.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CCC, 2013. Reducing the UK’s carbon footprint and managing competitiveness risks. London: Committee on Climate Change.
   Google Scholar
• Centner, T.J. and Eberhart, N.S., 2015. The use of best management practices to respond to externalities from developing shale gas resources. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 1–23. doi:10.1080/09640568.2015.1039641.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colborn, T., et al., 2011. Natural gas operations from a public health perspective. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment, 17, 1039–1056. doi: 10.1080/10807039.2011.605662
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cotton, M., 2011. Public participation in UK infrastructure planning: democracy, technology and environmental justice. In: M. Cotton and B.H. Motta, eds. Engaging with environmental justice: governance, education and citizenship. Oxford: Inter-Disciplinary Press, 201–211.
   Google Scholar
• Cotton, M., 2013. NIMBY or not? Integrating social factors into shale gas community engagements. Natural Gas & Electricity, 29 (9), 8–12. doi: 10.1002/gas.21678
   Google Scholar
• Cotton, M., 2014. Environmental justice challenges in United Kingdom infrastructure planning: lessons from a Welsh Incinerator project. Environmental Justice, 7 (2), 39–44. doi: 10.1089/env.2013.0037
   Google Scholar
• Cotton, M. and Devine-Wright, P., 2012. Making electricity networks ‘visible’: industry actor representations of ‘publics’ and public engagement in infrastructure planning. Public Understanding of Science, 21 (1), 17–35. doi: 10.1177/0963662510362658
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cotton, M. and Devine-Wright, P., 2013. Putting pylons into place: a UK case study of public beliefs about the impacts of high voltage overhead transmission lines. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 56 (8), 1225–1245. doi: 10.1080/09640568.2012.716756
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cotton, M., Rattle, I., and Van Alstine, J., 2014. Shale gas policy in the United Kingdom: an argumentative discourse analysis. Energy Policy, 73, 427–438. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2014.05.031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cowell, R. and Owens, S., 2006. Governing space: planning reform and the politics of sustainability. Environment and Planning C, 24 (3), 403–421. doi: 10.1068/c0416j
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DECC, 2013a. Estimates of shale gas resource in North of England published, alongside a package of community benefits [online]. Available from: https://www.gov.uk/government/news/estimates-of-shale-gas-resource-in-north-of-england-published-alongside-a-package-of-community-benefits [Accessed 15 July 2015].
   Google Scholar
• DECC, 2013b. Onshore oil and gas exploration in the UK: regulation and best practice. London: Department of Energy and Climate Change.
   Google Scholar
• DECC, 2014. Fracking UK shale: planning permission and communities. London: Department of Energy & Climate Change.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Energy and Climate Change, 2014. Underground drilling access: government response to the consultation on proposal for underground access for the extraction of gas, oil or geothermal energy. London: The Office of Unconventional Gas and Oil and The Heat and Strategy Policy Team, Department of Energy & Climate Change.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Energy & Climate Change, Department for Communities and Local Government, The Rt Hon Greg Clark MP, 2015. Faster decision making on shale gas for economic growth and energy security. London: Department of Energy & Climate Change.
   Google Scholar
• Dworkin, R., 1978. Taking rights seriously. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dworkin, G., 1988. The theory and practice of autonomy. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ellsworth, W.L., 2013. Injection-induced earthquakes. Science, 341 (6142), 1225942. doi:10.1126/science.1225942.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Environment Agency, 2013. Onshore oil and gas exploratory operations: technical guidance. Bristol: Environment Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Environment Agency. 2015. Onshore oil & gas sector guidance consultation draft, November. Bristol: Environment Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, D., forthcoming. Ethics and ‘fracking’: a review of (the limited) moral thought on shale gas development. WIREs Water. doi:10.1002/wat2.1152
   Google Scholar
• Fisk, J.M., 2013. The right to know? State politics of fracking disclosure. Review of Policy Research, 30 (4), 345–365. doi:10.1111/ropr.12025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friends of the Earth. 2014. All that glitters … Is the regulation of unconventional gas and oil exploration in England really ‘gold standard?’ London: Friends of the Earth.
   Google Scholar
• Gillen, Jennifer L. and Kiviat, Erik, 2012. Hydraulic fracturing threats to species with restricted geographic ranges in the Eastern United States. Environmental Practice, 14 (4), 320–331. doi: 10.1017/S1466046612000361
   Google Scholar
• Gosden, E., 2015. Fracking: communities may miss out on cash payments [online]. The Telegraph. Available from: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/earth/energy/fracking/11462840/Fracking-communities-may-miss-out-on-cash-payments.html [Accessed 10 March 2015].
   Google Scholar
• Green, C.A., Styles, P., and Baptie, B., 2012. Preese Hall shale gas fracturing: review & recommendations for induced seismic mitigation. London: Department of Energy & Climate Change.
   Google Scholar
• Groves, C., Munday, M., and N. Yakovleva, 2013. Fighting the pipe: neo-liberal governance and barriers to effective community participation in energy infrastructure planning. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 31 (2), 340–356. doi: 10.1068/c11331r
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grubert, E., 2016. Response to “discourse over a contested technology on Twitter: a case study of hydraulic fracturing” – Word choice as political speech. Public Understanding of Science. doi:10.1177/0963662515626310.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilson, C., 2015. Framing fracking: which frames are heard in English planning and environmental policy and practice? Journal of Environmental Law, 27 (2), 177–202. doi:10.1093/jel/equ036.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hindmarsh, R. and Matthews, C., 2008. Deliberative speak at the turbine face: community engagement, wind farms, and renewable energy transitions, in Australia. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 10 (3), 217–232. doi: 10.1080/15239080802242662
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HM Treasury, 2013a. Harnessing the potential of the UK’s natural resources: a fiscal regime for shale gas. London: HM Treasury.
   Google Scholar
• HM Treasury, 2013b. Spending round 2013. London: HM Treasury.
   Google Scholar
• Hope, C., 2016. Ministers plot to foil anti-frackers [online]. The Telegraphy. Available from: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/earth/energy/fracking/12130801/Ministers-plot-to-foil-anti-frackers.html [Accessed 10th January 2016].
   Google Scholar
• Howarth, R., Santoro, R., and Ingraffea, A., 2011. Methane and the greenhouse-gas footprint of natural gas from shale formations. Climatic Change, 106 (4), 679–690. doi: 10.1007/s10584-011-0061-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobsen, G.D. and Parker, D.P., 2014. The economic aftermath of resource booms: evidence from boomtowns in the American West. The Economic Journal. doi:10.1111/ecoj.12173
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenner, S. and Lamadrid, A.J., 2013. Shale gas vs. coal: policy implications from environmental impact comparisons of shale gas, conventional gas, and coal on air, water, and land in the United States. Energy Policy, 53, 442–453. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.11.010. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2012.11.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnstone, P., 2010. The nuclear power renaissance in the UK: democratic deficiencies within the'consensus’ on sustainability. Human Geography, 3 (2), 91–104.
   Google Scholar
• Johnstone, P., 2014. Planning reform, rescaling, and the construction of the postpolitical: the case of The Planning Act 2008 and nuclear power consultation in the UK. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 32 (4), 697–713. doi: 10.1068/c1225
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaswan, A., 2002. Distributive justice and the environment. NCL Rev, 81, 1031–1148.
   Google Scholar
• Konkel, L., 2015. What’s NORMal for fracking? Estimating total radioactivity of produced fluids. Environmental Health Perspectives, 123 (7), A186. doi:10.1289/ehp.123-A186.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lancashire County Council, 2015. Agenda and minutes of the Development Control Committee [online], Wednesday, 28th January, 2015 10.00 am. Lancashire County Council. Available from: http://council.lancashire.gov.uk/ieListDocuments.aspx?CId=118&MId=4340&Ver=4 [Accessed 10th January 2016].
   Google Scholar
• Lawrence, R.L., Daniels, S.E., and Stankey, G.H., 1997. Procedural justice and public involvement in natural resource decision making. Society & Natural Resources, 10 (6), 577–589. doi: 10.1080/08941929709381054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacKay, D. and Stone, T., 2013. Potential greenhouse gas emissions associated with shale gas extraction and use. London: Department of Energy & Climate Change.
   Google Scholar
• Mackerron, G., 2015. Multiple challenges: nuclear waste governance in the United Kingdom. In: A. Brunnengräber, M.R. Di Nucci, A.M.I. Losada, L. Mez and M.A. Schreurs, eds. Nuclear waste governance: an international comparison. Wiesbaden: Springer VS, 101–116.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, T., 2013. The remodeling of decision making on major infrastructure in Britain. Planning Practice & Research, 28 (1), 122–140. doi: 10.1080/02697459.2012.699255
   Google Scholar
• Maule, A.L., et al., 2013. Disclosure of hydraulic fracturing fluid chemical additives: analysis of regulations. NEW SOLUTIONS: A Journal of Environmental and Occupational Health Policy, 23 (1), 167–187. doi: 10.2190/NS.23.1.j
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McGowan, F., 2012. Regulating innovation: European responses to shale gas development. Environmental Politics, 1–18. doi:10.1080/09644016.2012.740939.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Melo-Martín, I., Hays, J., and Finkel, M.L., 2014. The role of ethics in shale gas policies. Science of the Total Environment, 470, 1114–1119. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.10.088
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meng, Q. and Ashby, S., 2014. Distance: a critical aspect for environmental impact assessment of hydraulic fracking. The Extractive Industries and Society, 1 (2), 124–126. doi: 10.1016/j.exis.2014.07.004
   Google Scholar
• Mercer, A., de Rijke, K., and Dressler, W., 2014. Silence in the midst of the boom: coal seam gas, neoliberalizing discourse, and the future of regional Australia. Journal of Political Ecology, 21, 279–302.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, S., 2012. Gas Works? Shale gas and its policy implications. London: Policy Exchange.
   Google Scholar
• Myers, T., 2012. Potential contaminant pathways from hydraulically fractured shale to aquifers. Groundwater, 50 (6), 872–882. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6584.2012.00933.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newbery, D.M., in press. Towards a green energy economy? The EU Energy Union’s transition to a low-carbon zero subsidy electricity system – Lessons from the UK’s electricity market reform [online]. Applied Energy. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.01.046.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Donnell, M., Gilfillan, S., and Haszeldine, S., 2016. Energy and carbon [online]. http://energyandcarbon.com/uk-failing-lessons-fracking-waste-water/ [Accessed 15 April 2016].
   Google Scholar
• O’Hara, S., et al., 2014. Public perception of shale gas extractionin the UK: the turn against fracking deepens. Nottingham: University of Nottingham.
   Google Scholar
• O’Hara, S., et al., 2013. Public perception of shale gas extraction in the UK: The impact of the Balcombe protests in July-August 2013. Nottingham: Nottingham University.
   Google Scholar
• O’Riordan, T., Kemp, R., and Purdue, M., 1988. Sizewell B: an anatomy of the inquiry. Basingstoke: MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Pearson, I., et al., 2012. Unconventional gas: potential energy market impacts in the European Union. Petten: European Commission Joint Research Centre - Institute for Energy and Transport.
   Google Scholar
• Persaud, K., 2016. Rudd and UK renewables – A question of obstructions. Renewable Energy Focus, 17 (2), 56–57. doi: 10.1016/j.ref.2016.02.004. doi: 10.1016/j.ref.2016.02.004
   Google Scholar
• Prime Minister’s Office, 2014a. Local councils to receive millions in business rates from shale gas developments. London: Prime Minister's Office, The Rt Hon Michael Fallon MP, Department for Communities and Local Government.
   Google Scholar
• Prime Minister’s Office, 2014b. Local councils to receive millions in business rates from shale gas developments [online]. GOV.UK. Available from: https://www.gov.uk/government/news/local-councils-to-receive-millions-in-business-rates-from-shale-gas-developments. [Accessed 10 December 2015].
   Google Scholar
• Prime Minister’s Office, 2014c. The Queen's speech 2014. London: Prime Minister's Office.
   Google Scholar
• Rahm, B.G. and Riha, S.J., 2012. Toward strategic management of shale gas development: regional, collective impacts on water resources. Environmental Science & Policy, 17, 12–23. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2011.12.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rawles, K., 2002. Compensation in radioactive waste management: ethical issues in the treatment of host communities. Harwell: United Kingdom Nirex Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Rawls, J., 1999. A theory of justice. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rudd, A., 2015. Amber Rudd, Secretary of State for energy and climate change on shale gas. London: Department of Energy & Climate Change.
   Google Scholar
• Rural Community Policy Unit, 2014. Shale gas: rural economy impacts (redacted). London: Rural Policy Team, Defra.
   Google Scholar
• Schlosberg, D., 2007. Defining environmental justice: theories, movements, and nature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schrag, D.P., 2012. Shale gas good for climate change? Daedalus, 141 (2), 72–80. doi: 10.1162/DAED_a_00147
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schreiber, S.P., 2013. Before you sign: natural gas lease tax issues: as more States permit fracking to recover shale gas, CPAs will increasingly encounter clients with tax issues arising from this activity. Journal of Accountancy, 216 (5), 44–46.
   Google Scholar
• Schulz, H.-M., Horsfield, B., and Sachsenhofer, R. F., 2010. Shale gas in Europe: a regional overview and current research activities. Geological Society, London, Petroleum Geology Conference Series, 7, 1079–1085. doi:10.1144/0071079.
   Google Scholar
• Shrader-Frechette, K.S., 2002. Environmental justice: creating equality, reclaiming democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, N., Turner, P., and Williams, G., 2010. UK data and analysis for shale gas prospectivity. Petroleum Geology Conference Series, 7, 1087–1098. doi:10.1144/0071087.
   Google Scholar
• Sovacool, B.K., 2013. Energy & ethics: justice and the global energy challenge. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Swyngedouw, E., 2007. Impossible “sustainability” and the postpolitical condition. In: edited by R. Krueger and R. Gibbs, eds. The sustainable development paradox: urban political economy in the United States and Europe. New York: The Guildford Press, 13–40.
   Google Scholar
• Trembath, A., et al., 2012. Where the shale gas revolution care from: Government's role in the hydraulic fracturing of shale. Oakland, CA: The Breakthrough Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Turney, R., 2013. Fracking and the National planning policy framwork. London: Landmark Chambers.
   Google Scholar
• UKOOG, 2015. Guidelines for UK well operators on onshore shale gas wells. London: Uniked Kingdom Onshore Oil and Gas.
   Google Scholar
• United Kingdom Onshore Oil and Gas, 2013. Community engagement charter: oil and gas from unconventional reservoirs. London: United Kingdom Onshore Oil and Gas.
   Google Scholar
• Vaughan, A., 2016. UK ministers make it ‘top priority’ to ensure nature laws do not hamper fracking [online]. Guardian, 1 Feb. Available from: http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2016/feb/01/uk-ministers-make-it-top-priority-to-ensure-nature-laws-do-not-hamper-fracking [Accessed 20 February 2016].
   Google Scholar
• Walker, G., et al., 2005. Industrial pollution and social deprivation: evidence and complexity in evaluating and responding to environmental inequality. Local Environment, 10 (4), 361–377. doi: 10.1080/13549830500160842
   Google Scholar
• Walker, G.P. and Bulkeley, H. 2006. Geographies of environmental justice. Geoforum, 37 (5), 655–659. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2005.12.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watt, N., 2014. Fracking in the UK: ‘we're going all out for shale,’ admits Cameron [online]. The Guardian. Available from: http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2014/jan/13/shale-gas-fracking-cameron-all-out [Accessed 20 February 2016]
   Google Scholar
• Wigley, T.M.L., 2011. Coal to gas: the influence of methane leakage. Climatic Change, 108 (3), 601–608. doi: 10.1007/s10584-011-0217-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, L. et al., 2015. Framing ‘fracking’: Exploring public perceptions of hydraulic fracturing in the United Kingdom. Public Understanding of Science. doi:10.1177/0963662515595159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar