A discussion of chuchotage and boothless simultaneous as marginal and unorthodox interpreting modes

References

• AIIC. (2001) 2003. ISO 2603–Fixed booths for simultaneous interpretation. Accessed 18 November 2014. http://www.zkts.si/upload/ISOfixedBooths.pdf
   Google Scholar
• AIIC (International Association of Conference Interpreters). (1991). Text on bidule. Accessed 18 November 2014. http://aiic.net/page/633/text-on-bidule/lang/1
   Google Scholar
• Alexieva, B. 1997. “A Typology of Interpreter-Mediated Events.” The Translator 3 (2): 153–174. doi:10.1080/13556509.1997.10798996.
   Google Scholar
• Alonso Bacigalupe, L. 2001. “La interpretación simultánea: una carrera de obstáculos.” Sendebar 12: 5–34.
   Google Scholar
• Alonso Bacigalupe, L., S. Cruces Colado, and S. Mascuñán Tolón. 2004. “Relaciones entre mercado, docencia e investigación en Traducción e Interpretación.” In Actas del I Congreso internacional de la Asociación Ibérica de Estudios de Traducción e Interpretación, edited by R. Muñoz Martín, 327–338. Granada: AIETI.
   Google Scholar
• Alvar, P., and D. Tanzella, 2011. “Interpreting at the European Institutions: Interpretation Ad Personam.” MA diss., Université de Genève. Accessed 18 November 2014. http://archive-ouverte.unige.ch/unige:17463
   Google Scholar
• Apfelbaum, B. 2010. “The Multilingual Organization of Remembrance in Nazi Camp Memorials.” In Multilingualism at Work, edited by B. Meyer and B. Apfelbaum, 47–80. Hamburg: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• BablesWiki. 2010. Interpreters’ Feedback: European Social Forum - Istanbul 2010. Accessed 18 November 2014. http://www.babels.org/wiki/Esf10InterpretersFeedback
   Google Scholar
• Baigorri Jalón, J. 2000. La interpretación de conferencias: el nacimiento de una profesión: De París a Nuremberg. Granada: Comares.
   Google Scholar
• Baxter, R. N. 2014. “Undergraduate Interpreter Training in the Spanish State: An Analytical Comparison.” Sendebar 25: 219–246.
   Google Scholar
• Boéri, J. 2008. “A Narrative Account of the Babels vs. Naumann Controversy. Competing Perspectives on Activism in Conference Interpreting.” The Translator 14 (1): 21–50. doi:10.1080/13556509.2008.10799248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boéri, J. 2010. “Emerging Narratives of Conference Interpreters’ Training: A Case Study of ad hoc Training in Babels and the Social Forum.” Puentes 9: 61–70. Accessed 18 November 2014. http://www.ugr.es/~greti/puentes/puentes9/08-Julie-Boeri.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Boéri, J. 2012a. “Translating/Interpreting Politics and Praxis. The Impact of Political principles on Babels’ Interpreting Practice.” The Translator 2: 269–290. doi:10.1080/13556509.2012.10799511.
   Google Scholar
• Boéri, J. 2012b. “Ad Hoc Interpreting at the Crossways between Natural, Professional, Novice and Expert Interpreting.” In Interpreting Brian Harris. Recent Developments in Translatology, edited by A. Jiménez Ivars and M. J. Blasco Mayor, 117–132. Bern: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Boéri, J. 2014. “Interpretación y formación ad hoc. Una aproximación contextual y ascendiente a la noción de calidad.” Quaderns. Revista De Traducció 21: 211–223. Accessed 18 November 2014. https://ddd.uab.cat/pub/quaderns/quaderns_a2014n21/quaderns_a2014n21p211.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Child, J. 2010. Introduction to Spanish Translation. Maryland: University Press of America.
   Google Scholar
• De Manuel Jerez, M., J. López Cortés, and M. Brander de la Iglesia. 2004. “Traducción e interpretación: Voluntariado y compromiso social. El compromiso social en traducción e interpretación: Una visión desde ECOS, traductores e intérpretes por la solidaridad.” Puentes 4: 65–72. Accessed 18 November 2014. http://www.ugr.es/~greti/puentes/puentes4/06%20Jesus%20de%20Manuel.pdf
   Google Scholar
• De Pedro Ricoy, R. 2014. “Introduction.” In Interpreting and Translating in Public Service Settings. Policy, Practice, Pedagogy, edited by R. Pedro Ricoy, R. A. Perez, and C. W. L. Wilson, 1–7. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Diriker, E. 2011. “User Expectation Surveys: Questioning Findings and Drawing Lessons for Interpreter Training.” İstanbul Üniversitesi Çeviribilim Dergisi [Istanbul University Journal of Translation and Interpreting]. 2 (3) [no pagination]. Accessed 18 November 2014. http://www.journals.istanbul.edu.tr/iuceviri/article/view/1023011090/1023010348
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, V. 2002. “The Role of Communication in Peace and Relief Mission Negotiations.” Translation Journal 6 (2): 1–13. Accessed 18 November 2014. http://www.translationjournal.net/journal/20interpr.htm
   Google Scholar
• Furtado, M. A. 2014. “A Interpretação In Situ e a Interpretação Remota Realização e Análise Científica de um Conjunto de Estudos Experimentais.” PhD diss., Instituto Superior de Contabilidade e Administração do Porto (ISCAP). Accessed 18 November 2014. http://recipp.ipp.pt/bitstream/10400.22/4596/1/TD_MarcoFurtado_2014.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Gambier, Y. 2007. “Réseaux de traducteurs/interprètes bénévoles.” Meta: Journal des traducteurs / Meta: Translators’ Journal 52 (4): 658–672. Accessed 18 November 2014. http://www.erudit.org/revue/meta/2007/v52/n4/017691ar.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Jones, R. 2002. Conference Interpreting Explained. Manchester: St. Jerome.
   Google Scholar
• Jovičić, S. T., and Z. Šarić. 2008. “Acoustic Analysis of Consonants in Whispered Speech.” Journal of Voice 22 (3): 263–274. doi:10.1016/j.jvoice.2006.08.012.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kade, O. 1967. “Zu einigen Besonderheiten des Simultandolmetschens.” Fremdsprachen 11 (1): 8–17.
   Google Scholar
• Keiser, W. 2004. “L’interprétation de conférence en tant que profession et les précurseurs de l’Association Internationale des Interprètes de Conférence (AIIC) 1918–1953.” Meta: journal des traducteurs/Meta: Translators’ Journal 49 (3): 576–608. Accessed 18 November 2014. http://www.erudit.org/revue/meta/2004/v49/n3/009380ar.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kopczyński, A. 1984. “Problems of Quality in Conference Interpreting.” In Contrastive Linguistics: Prospects and Problems, edited by J. Fisiak, 283–300. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Macdonald, P. 2013. “It Don’t Mean a Thing. Simultaneous Interpretation Quality and User Satisfaction.” The Interpreters’ Newsletter 18: 35–59. Accessed 18 November 2014. https://www.openstarts.units.it/dspace/bitstream/10077/9750/1/Macdonald_Interpreters18.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Markic, J. 2009. “El papel de la traducción y la interpretación en el mundo pluricultural y plurilingüe actual.” In La pluralidad lingüística: aportaciones sociales, culturales y formativas, edited by M. Aparicio and M. C. Buitrago Gómez, 217–236. Madrid: Ministerio de Educación, Subdirección General de Información y Publicaciones.
   Google Scholar
• Marszalenko, J. E. 2014. “Three Stages of Interpreting in Japan’s Criminal Process.” Language and Law/Linguagem e Direito 1 (1): 174–187.
   Google Scholar
• Marti Velázquez, O. F. 2013. “Una propuesta para la inclusión del parámetro protocolo de cabina en la evaluación de la calidad de la interpretación simultánea de conferencia.” Sendebar 24: 287–318. Accessed 18 November 2014. http://revistaseug.ugr.es/index.php/sendebar/article/view/774/2619
   Google Scholar
• Mouzourakis, P. 2006. “Remote Interpreting: A Technical Perspective on Recent Experiments.” Interpreting 8 (1): 45–66. doi:10.1075/intp.8.1.04mou.
   Google Scholar
• Pagura, R. 2003. “A interpretação de conferências: interfaces com a tradução escrita e implicações para a formação de Intérpretes e tradutores.” DELTA: Documentação de Estudos em Lingüística Teórica e Aplicada 19: 209–236. doi:10.1590/S0102-44502003000300013.
   Google Scholar
• Paneth, E. [1957] 2002. “An Investigation into Conference Interpreting.” Reprinted in The Interpreting Studies Reader, edited by F. Pöchhacker and M. Shlesinger, 31–40. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pérez-González, L. 2012. “Non-professionals Translating and Interpreting. Participatory and Engaged Perspectives.” The Translator 18 (2): 149–165. doi:10.1080/13556509.2012.10799506.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickett, J. M. 1955. “Effects of Vocal Effort on Intelligibility.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 27 (5): 1000. doi:10.1121/1.1917967.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pöchhacker, R. 2004. Introducing Interpreting Studies. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pym, A. 2000. Negotiating the Frontiers: Translators and Intercultures in Hispanic History. Manchester: St. Jerome.
   Google Scholar
• Roziner, I., and M. Shlesinger. 2010. “Much Ado about Something Remote: Stress and Performance in Remote Interpreting.” Interpreting 12 (2): 214–247. doi:10.1075/intp.12.2.05roz.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubin, A. D., V. Praneetvatakul, S. Gherson, C. A. Moyer, and R. T. Sataloff. 2006. “Laryngeal Hyperfunction during Whispering: Reality or Myth?” Journal of Voice 20 (1): 121–127. doi:10.1016/j.jvoice.2004.10.007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salevsky, H. 1982. “Теоретические проблемы классификации видов перевода.” [Theoretical Problems of the Classification of Types of Translation].” Fremdsprachen 2: 80–86.
   Google Scholar
• Sánchez Balsalobre, L., E. Monteoliva García, E. Romero Gutiérrez, and J. De Manuel Jerez. 2010. “12 Years Breaking down the Barriers of Silence and Languages.” In Compromiso Social y Traducción/Interpretación – Translation/Interpreting and Social Activism, edited by J. Boéri and C. Maier, 7–18. Granada: ECOS.
   Google Scholar
• Valero Garcés, C. 2006. “Las instituciones oficiales y sus soluciones a los problemas de 595 comunicación.” Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada Vol. Extra 1: 29–48. Accessed 18 November 2014. http://dialnet.unirioja.es/descarga/articulo/2198679.pdf
   Google Scholar