Know what I mean? Enhancing student understanding of assessment standards and criteria

References

• Baumard P (1999) Tacit knowledge in organizations (London, Sage Publications)
   Google Scholar
• Brown S Knight P (1994) Assessing learners in higher education (London, Kogan Page)
   Google Scholar
• Cunliffe , LA . (2002) . Reflexive dialogical practice in management learning . Management Learning , 33 : 35 – 61 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davenport , TH . (1997) . 10 Principles of knowledge management and four case studies . Knowledge and Process Management , 4 : 187 – 208 .
   Google Scholar
• Ecclestone , K . (2001) . ‘I know a 2: I when I see it’: understanding criteria for degree classification in franchized university programmes . Journal of Further and Higher Education , 25 : 301 – 313 .
   Google Scholar
• Elwood , J and Klenowski , V . (2002) . Creating communities of shared practice: the challenges of assessment use in learning and teaching . Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education , 27 : 243 – 256 .
   Google Scholar
• Forbes DA Spence J (1991) An experiment in assessment for a large class in: R. Smith (Ed.) Innovations in engineering education (London, Ellis Horwood) 97 101
   Google Scholar
• Freeman R Lewis R (1998) Planning and implementing assessment (London, Kogan Page)
   Google Scholar
• Hughes , IE . (1995) . Peer assessment . Capability , 1 : 39 – 43 .
   Google Scholar
• Hussey , T and Smith , P . (2002) . The trouble with learning outcomes . Active Learning in Higher Education , 3 : 220 – 234 .
   Google Scholar
• Laming , D . (1990) . The reliability of a certain university examination compared with the precision of absolute judgements . Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A—Human Experimental Psychology , 42 : 239 – 254 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lucas L Webster F (1998) Maintaining standards in higher education? A case study in: D. Jary & M. Parker (Eds) The new higher education; issues and directions for the post‐Dearing university (Stoke‐on‐Trent, Staffordshire University Press) 105 113
   Google Scholar
• Maclellan , E . (2001) . Assessment for learning: the different perceptions of tutors and students . Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education , 26 : 307 – 318 .
   Google Scholar
• Newstead , SE and Dennis , I . (1994) . Examiners examined: the reliability of exam marking in psychology . Psychologist: Bulletin of the British Psychological Society , 7 : 216 – 219 .
   Google Scholar
• Nonaka , I . (1991) . The knowledge‐creating company . Harvard Business Review , 69 : 96 – 104 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Donovan , B , Price , M and Rust , C . (2001) . The student experience of criterion‐referenced assessment through the use of a common criteria assessment grid . Innovations in Learning and Teaching International , 38 : 74 – 85 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orsmond , P , Merry , S and Reiling , K . (1996) . The importance of marking criteria in the use of peer assessment . Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education , 21 : 239 – 249 .
   Google Scholar
• Orsmond , P , Merry , S and Reiling , K . (2002) . The use of exemplars and formative feedback when using student derived marking criteria in peer and self‐assessment . Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education , 25 : 309 – 324 .
   Google Scholar
• Polanyi M (1998) The tacit dimension in: L. Prusak (Ed.) Knowledge in organizations (Boston, Butterworth Heineman) 135 146
   Google Scholar
• Price , M and Rust , C . (1999) . The experience of introducing a common criteria assessment grid across an academic department . Quality in Higher Education , 5 : 133 – 144 .
   Google Scholar
• Price M O'Donovan B Rust C (2001) Strategies to develop students' understanding of assessment criteria and processes in: C. Rust (Ed.) Improving student learning: 8 improving student learning strategically (Oxford, Oxford Centre for Staff and Learning Development) 206 219
   Google Scholar
• Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education (2000) Benchmarking academic standards: demonstrating achievement to stakeholders Conference, London, May 17
   Google Scholar
• Radnor H Shaw K (1995) Developing a collaborative approach to moderation in: H. Torrence (Ed.) Evaluating authentic assessment (Buckingham, Open University Press) 124 143
   Google Scholar
• Ramsden P (1992) Learning to teach in higher education (London, Routledge)
   Google Scholar
• Rust , C , Price , M and O'Donovan , B . (2003) . Improving students' learning by developing their understanding of assessment criteria and processes . Assessment and Evaluation , 28 : 147 – 164 .
   Google Scholar
• Sadler , DR . (1987) . Specifying and promulgating achievement standards . Oxford Review of Education , 13 : 191 – 209 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saunders , MNK and Davis , SM . (1998) . The use of assessment criteria to ensure consistency of marking: some implications for good practice . Quality Assurance in Higher Education , 6 : 162 – 171 .
   Google Scholar
• Sharp , S . (1996) . Undergraduate degree awards in teacher education: constant standards in a changing context . Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education , 21 : 325 – 334 .
   Google Scholar
• Spender , JC . (1996) . Organisational knowledge, learning and memory: three concepts in search of a theory . Journal of Organizational Change Management , 9 : 63 – 78 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stefani , LAJ . (1992) . Comparison of collaborative, self, peer and tutor assessment in a biochemistry practical . Biochemical Education , 20 : 148 – 151 .
   Google Scholar
• Stenmark , D . (2000) . Leveraging tacit organizational knowledge . Journal of Management Information Systems , 17 : 9 – 25 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsoukas , H . (2001) . What is organizational knowledge? . Journal of Management Studies , 38 : 973 – 994 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vygotsky LS (1978) Mind in society: the development of higher psychological processes (Harvard, MA, Harvard University Press)
   Google Scholar
• Webster , F , Pepper , D and Jenkins , A . (2000) . Assessing the undergraduate dissertation . Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education , 25 : 72 – 80 .
   Google Scholar
• Winter , R . (1994) . The problem of educational levels part 2: a new framework for credit accumulation in higher education . Journal for Further and Higher Education , 18 : 92 – 107 .
   Google Scholar
• Yorke , M , Bridges , P and Woolf , H . (2000) . Mark distributions and marking practices in UK higher education . Active Learning in Higher Education , 1 : 7 – 27 .
   Google Scholar