‘Why would I want to be anonymous?’ Questioning ethical principles of anonymity in cross-cultural feminist research

References

• Allen, Ruth E.S. and Janine L. Wiles (2016) ‘A rose by any other name: participants choosing research pseudonyms’, Qualitative Research in Psychology 13(2): 149–65 doi: 10.1080/14780887.2015.1133746
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baez, Benjamin (2002) ‘Confidentiality in qualitative research: Reflections on secrets, power, and agency’, Qualitative Research 2(1): 35–58 doi: 10.1177/1468794102002001638
   Google Scholar
• Battiste, Marie (2008) ‘Research ethics for protecting indigenous knowledge and heritage: institutional and researcher responsibilities’, in Norman K. Denzin, Yvonna S. Lincoln, and Linda Tuhiwai Smith (eds.) Handbook of Critical and Indigenous Methodologies, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 497–510
   Google Scholar
• BERA (2018) Ethical guidelines for educational research, fourth edition, https://www.bera.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/BERA-Ethical-Guidelines-for-Educational-Research_4thEdn_2018.pdf?noredirect=1 (last checked 22 October 2019)
   Google Scholar
• Berkhout, Suze G. (2013) ‘Private talk: testimony, evidence and the practice of anonymization in research’, IJFAB: International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 6(1): 19–45
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brear, Michelle (2017) ‘Swazi co-researcher participants’ dynamic preferences and motivations for, representation with real names and (English-language) pseudonyms – an ethnography’, Qualitative Research 18(6): 722–40 doi: 10.1177/1468794117743467
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooks, Abigail (2006) ‘Feminist standpoint epistemology: building knowledge and empowerment through women’s lived experience’, https://us.sagepub.com/sites/default/files/upm-binaries/12936_Chapter3.pdf (last checked 22 October 2019)
   Google Scholar
• Browning Cole, Eve and Susan Coultrap-McGuinn (1992) ‘Toward a feminist conception of moral life’, in Eve Browning Cole and Susan Coultrap-McQuinn (eds.) Exploitation in Feminist Ethics: Theory and Practice, Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1–11
   Google Scholar
• Davison, Colleen M., Micaela Brown and Pertice Moffitt (2006) ‘Student researchers negotiating consent in northern aboriginal communities’, International Journal of Qualitative Methods 5(2): 28–39 doi: 10.1177/160940690600500207
   Google Scholar
• Durham, Jo (2014) ‘Ethical challenges in cross-cultural research: a student researcher’s perspective’, Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health 38(6): 509–12 doi: 10.1111/1753-6405.12286
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, Rosalind and Tula Brannelly (2017) ‘Approaches to democratising qualitative research methods’, Qualitative Research 17(3): 271–77 doi: 10.1177/1468794117706869
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, Rosalind and Melanie Mauthner (2012) ‘Ethics and feminist research: theory and practice’, in Tina Miller, Maxine Birch, Melanie Mauthner and Julie Jessop (eds.) Ethics in Qualitative Research, London: SAGE
   Google Scholar
• Eyre, Linda (2010) ‘Whose ethics? Whose interests? The tri-council policy and feminist research’, Journal of Curriculum Theorising 26(3): 75–85
   Google Scholar
• Faculty of Education (2018) Research Ethics Review Checklist, Cambridge: University of Cambridge
   Google Scholar
• Guenther, Katja M. (2009) ‘The politics of names: rethinking the methodological and ethical significance of naming people, organizations, and places’, Qualitative Research 9(4): 411–21 doi: 10.1177/1468794109337872
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guillemin, Marilys and Lynn Gillam (2004) ‘Ethics, reflexivity and “ethically important moments” in research’, Qualitative Inquiry 10(2): 261–80 doi: 10.1177/1077800403262360
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammersley, Martin (2015) ‘On ethical principles for social research’, International Journal of Social Research Methodology 18(4): 433–49 doi: 10.1080/13645579.2014.924169
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill Collins, Patricia (1990) Black Feminist thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics of Empowerment, New York: Routledge
   Google Scholar
• hooks, bell (2004) Feminist Theory: From Margin to Center, Cambridge: South End Press
   Google Scholar
• Hyndman, Emma (2017) ‘The invisible #MeToo: how anonymous testimony can help survivors of sexual abuse’, Open Democracy, https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/5050/invisible-metoo-anonymous-testimony-sexual-abuse/ (last checked 17 July 2019)
   Google Scholar
• Israel, Barbara A., Eugenia Eng, Amy Schulz and Edith Parker (2013) ‘Introduction to methods for community based participatory research’, in Methods for Community-Based Participatory Research for Health, Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, 4–37
   Google Scholar
• McCormack, Dianne, Tracy Carr, Rose McCloskey, Lisa Keeping-Burke, Karen E. Furlong and Shelley Doucet (2012) ‘Getting through ethics: the fit between research ethics board assessments and qualitative research’, Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics 7(5): 30–36 doi: 10.1525/jer.2012.7.5.30
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, Niamh (2012) ‘The politics and ethics of naming: questioning anonymisation in (archival) research,’ International Journal of Social Research Methodology 15(4): 331–40 doi: 10.1080/13645579.2012.688330
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris, Nina (2015) ‘Providing ethical guidance for collaborative research in developing countries’, Research Ethics 11(4): 211–35 doi: 10.1177/1747016115586759
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pickering, Lucy and Helen Kara (2017) ‘Presenting and representing others: towards an ethics of engagement’, International Journal of Social Research Methodology 20(3): 299–309 doi: 10.1080/13645579.2017.1287875
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson-Pant, Anna (2005) Cross-Cultural Perspectives on Educational Research, Maidenhead, Berks and New York: Open University Press
   Google Scholar
• Rooney, Vivien M. (2015) ‘Consent in longitudinal intimacy research: adjusting formal procedure as a means of enhancing reflexivity in ethically important decisions’, Qualitative Research 15(1): 71–84 doi: 10.1177/1468794113501686
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scharff, Christina (2010) ‘Silencing differences: the “unspoken” dimensions of “speaking for others”’, in Róisin Ryan-Flood and Rosalind Gill (eds.) Secrecy and Silence in the Research Process: Feminist Reflections, Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge
   Google Scholar
• Sevenhuijsen, Selma (1998) Citizenship and the Ethics of Care: Feminist Considerations on Justice, Morality and Politics, Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge
   Google Scholar
• Smart, Carol, Jenny Hockey and Allison Janes (2014) The Craft of Knowledge: Experiences of Living with Data, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 1–20
   Google Scholar
• Tikly, Leon and Tim Bond (2013) ‘Towards a postcolonial research ethics in comparative and international education’, Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education 43(4): 422–42 doi: 10.1080/03057925.2013.797721
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vainio, Annukka (2013) ‘Beyond research ethics: anonymity as “ontology,” “analysis” and “independence”’, Qualitative Research 13(6): 685–98 doi: 10.1177/1468794112459669
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, Elena, Amanda Kenny and Virginia Dickson-Swift (2018) ‘Ethical challenges of community based participatory research: exploring researchers’ experience’, International Journal of Social Research Methodology 21(1): 7–24 doi: 10.1080/13645579.2017.1296714
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yanar, Zeynep M., Mehria Fazli, Jahanara Rahman and Rys Farthing (2016) ‘Research ethics committees and participatory action research with young people: the politics of voice’, Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics 11(2): 122–28 doi: 10.1177/1556264616650114
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yee, Wan Ching and Jane Andrews (2006) ‘Professional researcher or a “good guest”? Ethical dilemmas involved in researching children and families in the home setting’, Educational Review 58(4): 397–413 doi: 10.1080/00131910600971859
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar