Publication Cover
Journal of Sexual Aggression
An international, interdisciplinary forum for research, theory and practice
Volume 26, 2020 - Issue 3
1,175
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

The link between myths about sexual aggression and sexual objectification via hostile attitudes toward women

& ORCID Icon

References

  • Abbey, A., McAuslan, P., & Ross, L. T. (1998). Sexual assault perpetration by college men: The role of alcohol, misperception of sexual intent, and sexual beliefs and experiences. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 17, 167–195. doi: 10.1521/jscp.1998.17.2.167
  • Abrahams, N., Jewkes, R., Hoffman, M., & Laubsher, R. (2004). Sexual violence against intimate partners in Cape Town: Prevalence and risk factors reported by men. Bull World Health Organization, 82, 330–337. doi: 10.1590/S0042-96862004000500006
  • Aosved, A. C., & Long, P. J. (2006). Co-occurrence of rape myth acceptance, sexism, racism, homophobia, ageism, classism, and religious intolerance. Sex Roles, 55, 481–492. doi: 10.1007/s11199-006-9101-4
  • Awasthi, B. (2017). From Attire to assault: Clothing, objectification, and De-humanization A possible Prelude to sexual violence? Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 338. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00338
  • Bartky, S. (1990). Femininity and Domination: Studies in the Phenomenology of Oppression. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Bernard, P., Loughnan, S., Marchal, C., Godart, A., & Klein, O. (2015). The exonerating effect of sexual objectification: Sexual objectification decreases rapist blame in a stranger rape context. Sex Roles, 72, 499–508. doi: 10.1007/s11199-015-0482-0
  • Bohner, G., Reinhard, M., Rutz, S., Sturm, S., Kerschbaum, B., & Effler, D. (1998). Rape myths as neutralizing cognitions: Evidence for a causal impact of anti- victim attitudes on men’s self-reported likelihood of raping. European Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 257–268. doi:10.1002/(SICI)10990992(199803/04)28:2257 doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(199803/04)28:2<257::AID-EJSP871>3.0.CO;2-1
  • Burt, M. R. (1980). Cultural myths and supports for rape. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 217–230. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.38.2.217
  • Check, J. V. P. (1985). The hostility toward women scale (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Manitoba, Winnipeg.
  • Cikara, M., Eberhardt, J. L., & Fiske, S. T. (2011). From agents to objects: Sexist attitudes and neural responses to sexualized targets. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23, 540–551. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2010.21497
  • Emmers-Sommer, T. M. (2017). College student perceptions of hypothetical rape disclosures: Do relational and demographic variables pose a risk on disclosure believability? Sexuality & Culture, 21, 664–679. doi: 10.1007/s12119-017-9411-4
  • Forbes, G. B., Adams-Curtis, L. E., Pakalka, A. H., & White, K. B. (2006). Dating aggression, sexual coercion, and aggression-supporting attitudes among college men as a function of participation in aggressive high school sports. Violence Against Women, 12, 441–455. doi: 10.1177/1077801206288126
  • Forbes, G. B., Adams-Curtis, L. E., & White, K. B. (2004). First-and second-generation measures of sexism, rape myths and related beliefs, and hostility toward women: Their interrelationships and association with college students’ experiences with dating aggression and sexual coercion. Violence Against Women, 10, 236–261. doi: 10.1177/1077801203256002
  • Franz, M. R., DiLillo, D., & Gervais, S. J. (2016). Sexual objectification and sexual assault: Do self- objectification and sexual assertiveness account for the link? Psychology of Violence, 6, 262–270. doi: 10.1037/vio0000015
  • Fredrickson, B. L., & Roberts, T. (1997). Objectification theory: Toward understanding women’s lived experiences and mental health risks. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 173–206. doi:10.1111/j.1471- 6402.1997.tb00108.x doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6402.1997.tb00108.x
  • Gallagher, K. E., & Parrott, D. J. (2011). What accounts for men’s hostile attitudes toward women? The influence of hegemonic male role norms and masculine gender role stress. Violence Against Women, 17, 568–583. doi: 10.1177/1077801211407296
  • Gerger, H., Kley, H., Bohner, G., & Siebler, F. (2007). The acceptance of modern myths about sexual aggression scale: Development and validation in German and English. Aggressive Behavior: Official Journal of the International Society for Research on Aggression, 33, 422–440. doi: 10.1002/ab.20195
  • Gerger, H., Kley, H., Bohner, G., & Siebler, F. (2013). Acceptance of Modern Myths About Sexual Aggression (AMMSA) scale. Measurement Instrument Database for the Social Science. Retrieved from www.midss.ie.
  • Gervais, S. J., DiLillo, D., & McChargue, D. (2014). Understanding the link between men’s alcohol use and sexual violence perpetration: The mediating role of sexual objectification. Psychology of Violence, 4, 156–169. doi: 10.1037/a0033840
  • Gervais, S. J., & Eagan, S. (2017). Sexual objectification: The common thread connecting myriad forms of sexual violence against women. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 87, 226–232. doi: 10.1037/ort0000257
  • Grubb, A., & Harrower, J. (2009). Understanding attribution of blame in cases of rape: An analysis of participant gender, type of rape and perceived similarity to the victim. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 15, 63–81. doi: 10.1080/13552600802641649
  • Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression- based approach. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
  • Hayes-Smith, R. M., & Levett, L. M. (2010). Student perceptions of sexual assault resources and prevalence of rape myth attitudes. Feminist Criminology, 5, 335–354. doi: 10.1177/1557085110387581
  • Heflick, N., Goldenberg, J., Cooper, D., & Puvia, E. (2011). From women to objects: Appearance focus, target gender, and perceptions of warmth, morality and competence. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 572–558. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2010.12.020
  • Hegarty, P., Stewart, A. L., Blockmans, I. G., & Horvath, M. A. (2018). The influence of magazines on men: Normalizing and challenging young men’s prejudice with “lads’mags”. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 19, 131–144. doi: 10.1037/men0000075
  • Hunter, J., Figueredo, A., & Malamuth, N. (2010). Developmental pathways into social and sexual deviance. Journal of Family Violence, 25, 141–148. doi: 10.1007/s10896-009-9277-9
  • IBM Corp. Released. (2018). IBN SPSS statistics for windows, version 24.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.
  • Jacques-Tiura, A. J., Abbey, A., Parkhill, M. R., & Zawacki, T. (2007). Why do some men misperceive women's sexual intentions more frequently than others do? An application of the confluence model. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 1467–1480. doi: 10.1177/0146167207306281
  • Kozee, H. B., Tylka, T. L., Augustus-Horvath, C. L., & Denchik, A. (2007). Development and psychometric evaluation of the Interpersonal Sexual Objectification Scale. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 31, 176–189. doi:10.1111/j.14716402.2007.00351.x doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6402.2007.00351.x
  • Lonsway, K. A., & Fitzgerald, L. F. (1994). Rape myths: In review. Psychology of women quarterly, 18, 133–164. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6402.1994.tb00448.x
  • Lonsway, K. A., & Fitzgerald, L. F. (1995). Attitudinal antecedents of rape myth acceptance: A theoretical and empirical reexamination. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 704–711. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.68.4.704
  • Loughnan, S., Haslam, N., Murnane, T., Vaes, J., Reynolds, C., & Suitner, C. (2010). Objectification leads to depersonalization: The denial of mind and moral concern to objectified others. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 709–717. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.755
  • Loughnan, S., Pina, A., Vasquez, E. A., & Puvia, E. (2013). Sexual objectification increases rape victim blame and decreases perceived suffering. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 37, 455–461. doi.10.1177/0361684313485718
  • Malamuth, N. M. (1981). Rape proclivity among males. Journal of Social Issues, 37, 138–157. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4560.1981.tb01075.x
  • Malamuth, N. M., & Check, J. V. (1985). The effects of aggressive pornography on beliefs in rape myths: Individual differences. Journal of Research in Personality, 19, 299–320. doi.org/10.1016/0092-6566(85)90021-2
  • Malamuth, N. M., Linz, D., Heavey, C. L., & Barnes, G. (1995). Using the confluence model of sexual aggression to predict men’s conflict with women: A 10-year follow-up study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 353–369. doi:10.1037/ 0022-3514.69.2.353 doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.69.2.353
  • Malamuth, N. M., Sockloskie, R. J., Koss, M. P., & Tanaka, J. S. (1991). Characteristics of aggressors against women: Testing a model using a national sample of college students. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59, 670–681. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.59.5.670
  • Mason, G. E., Riger, S., & Foley, L. A. (2004). The impact of past sexual experiences on attributions of responsibility for rape. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 19, 1157–1171. doi: 10.1177/0886260504269094
  • Maxfield, M. G., & Babbie, E. (2008). Research methods for criminal justice and criminology. Belmont, CA: Thomas/Wadsworth.
  • Maxwell, L., & Scott, G. (2014). A review of the role of radical feminist theories in the understanding of rape myth acceptance. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 20, 40–54. doi: 10.1080/13552600.2013.773384
  • Mikorski, R., & Szymanski, D. M. (2017). Masculine norms, peer group, pornography, Facebook, and men’s sexual objectification of women. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 18, 257–265. doi: 10.1037/men0000058
  • Murnen, S. K., Wright, C., & Kaluzny, G. (2002). If “boys will be boys,” then girls will be victims? A meta-analytic review of the research that relates masculine ideology to sexual aggression. Sex Roles, 46, 359–375. doi: 10.1023/A:1020488928736
  • Nussbaum, M. C. (1995). Objectification. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 24, 249–291. doi: 10.1111/j.1088-4963.1995.tb00032.x
  • Parkhill, M. R., & Abbey, A. (2008). Does alcohol contribute to the confluence model of sexual assault perpetration? Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 27, 529–554. doi: 10.1521/jscp.2008.27.6.529
  • Polaschek, D. L., & Ward, T. (2002). The implicit theories of potential rapists: What our questionnaires tell us. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 7, 385–406. doi: 10.1016/S1359-1789(01)00063-5
  • Rollero, C. (2013). Men and women facing objectification: The effects of media models on well-being, self- esteem and ambivalent sexism. Revista de Psicología Social, 28, 373–382. doi: 10.1174/021347413807719166
  • Rudman, L. A., & Mescher, K. (2012). Of animals and objects: Men’s implicit dehumanization of women and likelihood of sexual aggression. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 734–746. doi: 10.1177/0146167212436401
  • Russell, T. D., & King, A. R. (2017). Distrustful, conventional, entitled, and dysregulated: PID-5 personality facets predict hostile masculinity and sexual violence in community men. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, Online First, 1–24. doi: 10.1177/0886260517689887
  • Sriwattanakomen, N. (2017). Who's laughing now? The effects of sexist and rape humor. Psi Chi Journal of Psychological Research, 22, 85–97. doi: 10.24839/2325-7342.JN22.2.85
  • Stermer, P., & Burkley, M. (2012). SeX-Box: Exposure to sexist video games predicts benevolent sexism. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 4, 47–55. doi: 10.1037/a0028397
  • Suarez, E., & Gadalla, T. (2010). Stop blaming the victim: A meta-analysis on rape myths. Variables within the context of attribution theory. Sex Roles, 41, 261–277. doi: 10.1177/0886260509354503
  • Vasquez, E. A., Ball, L., Loughnan, S., & Pina, A. (2018). The object of my aggression: Sexual objectification increases physical aggression toward women. Aggressive Behaviour, 44, 5–17. doi: 10.1002/ab.21719
  • Vasquez, E. A., Osinnowo, K., Pina, A., Ball, L., & Bell, C. (2017). The sexual objectification of girls and aggression towards them in gang and non-gang affiliated youth. Psychology, Crime, and Law, 23, 459–471. doi: 10.1080/1068316X.2016.1269902
  • Vonderhaar, R. L., & Carmody, D. C. (2015). There are no “innocent victims” the influence of just world beliefs and prior victimization on rape myth acceptance. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 30, 1615–1632. doi: 10.1177/0886260514549196
  • Woods, M., Hermann, C. A., Nunes, K. L., McPhail, I. V., & Sewell, R. (2011). The validity of self-reported risk among sex offenders. Poster presented at the 2nd North American Correctional and Criminal Justice Psychology Conference, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
  • Workman, J., & Freeburg, E. (1999). An examination of date rape, victim dress, and perceiver variables within the context of attribution theory. Sex Roles, 41, 261–277. doi: 10.1023/A:1018858313267

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.