A STUDY IN THE EVALUATION OF SOME JUNIOR SCHOOL SCIENCE PROGRAMS

References

• Amaria , R. , Biran , L. A. and Leith , G. O. M. 1966 . Learning in Pairs , University of Birmingham . Research Notes on Programmed Learning No. 10,
   Google Scholar
• Biran , L. A. , Clarke , R. and Leith , G. O. M. 1966 . Mode of Response and Learner Characteristics , Research Notes on Programmed Learning No. 13 University of Birmingham .
   Google Scholar
• Carpenter , R. 1963 . “A reading method and an activity method in elementary science instruction ‐‐ comparison,” . Science Education , 44 : 256 – 258 .
   Google Scholar
• Crabtree , J. F. 1967 . “A study of the relationships between score, time I. Q. and reading level for fourth‐grade students using programmed science materials,” . Science Education , 51 : 298 – 304 .
   Google Scholar
• Department of Education and Science . 1967 . Children and their Primary Schools , London : H.M.S.O . A report of the Central Advisory Council for Education, paragraphs 663‐665
   Google Scholar
• Hedges , W. H. and MacDougall , M. A. 1964 . “Teaching fourth‐grade science by means of programmed science materials with laboratory experiences,” . Science Education , 48 : 64 – 76 .
   Google Scholar
• Hedges , W. H. and MacDougall , M. A. 1965 . “Teaching fourth‐grade soience by means of programmed science materials with laboratory experiences,” . Science Education , 49 : 348 – 358 .
   Google Scholar
• Kerr , J. F. and Neal , G. 1966 . “Understanding in junior science,” . Educational Review , 18 : 167 – 176 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larkin , T. C. 1964 . “Electricity: a comparison between linear and branching methods of programming,” . Educational Review , 16 : 92 – 98 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larkin , T. C. and Leith , G. O. M. 1964 . “The effects of linear and branching methods of programmed instruction on learning and retention of a topic in elementary science,” . Programmed Learning and Educational Technology , 1 : 12 – 16 .
   Google Scholar
• Leedham , J. G. 1965 . “Programmed learning: revision in small groups,” . Educational Research , 7 : 147 – 154 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis , D. G. 1967 . Statistical Methods in Education , London : University of London Press .
   Google Scholar
• Neal , G. 1959 . “The age placement of science in a junior school.” , University of Birmingham . Unpublished D.C.P. dissertation,
   Google Scholar
• Oldfield , W. J. 1964 . Individual vs. Group Methods in Programmed Instruction , Research Notes on Programmed Learning No. 1 University of Birmingham .
   Google Scholar
• Peel , E. A. 1967 . “Programmed thinking,” . Programmed Learning and Educational Technology , 4 : 151 – 157 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perrodin , A. F. 1966 . “Children's attitudes towards elementary school science,” . Science Education , 50 : 214 – 218 .
   Google Scholar
• Pumfrey , P. D. 1962 . “Junior school science,” . Educational Review , 14 : 142 – 151 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts , J. D. 1963 . “An experiment in programmed instruction: junior school science,” . Educational Review , 15 : 118 – 131 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snedecor , G. W. and Cochran , W. G. 1967 . Statistical Methods , Ames , Iowa : Iowa State University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Thomas , A. 1966 . “An experiment in programming junior science,” . Programmed Learning and Educational Technology , 3 : 163 – 170 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams , J. D. 1965 . “Some problems involved in the experimental comparison of teaching methods,” . Educational Research , 8 : 26 – 41 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar