Collaborative practices between correctional and mental health services in Norway: Expanding the roles and responsibility competence domain

References

• Akkerman, S. F., & Bakker, A. (2011). Boundary crossing and boundary objects. Review of Educational Research, 81, 132–169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Appelbaum, K. L., Hickey, J. M., & Packer, I. (2001). The role of correctional officers in multidisciplinary mental health care in prisons. Psychiatric Services, 52(10), 1343–1347. doi:10.1176/appi.ps.52.10.1343
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armstrong, S. (2012). Reducing reoffending: Review of selected countries. Edinburgh, UK: Scottish Centre for Crime and Justice Research.
   Google Scholar
• Atkinson, M., Doherty, P., & Kinder, K. (2002). Models, challenges and key factors for success. Journal of Early Childhood Research, 3(1), 7–17. doi:10.1177/1476718X05051344
   Google Scholar
• Bhaskar, R. A. (2008). Fathoming the depths of reality. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bond, B. J., & Gittell, J. H. (2010). Cross-agency coordination of offender reentry: Testing collaboration outcomes. Journal of Criminal Justice, 38(2), 118–129. doi:10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2010.02.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. G. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of capital (pp. 241–258). New York, NY: Greenwood Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brandt, B., Lutfiyya, M. N., King, J. A., & Chioreso, C. (2014). A scoping review of interprofessional collaborative practice and education using the lens of the Triple Aim. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 1820, 1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Chang, Z., Larsson, H., Lichtenstein, P., & Fazel, S. (2015). Psychiatric disorders and violent reoffending: A national cohort study of convicted prisoners in Sweden. The Lancet Psychiatry, 0366(15), 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Cramer V. (2014) Kompetansesenter for Helseregion Sør-Øst Forekomst av psykiske lidelser hos domfelte i norske fengsler [The Health Resource Centre for the South East Region: The prevalence of mental disorders in offenders in Norwegian prisons]. Oslo, Norway: Helse Sør-Øst.
   Google Scholar
• Daniels, H., Leadbetter, J., Warmington, P., Edwards, A., Brown, S., Middleton, D., … Apostolov, A. (2007). Learning in and for multi-agency working. Oxford Review of Education, 33, 521–538.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dvoskin, J. A., & Spiers, E. M. (2004). On the role of correctional officers in prison mental health. The Psychiatric Quarterly, 75(1), 41–59. doi:10.1023/B:PSAQ.0000007560.09475.a0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, A. (2011). Building common knowledge at the boundaries between professional practices: Relational agency and relational expertise in systems of distributed expertise. International Journal of Educational Research, 50(1), 33–39. doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2011.04.007
   Google Scholar
• Engestrom, Y. (2001). Expansive learning at work: Towards an activity theoretical reconceptualisation. Journal of Education and Work, 14, 133–156. doi:10.1080/13639080020028747
   Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y., Engeström, R., & Kärkkäinen, M. (1995). Polycontextuality and boundary crossing in expert cognition: Learning and problem solving in complex work activities. Learning and Instruction, 5, 319–336.
   Google Scholar
• Friestad, C., & Kjelsberg, E. (2009). Drug use and mental health problems among prison inmates–results from a nanation-wide prison population study. Nordic Journal of Psychiatry, 63, 237–245. doi:10.1080/08039480802571044
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Graneheim, U. H., & Lundman, B. (2004). Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: Concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Education Today, 24(2), 105–112. doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2003.10.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hean, S., Willumsen, E., Ødegård, A., & Bjørkly, S. (2015). Using social innovation as a theoretical framework to guide future thinking on facilitating collaboration between mental health and criminal justice services. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 14(4), 280–289.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Interprofessional Education Collaborative. (2011). Core competencies for interprofessional collaborative practice: Report of an expert panel. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Justice Cooperation Network. (2011). Development of minimum standards and best practice model. Retrieved January 01, 2016, from. http://jcn.pixel-online.org/files/workshops/04/01_Englishversion.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kernick, D. (2003). Can complexity theory provide better understanding of integrated care? Journal of Integrated Care, 11, 22–29. doi:10.1108/14769018200300047
   Google Scholar
• Kristoffersen, R. (2013). Correctional statistics of Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway and Sweden 2008–2012. Oslo, Norway: KRUS.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, D. (2001). Distributing responsibilities*. The Journal of Political Philosophy, 9(4), 453–471. doi:10.1111/1467-9760.00136
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norwegian Ministry of Health and Care. (1974). Report. no. 9 (1974 to 1975). Hospital Development in regionalized health care. Oslo, Norway: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Norwegian Ministry of Justice and Police. (2008). Punishment that works. Oslo, Norway: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Ødegård, A. (2006). Exploring perceptions of interprofessional collaboration in child mental health care. International Journal of Integrated Care, 6(4), e25. doi:10.5334/ijic.165
   Google Scholar
• Orchard, C. A., & Bainbridge, L. A. (2010). A National interprofessional competency framework. Vancouver, Canada: Canadian Interprofessional Health Collaborative.
   Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Rittel, H., & Webber, M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4, 155–169. doi:10.1007/BF01405730
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sapouna. (2015). What works to reduce reoffending: A summary of the evidence. Edinburgh, UK: Justice Analytical Services Scottish Government.
   Google Scholar
• Shenton, A. (2004). Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects. Education for information, 22, 63–75. doi:10.1111/j.1744-618X.2000.tb00391.x
   Google Scholar
• Skeem, J., & Peterson, J. (2011). Major risk factors for recidivism among offenders with mental illness. Report prepared for the Council of State Governments (CSG). Retrieved January 01, 2016, from http://riskreduction.soceco.uci.edu/index.php/publications-all/published-risk-assessments/
   Google Scholar
• Stones, R. (2005) Strong Structuration Theory. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Stuart K. (2014). Collaborative agency to support integrated care for children, young people and families: An action research study. Journal of Integrated Care, 14, 1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sverdrup, S. (2013). Evaluering av tilbakeføringskoordinatorene: Analyse av implementeringsprosessen [Evaluation of the reintegration coordinator: An analysis of the implementation process]. Oslo, Norway: Hogskolen Diakon.
   Google Scholar
• Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (2003). Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Vangen, S., & Huxham, C. (2013). Building and using the theory of collaborative advantage. In R. Keast, M. Mandell, & R. Agranoff (Eds.), Building and using the theory of collaborative advantage. In network theory in the public sector: Building new theoretical frameworks. New York, NY: Taylor and Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Willumsen, E. (2008) Interprofessional collaboration–A matter of differentiation and integration? Theoretical reflections based in the context of Norwegian childcare. Journal of Interprofessional Care 22, 352–363.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willumsen, E., & Skivenes, M. (2005). Collaboration between service users and professionals: Legitimate decisions in child protection – a Norwegian model Correspondence. Child and Family Social Work, 10, 197–206. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2206.2005.00371.x
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organisation. (2010). Framework for action on interprofessional education & collaborative practice. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO.
   Google Scholar
• Zwarenstein, M., Goldman, J., & Reeves, S. (2009). Interprofessional collaboration : Effects of practice-based interventions on professional practice and healthcare outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 8(3), CD000072.
   Google Scholar