REFERENCES
- American Association for the Advancement of Science (1993) Benchmarks for Science Literacy. Oxford University Press, New York.
- Bloom, B S (1956) Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Handbook I: Cognitive Domain. David McKay, New York.
- Campbell, D and Stanley, J (1966) Experimental and Quasi-experimental Designs for Research. Rand McNally, Chicago.
- Chall, J S (2000) The Academic Achievement Challenge: What Really Works in the Classroom? Guilford Press, New York.
- Chang, C Y (2000) Enhancing tenth graders' earth science learning through computer-assisted instruction. Journal of Geoscience Education, 48, 636-40.
- Chang, C Y (2001a) Comparing the impacts of a problem-based computer-assisted instruction and the direct-interactive teaching method on student science achievement. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 10, 147-53.
- Chang, C Y (2001b) A problem-solving based computer-assisted tutorial for the earth sciences. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 17, 263-74.
- Chang, C Y (2002). Does computer-assisted instruction + problem solving = improved science outcomes? A pioneer study. The Journal of Educational Research, 95, 143-50.
- Clark, R (1994) Media will never influence learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 42, 21-9.
- Cohen, J (1988) Statistics power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd edn. Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc., Hillsdale, NJ.
- Davis, I. P. Storch, D M and Strawser, L D (1987) Physical chemistry at USAFA: Personalized instruction. Journal of Chemical Education, 64, 784-7.
- Dubrkopf, R and Kramer, D W (1991) Enhancing biology lectures with videodisc. American Biology Teacher, 53, 48-53.
- Fletcherflinn, C M and Gravatt, B (1995) The efficacy of computer-assisted-instruction (CAI) - a meta analysis. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 12, 219-42.
- Kulik, C-L C, and Kulik, J A (1991) Effectiveness of computer-based instruction: an updated analysis. Computers in Human Behavior, 7, 75-94.
- Lu, C R, Voss, B E, and Kleinsmith, L J (1997) The effect of a microcomputer-based biology study center on learning in high-school biology students. American Biology Teacher, 59, 270-8.
- Marsh, E J and Kumar, D D (1992) Hypermedia: a conceptual framework for science education and review of recent findings. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 1, 25-37.
- Martin, M O, Mullis, I V S, Gonzalez, E J, Gregory, K D, Smith, T A, Chrostowski, S J, Garden, R A and O'Connor, K M (2000) TIMSS 1999 International Science Report. International Study Center. Lynch School of Education, Boston College, Boston.
- Millar, R and Osborne, J (1998) Beyond 2000: Science Education for the Future. King's College, London.
- Ministry of Education (2001) The 1-9 Grades Science and Technology Curriculum Standards. Ministry of Education, Taipei.
- National Research Council (1996) National Science Education Standards. National Academy Press, Washington, DC.
- Olugbemiro, J (1991) Computers and the learning of biological concepts, attitudes and achievement of Nigerian students. Science Education, 75, 701-6.
- Purao, S (1997) Hyper-link teaching to foster active learning. Proceedings of the International Academy for Information Management Annual Conference. 12th. Atlanta, GA, 12-14 December.
- Renshaw, C F and Taylor, H A (2000) The educational effectiveness of computer-based instruction. Computers and Geosciences, 677-82.
- Thompson, A D, Simonson, M R and Hargrave, C P (1996) Educational Technology: A Review of the Research. 2nd edn. The Association for Educational Communications and Technology, Bloomington, IN.
- Walberg, H J (1990) Productive teaching and instruction: assessing the knowledge base. Phi Delta Kappan, 71, 470-8.
- Yalcinalp, S. Geban, O and Ozkan, I (1995) Effectiveness of using computer-assisted supplementary instruction for teaching the mole concept. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32, 1083-95.