Business Students' Ranking of Reasons for Assessment: Gender Differences

REFERENCES

• Adams, C and King, K (1994) Towards a framework for student self-assessment, Innovation in Education and Training International, 32, 4, 336-43.
   Google Scholar
• Atkins, M, Beattie, J and Dockrell, W (eds) (1993) Assessment Issues in Higher Education, Department of Employment, London.
   Google Scholar
• Bayliss, V (1993) Foreword. In Atkins, M, Beattie, J and Dockrell, W (eds) Assessment Issues in Higher Education, Department of Employment, London.
   Google Scholar
• Bligh, D, Jaques, D and Warren-Piper, D (1981) Seven Decisions When Teaching Students, A. Wheaton & Co, Exeter, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Boud, D (1981) Developing greater student autonomy in student learning, Kogan Page, London.
   Google Scholar
• Boud, D (1986) Implementing Student Self-Assessment, HERDSA Green Guide no 5, Sydney.
   Google Scholar
• Brannon, L (1996) Gender: Psychological Perspectives, Allyn & Bacon, London.
   Google Scholar
• Broadfoot, P (1996) Education, Assessment and Society, Open University Press, Buckingham.
   Google Scholar
• Brook? eld, S (1982) Independent Adult Learning, ‘Adults: Psychological and Educational Perspectives’ series, University of Nottingham.
   Google Scholar
• Brookhart, S (1997) A theoretical framework for the role of classroom assessment in motivating student effort and achievement, Applied Measurement In Education, 10, 2, 161-80.
   Google Scholar
• Cheng, W and Warren, M (1997) Having second thoughts: student perceptions before and after a peer assessment exercise, Studies in Higher Education, 22, 2, 233-9.
   Google Scholar
• Chipman, S (1996) Still far too sexy a topic, Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 19, 248-9.
   Google Scholar
• Clare, J (1996) Undergraduate survey: why Oxbridge students have the blues, The Daily Telegraph, Thursday, 28 November, p 4.
   Google Scholar
• Crick, W F (1964) A Higher Award For Business Studies: report of the advisory sub-committee on a Higher Award in Business Studies, HMSO, Swindon.
   Google Scholar
• Dowker, A (1996) How important is spacial ability to mathematics? Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 19, 251.
   Google Scholar
• Epstein, H (1996) Omissions relevant to gender-linked mathematical abilities, Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 19, 251-2.
   Google Scholar
• Geary, D (1996) Sexual selection and sex differences in mathematical abilities, Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 19, 229-85.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbs, G (1989) ‘Module 3 Assessment’, Certi? cate in Teaching in Higher Education by Open Learning, The Oxford Centre for Staff Development, Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbs, G and Jenkins (eds) (1992) Teaching large classes in HE: How to maintain quality with reduced resources, Kogan Page, London.
   Google Scholar
• Graue, E and Smith, S (1996) Ventriloquating the meanings of mathematics, Curriculum Studies, 4, 3, 301-27.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, D and Bell, C (1994) Evaluation and Assessing for Learning, Kogan Page, London.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, I and Large, B (1993) Assessment of students’ oral communication skills by staff and peer groups, The New Academic, Summer.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, G (1997) The Dearing Report: A summary with respect to learning technology, and some ? rst thoughts, special paper for the Association for Learning Technology, 24th July.
   Google Scholar
• Klug, B (1974) Student Pro? les, Butterworth Press, London.
   Google Scholar
• MacFarlane, B (1997) The business studies ? rst degree: institutional trends and the pedagogic context, Teaching in Higher Education, 2, 1.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, J (1997) Dispelling some myths about mature students in higher education: study skills, approaches to studying and intellectual ability. In Sutherland, P (ed.) Adult Learning, a reader, Kogan Page, London, 166-73.
   Google Scholar
• Schmeck, R (1997) Personal factors that in? uence a student’s choice of learning tactics. In Sutherland, P (ed.), Adult Learning, a reader, Kogan Page, London, 58-9.
   Google Scholar
• Tillyard, A (1913) A History of University Reforms, W. Heffer & Sons, Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Trigwell, K and Prosser, M (1996) Changing approaches to teaching: a relational perspective, Studies in Higher Education, 21, 3, 275-87.
   Google Scholar
• Watts, H, Workman, L, Berrow, T and Gardner, W (1997) Sex differences in IQ score predictions in higher education, Journal of Further and Higher Education, 21, 1.
   Google Scholar
• Willis, D (1993) Learning and assessment: exposing the inconsistency of theory and practice, Oxford Review of Education, 19, 3, 383-402.
   Google Scholar
• Winter, R (1993) Education or grading? arguments for a non-subdivided honours degree, Studies in Higher Education, 18, 3, 363-77.
   Google Scholar