Functions of sustainability: exploring what urban sustainability policy discourse “does” in the Gothenburg Metropolitan Area

References

• Andersson, R., Bråmå, Å., and Hogdal, J., 2010. Fattiga och rika – segregerad stad flyttningar och segregationens dynamik i Göteborg 1990–2006. Göteborgs Stad: Social Resursförvaltning.
   Google Scholar
• Béal, V., 2012. Urban governance, sustainability and environmental movements: post-democracy in French and British cities. European Urban and Regional Studies, 19 (4), 404–419. doi: 10.1177/0969776411428562
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brenner, N., 2009. New state spaces: urban governance and the rescaling of statehood. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brorström, S., 2015. Strategizing sustainability: the case of River City, Gothenburg. Cities, 42 (Part A), 25–30. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2014.08.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bulkeley, H. and Betsill, M.M., 2013. Revisiting the urban politics of climate change. Environmental Politics, 22, 136–154. doi: 10.1080/09644016.2013.755797
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Business Region Gothenburg (BRG), 2005. Tillväxt i Göteborgsregionen: Ett underlag för regionens tillväxtstrategi [Growth in the Gothenburg region: a foundation for the region’s growth strategy]. Gothenburg: Business Region Gothenburg AB.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, S., 1996. Green cities, growing cities, just cities? Urban planning and the contradictions of sustainable development. Journal of the American Planning Association, 62, 296–312. doi: 10.1080/01944369608975696
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connelly, S., 2007. Mapping sustainable development as a contested concept. Local Environment, 12, 259–278. doi: 10.1080/13549830601183289
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, R.H. and Béland, D., 2013. Valence, policy ideas, and the rise of sustainability. Governance, 26 (2), 307–328. doi: 10.1111/gove.12003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cullberg, M., Montin, S., and Tahvilzadeh, N., 2014. Urban challenges, policy and action in Gothenburg: gaps project baseline study. Mistra Urban Futures Report 2014:5. Gothenburg: Mistra Urban Futures.
   Google Scholar
• Davidson, K., 2014. A typology to categorize the ideologies of actors in the sustainable development debate. Sustainable Development, 22, 1–14. doi: 10.1002/sd.520
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Despotovic, K. and Thörn, C., 2015. Den urbana fronten: En dokumentation av makten över staden. Stockholm: Arkitektur Förlag Ab.
   Google Scholar
• van Dijk, T.A., 1993. Elite discourse and racism. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Engelman, R., 2013. Beyond sustainababble. In: L. Starke, E. Assadourian and T. Prugh, eds. State of the world 2013: is sustainability still possible? Washington, DC: Island Press, 3–16.
   Google Scholar
• Etherington, D. and Jones, M., 2009. City regions: new geographies of uneven development and inequality. Regional Studies, 43, 247–265. doi: 10.1080/00343400801968353
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer, F., 2005. Policy discourse and the politics of Washington think tanks. In: F. Fischer and J. Forester, eds. The argumentative turn in policy analysis and planning. 3rd ed. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 21–42.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbs, D.C., 1998. ‘Struggling with sustainability’: weak and strong interpretations of sustainable development within local authority policy. Environment and Planning A, 30 (8), 1351–1365. doi: 10.1068/a301351
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbs, D. and Kreuger, R., 2007. Containing the contradictions of rapid development? New economy spaces and sustainable urban development. In: R. Krueger and D. Gibbs, eds. The sustainable development paradox: urban political economy in the United States and Europe. New York: Guilford Press, 95–122.
   Google Scholar
• Göteborg, 2014a. Klimatstrategiskt program för Göteborg [Climate strategy program for Gothenburg]. Gothenburg: Environment and Climate Committee of Gothenburg City and the Environmental Department.
   Google Scholar
• Göteborg, 2014b. Skillnader i livsvillkor och hälsa i Göteborg. [Differences in living conditions and health in Gothenburg]. Intermediate report. Available from: www.goteborg.se
   Google Scholar
• Göteborg, 2016a. Budget 2016. För ett jämlikt och hållbart Göteborg. Mål och inriktningsdokument för Göteborgs Stad. Socialdemokraterna, Miljöpartiet de gröna, Vänsterpartiet, Feministiskt initiativ. (Budget 2016. For an equal and sustainable Gothenburg. Objectives and directions document for the city of Gothenburg. The Social democrats, The Swedish Green party, The Left party, Feministiskt Initiativ).
   Google Scholar
• Göteborg, 2016b. The international website of the city of Gothenburg. Available from: http://international.goteborg.se/ [Accessed 9 September 2016].
   Google Scholar
• Göteborg Region Association of Local Authorities (GR), 1999. Transportstrategi för Göteborgsregionen med omland eller “Så ska vi hát” [Transport strategy for the Gothenburg region with surrounding area or “That’s the way were having it”]. Gothenburg: Göteborg Region Association of Local Authorities.
   Google Scholar
• Göteborg Region Association of Local Authorities (GR), 2002. Kommunal samverkan – Regional styrka. Inbjudan till rådslag. Ett Diskussionsunderlag [Municipal collaboration – Regional strength. An invitation to take part in the consultation process. A basis for discussion]. Gothenburg: Göteborg Region Association of Local Authorities.
   Google Scholar
• Göteborg Region Association of Local Authorities (GR), 2004. Inbjudan till fortsatta rådslag. Ett diskussions- och faktaunderlag Göteborgsregionens kommunalförbund – december 2004 [Invitation to take part in ongoing consultation. A discussion and fact-based document prepared by the Göteborg Region Association of Local Authorities -– December 2004]. Gothenburg: Göteborg Region Association of Local Authorities.
   Google Scholar
• Göteborg Region Association of Local Authorities (GR), 2005a. Hur kan vi samverka för att utveckla Göteborgsregionen? Resultat från rådslag – andra rundan – 2005 [How can we collaborate to develop the Gothenburg region? Results of consultation – second round – 2005]. Gothenburg: Göteborg Region Association of Local Authorities.
   Google Scholar
• Göteborg Region Association of Local Authorities (GR), 2005b. Tio år med GR. Göteborgsregionens kommunalförbund 1995–2005 [Ten years of GR: Göteborg Region Association of Local Authorities 1995–2005]. Gothenburg: Göteborg Region Association of Local Authorities.
   Google Scholar
• Göteborg Region Association of Local Authorities (GR), 2006. Uthållig tillväxt: Mål och strategier med fokus på regional hållbar struktur. En del av det goda livet i Göteborgsregionen [Sustained Growth: Objectives and strategies with a focus on regional sustainable structures. Part of “A good life” in the Gothenburg region]. Gothenburg: Göteborg Region Association of Local Authorities.
   Google Scholar
• Göteborg Region Association of Local Authorities (GR), 2008. Strukturbild för Göteborgsregionen. En överenskommelse om att vi gemensamt tar ansvar för att den regionala strukturen är långsiktigt hållbar [Structural illustration for the Gothenburg Region. An agreement concerning our shared responsibility for ensuring that our regional structure is sustainable in the long term]. Gothenburg: Göteborg Region Association of Local Authorities.
   Google Scholar
• Göteborg Region Association of Local Authorities (GR), 2009a. Avtal avseende ett paket för infrastrukturåtgärder i Västsverige [Agreement on a package of infrastructure measures for Western Sweden]. Letter to the Board, 23 October 2009, Dnr: 09-160.20. Gothenburg: Göteborg Region Association of Local Authorities.
   Google Scholar
• Göteborg Region Association of Local Authorities (GR), 2009b. Hållbarhetsmodeller – vad är hållbar utveckling? [Sustainability models – what is sustainable development?]. Gothenburg: Göteborg Region Association of Local Authorities.
   Google Scholar
• Göteborg Region Association of Local Authorities (GR), 2010. Socialt hållbar utveckling i Göteborgsregionen: ett kunskapsunderlag [Socially sustainable development in the Gothenburg Region: a baseline analysis]. Gothenburg: Göteborg Region Association of Local Authorities.
   Google Scholar
• Göteborg Region Association of Local Authorities (GR), 2012a. Välfärdsbilder i Göteborgsregionen, En rapport från Göteborgsregionens kommunalförbund 2012 [Quality-of-life indicators for the Gothenburg region: a report by the Göteborg Region Association of Local Authorities 2012]. Gothenburg: Göteborg Region Association of Local Authorities.
   Google Scholar
• Göteborg Region Association of Local Authorities (GR), 2012b. Uthållig tillväxt – uppdatering. Underlag inför rådslag 5, kommunal reflektion [Sustained growth – update. Background information for Consultation 5, debate at local authority level]. Memo. Gothenburg: Göteborg Region Association of Local Authorities.
   Google Scholar
• Göteborg Region Association of Local Authorities (GR), 2013a. Hållbar tillväxt. Mål och strategier med fokus på regional struktur [Sustainable growth. Objectives and strategies with a focus on regional structure]. Gothenburg: Göteborg Region Association of Local Authorities.
   Google Scholar
• Göteborg Region Association of Local Authorities (GR), 2013b. Pamphlet relating to the meeting held at the Swedish Exhibition and Congress Centre in Gothenburg on 19 March 2013. Memo. Gothenburg: Göteborg Region Association of Local Authorities.
   Google Scholar
• Göteborg Region Association of Local Authorities (GR), 2013c. Supplementary motion (Green Party). Sustainable growth: Mål och strategier med fokus på hållbar regional struktur. [Objectives and strategies with a focus on a sustainable regional structure.] Doc. no. 09/70.21/2 24 May 2013. Göteborg Region Association of Local Authorities (GR).
   Google Scholar
• Granberg, M. and Elander, I., 2007. Local governance and climate change: reflections on the Swedish experience. Local Environment, 12, 537–548. doi: 10.1080/13549830701656911
   Google Scholar
• Gressgård, R., 2015. The power of (re)attachment in urban strategy: interrogating the framing of social sustainability in Malmö. Environment and Planning A, 47, 108–120. doi: 10.1068/a130167p
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griggs, D., et al., 2013. Policy: sustainable development goals for people and planet. Nature, 495, 305–307. doi: 10.1038/495305a
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunder, M., 2006. Sustainability: planning’s saving grace or road to perdition? Journal of Planning Education and Research, 26, 208–221. doi: 10.1177/0739456X06289359
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hajer, M.A., 1997. The politics of environmental discourse, ecological modernization and the policy process. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hajer, M.A., 2005. Discourse coalitions and the institutionalization of practice: the case of acid rain in Britain. In: F. Fischer and J. Forester, eds. The argumentative turn in policy analysis and planning. 3rd ed. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, D., 1982. The limits to capital. Oxford: B. Blackwell, 43–76.
   Google Scholar
• Hilding-Rydevik, T., Håkansson, M., and Isaksson, K., 2011. The Swedish discourse on sustainable regional development: consolidating the post-political condition. International Planning Studies, 16, 169–187. doi: 10.1080/13563475.2011.561062
   Google Scholar
• Holden, M., 2012. Urban policy engagement with social sustainability in metro Vancouver. Urban Studies, 49, 527–542. doi: 10.1177/0042098011403015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holgersson, H. and Thörn, C., eds., 2014. Gentrifiering. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
   Google Scholar
• Holgersson, Helena, Thörn, C., Thörn, H., and Wahlström, M., 2010. (Re)searching Gothenburg: essays on a changing city. Göteborg: Glänta produktion.
   Google Scholar
• Hudson, C., 2005. Regional development partnerships in Sweden: putting the government back in governance?. Regional and Federal Studies, 15, 311–327. doi: 10.1080/13597560500223297
   Google Scholar
• Hugé, J., et al., 2013. A discourse-analytical perspective on sustainability assessment: interpreting sustainable development in practice. Sustainability Science, 8, 187–198. doi: 10.1007/s11625-012-0184-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HUR2050, 2005. Framtidens utmaning – tillsammans utveckla en hållbar region. En beskrivning av arbetet 2002–2005 [Future challenges – developing a sustainable region together: a description of efforts 2002–2005]. Gothenburg: HUR2050.
   Google Scholar
• Hysing, E., Frändberg, L., and Vilhelmson, B., 2015. Compromising sustainable mobility? The case of the Gothenburg congestion tax. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 58, 1058–1075. doi: 10.1080/09640568.2014.912615
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janssen-Jansen, L.B. and Hutton, T.A., 2011. Rethinking the metropolis: reconfiguring the governance structures of the twenty-first-century city-region. International Planning Studies, 16, 201–215. doi: 10.1080/13563475.2011.591140
   Google Scholar
• Jonas, A.E.G., 2015. Beyond the urban ‘sustainability fix’: looking for new spaces and discourses of sustainability in the city. In: D. Wilson, ed. The politics of the urban sustainability concept. Champaign, IL: Common Ground Publishing, 117–135.
   Google Scholar
• Jonas, A.E.G. and Ward, K., 2007. Introduction to a debate on city-regions: new geographies of governance, democracy and social reproduction. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 31, 169–178. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2427.2007.00711.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordan, A., 2008. The governance of sustainable development: taking stock and looking forwards. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 26, 17–33. doi: 10.1068/cav6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jörnmark, J., Carlsson, J., and Moran, D., 2006. The globalisation of Göteborg. Göteborg: Göteborgs Stadsmuseum.
   Google Scholar
• Kemp, R., Parto, S., and Gibson, R.B., 2005. Governance for sustainable development: moving from theory to practice. International Journal of Sustainable Development, 8, 12–30. doi: 10.1504/IJSD.2005.007372
   Google Scholar
• Krueger, R. and Agyeman, J., 2005. Sustainability schizophrenia or “actually existing sustainabilities?” Toward a broader understanding of the politics and promise of local sustainability in the US. Geoforum, 36, 410–417. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2004.07.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krueger, R. and Gibbs, D., 2008. ‘Third wave’ sustainability? Smart growth and regional development in the USA. Regional Studies, 42, 1263–1274. doi: 10.1080/00343400801968403
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krueger, R.O.B. and Savage, L., 2007. City-regions and social reproduction: a ‘place’ for sustainable development?. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 31, 215–223. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2427.2007.00716.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsson, J., et al., 2014. Low-carbon Gothenburg: technological potentials and lifestyle changes. Mistra Urban Futures Reports 2013:5. Gothenburg: Mistra Urban Futures.
   Google Scholar
• Lefèvre, C., 1998. Metropolitan government and governance in western countries: a critical review. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 22, 9–25. doi: 10.1111/1468-2427.00120
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lefèvre, C., 2010. The improbable metropolis: decentralization, local democracy and metropolitan areas in the western world. Análise social. Urban Governance in Southern Europe, 45 (197), 623–637.
   Google Scholar
• Lejano, R.P., Ingram, M., and Ingram, H.M., 2013. The power of narrative in environmental networks. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lundström, M.J., Fredriksson, C., and Witzell, J., eds., 2013. Planning and sustainable urban development in Sweden. Stockholm: Swedish Society For Town and Country Planning.
   Google Scholar
• Malmberg, B., Andersson, E., and Östh, J., 2013. Segregation and urban unrest in Sweden. Urban Geography, 34, 1031–1046. doi: 10.1080/02723638.2013.799370
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcuse, P., 1998. Sustainability is not enough. Environment and Urbanization, 10, 103–112. doi: 10.1177/095624789801000201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCann, E.J., 2007. Inequality and politics in the creative city-region: questions of livability and state strategy. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 31, 188–196. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2427.2007.00713.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mclennan, G., 2004. Travelling with vehicular ideas: the case of the third way. Economy and Society, 33, 484–499. doi: 10.1080/0308514042000285251
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mcmanus, P., 1996. Contested terrains: politics, stories and discourses of sustainability. Environmental Politics, 5, 48–73. doi: 10.1080/09644019608414247
   Google Scholar
• Mebratu, D., 1998. Sustainability and sustainable development: historical and conceptual review. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 18, 493–520. doi: 10.1016/S0195-9255(98)00019-5
   Google Scholar
• Metzger, J. and Rader Olsson, A., 2013. Sustainable Stockholm: exploring urban sustainability in Europe’s greenest city. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Montin, S., Johannson, M., and Forsemalm, J., 2014. Understanding innovative regional collaboration: metagovernance and boundary objects as mechanisms. In: C.K. Ansell and J. Torfing, eds., Public innovation through collaboration and design. Abingdon: Routledge, 106–124.
   Google Scholar
• Neumayer, E., 2013. Weak versus strong sustainability: exploring the limits of two opposing paradigms. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, T., 2004. On mediators: intellectuals and the ideas trade in the knowledge society. Economy and Society, 33, 430–447. doi: 10.1080/0308514042000285224
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parr, A., 2009. Hijacking sustainability. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peck, J. and Theodore, N., 2010. Mobilizing policy: models, methods, and mutations. Geoforum, 41, 169–174. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2010.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polk, M., 2010. Sustainability in practice: the interpretation of sustainable development in a regional planning arena for dialogue and learning in western Sweden. Planning Theory and Practice, 11, 481–497. doi: 10.1080/14649357.2010.525363
   Google Scholar
• Polk, M., 2011. Institutional capacity-building in urban planning and policy-making for sustainable development: success or failure?. Planning Practice and Research, 26, 185–206. doi: 10.1080/02697459.2011.560461
   Google Scholar
• Polk, M., 2015. Transdisciplinary coproduction: designing and testing a transdisciplinary research framework for societal problem solving. Futures, 65, 110–122. doi: 10.1016/j.futures.2014.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raco, M., 2014. The post-politics of sustainability planning: privatisation and the demise of democratic government. In: J. Wilson and E. Swyngedouw, eds. The post-political and its discontents. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 25–47.
   Google Scholar
• Region Västra Götaland (VGR), 2005a. Vision Västra Götaland. Det goda livet [Vision Västra Götaland: a good life]. Gothenbur: Region Västra Götaland.
   Google Scholar
• Region Västra Götaland (VGR), 2005b. Västsverige och den nya ekonomiska geografin [West Sweden and the new economic geography]. Gothenburg: Region Västra Götaland.
   Google Scholar
• Ronge, C-H., 2002. Samarbete över kommungränserna. Exempel på internkommunala arkiv i region- och stadsarkivet [Collaboration over municipal borders. Examples of intermunicipal archives in the regional and urban archive, memo dated 2002-01-31]. Gothenburg: Region- och stadsarkivet i Göteborg.
   Google Scholar
• Shaw, K., 2013. Docklands dreamings: illusions of sustainability in the Melbourne docks redevelopment. Urban Studies, 50, 2158–2177. doi: 10.1177/0042098013478237
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swyngedouw, E., 2007. Impossible ‘sustainability’ and the postpolitical condition. In: R.O.B. Krueger and D. Gibbs, eds. The sustainable development paradox: urban political economy in the United States and Europe. New York: Guilford Press, 13–40.
   Google Scholar
• von Sydow, Å., 2004. Exploring local governance in urban planning and development: the case of Lindholmen, Göteborg. Stockholm: Royal Institute of Technology KTH.
   Google Scholar
• Tahvilzadeh, N., et al., 2014. Sustainability policy in the Gothenburg region: On cohesion and tensions between strong and weak sustainability (Mistra Urban Futures Reports 2014:7). Gothenburg: Mistra Urban Futures.
   Google Scholar
• Temenos, C. and McCann, E., 2012. The local politics of policy mobility: learning, persuasion, and the production of a municipal sustainability fix. Environment and Planning A, 44, 1389–1406. doi: 10.1068/a44314
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thörn, C., 2011. Soft policies of exclusion: entrepreneurial strategies of ambience and control of public space in Gothenburg, Sweden. Urban Geography, 32, 989–1008. doi: 10.2747/0272-3638.32.7.989
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thörn, H., 2012. In between social engineering and gentrification: urban restructuring, social movements, and the politics of open space. Journal of Urban Affairs, 34, 153–168. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9906.2012.00608.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wheeler, S. and Beatley, T., eds., 2014. The sustainable urban development reader. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• While, A., Jonas, A.E.G., and Gibbs, D., 2004. The environment and the entrepreneurial city: searching for the urban ‘sustainability fix’ in Manchester and Leeds. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 28, 549–569. doi: 10.1111/j.0309-1317.2004.00535.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, D., ed., 2015. The politics of the urban sustainability concept. Champaign, IL: Common Ground Publishing.
   Google Scholar