Trusting parent-professional relationships in interprofessional interventions for expectant and new parents in vulnerable positions: A realist evaluation

References

• Armstrong, G., Barton, A., Nuffer, W., & Yancey, L. (2014). Patient and family-centered care and the interprofessional team. In J. H. Barnsteiner, J. Disch, & M. K. Walton (Eds.), Person and family-centred care (1st ed., pp. 365–388). Sigma Theta Tau International.
   Google Scholar
• Auschra, C. (2018). Barriers to the integration of care in inter-organisational settings: A literature review. International Journal of Integrated Care, 18(1), 5. https://doi.org/10.5334/ijic.3068
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balaam, M. -C., & Thomson, G. (2018). Building capacity and wellbeing in vulnerable/marginalised mothers: A qualitative study. Women and Birth, 31(5), e341–347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2017.12.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behruzi, R., Klam, S., Dehertog, M., Jimenez, V., & Hatem, M. (2017). Understanding factors affecting collaboration between midwives and other health care professionals in a birth center and its affiliated Quebec hospital: A case study. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 17(1), 200. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-017-1381-x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bonell, C., Jamal, F., Melendez-Torres, G. J., & Cummins, S. (2015). ‘Dark logic’: Theorising the harmful consequences of public health interventions. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 69(1), 95–98. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech-2014-204671
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boreham, N. (2004). A theory of collective competence: Challenging the neo-liberal individualisation of performance at work. British Journal of Educational Studies, 52(1), 5–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8527.2004.00251.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’amour, D., Goulet, L., Labadie, J. -F., Martín-Rodriguez, L. S., & Pineault, R. (2008). A model and typology of collaboration between professionals in healthcare organizations. BMC Health Services Research, 8(1), 188. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-8-188
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Danish Health Authority. (2019). Guidance for preventative health services for children and young people (3rd ed.).
   Google Scholar
• Daoud, N., O’campo, P., Minh, A., Urquia, M. L., Dzakpasu, S., Heaman, M., Kaczorowski, J., Levitt, C., Smylie, J., & Chalmers, B. (2014). Patterns of social inequalities across pregnancy and birth outcomes: A comparison of individual and neighborhood socioeconomic measures. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 14(1), 393. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-014-0393-z
   Google Scholar
• Dinç, L., & Gastmans, C. (2012). Trust and trustworthiness in nursing: An argument-based literature review. Nursing Inquiry, 19(3), 223–237. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1800.2011.00582.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellehave, S., Thomsen, L. L. H., Frederiksen, M. S., & Overgaard, C. (in review). Initial programme theory building as the first step in a realist evaluation of a cross-sectoral intervention for Danish expectant parents living with psychosocial risks
   Google Scholar
• Frederiksen, M. S., Schmied, V., & Overgaard, C. (2021a). Living with fear: Experiences of Danish parents in vulnerable positions during pregnancy and in the postnatal period. Qualitative Health Research, 31(3), 564–577. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732320978206
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frederiksen, M. S., Schmied, V., & Overgaard, C. (2021b). Supportive encounters during pregnancy and the postnatal period: An ethnographic study of care experiences of parents in a vulnerable position. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 30(15–16), 2386–2398. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15778
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frederiksen, M. S., Schmied, V., & Overgaard, C. (2022). Creating coherent perinatal care journeys: An ethnographic study of the role of continuity of care for Danish parents in a vulnerable position. Women and Birth, 36, 117–126. in press. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2022.03.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilmore, B., McAuliffe, E., Power, J., & Vallières, F. (2019). Data analysis and synthesis within a realist evaluation: Toward more transparent methodological approaches. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 18, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919859754
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haggerty, J. L., Reid, R. J., Freeman, G. K., Starfield, B. H., Adair, C. E., & McKendry, R. (2003). Continuity of care: A multidisciplinary review. The BMJ, 327(7425), 1219–1221. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.327.7425.1219
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Handley, M., Bunn, F., Lynch, J., & Goodman, C. (2020). Using non-participant observation to uncover mechanisms: Insights from a realist evaluation. Evaluation, 26(3), 380–393. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389019869036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollowell, J., Oakley, L., Kurinczuk, J. J., Brocklehurst, P., & Gray, R. (2011). The effectiveness of antenatal care programmes to reduce infant mortality and preterm birth in socially disadvantaged and vulnerable women in high-income countries: A systematic review. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 11(1), 13. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-11-13
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Institute for Patient- And Family-Centered Care. (n.d.). What is PFCC? https://ipfcc.org/about/pfcc.html
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, S. F., & Kolla, G. (2012). A new realistic evaluation analysis method: Linked coding of context, mechanism, and outcome relationships. American Journal of Evaluation, 33(3), 339–349. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214012440030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jakobsen, S. P., & Overgaard, C. (2018). ‘They’ll be judging us’ a qualitative study of pregnant women’s experience of being offered participation in a supportive intervention. Midwifery, 61, 81–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2018.02.017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klode, K., Ringer, A., & Hølge-Hazelton, B. (2020). Interprofessional and intersectoral collaboration in the care of vulnerable pregnant women: An interpretive study. Journal of Interprofessional Care, Advance online publication, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/13561820.2020.1761306
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lingard, L. (2016). Paradoxical truths and persistent myths: Reframing the team competence conversation. The Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions, 36(1), S19–21. https://doi.org/10.1097/CEH.0000000000000078
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lingard, L., Sue-Chue-Lam, C., Tait, G. R., Bates, J., Shadd, J., & Schulz, V. (2017). Pulling together and pulling apart: Influences of convergence and divergence on distributed healthcare teams. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 22(5), 1085–1099. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-016-9741-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malterud, K., Siersma, V. D., & Guassora, A. D. (2016). Sample size in qualitative interview studies: Guided by information power. Qualitative Health Research, 26(13), 1753–1760. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732315617444
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manzano, A. (2016). The craft of interviewing in realist evaluation. Evaluation, 22(3), 342–360. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389016638615
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McInnes, R. J., Aitken-Arbuckle, A., Lake, S., Hollins Martin, C., & MacArthur, J. (2020). Implementing continuity of midwife carer – Just a friendly face? A realist evaluation. BMC Health Services Research, 20(1), 304. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-05159-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLeish, J., & Redshaw, M. (2019). Maternity experiences of mothers with multiple disadvantages in England: A qualitative study. Women and Birth, 32(2), 178–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2018.05.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, S., & Yoder, L. H. (2012). A concept analysis of person-centered care. Journal of Holistic Nursing, 30(1), 6–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/0898010111412189
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Morrison, J., Pikhart, H., Ruiz, M., & Goldblatt, P. (2014). Systematic review of parenting interventions in European countries aiming to reduce social inequalities in children’s health and development. BMC Public Health, 14(1), 1040. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-14-1040
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mukumbang, F. C. (2021). Retroductive theorizing: A contribution of critical realism to mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 17(1), 93–114. https://doi.org/10.1177/15586898211049847
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myors, K. A., Johnson, M., Cleary, M., & Schmied, V. (2015). Engaging women at risk for poor perinatal mental health outcomes: A mixed-methods study. International Journal of Mental Health Nursing, 24(3), 241–252. https://doi.org/10.1111/inm.12109
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norhayati, M. N., Nik Hazlina, N. H., Asrenee, A. R., & Wan Emilin, W. M. A. (2015). Magnitude and risk factors for postpartum symptoms: A literature review. Journal of Affective Disorders, 175, 34–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2014.12.041
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pawson, R., & Tilley, N. (1997). Realistic evaluation. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Posthumus, A. G., Birnie, E., van Veen, M. J., Steegers, E. A. P., & Bonsel, G. J. (2016). An antenatal prediction model for adverse birth outcomes in an urban population: The contribution of medical and non-medical risks. Midwifery, 38, 78–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2015.11.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rayment-jones, H., Harris, J., Harden, A., Khan, Z., & Sandall, J. (2019). How do women with social risk factors experience United Kingdom maternity care? A realist synthesis. Birth, 46(3), 461–474. https://doi.org/10.1111/birt.12446
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rayment-Jones, H., Silverio, S. A., Harris, J., Harden, A., & Sandall, J. (2020). Project 20: Midwives’ insight into continuity of care models for women with social risk factors: What works, for whom, in what circumstances, and how. Midwifery, 84, 102654. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2020.102654
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rod, N. H., Bengtsson, J., Budtz-Jørgensen, E., Clipet-Jensen, C., Taylor-Robinson, D., Andersen, A. -M.N., Dich, N., & Rieckmann, A. (2020). Trajectories of childhood adversity and mortality in early adulthood: A population-based cohort study. The Lancet, 396(10249), 489–497. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30621-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosa, H. (2020). The uncontrollability of the world. Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schmied, V., Beake, S., Sheehan, A., McCourt, C., & Dykes, F. (2011). Women’s perceptions and experiences of breastfeeding support: A meta synthesis. Birth, 38(1), 49–60. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-536X.2010.00446.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skivington, K., Matthews, L., Simpson, S. A., Craig, P., Baird, J., Blazeby, J. M., Boyd, K. A., Craig, N., French, D. P., McIntosh, E., Petticrew, M., Rycroft-Malone, J., White, M., & Moore, L. (2021). A new framework for developing and evaluating complex interventions: Update of Medical Research Council guidance. The BMJ, n2061. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n2061
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Symon, A., Pringle, J., Cheyne, H., Downe, S., Hundley, V., Lee, E., Lynn, F., McFadden, A., McNeill, J., Renfrew, M. J., Ross Davie, M., van Teijlingen, E., Whitford, H., & Alderdice, F. (2016). Midwifery-led antenatal care models: Mapping a systematic review to an evidence-based quality framework to identify key components and characteristics of care. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 16(1), 168. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-016-0944-6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Toh, R. S., Lee, E., & Hu, M. Y. (2006). Social desirability bias in diary panels is evident in panelists’ behavioral frequency. Psychological Reports, 99(2), 322–334. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.99.2.322-334
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. (2010). Framework for action on interprofessional education & collaborative practice. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/framework-for-action-on-interprofessional-education-collaborative-practice
   Google Scholar
• Yamamoto, C., Wener, P., Ripat, J., & Woodgate, R. L. (2022). Understanding interprofessional team delivery of patient-centered care: A qualitative secondary analysis. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 36(2), 202–209. https://doi.org/10.1080/13561820.2021.1899146
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar