Forever fields: studying knowledge practices in the global North: a view from the global South

References

• Abidin, Crystal (2019) ‘Navigating interdisciplinarity as a precarious early career researcher’, Cultural Studies Review 25(2): 78–83. doi:10.5130/csr.v25i2.6880.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, Esther R. (2021) ‘Positionality, privilege, and possibility: The ethnographer “at home” as an uncomfortable’, Anthropology and Humanism 46: 212–225. doi:10.1111/anhu.12326.
   Google Scholar
• Banerjee, Prathama (2020) Elementary Aspects of the Political: Histories from the Global South, Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Benjamin, Walter (1999) The Arcades Project, Translated by Howard Eiland and Kevin McLaughlin. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, Wendy (2017) ‘The vocation of the public university’, in Anton Bech Jørgensen, Jakob Juel Justesen, Nana Bech, Niels Nykrog and Rasmus Bro Clemmensen (eds.), What is Education? An Anthology on Education, Copenhagen: Problema, 55–90.
   Google Scholar
• Clifford, James (1989) ‘Notes on travel and theory’, Inscriptions 5(5.29): 11. https://culturalstudies.ucsc.edu/inscriptions/volume-5/james-clifford/ (accessed 13 September 2023).
   Google Scholar
• Connell, Raewyn (2014) ‘The sociology of gender in southern perspective’, Current Sociology 62(4): 550–567. doi:10.1177/0011392114524510.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connell, Raewyn, F. Collyer, J. Maia, and R. Morrell (2017) ‘Toward a global sociology of knowledge: Post-colonial realities and intellectual practices’, International Sociology 32(1): 21–37. doi:10.1177/0268580916676913.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dixit, Priya (2021) ‘Encounters with borders: A migrant academic’s experiences of the visa regime in the Global North’, Learning and Teaching: The International Journal of Higher Education in the Social Sciences 14(2): 55–75. doi:10.3167/latiss.2021.140204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenhouse, Carol J. (1985) ‘Anthropology at home: Whose home?’, Human Organization 44(3): 261–264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grewal, Inderpal and Cara Kaplan (1994) Scattered Hegemonies: Postmodernity and Transnational Feminist Practices, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Guasco, Anne (2022) ‘On an ethic of not going there’, The Geographical Journal 188: 468–475. doi:10.1111/geoj.12462.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta, Akhil and James Ferguson (1977) ‘Discipline and practice: “The field” as site, method, and location in anthropology’, in A. Gupta and J. Ferguson (eds.) Anthropological Locations: Boundaries and Grounds of a Field Science, Berkeley: University of California Press, 1–46. doi:10.1525/9780520342392-002.
   Google Scholar
• Hountondji, Paulin J. (1997) ‘Introduction: recentring Africa’, in P. J. Hountondji (ed.) Endogenous Knowledge: Research Trails, Dakar: CODESRIA, 1–39.
   Google Scholar
• John, Mary E (1996) Discrepant Dislocations: Feminism, Theory and Postcolonial Histories, New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kanagasabai, Nithila (2018) ‘Possibilities of transformation: Women’s studies in Tier II cities in Tamil Nadu, India’, Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education 39(5): 709–722. doi:10.1080/01596306.2018.1448702.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanagasabai, Nithila (2021) ‘Reversing the gaze: Research from afar’, Economic and Political Weekly 56(50): 65–66.
   Google Scholar
• Leontidou, Lila (2006) ‘Urban social movements: From the ‘right to the city’ to transnational spatialities and flâneur activists’, City 10: 259–268.
   Google Scholar
• Lopez, Alfred J. (2007) ‘Introduction: The (post) global south’, The Global South 1(1): 1–11. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40339224.
   Google Scholar
• Mahler, Anne Garland (2017) ‘Global South’, in E. O’Brien (ed.) Oxford Bibliographies in Literary and Critical Theory. accessed 13 September 2023 https://www.oxfordbibliographies.com/display/document/obo-9780190221911/obo-9780190221911-0055.xml doi:10.1093/OBO/9780190221911-0055
   Google Scholar
• Majumder, Atreyee (2018, January 23) Fieldwork and the Native Informant: A Review of Culture at Large 2017. Retrieved from Member Voices, Fieldsights, Society for Cultural Anthropology: https://culanth.org/fieldsights/fieldwork-and-the-native-informant-a-review-of-culture-at-large-2017.
   Google Scholar
• Messerschmidt, Donald Alan (ed.) (1981) Anthropologists at Home in North America: Methods and Issues in the Study of One’s Own Society, New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Millora, Chris, Siti Maimunah, and E. Enid Still (2020) ‘Reflecting on the ethics of PhD research in the global south: Reciprocity, reflexivity, and situatedness’, Acta Academica 52(1): 10–30. doi:10.18820/24150479/aa52i1/SP2
   Google Scholar
• Mohanty, Chandra Talpade. (1991) ‘Under western eyes: Feminist scholarship and colonial discourses’, in C. T. Mohanty (ed.) Third World Women and the Politics of Feminism, Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, pp. 51-80.
   Google Scholar
• Mughal, Muhammad Aurang Zeb (2015) ‘Being and becoming native: A methodological enquiry into doing anthropology at home’, Anthropological Notebooks 21(1): 121–132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nader, Laura (1972) ‘Up the anthropologist: Perspective gained from studying up’, in D. Hymes (ed.) Reinventing Anthropology, New York: Random House, 284–311.
   Google Scholar
• Narayanaswamy, Lata (2014) ‘NGOs and feminisms in development: Interrogating the “southern women’s NGO”’, Geography Compass 8(8): 576–589. doi:10.1111/gec3.12150
   Google Scholar
• Narayanaswamy, Lata and Julia Schöneberg (2020) ‘Interrogating how we know the world – starting the conversation … ’, Acta Academica 52(1): 1–9. doi:10.18820/24150479/aa52i1/sp1
   Google Scholar
• Niranjana, Tejaswini (2000) ‘Alternative frames? Questions for comparative research in the third world’, Inter-Asia Cultural Studies 1(1): 97–108. doi:10.1080/146493700361024
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, Catherine (2022) ‘“Significant nothingness” in geographical fieldwork’, Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences 134: 82–85. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2022.06.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Priyadharshini, Esther (2003) ‘Coming unstuck: Thinking otherwise about “studying up”’, Anthropology & Education Quarterly 34(4): 420–437.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salter, Mark B. (2006) ‘The global visa regime and the political technologies of the international self: Borders, bodies, biopolitics’, Alternatives: Global, Local, Political 31(2): 167–189. doi:10.1177/030437540603100203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sassen, Saskia (2000) ‘‘Excavating power: In search of frontier zones and new actors’ , Theory,Culture and Society 17(l):163–170.
   Google Scholar
• Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty (1988) ‘Can the subaltern speak?’, in C. Nelson and L. Grossberg (eds.) Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture, Basingstoke: MacMillan Education, 271–313.
   Google Scholar
• Stich, Amy E and Julia E. Colyar (2015) ‘Thinking relationally about studying “up”’, British Journal of Sociology of Education 36(5): 729–746.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waetjen, Thembisa (2013) ‘Review of the book South Africa and India: Shaping the Global South ed. by Isabel Hofmeyr and Michelle Williams’, Transformation: Critical Perspectives on Southern Africa 81: 317–322. doi:10.1353/trn.2013.0008.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao, Xinyi, Aliakbar Akbarit Aliakbar Akbaritabar, Ridhi Kashyap, and Emilio Zagheni (2023) ‘A gender perspective on the global migration of scholars’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 120. doi:10.1073/pnas.2214664120
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar