Gender disparities in sentencing outcomes for sexual offenders

References

• Ashfield, S., Brotherston, S., Eldridge, H., & Elliot, I. (2013). Female sexual offenders: The need for a gender-responsive approach. In K. Harrison, & B. Rainey (Eds.), The Wiley-Blackwell handbook of legal and ethical aspects of sex offender treatment and management (pp. 321–338). Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118314876.ch19.
   Google Scholar
• Becker, J. V., Hall, S. R., & Stinson, J. D. (2001). Female sexual offenders: Clinical, legal and policy issues. Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice, 1(3), 31–53. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1300/J158v01n03_02
   Google Scholar
• Blackwell, B. S., Holleran, D., & Finn, M. A. (2008). The impact of the Pennsylvania sentencing guidelines on sex differences in sentencing. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 24(4), 399–418. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1043986208319453
   Google Scholar
• Byers, E. S. (1996). How well does the traditional sexual script explain sexual coercion? Review of a program of research. Journal of Psychology & Human Sexuality, 8(1-2), 7–25. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1300/J056v08n01_02
   Google Scholar
• Clark, R. D., & Hatfield, E. (1989). Gender differences in receptivity to sexual offers. Journal of Psychology & Human Sexuality, 2(1), 39–55. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1300/J056v02n01_04
   Google Scholar
• Colson, M. H., Boyer, L., Baumstarck, K., & Loundou, A. D. (2013). Female sex offenders: A challenge to certain paradigmes. Meta-analysis. Sexologies, 22(4), 109–117. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sexol.2013.05.002
   Google Scholar
• Cortoni, F. C., Babchishin, K. M., & Rat, C. (2016). The proportion of sexual offenders who are female is higher than thought. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 44(2), 145–162. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854816658923
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Covington, S. S., & Bloom, B. E. (2003). Gendered justice: Women in the criminal justice system. In B. E. Bloom (Ed.), Gendered justice: Addressing female offenders (pp. 3–24). Carolina Academic Press. https://www.stephaniecovington.com/assets/files/4.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Daly, K. (1987). Structure and practice of familial-based justice in a criminal court. Law & Society Review, 21(2), 267–290. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/3053522
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daly, K. (1989). Neither conflict for labeling nor paternalism will suffice: Intersections of race, ethnicity, gender, and family in criminal court decisions. Crime and Delinquency, 35(1), 136–168. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128789035001007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daly, K., & Bordt, R. L. (1995). Sex effects and sentencing: An analysis of the statistical literature. Justice Quarterly, 12(1), 141–175. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/07418829500092601
   Google Scholar
• Damiris, I., McKillop, N., Christensen, L., Rayment-McHugh, S., Burton, K., Hobbs, L., & Patterson, T. (2020). Sentencing disparities for female and male sexual offending in Queensland: Do they exist and what is the impact? Applied Research in Crime and Justice Conference, Brisbane, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Deering, R., & Mellor, D. (2009). Sentencing of male and female child sex offenders: Australian study. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 16(3), 394–412. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13218710902930291
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deering, R., & Mellor, D. (2011). An exploratory qualitative study of the self-reported impact of female-perpetrated childhood sexual abuse. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 20(1), 58–76. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10538712.2011.539964
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denov, M. S. (2001). A culture of denial: Exploring professional perspectives on female sex offending. Canadian Journal of Criminology, 43(3), 303–329. https://search.proquest.com/docview/216107688?accountid=14700 doi: https://doi.org/10.3138/cjcrim.43.3.303
   Google Scholar
• Denov, M. S. (2003). The myth of innocence: Sexual scripts and the recognition of child sexual abuse by female perpetrators. The Journal of Sex Research, 40(3), 303–314. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00224490309552195
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dube, S. R., Anda, R. F., Whitfield, C. L., Brown, D. W., Felitti, V. J., Dong, M., & Giles, W. H. (2005). Long-term consequences of childhood sexual abuse by gender of victim. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 28(5), 430–438. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2005.01.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dwyer, C. (2000). Negotiating diasporic identities: Young British South Asian Muslim women. Women’s Studies International Forum, 23(4), 475–486. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-5395(00)00110-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Embry, R., & LyonsJr.P. M. (2012). Sex-based sentencing: Sentencing discrepancies between male and female sex offenders. Feminist Criminology, 7(2), 146–162. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1557085111430214
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frazier, P. A., & Haney, B. (1996). Sexual assault cases in the legal system: Police, prosecutor, and victim perspectives. Law and Human Behavior, 20(6), 607–628. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01499234
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, N. J., & Sandler, J. C. (2008). Female and male sex offenders: A comparison of recidivism patterns and risk factors. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 23(10), 1394–1413. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260508314304
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friendship, C., Mann, R. E., & Beech, A. R. (2003). Evaluation of a national prison-based treatment program for sexual offenders in England and Wales. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 18(7), 744–759. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260503253236
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gannon, T. A., & Rose, M. R. (2008). Female child sexual offenders: Towards integrating theory and practice. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 13(6), 442–461. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2008.07.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodman-Delahunty, J., & Sporer, S. L. (2010). Unconscious influences in sentencing decisions: A research review of psychological sources of disparity. Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences, 42(1), 19–36. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00450610903391440
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffin, T., & Wooldredge, J. (2006). Sex-based disparities in felony dispositions before versus after sentencing reform in Ohio. Criminology; An interdisciplinary Journal, 44(4), 893–923. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2006.00067.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henning, T. (1995). Psychological explanations in sentencing women in Tasmania. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 28(3), 1–14. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/000486589502800304
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hetherton, J. (1999). The idealization of women: Its role in the minimization of child sexual abuse by females. Child Abuse & Neglect, 23(2), 161–174. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0145-2134(98)00119-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansson-Love, J., & Fremouw, W. (2009). Female sex offenders: A controlled comparison of offender and victim/crime characteristics. Journal of Family Violence, 24(6), 367–376. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-009-9236-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jozkowski, K. N., & Peterson, Z. D. (2013). College students and sexual consent: Unique insights. The Journal of Sex Research, 50(6), 517–523. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2012.700739
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirkwood, D. (2003). Female perpetrated homicide in Victoria between 1985 and 1995. The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 36(2), 152–172. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1375/acri.36.2.152
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kite, D., & Tyson, G. A. (2004). The impact of perpetrator gender on male and female police officers’ perceptions of child sexual abuse. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 11(2), 308–318. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1375/pplt.2004.11.2.308
   Google Scholar
• Kubik, E. K., Hecker, J. E., & Rightland, S. (2002). Adolescent females who have sexually offended: Comparisons with delinquent adolescent female offenders and adolescent males who sexually offend. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 11(3), 63–83. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1300/J070v11n03_04
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kunst, M., Popelier, L., & Varekamp, E. (2015). Victim satisfaction with the criminal justice system and emotional recovery: A systematic and critical review of the literature. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 16(3), 336–358. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838014555034
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LaPlante, M. N., McCormick, N., & Brannigan, G. G. (1980). Living the sexual script: College students’ views of influence in sexual encounters. The Journal of Sex Research, 16(4), 338–355. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00224498009551090
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, C. F., & Stanley, C. R. (2000). Women accused of sexual offenses. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 18(1), 73–81. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0798(200001/02)18:1<73::AID-BSL378>3.0.CO;2-#
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masters, N. T., Casey, E., Wells, E. A., & Morrison, D. M. (2013). Sexual scripts among young heterosexually active men and women: Continuity and change. The Journal of Sex Research, 50(5), 409–420. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2012.661102
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathis, J. L. (1972). Clear thinking about sexual deviations: A new look at an old problem. Nelson-Holt.
   Google Scholar
• McLeod, D. A. (2015). Female offenders in child sexual abuse cases: A national picture. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 24(1), 97–114. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10538712.2015.978925
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mellor, D., & Deering, R. (2010). Professional response and attitudes toward female-perpetrated child sexual abuse: A study of psychologists, psychiatrists, probationary psychologists and child protection workers. Psychology, Crime & Law, 16(5), 415–438. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10683160902776850
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mpofu, E., Athanasou, J. A., Rafe, C., & Belshaw, S. H. (2018). Cognitive-behavioral therapy for reducing recidivism rates of moderate- and high-risk sexual offenders: A scoping systematic literature review. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 62(1), 170–186. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X16644501
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mustard, D. B. (2001). Racial, ethnic, and gender disparities in sentencing: Evidence from the U.S. Federal courts. The Journal of Law and Economics, 44(1), 285–314. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1086/320276
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagel, I. H., & Hagan, J. (1983). Gender and crime: Offense patterns and criminal court sanctions. Crime and Justice, 4, 91–144. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1086/449087
   Google Scholar
• Nathan, P., & Ward, T. (2002). Female sex offenders: Clinical and demographic features. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 8(1), 5–21. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13552600208413329
   Google Scholar
• New Zealand Sentencing Act. (2002). http://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/2002/0009/143.0/DLM135342.html.
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, B. E. (2007). Preventing female-perpetrated sexual abuse. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 8(1), 19–32. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838006296747
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Sullivan, L. F., & Byers, E. S. (1992). College students’ incorporation of initiator and restrictor roles in sexual dating interactions. The Journal of Sex Research, 29(3), 435–446. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499209551658
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peter, T. (2009). Exploring taboos: Comparing male- and female-perpetrated child sexual abuse. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 24(7), 1111–1128. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260508322194
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierce, M. B. (2013). Examining the impact of familial paternalism on the sentencing decision: Gender leniency or legitimate judicial consideration? In B. L. Russell (Ed.), Perceptions of female offenders: How stereotypes and social norms affect criminal justice responses (pp. 93–100). Springer. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5871-5.
   Google Scholar
• The Queen v Drew Webb. (2016). NZDC 9087.
   Google Scholar
• Rodriguez, S. F., Curry, T. R., & Lee, G. (2006). Gender differences in criminal sentencing: Do effects vary across violent, property, and drug offenses? Social Science Quarterly, 87(2), 318–339. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6237.2006.00383.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, D. L., & Ferguson, C. J. (2011). Punishment and rehabilitation attitudes toward sex offenders versus nonsexual offenders. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 20(4), 395–414. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10926771.2011.570287
   Google Scholar
• Russell, B. L. (2013). Perceptions of female offenders: How stereotypes and social norms affect criminal justice responses. Springer. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5871-5_1.
   Google Scholar
• R v AM. (2010). 2 NZLR 750.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, K. M. (2011). The relationship between rape myths and sexual scripts: The social construction of rape. Sex Roles, 65(11-12), 774–782. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-011-0033-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandler, J., & Freeman, N. J. (2011). Female sex offenders and the criminal justice system: A comparison of arrests and outcomes. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 17(1), 61–76. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13552600.2010.537380
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saradjian, J. (2010). Understanding the prevalence of female-perpetrated sexual abuse and the impact of that abuse on victims. In T. A. Gannon, & F. Cortoni (Eds.), Female sexual offenders: Theory, assessment and treatment (pp. 9–30). Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470666715.
   Google Scholar
• Shields, R. T., & Cochran, J. C. (2020). The gender gap in sex offender punishment. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 1(36), 95–118. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-019-09416-x.
   Google Scholar
• Spohn, C. C., & Spears, J. W. (1997). Gender and case processing decisions: A comparison of case outcomes for male and female defendants charged with violent felonies. Women & Criminal Justice, 8(3), 29–59. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1300/J012v08n03_02
   Google Scholar
• Sprott, J. B., & Doob, A. N. (1997). Fear, victimization, and attitudes to sentencing, the courts, and the police. Canadian Journal of Criminology, 39(3), 275–292. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3138/cjcrim.39.3.275
   Google Scholar
• Steffensmeier, D., Kramer, J., & Streifel, C. (1993). Gender and imprisonment decisions. Criminology: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 31(3), 411–446. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.1993.tb01136.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Triandis, H. C. (2018). Individualism and collectivism. Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Tsopelas, C., Spyridoula, T., & Athanasios, D. (2011). Review on female sexual offenders: Findings about profile and personality. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 34(2), 122–126. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlp.2011.02.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United Kingdom Sentencing Council. (2014). Sexual offences definitive guideline. https://www.iwf.org.uk/sites/default/files/inline-files/Sentencing%2520Councils%2520Sexual%2520Offences%2520Definitive%2520Guideline%2520April%25202014%5B1%5D.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Vandiver, D. M., & Teske, R. (2006). Juvenile female and male sex offenders: A comparison of offender, victim, and judicial processing characteristics. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 50(2), 148–165. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X05277941
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varghese, A., & Jenkins, S. R. (2009). Parental overprotection, cultural value conflict, and psychological adaptation among Asian Indian women in America. Sex Roles, 61(3-4), 235–251. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-009-9620-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walton, J. S., & Chou, S. (2015). The effectiveness of psychological treatment for reducing recidivism in child molesters: A systematic review of randomized and nonrandomized studies. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 16(4), 401–417. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838014537905
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinsheimer, C. C., Woiwod, D. M., Coburn, P. I., Chong, K., & Connolly, D. A. (2017). The unusual suspects: Female versus male accused in child sexual abuse cases. Child Abuse & Neglect, 72, 446–455. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2017.09.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West, S. G., Friedman, S. H., & Kim, K. D. (2011). Women accused of sex offenses: A gender-based comparison. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 29(5), 728–740. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.1007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiederman, M. W. (2005). The gendered nature of sexual scripts. The Family Journal: Counseling and Therapy for Couples and Families, 13, 496–502. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1066480705278729
   Google Scholar
• Williams, K. S., & Bierie, D. M. (2015). An incident-based comparison of female and male sexual offenders. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 27(3), 235–257. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063214544333
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar