The association between sentencing and recidivism in men who have committed a sexual offence

References

• Azuero, A. (2016). A note on the magnitude of hazard ratios. Cancer, 122(8), 1298–1299. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.29924
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Babchishin, K., Hanson, R. K., & Blais, J. (2016). Less is more: Using Static-2002R subscales to predict violent and general recidivism among sexual offenders. Sexual Abuse, 28(3), 187–217. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063215569544
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brouillette-Alarie, S., & Proulx, J. (2013). Predictive validity of the Static-99R and its dimensions. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 19(3), 311–328. https://doi.org/10.1080/13552600.2012.747630
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Budd, K., & Desmond, S. A. (2014). Sex offenders and sex crime recidivism: Investigating role of sentence length and time served. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 58(12), 1481–1499. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X13507421
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bushway, S. D., & Piehl, A. M. (2007). The inextricable link between age and criminal history in sentencing. Crime & Delinquency, 53(1), 156–183. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128706294444
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gendreau, P., Goggin, C., & Cullen, F. T. (1999). The effects of prison sentences on recidivism. Department of the Solicitor General. https://www.publicsafety.gc.ca/cnt/rsrcs/pblctns/ffcts-prsn-sntncs-rcdvsm/ffcts-prsn-sntncs-rcdvsm-eng.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Hackett, S., Masson, H., Balfe, M., & Philips, J. (2014). Community reactions to young people who have sexually abused and their families: A shotgun blast, not a rifle shot. Children & Society, 29(4), 243–254. https://doi.org/10.1111/chso.12030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hames, R., & Blanchard, R. (2012). Anthropological data regarding the adaptiveness of hebephilia. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 41(4), 745–747. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-012-9972-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanson, R. K., & Bussière, M. T. (1998). Predicting relapse: A meta-analysis of sexual offender recidivism studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66(2), 348–362. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.66.2.348
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanson, R. K., Lloyd, C. D., Helmus, L., & Thornton, D. (2012). Developing non-arbitrary metrics for risk communication: Percentile ranks for the Static-99/R and Static-2002/R sexual offender risk tools. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 11(1), 9–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/14999013.2012.667511
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanson, R. K., & Morton-Bourgon, K. E. (2009). The accuracy of recidivism risk assessments for sexual offenders: A meta-analysis of 118 prediction studies. Psychological Assessment, 21(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014421
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanson, R. K., & Nicholaichuk, T. (2000). A cautionary note regarding Nicholaichuk et al. (2000). Sexual Abuse, 12(4), 289–293. https://doi.org/10.1177/107906320001200405
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Harper, C. A., Hogue, T. E., & Bartels, R. M. (2017). Attitudes towards sexual offenders: What do we know, and why are they important? Aggression and Violent Behavior, 34, 201–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2017.01.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, A., Phenix, A., Hanson, R. H., & Thorton, D. (2003). STATIC-99 coding rules revised – 2003. http://www.static99.org/pdfdocs/static-99-coding-rules_e.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Helmus, L., Hanson, R. H., Thornton, D., Babchishin, K. M., & Harris, A. J. R. (2012). Absolute recidivism rates predicted by Static-99R and Static-2002R Sex offender risk assessment tools vary across samples. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 39(9), 1148–1171. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854812443648
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helmus, L., Thornton, D., Hanson, R. K., & Babchishin, K. M. (2012). Improving the predictive accuracy of Static-99 and Static-2002 with older Sex offenders. Sexual Abuse, 24(1), 64–101. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063211409951
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsieh, M.-L., Hamilton, Z., & Zgoba, K. M. (2018). Prison experience and reoffending: Exploring the relationship between prison terms, institutional treatment, infractions, and recidivism for sex offenders. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 30(5), 107906321668156–575. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063216681562
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonson, C. L. (2010). The impact of imprisonment on reoffending: A meta-analysis [Doctoral dissertation]. https://etd.ohiolink.edu/apexprod/rws_olink/r/1501/10?clear=10&p10_accession_num=ucin1285687754.
   Google Scholar
• Justice Policy Institute. (2011). Finding direction: Expanding criminal justice options by considering policies of other nations. http://www.justicepolicy.org/uploads/justicepolicy/documents/sentencing.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Mears, D. P., Cochran, J. C., Bales, W. D., & Bhati, A. S. (2016). Recidivism and time served in prison. The Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 106(1), 81–122. https://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/jclc/vol106/iss1/5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morabito, M. S., Williams, L. M., & Pattavina, A. (2019). Decision making in sexual assault cases: Replication research on sexual violence case attrition in the U.S (Document Number 252689). https://www.ojp.gov/pdffiles1/nij/grants/252689.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Nunes, K. L., Firestone, P., Wexler, A. F., Jensen, T. L., & Bradford, J. M. (2007). Incarceration and recidivism among sexual offenders. Law and Human Behavior, 31(3), 305–318. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-006-9065-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parent, G., Guay, J. P., & Knight, R. A. (2011). An assessment of long-term risk of recidivism by adult sex offenders: One size doesn’t fit all. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 38(2), 188–209. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854810388238
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petrunik, M. (1994). Models of dangerousness: A cross jurisdictional review of dangerousness legislation and practice. Policy Branch, Ministry of Solicitor General. https://www.publicsafety.gc.ca/lbrr/archives/k%205165%20p4%201994-eng.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Petrunik, M. (2003). The hare and the tortoise: Dangerousness and sex offender policy in the United States and Canada. Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice, 45(1), 43–72. https://doi.org/10.3138/cjccj.45.1.43
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phenix, A., Fernandez, Y., Harris, A. J. R., Helmus, M., Hanson, R. K., & Thornton, D. (2016). Static-99R Coding Rules Revised – 2016. http://static99.org/pdfdocs/Coding_manual_2016_v2.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness Portfolio Corrections Statistics Committee. (2004). Correctional and conditional release statistical overview. Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness Canada. https://publications.gc.ca/collections/Collection/PS4-12-2004E.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Public Safety Canada. (2020). Corrections and conditional release statistical overview 2019. https://www.publicsafety.gc.ca/cnt/rsrcs/pblctns/ccrso-2019/ccrso-2019-en.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Quinn, J. F., Forsyth, C. J., & Mullen-Quinn, C. (2004). Societal reaction to sex offenders: A review of the origins and results of the myths surrounding their crimes and treatment amenability. Deviant Behavior, 25(3), 215–232. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639620490431147
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ricciardelli, R., & Moir, M. (2013). Stigmatized among the stigmatized: Sex offenders in Canadian penitentiaries. Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice, 55(3), 353–386. https://doi.org/10.3138/cjccj.2012.E22
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rice, M. E., Harris, G. T., Lang, C., & Cormier, C. (2006). Violent Sex offenses: How are they best measured from official records? Law and Human Behavior, 30(4), 525–541. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-006-9022-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rotenberg, C. (2017). From arrest to conviction: Court outcomes of police-reported sexual assaults in Canada, 2009 to 2014. Statistics Canada. https://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/85-002-x/2017001/article/54870-eng.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Rubenfeld, S., & Shanahan Somerville, M. C. (2017). The relationship between length of incarceration and recidivism. https://www.publicsafety.gc.ca/lbrr/archives/cn97265203-eng.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Schmucker, M., & Lösel, F. (2015). The effects of sexual offender treatment on recidivism: An international meta-analysis of sound quality evaluations. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 11(4), 597–630. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-015-9241-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, P., Goggin, C., & Gendreau, P. (2002). The effects of prison sentences and intermediate sanctions on recidivism: General effects and individual differences. https://www.publicsafety.gc.ca/cnt/rsrcs/pblctns/ffcts-prsn-sntncs/ffcts-prsn-sntncs-eng.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Stansfield, R., O’Connor, T., Duncan, J., & Hall, S. (2020). Comparing recidivism of sexual and nonsexual offenders: The role of humanist, spiritual, and religious involvement. Sexual Abuse, 32(6), 634–656. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063219843903
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephens, S., Cantor, J. M., Goodwill, A. M., & Seto, M. C. (2017). Multiple indicators of sexual interest in prepubescent or pubescent children as predictors of sexual recidivism. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 85(6), 585–595. https://doi.org/10.1037/ccp0000194
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephens, S., Newman, J. E., Cantor, J. M., & Seto, M. C. (2018). The static-99R predicts sexual and violent recidivism for individuals with low intellectual functioning. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 24(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/13552600.2017.1372936
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephens, S., Seto, M. C., Goodwill, A. M., & Cantor, J. M. (2018). The relationships between victim age, gender, and relationship polymorphism and sexual recidivism. Sexual Abuse, 30(2), 132–146. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063216630983
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United States Sentencing Commission. (2018). Quick Facts: Sexual Abuse Offenders. FY 2014 through FY2018 Datafiles, USSCFY14-USSCFY18. https://www.ussc.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/research-and-publications/quick-facts/Sexual_Abuse_FY18.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• van den Berg, C., Beijersbergen, K., Nieuwbeerta, P., & Dirkzwager, A. (2017). Sex offenders in prison: Are they socially isolated? Sexual Abuse, 30(7), 828–845. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063217700884
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vargen, L. M., Jackson, K. J., & Hart, S. D. (2020). Interrater reliability, concurrent validity, and predictive validity of the risk for sexual violence protocol. Law and Human Behavior, 44(1), 37–50. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000353
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Villettaz, P., Gilliéron, G., & Killias, M. (2015). The effects on re-offending of custodial vs. non-custodial sanctions: An updated systematic review of the state of knowledge. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 11(1), 1–92. https://doi.org/10.4073/csr.2015.1
   Google Scholar
• Walmsley, R. (2018). World prison population list (12th edition). Institute for Criminal Policy Research. https://www.prisonstudies.org/sites/default/files/resources/downloads/wppl_12.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Weekes, J. R., Pelletier, G., & Beaudette, D. (1995). Correctional officers: How do they perceive sex offenders? International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 39(1), 55–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X9503900107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willis, G. M., Levenson, J. S., & Ward, T. (2010). Desistance and attitudes towards sex offenders: Facilitation or hindrance? Journal of Family Violence, 25(6), 545–556. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-010-9314-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar