Using Student Reflective Self-Assessment for Awarding Degree Classifications

REFERENCES

• Bhalerao, A and Ward, A (2001) Towards Electronically Assisted Peer Assessment, a case study. ALT-J, 9,1, 26-37.
   Google Scholar
• Bloom, B (1956) A taxonomy of educational objectives: Handbook of Cognitive Domain. McKay, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Bostock, S (2001) Peer Assessment: principles, a case, and computer support. Paper for LTSN-ICS workshop in Computer Assisted Assessment. Warwick University, 5-6 April. http://www.keele.ac.uk/depts/es/Stephen_Bostock/does/ Itsniesapril2001.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Boud, D (1992) The use of self-assessment schedules in Negotiated Learning. Studies in Higher Education. 18, 5, 529-49.
   Google Scholar
• Boud, D. Cohen, R and Sampson, J (1999) Peer learning and assessment. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 24, 4, 413-26.
   Google Scholar
• Bond, D and Falchikov, N (1989) Quantitative studies of self-assessment in higher education: a critical analysis of findings. Higher Education, 18, 529-49.
   Google Scholar
• Brindley, C and Scoffield, S (1998) Peer assessment in undergraduate programmes. Teaching in Higher Education, 3. 1, 79-89.
   Google Scholar
• Dancer, WT and Dancer, J (1992) Peer rating in higher education. Journal of Education for Business. 67, 306-9.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, P (2000) Computerized peer assessment, Innovations in Education and Training International, 37, 4, 346-55.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, P (2001) CAA must be more than multiple choice tests for it to be academically credible? In Danson, M and Eahry, C (eds) Proceedings of 5th International CAA Conference Loughborough 2001, pp. 145-9.
   Google Scholar
• Dennis, H and Dempster, J (2000) Enhancing critical debate through web-based discussion and publishing. Interactions 4 (2)., Available online: http://www. warwick. ac.uk/ets/interactions/vol4no2/den nis. htm
   Google Scholar
• Dochy, FJRC and McDowell, I (1997) Assessment as a tool for learning. Studies in Educational Evaluation. 23, 279-98.
   Google Scholar
• Dochy, FJRC, Segers, M and Sluijsmans, D (1999) The use of Self-Peer, and Co-Assessment in Higher Education: a review. Studies in Higher Education, 24, 3, 331-50.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, R and Sutton, A (1992) A practical approach to student-centred learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 23, 1, 4-20.
   Google Scholar
• Falchikov, N (1986) Product comparisons and process benefits of collaborative self & peer group assessments. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 11, 2, 146-66.
   Google Scholar
• Falchikov, N (1995) Peer feedback marking: developing peer assessment. Innovations in Education and Training International, 32, 175-87.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, TGF (1987) An exercise in improving the potential of exams for learning. European Journal of Engineering Education, 12, 4, 311-23.
   Google Scholar
• Longhurst, N and Norton, LS (1997) Self-assessment in course work essays. Studies, in Educational Evaluation, 23, 319-30.
   Google Scholar
• McDowell, I. (1995) The impact of innovative assessment on student learning, Innovations in Education and Training International. 32, 302-13.
   Google Scholar
• Mowl, G and Pain, R (1995) Using self & peer assessment to improve students' essay writing: a cast study from geography. Innovations in Education & Training International. 32, 4, 324-35.
   Google Scholar
• Norton, L (1990) Essay writing: what really counts. Higher Education. 20, 411-12.
   Google Scholar
• Orsmond, P. Merry, S and Reiling, K (1996) The importance of marking criteria in the use of peer assessment. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 21, 3, 239-50.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, RS (1978) Ethics and Education. Unwin Brothers Ltd. London.
   Google Scholar
• Race, P (1995) The art of assessing. The New Academic, 4, 3 and 5, 1
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, JM (1999) Computer-assisted peer review, Computer-Assisted Assessment in Higher Education SEDA. Kogan Page, London, pp. 95-102.
   Google Scholar
• Somervell, H (1993) Issues in assessment, enterprise and higher education the case for self-, peer- and collaborative learning. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 18, 221-33.
   Google Scholar
• Stefani, LAI (1994) Peer, self and tutor assessment: relative reliabilities. Studies in Higher Education, 19, 1, 69-75.
   Google Scholar
• Topping, KJ (1998) Peer-assessment between students in colleges and universities. Review of Educational Research, 68, 249-76.
   Google Scholar