Farmers as modern-day stewards and the rise of new rural citizenship in the battle over land use

References

• Aplin, G., 2001. Australians and their environment. Melbourne: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Argent, N., 2002. From pillar to post? In search of the postproductivist countryside in Australia. Australian Geographer, 33, 97–114. doi: 10.1080/00049180220125033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Askew, L.E., Sherval, M., and McGuirk, P.M., 2014. Not just drought: drought, rural change and more: perspectives from rural farming communities. In: R. Dufty-Jones and J. Connell, eds. Rural change in Australia: population, economy, environment. Farnham: Ashgate, 235–255.
   Google Scholar
• Askland, H.H., 2014. “It was all about independence”: loss, division and rejuvenation amongst the East Timorese in Melbourne. The Australian Journal of Anthropology, 25, 321–336. doi: 10.1111/taja.12107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Askland, H.H., et al., 2016. Local attitudes to changing land-use – Narrabri Shire. Full report. October 2016. Newcastle: The University of Newcastle, NSW Department of Primary Industries.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Bureau of Statistics, 2009a. Australia national accounts: national income, expenditure and product. Canberra: Commonwealth Government.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Bureau of Statistics, 2009b. Labour force Australia, quarterly. Canberra: Commonwealth Government.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Government, 2007. National statement on ethical conduct in human research (2007) - Updated 2015. Available from: https://www.nhmrc.gov.au/guidelines-publications/e72
   Google Scholar
• Australian Government, 2014. Great Artesian Basin sustainability initiative (GABSI) [online]. Available from: http://www.environment.gov.au/water/environment/great-artesian-basin-sustainability-initiative [Accessed 7 March 2016]
   Google Scholar
• Barr, N., 2005. Understanding rural Victoria. Victoria: Department of Primary Industries.
   Google Scholar
• Bear, C. and Holloway, L., 2015. Country life: agricultural technologies and the emergence of new rural subjectivities. Geography Compass, 9 (6), 303–315. doi: 10.1111/gec3.12217
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busquet, G., 2013. Political space in the work of Henri Lefebvre: ideology and Utopia. Justice Spatiale/Spatial Justice 5, 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, A., 2008. Managing Australia’s soils: a policy discussion paper. Queanbeyan: Triple Helix Consulting. Report for the National Committee on Soil and Terrain (NCST) through the Natural Resource Management Ministerial Council (NRMMC).
   Google Scholar
• Castree, N., 2008. Neoliberalising nature: the logics of deregulation and reregulation. Environment and Planning A, 40, 131–152. doi: 10.1068/a3999
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chambers, M. and Creighton, A., 2016. Benefits of LNG boom will fall to agile. The Australian, May 28. Available from: http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/mining-energy/benefits-of-lng-boom-will-fall-to-agile/news-story/cfd94b7ca6073fca6517a4846265d375 [Accessed 14 September 2016].
   Google Scholar
• Cheshire, L., Meurk, C., and Woods, M., 2013. Decoupling farm, farming and place: recombinant attachments of globally engaged family farmers. Journal of Rural Studies, 30, 64–74. doi: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2012.11.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colvin, R.M., Witt, G.B., and Lacey, J., 2015. Strange bedfellows or an aligning of values? Exploration of stakeholder values in an alliance of concerned citizens against coal seam gas mining. Land-use Policy, 42, 392–399. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.08.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cotton Australia, 2016. Responsible and sustainable cotton production [online]. Available from: http://cottonaustralia.com.au/cotton-library/fact-sheets/responsible-and-sustainable-cotton-production [Accessed 1 June 2016].
   Google Scholar
• Department of Agriculture, 2014. The national soil research, Development and extension strategy - securing Australia’s soil for profitable industries and healthy landscapes [online]. Available from: http://www.agriculture.gov.au/Style%20Library/Images/DAFF/__data/assets/pdffile/0012/2379585/soil.pdf [Accessed 15 March 2016]
   Google Scholar
• de Rijke, K., Munro, P., and de Lourdes Melo Zurita, M., 2016. The great artesian basin: a contested resource environment of subterranean water and coal seam gas in Australia. Society & Natural Resources, 29 (6), 696–710. doi: 10.1080/08941920.2015.1122133
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dibden, J., Potter, C., and Cocklin, C., 2009. Contesting the neoliberal project for agriculture: productivist and multifunctional trajectories in the European Union and Australia. Journal of Rural Studies, 25, 299–308. doi: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2008.12.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dowling, R., Lloyd, K., and Suchet-Pearson, S., 2016. Qualitative methods I: enriching the interview. Progress in Human Geography, 40(5), 679–686. doi: 10.1177/0309132515596880
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dryzek, J.S., 2005. The politics of the Earth (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Duffy, M. and Mair, J., 2017. Festival encounters: theoretical perspectives on festival events. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ey, M., Sherval, M., and Hodge, P., 2017. Value, identity and place: unearthing the emotional geographies of the extractive sector. Australian Geographer, 48 (2), 153–168. doi: 10.1080/00049182.2016.1251297
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrier, D., and Stein, P., 2011. The environmental law handbook. 5th ed. Pyrmont: Thomson Reuters.
   Google Scholar
• Fell, C., 2014. Water treatment and coal seam gas. Discussion paper for the Office of Chief Scientist and Engineer. Sydney: Fell Consulting P/L.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, T.A., 2005. NIMBY and the civic good. City and Community, 4 (4), 381–401. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6040.2005.00144.x
   Google Scholar
• Holmes, J., 2008. Impulses towards a multifunctional transition in rural Australia: interpreting regional dynamics in landscapes, lifestyles and livelihoods. Landscape Research, 33, 211–223. doi: 10.1080/01426390801912089
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howells, B. and Rogner, R.H., 2014. Water-energy nexus: assessing integrated systems. Nature Climate Change, 4, 246–247. doi: 10.1038/nclimate2180
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy, A., 2014. There’s a crisis developing in the heart of Australia. Wilderness News, 184, 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy, A., Schafft, K.A., and Howard, T.M., 2017. Taking away David’s sling: environmental justice and land –use conflict in extractive resource development. Local Environment, 22 (8), 952–968. doi: 10.1080/13549839.2017.1309369
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koch, A., et al., 2015. Monitor soil degradation or triage for soil security? An Australian challenge. Sustainability, 7, 4870–4892. doi: 10.3390/su7054870
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lazar, S., 2012. Citizenship quality: a new agenda for development? Journal of Civil Society, 8 (4), 333–350. doi: 10.1080/17448689.2012.738898
   Google Scholar
• Lefebvre, H., 1991. The production of space. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Leopold, A., 1949. A Sand County Almanac. New York: Ballantine Books.
   Google Scholar
• Leser, D., 2011. What lies beneath. Sydney Morning Herald – Good Weekend Magazine, August 13. Available from: http://coalseamgasnews.org/qld/what-lies-beneath/ [Accessed 16 September 2016]
   Google Scholar
• Lewicka, M., 2013. Localism and activity as two dimensions of people - place bonding: the role of cultural capital. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 36, 43–53. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.07.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lockie, S., 2015. Australia’s agricultural future: the social and political context: report to SAF07 – Australia’s agricultural future project. Melbourne: Australian Council of Learned Academies.
   Google Scholar
• McDonagh, J., 2013. Rural geography I: changing expectations and contradictions in the rural. Progress in Human Geography, 37 (5), 712–720. doi: 10.1177/0309132512474404
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McManus, P., et al., 2012. Rural community and rural resilience: what is important to farmers in keeping their country towns alive? Journal of Rural Studies, 28, 20–29. doi: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2011.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mercer, A., de Rijke, K., and Dressler, W., 2014. Silences in the boom. Journal of Political Ecology, 21, 279–302.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, T., 2014. Leard protestors delay mine, vowing to continue to fight. Tharunka June 16. Available from: http://tharunka.arc.unsw.edu.au/leard-protesters-delay-mine-vowing-continue-fight/
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, M.I., et al., 2016. Fracked: coal seam gas extraction and farmer’s mental health. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 47, 22–32. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2016.04.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, J., 2017. Narrabri coal seam gas project protested in Sydney. The Northern Daily Leader (Newspaper), August 11. Available from: http://www.northerndailyleader.com.au/story/4831366/hundreds-protest-narrabri-gas-project-in-sydney/?cs=159.
   Google Scholar
• Næss, A., 1986. The Deep Ecological movement: some philosophical aspects. Inquiry, 5, 10–12.
   Google Scholar
• National Water Commission, 2011. Water markets in Australia – a short history. Canberra: Australian Government.
   Google Scholar
• NSW Government, 2012. Strategic regional land-use policy. Sydney: NSW Government, Department of Planning and Infrastructure.
   Google Scholar
• Otaro, G., 2013. Food for the few: neoliberal globalism and biotechnology in Latin America. Austin: University of Texas press.
   Google Scholar
• Purcell, M., 2002. Excavating Lefebvre: the right to the city and its urban politics of the inhabitant. GeoJournal, 58, 99–108. doi: 10.1023/B:GEJO.0000010829.62237.8f
   Google Scholar
• Ripple, R.D., 2014. The geopolitics of Australian natural gas development. Houston: James A. Baker III Institute for Public Policy of Rice University.
   Google Scholar
• Roche, M and Argent, N., 2015. The rise and fall of agricultural productivism? An antipodean viewpoint. Progress in Human Geography, 39 (5), 621–635. doi: 10.1177/0309132515582058
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santos Ltd., 2015. The narrabri gas project – overview. Narrabri: Information Pack, Santos Ltd. Available from: https://www.santos.com/
   Google Scholar
• Sebastien, L., 2017. From NIMBY to enlightened resistance: a framework proposal to decrypt land-use disputes based on a landfill opposition case in France. Local Environment, 22 (4), 461–477. doi: 10.1080/13549839.2016.1223620
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherval, M. and Askew, L.E., 2012. Experiencing “drought and more”: local responses from rural Victoria, Australia. Population and Environment, 33, 347–364. doi: 10.1007/s11111-011-0149-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stern, P.C., et al., 1999. A value-belief-norm theory of support for social movements: the case of environmentalism. Research in Human Ecology, 6 (2), 81–92.
   Google Scholar
• Watts, N. and Scales, I.R., 2015. Seeds, agricultural systems and socio-natures: towards an actor–network theory informed political ecology of agriculture. Geography Compass, 9 (5), 225–236. doi: 10.1111/gec3.12212
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weier, A. and Loke, P., 2007. Precaution and the precautionary principle: two Australian case studies. Productivity commission staff working paper, Melbourne, September. Available from: http://www.pc.gov.au/research/supporting/precautionary-principle/precautionaryprinciple.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Woods, M., 2006. Political articulation: the modalities of new critical politics of rural citizenship. In: P. Cloke, T. Marsden, and P. Mooney, eds. Handbook of rural studies. London: Sage publications, 457–471.
   Google Scholar
• Woods, M., 2011. Rural. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar