Exploring intersectional approaches to waste through grassroots innovations in the U.K.

References

• Adeola, F. 2000. “Cross-National Environmental Injustice and Human Rights Issues: A Review of Evidence in the Developing World.” American Behavioral Scientist 43 (4): 686–706. https://doi.org/10.1177/00027640021955496.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akenji, L. 2014. “Consumer Scapegoatism and Limits to Green Consumerism.” Journal of Cleaner Production 63:13–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.05.022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amorim-Maia, A. T., I. Anguelovski, E. Chu, and J. Connolly. 2022. “Intersectional Climate Justice: A Conceptual Pathway for Bridging Adaptation Planning, Transformative Action, and Social Equity.” Urban Climate 41:101053. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.uclim.2021.101053.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anantharaman, M. 2014. “Networked Ecological Citizenship, the New Middle Classes, and the Provisioning of Sustainable Waste Management in Bangalore, India.” Journal of Cleaner Production 63:173–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.08.041.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anantharaman, M. 2018. “Critical Sustainable Consumption: A Research Agenda.” Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences 8 (5): 3–561.
   Google Scholar
• Anantharaman, M. 2022. “Is It Sustainable Consumption or Performative Environmentalism?” Consumption and Society 1 (1): 120–143. https://doi.org/10.1332/LTTT8626.
   Google Scholar
• Anantharaman, M., E. Huddart Kennedy, L. Middlemiss, and S. Bradbury. 2019. “Who Participates in Community-Based Sustainable Consumption Projects and Why Does It Matter? A Constructively Critical Approach.” In Power and Politics in Sustainable Consumption Research and Practice, edited by C. Isenhour, M. Martiskainen, and L. Middlemiss, 178–200. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Anantharaman, M., and P. Schröder. 2021. “Opinion: Why We Need to Fund the Circular Economy.” Devex. Accessed February 22, 2023. https://www.devex.com/news/opinion-why-we-need-to-fund-the-circular-economy-101554.
   Google Scholar
• Araujo, S. G., and T. González-Fernández. 2014. “International Migration, Public Policies, and Domestic Work: Latin American Migrant Women in the Spanish Domestic Work Sector.” Women’s Studies International Forum 46:13–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2014.01.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrie, J., M. Anantharaman, M. Oyinola, and P. Schröder. 2022. “The Circularity Divide: What Is It? And How Do We Avoid It?” Resources, Conservation, and Recycling 180:106208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, K. 2020. Working-Class Environmentalism: An Agenda for a Just and Fair Transition to Sustainability. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, K., and G. Bevan. 2021. “Beyond Inclusion? Perceptions of the Extent to Which Extinction Rebellion Speaks to, and for, Black, Asian and Minority Ethnic (BAME) and Working-Class Communities.” Local Environment 26 (10): 1205–1220. https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2021.1970728.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benford, R., and A. Snow. 2000. “Framing Processes and Social Movements: An Overview and Sssessment.” Annual Review of Sociology 26 (1): 611–639. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.26.1.611.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bilge, S. 2013. “Intersectionality Undone: Saving Intersectionality from Feminist Intersectionality Studies.” Du Bois Review: Social Science Research on Race 10 (2): 405–424. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1742058X13000283.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloody Good Period. 2023. “Homepage.” Accessed September 25, 2023. https://www.bloodygoodperiod.com.
   Google Scholar
• Bohrer, A. 2019. Marxism and Intersectionality: Race, Gender, Class and Sexuality Under Contemporary Capitalism. Bielefeld: Transcript Berlag.
   Google Scholar
• Bulkeley, H., and S. Fuller. 2012. “Low Carbon Communities and Social Justice.” Joseph Rowntree Foundation. Accessed February 22, 2023. https://www.climatejust.org.uk/sites/default/files/11.%20low-carbon-communities-summary.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Bullard, R. D. 2000. Dumping in Dixie. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Chatterton, P. 2016. “Building Transitions to Post-Capitalist Urban Commons.” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 41 (4): 403–415. https://doi.org/10.1111/tran.12139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chigwenya, A., and P. Wadzanai. 2020. “The Intersectionality between Right to the City, Informality and Waste Management in Masvingo City, Zimbabwe.” Journal of Urban Systems and Innovations for Resilience in Zimbabwe 2 (1): 26–52.
   Google Scholar
• Combahee River Collective. 1977. The Combahee River Collective Statement. Accessed December 14, 2022. https://www.blackpast.org/african-american-history/combahee-river-collective-statement-1977/.
   Google Scholar
• Cook, M. 2022. “Linkedin Post.” Accessed February 22, 2023. https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:6975833874136236032/.
   Google Scholar
• Coote, A. 2010. “Big Society and the New Austerity.” In The Big Society Challenge, edited by M. Stott, 82–95. Cardiff: Keystone Development Trust Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Crenshaw, K. 1989. “Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine, Feminist Theory and Anti-Racist Politics.” University of Chicago Legal Forum 1989 (1): 139–167.
   Google Scholar
• Crenshaw, K. 1991. “Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence Against Women of Color.” Stanford Law Review 43 (6): 1241–1299. https://doi.org/10.2307/1229039.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, A. (1981) 2019. Women, Class, and Race. London: Penguin Classics.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, K. 2008. “Intersectionality as Buzzword: A Sociology of Science Perspective on What Makes a Feminist Theory Successful.” Feminist Theory 9 (1): 67–85. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464700108086364.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, A. 2016. Freedom is a Constant Struggle: Ferguson, Palestine, and the Foundations of a Movement. Chicago: Haymarket Books.
   Google Scholar
• Della Porta, D., and M. Diani. 1999. Social Movements: An Introduction. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• de Moor, J., P. Catney, and B. Doherty. 2021. “What Hampers ‘Political’ Action in Environmental Alternative Action Organisations? Exploring the Scope for Strategic Agency Under Post-Political Conditions.” Social Movement Studies 20 (3): 312–328. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2019.1708311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Wilde, M., and S. Parry. 2022. “Feminised Concern or Feminised Care? Reclaiming Gender Normatives in Zero Waste Living.” The Sociological Review 70 (3): 526–546. https://doi.org/10.1177/00380261221080110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Chiro, G. 2021. “Mobilizing ‘Intersectionality’ in Environmental Justice Research and Action in a Time of Crisis.” In Environmental Justice: Key Issues, edited by B. Coolsaet, 316–333. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dururu, J., C. Anderson, M. Bates, W. Montasser, and T. Tudor. 2015. “Enhancing Engagement in Community Sector Organisations Working in Sustainable Waste Management: A Case Study.” Waste Management and Research 33 (3): 284–290.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, K. 2011. “‘Big Society’ in the UK: A Policy Review.” Children and Society 25 (2): 164–171. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1099-0860.2010.00351.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fressolini, M., E. Arond, D. Abrol, A. Smith, A. Ely, and R. Dias. 2014. “When Grassroots Innovation Movements Encounter Mainstream Institutions: Implications for Models of Inclusive Innovation.” Innovation and Development 4 (2): 277–292. https://doi.org/10.1080/2157930X.2014.921354
   Google Scholar
• Fuller, S., T. Ngata, S. B. Borrelle, and T. Farrelly. 2022. “Plastics Pollution as Waste Colonialism in Te Moananui.” Journal of Political Ecology 29 (1): 534–560. https://doi.org/10.2458/jpe.2401.
   Google Scholar
• Gaia. 2019. Discarded: Communities on the Frontline of the Global Plastics Crisis. Accessed December 4, 2022. https://www.no-burn.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/Report-July-12-2019-Spreads-no-marks-1.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson-Graham, J. K., J. Cameron, and S. Healy. 2013. Take Back the Economy: An Ethical Guide for Transforming Our Communities. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gupta, A. K., R. Sinha, D. Koradia, R. Patel, M. Parmar, P. Rohit, H. Patel, et al. 2003. “Mobilising Grassroots Technological Innovations and Traditional Knowledge, Values and Institutions: Articulating Social and Ethical Capital.” Futures 35 (9): 975–987. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-3287(03)00053-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hancock, A. M. 2007. “When Multiplication Doesn’t Equal Quick Addition: Examining Intersectionality as a Research Paradigm.” Perspectives on Politics 5 (1): 63–79. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592707070065.
   Google Scholar
• Hauxwell-Baldwin, R. 2013. “Tackling Climate Change Through Community: The Politics and Practice of the Low Carbon Communities Challenge.” Doctoral thesis, University of East Anglia.
   Google Scholar
• Hernandez, I. 2021. “Zero Waste Systems and Environmental Racism.” Queer Brown Vegan. Accessed February 22, 2023. https://queerbrownvegan.com/zero-waste-systems-and-environmental-racism/.
   Google Scholar
• hooks, b. 2003. Teaching Community: A Pedagogy of Hope. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hossain, M. 2018. “Grassroots Innovation: The State of the Art and Future Perspectives.” Technology in Society 55:63–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2018.06.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Alliance of Waste Pickers. 2023. We Advocate at the ILC that Social Justice must be at the Heart of the Just Transition. Accessed September 25, 2023. https://globalrec.org/2023/08/18/ilc2023-just-transition/.
   Google Scholar
• International Resource Panel. 2019. Global Resources Outlook 2019: Natural Resources for the Future We Want. Accessed December 4, 2022. https://www.resourcepanel.org/sites/default/files/documents/document/media/unep_252_global_resource_outlook_2019_web.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Jibrin, R., and S. Salem. 2015. “Revisiting Intersectionality: Reflections on Theory and Praxis.” Trans-Scripts 5. Accessed December 14, 2022. https://cpb-us-e2.wpmucdn.com/sites.uci.edu/dist/f/1861/files/2014/10/2015_5_salem.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Judkins, B., and L. Presser. 2008. “Division of Eco-Friendly Household Labour and the Marital Relationship.” Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 25 (6): 923–941. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407508096701.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz, C. 2011. “Accumulation, Excess, Childhood: Toward a Countertopography of Waste.” Documents D’Analisi Geografica 57 (1): 47–60. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/dag.806.
   Google Scholar
• Kaza, S., L. Yao, P. Bhada-Tata, and F. Van Woerden. 2018. What a Waste 2.0: A Global Snapshot of Solid Waste Management to 2050. Washington: World Bank Group.
   Google Scholar
• Keiller, S., and M. Charter. 2014. “A Study of Member Motivations and Activities in Hackerspaces and Repair Cafes.” In Sustainable Innovation 2014 19th International Conference Cities & Regions as Catalysts for Smart & Sustainable Innovation 3rd – 4th November 2014 KADK Copenhagen, Denmark, 125–137. Farnham: Centre for Sustainable Design.
   Google Scholar
• Khalil, M. B., B. C. Jacobs, K. McKenna, and N. Kuruppu. 2020. “Female Contribution to Grassroots Innovation for Climate Change Adaptation in Bangladesh.” Climate and Development 12 (7): 664–676. https://doi.org/10.1080/17565529.2019.1676188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kisby, B. 2010. “The Big Society: Power to the People?” The Political Quarterly 81 (4): 484–491. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-923X.2010.02133.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kraus, C. 1993. “Women and Toxic Waste Protests: Race, Class and Gender as Resources of Resistance.” Qualitative Sociology 16 (3): 247–262. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00990101.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, J. 2015. “Barriers to Women's Involvement in Hackspaces and Makerspaces.” Accessed February 22, 2023. https://transit.slab.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2017/04/Barriers-to-womens-involvement-in-hackspaces-and-makerspaces.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Liboiron, M. 2014. “Why Discard Studies?” Discardstudies.com. Accessed December 4, 2022. https://discardstudies.com/2014/05/07/why-discard-studies/.
   Google Scholar
• Liboiron, M., and R. Cotter. 2023. “Review of Participation of Indigenous Peoples in Plastics Pollution Governance.” Cambridge Prisms: Plastics 1:e16, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1017/plc.2023.16.
   Google Scholar
• Liboiron, M., and J. Lepawsky. 2022. Discard Studies: Waste, Systems, and Power. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Loukakis, A. 2018. “Not Just Solidarity Providers: Investigating the Political Dimension of Alternative Action Organisations (AAOs) During the Economic Crisis in Greece.” Partecipazione e Conflitto 11 (1): 12–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luckin, D., and L. Sharp. 2005. “Exploring the Community Waste Sector: Are Sustainable Development and Social Capital Useful Concepts for Project-Level Research?” Community Development Journal 40 (1): 62-75.
   Google Scholar
• Lutz, H. 2014. “Intersectionality’s (Brilliant) Career – How to Understand the Attraction of the Concept?” Working Paper Series “Gender, Diversity and Migration” No. 1, Presented at Intersectionality – a Cross-Disciplinary Exchange, February 27. Free University Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• Lutzenberger, J., and J. T. Clark. 1999. “Minding the Gap: Introduction to Radical Teaching Practice.” The Radical Teacher, no. 56: 2–6.
   Google Scholar
• MacBride, S. 2012. Recycling Reconsidered: The Present Failure and Future Promise of Environmental Action in the United States. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• MacBride, S. 2019. “Does Recycling Actually Conserve or Preserve Things?” Discard Studies. Accessed December 6, 2022. https://discardstudies.com/2019/02/11/12755/.
   Google Scholar
• Malin, S. A., and S. S. Ryder. 2018. “Developing Deeply Intersectional Environmental Justice Scholarship.” Environmental Sociology 4 (1): 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1080/23251042.2018.1446711.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maniates, M. 2001. “Individualization: Plant a Tree, Buy a Bike, Save the World?” Global Environmental Politics 1 (3): 31–52. https://doi.org/10.1162/152638001316881395.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, C. J., P. Upham, and L. Budd. 2015. “Commercial Orientation in Grassroots Social Innovation: Insights from the Sharing Economy.” Ecological Economics 118:240–251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.08.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, C. J., and P. Upman. 2016. “Grassroots Social Innovation and the Mobilization of Values in Collaborative Consumption: A Conceptual Model.” Journal of Cleaner Production 134 (A): 204–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.04.062.
   Google Scholar
• Mason, C. L. 2019. “Buzzwords and Fuzzwords: Flattening Intersectionality in Canadian Aid.” Canadian Foreign Policy Journal 25 (2): 203–219. https://doi.org/10.1080/11926422.2019.1592002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehrotra, G. 2010. “Toward a Continuum of Intersectionality Theorising for Feminist Social Work Scholarship.” Affila: Journal of Women and Social Work 25 (4): 417–430. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886109910384190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meissner, M. 2021. “Repair is Care? Dimensions of Care Within Collaborative Practices in Repair Cafes.” Journal of Cleaner Production 229:126913. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126913.
   Google Scholar
• Middlemiss, Lucie. 2018. Sustainable Consumption: Key Issues. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mikulewicz, M., M. A. Caretta, F. Sultana, and N. J. W. Crawford. 2023. “Intersectionality & Climate Justice: A Call for Synergy in Climate Change Scholarship.” Environmental Politics 1:12.
   Google Scholar
• Millar, K. M. 2020. “Garbage as Racialisation.” Anthropology and Humanism 45 (1): 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/anhu.12267.
   Google Scholar
• More, D. 2021. “A Look at the Decolonise Menstruation Project.” Accessed September 19, 2023. https://dianamore.co.uk/post/664324381807362048/a-look-at-the-decolonise-menstruation-project.
   Google Scholar
• Müller, R., and S. Schönbauer. 2020. “Zero Waste – Zero Justice?” Engaging Science, Technology, and Society 6:416–420. https://doi.org/10.17351/ests2020.649.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ndhlovu, F. 2022. “Revisiting the True Purpose of the Discourse on Decolonising.” Journal of Multicultural Discourses 17 (3): 240–254. https://doi.org/10.1080/17447143.2022.2119990.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ngata, T. 2018. “An Unconquerable Tide.” Kia Mau Resisting Colonial Fictions, February 18. accessed December 16, 2023. https://tinangata.com/2018/02/18/2494/.
   Google Scholar
• Parthasarathy, S. 2017. “Grassroots Innovation Systems for the Post-Carbon World: Promoting Economic Democracy, Environmental Sustainability, and the Public Interest.” Brooklyn Law Review 82 (2): 761–788.
   Google Scholar
• Pellow, D. N. 2004. Garbage Wars: The Struggle for Environmental Justice in Chicago. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Plumwood, V. 1993. Feminism and the Mastery of Nature. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pratt, L. A. W. 2011. “Decreasing Dirty Dumping – a Re-Evaluation of Toxic Waste Colonialism and the Global Management of Transboundary Hazardous Waste.” William & Mary Environmental Law & Policy Review 35 (2): 581–623.
   Google Scholar
• Pulido, L. 2016. “Flint, Environmental Racism, and Racial Capitalism.” Capitalism Nature Socialism 27 (3): 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/10455752.2016.1213013.
   Google Scholar
• Reno, J. 2015. “Waste and Waste Management.” Annual Review of Anthropology 44 (1): 557–572. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-102214-014146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson, K., W. Steffan, W. Lucht, J. Bendtsen, S. E. Cornell, J. F. Donges, M. Drüke, et al. 2023. “Earth Beyond Six of Nine Planetary Boundaries.” Science Advances 9 (37): 37. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adh2458.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryder, S. S. 2017. “A Bridge to Challenging Environmental Inequality: Intersectionality, Environmental Justice, and Disaster Vulnerability.” Social Thought & Research: A Continuation of the Mid-American Review of Sociology 34:85–115.
   Google Scholar
• Schägg, E., S. L. Becker, and P. Pradhan. 2022. “Thwarted Visions of Change: Power and Demographics in Repair Cafes and Urban Sustainability Transitions.” Urban Transformations 4:1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42854-022-00031-x.
   Google Scholar
• Seyfang, G., and N. Longhurst. 2016. “What Influences the Diffusion of Grassroots Innovations for Sustainability? Investigating Community Currency Niches.” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 28 (1): 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2015.1063603.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seyfang, G., and A. Smith. 2007. “Grassroots Innovation for Sustainable Development: Towards a New Research and Policy Agenda.” Environmental Politics 16 (4): 584–603. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644010701419121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shadaan, R., and M. Murphy. 2020. “Endocrine-Disrupting Chemicals (EDCs) as Industrial and Settler-Colonial Structures: Towards a Decolonial Feminist Approach.” Catalyst: Feminism, Theory, Technoscience 6 (1): 1–36. https://doi.org/10.28968/cftt.v6i1.32089.
   Google Scholar
• Sharp, L., and D. Luckin. 2006. “The Community Waste Sector and Waste Services in the UK: Current State and Future Perspectives.” Resources, Conservation and Recycling 47 (3): 277–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2005.12.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siragusa, L., and D. Arzyutov. 2020. “Nothing Goes to Waste: Sustainable Practices of Re-Use among Indigenous Groups in the Russian North.” Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 43:41–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2020.02.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skarp, S. 2021. “The Gateway to All Good Things? Commoning, Sustainability, and Post-Capitalist Possibility in UK Community Waste Initiatives.” Doctoral thesis, University of East Anglia.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, A. 2007. “Translating Sustainabilities Between Green Niches and Socio-Technical Regimes.” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 19 (4): 427–450. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537320701403334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, A., M. Fressoli, D. Abrol, E. Around, and A. Ely. 2017. Grassroots Innovation Movements. Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, A., M. Fressoli, and H. Thomas. 2014. “Grassroots Innovation Movements: Challenges and Contributions.” Journal of Cleaner Production 63:114–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.12.025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, A., T. Hargreaves, S. Hielscher, M. Martiskainen, and G. Seyfang. 2016. “Making the Most of Community Energies: Three Perspectives on Grassroots Innovation.” Environment and Planning A 42 (2): 407–432. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X15597908.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, A., and G. Seyfang. 2013. “Constructing Grassroots Innovations for Sustainability.” Global Environmental Change 23 (5): 827–829. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.07.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephanides, P. 2017. “Crisis as Opportunity? An Ethnographic Case-Study of the Post-Capitalist Possibilities of Crisis Community Currency Movements.” Doctoral thesis, University of East Anglia. Accessed March 5, 2024. https://ueaeprints.uea.ac.uk/id/eprint/64091/.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, V., and N. Van Dyke. 2004. “'Get Up, Stand Up’: Tactical Repertoires of Social Movements.” In The Blackwell Companion to Social Movements, edited by D. Snow, S. A. Soule, and H. Kriesi, 262–294.  Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, L. 2022. The Intersectional Environmentalist: How to Dismantle Systems of Oppression and Protect People + Planet. London: Souvenir Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tuck, E., and K. W. Yang. 2012. “Decolonization is not a Metaphor.” Decolonization: Indigeneity, Education & Society 1:1–40.
   Google Scholar
• UK Government. 2018. Our Waste, Our Resources: A Strategy for England. Accessed December 6, 2022. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/765914/resources-waste-strategy-dec-2018.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Unwin, S. 2021. “A Model for a City-Wide Repair Economy.” Remade Network [pdf currently unavailable online].
   Google Scholar
• Vergès, F. 2019. “Capitalocene, Waste, Race, and Gender.” eflux Journal 100. http://worker01.e-flux.com/pdf/article_269165.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Vergès, F. 2021. A Decolonial Feminism. Translated by A. Bohrer. London: Pluto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Villarrubia-Gómez, P., B. Carney Almroth, and S. E. Cornell. 2022. “Reframing Plastics Pollution to Include Social, Ecological and Policy Perspectives.” Nature Reviews Earth and Environment 3 (11): 724–725. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-022-00359-9.
   Google Scholar
• Walby, S., J. Armstrong, and S. Strid. 2012. “Intersectionality: Multiple Inequalities in Social Theory.” Sociology 42 (2): 224–240. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038511416164.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, G. 2011. “The Role for ‘Community’ in Carbon Governance.” WIRES Climate Change 2 (5): 777–782. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warren, K. J. 1990. “The Power and Promise of Ecological Feminism.” Environmental Ethics 21 (2): 125–146. https://doi.org/10.5840/enviroethics199012221.
   Google Scholar
• Windebank, J. 2007. “Outsourcing Women’s Domestic Labour: The Chèque Emploi-Service Universel in France.” Journal of European Social Policy 17 (3): 257–270. https://doi.org/10.1177/0958928707078368.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wittmer, J. 2021. “We Live and Do This Work: Women Waste Pickers’ Experiences of Wellbeing in Ahmedabad, India.” World Development 140:105253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuval-Davis, N. 2015. “Situated Intersectionality: A Reflection on Ange-Marie Hancock’s Forthcoming Book: Intersectionality – an Intellectual History.” New Political Science 37 (4): 637–642. https://doi.org/10.1080/07393148.2015.1089045.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zapata Campos, M. J., S. Carenzo, G. Charles, J. Gutberlet, J. H. Kain, M. O. Oloko, J. Pérez Reynosa, and P. Zapata. 2022. “Grassroots Innovations in Extreme Urban Environments: The Inclusive Recycling Movement.” Politics and Space 41 (2): 351–374.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zapata Campos, M. J., S. Carenzo, J. H. Kain, M. O. Oloko, J. Pérez Reynosa, and P. Zapata. 2021. “Inclusive Recycling Movements: A Green Deep Democracy from Below.” Environment and Urbanisation 33 (2): 579–598. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956247820967621.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zapata Campos, M. J., and P. Zapata. 2017. “Infiltrating Citizen-Driven Initiatives for Sustainability.” Environmental Politics 26 (6): 1055–1078. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2017.1352592.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zink, T., and R. Geyer. 2017. “Circular Economy Rebound.” Journal of Industrial Ecology 21 (3): 593–602. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12545.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zoie, D., K. Reilly, R. Karasik, T. Vegh, Y. Wang, Z. Wong, L. Dunn, et al. 2022. “Voluntary Commitments Made by the World’s Largest Companies Focus on Recycling and Packaging Over Other Actions to Address the Plastics Crisis.” One Earth 11:1286–1306.
   Google Scholar