Planning for a sustainable Oslo: the challenge of turning urban theory into practice

References

• Andersen, B., 2014. Westbound and eastbound. Managing sameness and the making of separations in Oslo. Thesis (PhD). University of Oslo, Oslo.
   Google Scholar
• Andersen, B. and Biseth, H., 2013. The myth of failed integration: the case of eastern Oslo. City & Society, 25 (1), 5–24. doi: 10.1111/ciso.12004
   Google Scholar
• Andersen, B. and Røe, P.G., 2016. The social context and politics of large scale urban architecture: investigating the design of Barcode, Oslo. European Urban and Regional Studies. doi:10.1177/0969776416643751
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersen, H.S., Turner, L.M., and Søholt, S., 2013. The special attention of housing policy for ethnic minorities: evidence from a comparison of four Nordic countries. International Journal of Housing Policy, 13 (1), 20–44. doi: 10.1080/14616718.2013.764659
   Google Scholar
• Andersen, B., Røe, P.G., and Sæter, O., 2015. Trust and distrust in Oslo: examining the relationship between the ideals of urban policy and (re)actions and ideals of citizens. In: E. Righard, M. Johansson, and T. Salonen, eds. Social transformations in Scandinavian cities: Nordic perspectives on urban marginalisation and social sustainability. Lund: Nordic Academic Press, 107–123.
   Google Scholar
• Blom, S., 2012. Innvandrernes bostedspreferanser – årsak til innvandrertett bosetting? [online]. Available from: https://www.ssb.no/a/publikasjoner/pdf/rapp_201244/rapp_201244.pdf [Accessed 4 September 2015].
   Google Scholar
• Bo-Vel Furuset. and Furuset Vel, 2014. Høringsuttalelse til kommuneplan “Oslo mot 2030” – smart, trygg og grønn” – fra Bo-Vel Furuset og Furuset Vel [online]. Available from https://www.oslo.kommune.no/getfile.php/Innhold/Politikk20OG20administrasjon/Kommuneplan/HC3B8ringsuttalelser20KOMMUNEPLANEN/BO-VEL20Furuset20OG20Furuset%20Vel-201305239-285.pdf [Accessed 2 February 2015].
   Google Scholar
• Brattbakk, I., 2014. Majoritetens syn på minoriteter i nabolaget – ønsket mangfold eller flukt og unnvikelse. Paper presented at the Etnisk boligsegregering på norsk: Hva skjer og hvorfor? Litteraturhuset, Oslo.
   Google Scholar
• Brattbakk, I. and Hansen, T., 2004. Post-war large housing estates in Norway – well-kept residential areas still stigmatised? Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 19 (3), 311–332. doi: 10.1007/s10901-004-0697-9
   Google Scholar
• Brenner, N., Marcuse, P., and Mayer, M., 2012. Cities for people, not for profit: an introduction. In: N. Brenner, P. Marcuse, and M. Mayer, eds. Cities for people, not for profit: Critical urban theory and the right to the city. London: Routledge, 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Bydel, Grorud, 2014. Kommuneplan “Oslo mot 2030 – smart, trygg og grønn”. Høringsuttalelse [online]. Available from https://www.oslo.kommune.no/getfile.php/Innhold/Politikk20OG20administrasjon/Kommuneplan/HC3B8ringsuttalelser20KOMMUNEPLANEN/BYDEL20Grorud-201305239-337-A.pdf [Accessed 10 January 2015].
   Google Scholar
• Carmon, N. and Fainstein, S.S., 2013. Policy, planning, and people: promoting justice in urban development. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cassiers, T. and Kesteloot, C., 2012. Socio-spatial inequalities and social cohesion in European cities. Urban Studies, 49 (9), 1909–1924. doi:10.1177/0042098012444888
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cervero, R., 2004. Transit and the metropolis: finding harmony. In: S. M. Wheeler and T. Beatley, eds. The sustainable urban development reader. London: Routledge, 89–96.
   Google Scholar
• Davidson, M., 2009. Social sustainability: a potential for politics? Local Environment, 14 (7), 607–619. doi: 10.1080/13549830903089291
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidson, M., 2010a. Hacking away at sustainability. Human Geography, 3 (2), 83–90.
   Google Scholar
• Davidson, M., 2010b. Social sustainability and the city. Geography Compass, 4 (7), 872–880. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-8198.2010.00339.x
   Google Scholar
• Falleth, E. I., Hanssen, G. S., and Saglie, I.-L., 2008. Medvirkning i byplanlegging i Norge [online]. Available from http://www.nibr.no/filer/2008-37.ny.pdf [Accessed 25 March 2015].
   Google Scholar
• Flierl, B. and Marcuse, P., 2012. Socialist cities, for people or for power? Bruno Flierl in conversation with Peter Marcuse. In: N. Brenner, P. Marcuse, and M. Mayer, eds. Cities for people, not for profit: Critical urban theory and the right to the city. London: Routledge, 231–249.
   Google Scholar
• Florida, R., 2002. The rise of the creative class: and how it’s transforming work, leisure, community and everyday life. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Florida, R., 2005. Cities and the creative class. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Florida, R., 2007. The flight of the creative class: the new global competition for talent. New York: Collins.
   Google Scholar
• FutureBuilt, 2015. What is FutureBuilt? [online]. Available from http://www.futurebuilt.no/english1 [Accessed 24 April 2015].
   Google Scholar
• Gibbs, D., Krueger, R., and MacLeod, G., 2013. Grappling with smart city politics in an era of market triumphalism. Urban Studies, 50 (11), 2151–2157. doi: 10.1177/0042098013491165
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giddens, A., 2011. The politics of climate change. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grant, J.L., 2009. Theory and practice in planning the suburbs: challenges to implementing new urbanism, smart growth, and sustainability principles. Planning Theory & Practice, 10 (1), 11–33. doi: 10.1080/14649350802661683
   Google Scholar
• Gressgård, R., 2015. The power of (re)attachment in urban strategy: interrogation the framing of social sustainability in Malmö. Environment and Planning A, 47 (1), 108–120. doi: 10.1068/a130167p
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hacking, I., 1999. The social construction of what? Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, P., 2003. Cities of tomorrow: an intellectual history of urban planning and design in the twentieth century. 3rd ed. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, T. and Guttu, J., 2000. Oslo kommunes boligpolitikk 1960–1989. Fra storskalabygging til frislepp. Oslo: NIBR.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, A. and Moore, S., 2015. Convergence and divergence in conceptualising and planning the sustainable city: an introduction. Area. doi:10.1111/area.12176
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holt-Jensen, A. and Pollock, E., 2009. Urban sustainability and governance; new challenges in Nordic–Baltic housing policies. New York: Nova Science Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Imrie, R. and Lees, L., 2014. Sustainable London? The future of a global city. Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kjeldstadli, K. and Myhre, J. E., 1995. Oslo – spenningenes by: oslohistorie. Oslo: Pax.
   Google Scholar
• Krueger, R. and Agyeman, J., 2005. Sustainability schizophrenia or “actually existing sustainabilities?” Toward a broader understanding of the politics and promise of local sustainability in the US. Geoforum, 36 (4), 410–417. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2004.07.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krueger, R. and Gibbs, D., 2007. Introduction: problematizing the politics of sustainability. In: R. Krueger and D. Gibbs, eds. The sustainable development paradox: urban political economy in the United States and Europe. New York: The Guilford Press, 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Lange, E., 2015. Trygghet og økt velferd [online]. Available from https://www.norgeshistorie.no/velferdsstat-og-vestvending/mennesker/1801-trygghet-og-okt-velferd.html [Accessed 22 May 2016].
   Google Scholar
• Ley, D., 2010. Millionaire migrants: trans-pacific life lines. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Long, J., 2014. Constructing the narrative of the sustainability fix: sustainability, social justice and representation in Austin, TX. Urban Studies, 1–24. doi:10.1177/0042098014560501
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lukes, S., 2005. Power: a radical view. 2nd ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Marcuse, P., 1998. Sustainability is not enough. Environment and Urbanization, 10 (2), 103–111. doi: 10.1177/095624789801000201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcuse, P., 2012. Whose right(s) to what city. In: N. Brenner, P. Marcuse, and M. Mayer, eds. Cities for people, not for profit: critical urban theory and the right to the city. London: Routledge, 24–41.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Local Government and Regional Development, 2002. St.meld. nr. 31 (2002-2003). Storbymeldingen [online]. Available from Oslo https://www.regjeringen.no/no/dokumenter/stmeld-nr-31-2002-2003-/id402979/ [Accessed 7 September 2015].
   Google Scholar
• Molotch, H., 1976. The city as a growth machine: toward a political economy of place. The American Journal of Sociology, 82(2), 309–332. doi: 10.1086/226311
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myhre, J.E., 1990. Hovedstaden Christiania: fra 1814 til 1900 (Vol. 3). Oslo: Cappelen.
   Google Scholar
• National Association of Norwegian Architects, 2010. Furuset – fra senter til sentrum [online]. Available from http://www.arkitektur.no/furuset-fra-senter-til-sentrum [Accessed 4 September 2015].
   Google Scholar
• Næss, P., 2012. Kritisk realisme og byplanforskning. FORMakademisk, 5 (2), 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Næss, P., 2014. Urban form, sustainability and health: the case of greater Oslo. European Planning Studies, 22 (7), 1524–1543. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2013.797383
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Næss, P. and Høyer, K.G., 2009. The emperor’s green clothes: growth, decoupling, and capitalism. Capitalism Nature Socialism, 20 (3), 74–95. doi: 10.1080/10455750903215753
   Google Scholar
• Neuman, M., 2005. The compact city fallacy. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 25(1), 11–26. doi: 10.1177/0739456X04270466
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman, P. and Kenworthy, J., 2004. Traffic calming. In: S.M. Wheeler and T. Beatley, eds. The sustainable urban development reader. London: Routledge, 97–103.
   Google Scholar
• Nore, N., et al., 2014. Areal – og transportutvikling i Osloregionen – faktagrunnlag. TØI rapport 1378/2014 [online]. Available from https://www.toi.no/getfile.php/Publikasjoner/TC398I20rapporter/2014/1378-2014/1378-hele20rapporten%20el.pdf [Accessed 25 June 2015].
   Google Scholar
• Passell, A., 2013. Building the new urbanism: places, professions, and profits in the American metropolitean landscape. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Peck, J., 2004. Struggling with the creative class. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 29 (4), 740–770. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2427.2005.00620.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Røe, P.G., 2014. Analysing place and place-making: urbanization in suburban Oslo. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 38 (2), 498–515. doi: 10.1111/1468-2427.12113
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Røe, P.G. and Saglie, I.-L., 2011. Minicities in suburbia – a model for urban sustainability? FORMakademisk, 4 (2), 38–58.
   Google Scholar
• Sachs, W., 1999. Sustainable development and the crisis of nature: on the political anatomy of an oxymoron. In: F. Fischer and M.A. Hajer, eds. Living with nature. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 23–41.
   Google Scholar
• Short, J. R., 2012. Globalization, modernity and the city. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Skrede, J., 2013. The issue of sustainable urban development in a neoliberal age: discursive entanglements and disputes. FORMakademisk, 6 (1), 1–15. doi: 10.7577/formakademisk.609
   Google Scholar
• Skrede, J., 2014. The value of culture. Discourse approaches to culture, capital and urban change. Thesis (PhD), Aalborg University, Aalborg.
   Google Scholar
• Skrede, J., 2015. What may culture contribute to urban sustainability? Critical reflections on the uses of culture in urban development in Oslo and beyond. Journal of Urbanism, 1–18. doi:10.1080/175491175.2015.1074603
   Google Scholar
• Slater, T., 2012. Missing Marcuse: on gentrification and displacement. In: N. Brenner, P. Marcuse, and M. Mayer, eds. Cities for people, not for profit: critical urban theory and the right to the city. London: Routledge, 171–196.
   Google Scholar
• Slater, T., 2013. Your life chances affect where you live: a critique of the ‘cottage industry’ of neighbourhood effects research. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 37 (2), 367–387. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2427.2013.01215.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slettholm, A., 2013, April 11. Så vanskelig er det å bygge i vest, Aftenposten. Aftenposten, 6–7.
   Google Scholar
• Statistics Norway, 2014, December. Labour force survey, seasonally-adjusted figures [online]. Available from http://ssb.no/en/arbeid-og-lonn/statistikker/akumnd/maaned [Accessed 15 April 2015].
   Google Scholar
• Statistics Norway, 2015, January. Arbeidskraftundersøkinga, sesongjusterte tal [online]. Available from http://www.ssb.no/arbeid-og-lonn/statistikker/akumnd [Accessed 15 April 2015].
   Google Scholar
• Tammaru, T., et al., 2015. Socio-economic segregation in European capital cities: east meets west. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• The Municipality of Oslo, 2011. Oslotrender 2011. Vedlegg til høringsutkast til planstrategi og planprogram for Kommuneplan 2013 [online]. Available from https://www.oslo.kommune.no/dok/Bbj5C05CVEDLEGG%5C2011004044-66227.pdf [Accessed 25 March 2015].
   Google Scholar
• The Municipality of Oslo, 2013a. Småhusplanen: Sterkere vern av det grønne [online]. Available from http://byplanoslo.no/content/smahusplanen-sterkere-vern-av-det-gronne [Accessed 6 July 2015].
   Google Scholar
• The Municipality of Oslo, 2013b. Strategi for utvikling av kulturnæring i Oslo. Oslo: Kulturmeglerne AS.
   Google Scholar
• The Municipality of Oslo, 2014. Smart, trygg, grønn. Kommuneplan for Oslo. Oslo mot 2030 [online]. Available from http://www.kommuneplan.oslo.kommune.no/getfile.php/Kommuneplan20FOR20Oslo2028KPO29/INTERNETT2028KPO29/Dokumenter/Vedlegg201-HC3B8RINGSUTKAST-KOMMUNEPLAN202030-web.pdf [Accessed 5 May 2015].
   Google Scholar
• The Municipality of Oslo, 2015a. Idékonkurranse Hovinbyen: Fire klare vinnere [online]. Available from http://byplanoslo.no/content/idekonkurranse-hovinbyen-fire-klare-vinnere [Accessed 25 March 2015].
   Google Scholar
• The Municipality of Oslo, 2015b, April 15. Smart, trygg, grønn. Kommuneplan 2015. Oslo mot 2030. Samfunnsdel og byutviklingsstrategi [online]. Available from https://www.oslo.kommune.no/sru/rightframes.asp?bottomurl=utv5FCASEINFO2Easp3FCASENO3D1743826UTVALG3DBR126DAYNO3D812E226Year3D152E042E201526db5FSOURCE3D1 [Accessed 21 April 2015].
   Google Scholar
• The Municipality of Oslo, 2015c. Vedlegg 26: Sammendrag av høringsinnspill med kommentarer. Oslo: The Municipality of Oslo [online]. Available from https://www.oslo.kommune.no/sru/rightframes.asp?bottomurl=utv5FCASEINFO2Easp3FCASENO3D1743826UTVALG3DBR126DAYNO3D812E226Year3D152E042E201526db5FSOURCE3D1 [Accessed 22 April 2015].
   Google Scholar
• The Municipality of Oslo, 2015d, March 3. Visjoner for Oslo [online]. Available from http://byplanoslo.no/content/visjoner-oslo [Accessed 22 April 2015].
   Google Scholar
• Tretter, E.M., 2013a. Contesting sustainability: ‘smart growth’ and the redevelopment of Austin’s eastside. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 37 (1), 297–310. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2427.2012.01166.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tretter, E.M., 2013b. Sustainability and neoliberal urban development: the environment, crime and the remaking of Austin’s downtown. Urban Studies, 50 (11), 2222–2237. doi: 10.1177/0042098013478234
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Troutman, P., 2004. A growth machine’s plan B. Journal of Urban Affairs, 26 (5), 611–622. doi: 10.1111/j.0735-2166.2004.00217.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wacquant, L.J.D., 2008. Red belt, black belt: racial division, class inequality and the state in the French urban periphery and the American Ghetto. In: E. Mingione, ed. Urban poverty and the underclass. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers Ltd, 234–274.
   Google Scholar
• WCED, 1987. Our common future. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wessel, T., 2000. Social polarisation and socioeconomic segregation in a welfare state: the case of Oslo. Urban Studies, 37 (11), 1947–1967. doi:10.1080/713707228
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• While, A., Jonas, A.E.G., and Gibbs, D., 2004. The environment and the entrepreneurial city: searching for the urban ‘sustainability fix’ in Manchester and Leeds. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 28 (3), 549–569. doi: 10.1111/j.0309-1317.2004.00535.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar