3,074
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Exploring interprofessional collaboration during the implementation of a parent-infant mental health service: A qualitative study

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 877-885 | Received 27 Aug 2021, Accepted 01 Nov 2022, Published online: 28 Nov 2022

References

  • Aquino, M. R. J. V., Olander, E. K., Needle, J. J., & Bryar, R. M. (2016). Midwives’ and health visitors’ collaborative relationships: A systematic review of qualitative and quantitative studies. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 62, 193–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2016.08.002
  • Asarnow, J. R., Rozenman, M., Wiblin, J., & Zeltzer, L. (2015). Integrated medical-behavioral care compared with usual primary care for child and adolescent behavioral health: A meta-analysis. JAMA Pediatrics, 169(10), 929–937. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2015.1141
  • Bateson, K., Lang, B., Hogg, S., & Clear, A. (2019). Development and implementation toolkit. Parent-Infant Foundation.
  • Bion, W. R. (1962). Learning from experience. Karnac.
  • Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
  • Burbach, F., & Pote, H. (2021). Digital approaches – A paradigm shift? Journal of Family Therapy, 43(2), 169–184. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6427.12336
  • Cain, C. L., Frazer, M., & Kilaberia, T. R. (2019). Identity work within attempts to transform healthcare: Invisible team processes. Human Relations, 72(2), 370–396. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726718764277
  • Cooper, M., Evans, Y., & Pybis, J. (2016). Interagency collaboration in children and young people’s mental health: A systematic review of outcomes, facilitating factors and inhibiting factors. Child: Health, Care & Development, 42(3), 325–342. https://doi.org/10.1111/cch.12322
  • Department for Health and Social Care. (2021). The best start for life: A vision for the 1,001 critical days. The early years healthy development review report. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/973112/The_best_start_for_life_a_vision_for_the_1_001_critical_days.pdf
  • Dow, A. W., Zhu, X., Sewell, D., Banas, C. A., Mishra, V., & Tu, S. (2017). Teamwork on the rocks: Rethinking interprofessional practice as networking. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 31(6), 677–678. https://doi.org/10.1080/13561820.2017.1344048
  • Goldsmith, J., Goldberger, D., Taylor, C., & Melbourne, J. (2018). A specialist mental health service that places the mother-infant relationship at the centre of care. Journal of Health Visiting, 6(2), 82–88. https://doi.org/10.12968/johv.2018.6.2.82
  • Health Research Authority. (2020). UK Policy framework for health and social care research. Author. https://www.hra.nhs.uk/planning-and-improving-research/policies-standards-legislation/uk-policy-framework-health-social-care-research/
  • Hunter, R., Glazebrook, K., & Ranger, S. (2020). The Leeds Infant Mental Health Service: Early relationships matter. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 40(1), 91–104. https://doi.org/10.1080/02646838.2020.1828842
  • Kennedy, H., Landor, M., & Todd, L. (2010). Video Interaction Guidance as a method to promote secure attachment. Educational and Child Psychology, 27(3), 59–72.
  • Lee, P., & Mee, C. (2015). The importance of parent- infant mental health services. Community Practitioner, 88(8), 31–35. https://www.communitypractitioner.co.uk/journal
  • Malone, J. C., & Dayton, C. J. (2015). What is the container/contained when there are ghosts in the nursery?: Joining Bion and Fraiberg in dyadic interventions with mother and infant. Infant Mental Health Journal, 36(3), 262–274. https://doi.org/10.1002/imhj.21509
  • Marvin, R. S., Cooper, G., Hoffman, K., & Powell, B. (2002). The Circle of Security project: Attachment-based intervention with caregiver-preschool child dyads. Attachment & Human Development, 4(1), 107–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616730252982491
  • Megnin-Viggars, O., Symington, I., Howard, L. M., & Pilling, S. (2015). Experience of care for mental health problems in the antenatal or postnatal period for women in the UK: A systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative research. Archive of Women’s Mental Health, 18(6), 745–759. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00737-015-0548-6
  • Moore, T. (2017). Authentic engagement: The nature and role of the relationship at the heart of effective practice. Keynote Address at ARACY Parental Engagement Conference. Maximising Every Child’s Potential. Melbourne, Australia: Centre for Community Child Health.
  • Myors, K. A., Schmied, V., Johnson, M., & Cleary, M. (2013). Collaboration and integrated services for perinatal mental health: An integrative review. Child and Adolescent Mental Health, 18(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-3588.2011.00639.x
  • Noroña, C. R., & Acker, M. L. (2016). Implementation and sustainability of child-parent psychotherapy: The role of reflective consultation in the learning collaborative model. Infant Mental Health Journal, 37(6), 701–716. https://doi.org/10.1002/imhj.21607
  • Olander, E. K., Aquino, M. R. J. V., Chhoa, C., Harris, E., Lee, S., & Bryar, R. M. (2019). Women’s views of continuity of information provided during and after pregnancy: A qualitative interview study. Health & Social Care in the Community, 27(5), 1214–1223. https://doi.org/10.111/hsc.12764
  • Olander, E. K., Moran, P. M., Coates, R., & Ayers, S. (2021). Evaluation of Together with Baby service. Parent Infant Foundation.
  • Parent-Infant Foundation. (2021). There are currently 39 parent-infant teams in the UK. https://parentinfantfoundation.org.uk/teams/locations/
  • Reeves, S., Pelone, F., Harrison, R., Goldman, J., Zwarenstein, M., & Zwarenstein, M. (2017 8). Interprofessional collaboration to improve professional practice and healthcare outcomes. Cochrane Library, 2018, CD000072
  • Reeves, S., Xyrichis, A., & Zwarenstein, M. (2018). Teamwork, collaboration, coordination, and networking: Why we need to distinguish between different types of interprofessional practice. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 32(1), 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1080/13561820.2017.1400150
  • Ruch, G. (2007). Reflective practice in contemporary child-care social work: The role of containment. The British Journal of Social Work, 37(4), 659–680. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bch277
  • Sarnat, J. E. (2019). What’s new in parallel process? The evolution of supervision’s signature phenomenon. The American Journal of Psychoanalysis, 79(3), 304–328. https://doi.org/10.1057/s11231-019-09202-5
  • Schot, E., Tummers, L., & Noordegraaf, M. (2020). Working on working together. A systematic review on how healthcare professionals contribute to interprofessional collaboration. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 34(3), 332–342. https://doi.org/10.1080/13561820.2019.1636007
  • Sekhon, M., Cartwright, M., & Francis, J. J. (2017). Acceptability of healthcare interventions: An overview of reviews and development of a theoretical framework. BMC Health Services Research, 17, 88. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-017-2031-8
  • Sheaff, R., Brand, S. L., Lloyd, H., Wanner, A., Fornasiero, M., Briscoe, S., Valderas, J. M., Byng, R., & Pearson, M. (2018). From programme theory to logic models for multispecialty community providers: A realist evidence synthesis. Health Services and Delivery Research, 6(24), 1–210. https://doi.org/10.3310/hsdr06240
  • World Health Organization. (2010). Framework for action on interprofessional education & collaborative practice. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/framework-for-action-on-interprofessional-education-collaborative-practice