Students evaluating teachers: exploring the importance of faculty reaction to feedback on teaching

References

• Ashford , SJ and Cummings , LL . 1983 . Feedback as an individual resource: personal strategies for creating information . Organisational Behaviour and Human Performance , 32 : 370 – 398 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brookfield S On becoming a critically reflective teacher, Jossey-Bass San Francisco CA 1995
   Google Scholar
• Calderon TG Gabbin AL Green BP Report of the committee on promoting and evaluating effective teaching, James Madison University Press Harrisonburg VA 1996
   Google Scholar
• Carey , G . 1993 . Thoughts on the lesser evil: student evaluations . Perspectives on political science , 22 (1) : 17 – 20 .
   Google Scholar
• Cashin WE Student ratings of teaching: a summary of the research (IDEA Paper No. 20), Kansas State University, Centre for Faculty Evaluation and Development Manhatten KS 1988
   Google Scholar
• De Nisi , A and Kluger , AN . 2000 . Feedback effectiveness: Can 360° appraisals be improved? . Academy of Management Executive , 14 : 129 – 139 .
   Google Scholar
• Green, B. P., Calderon, T. G. & Reider, B. P. (1998) A content analysis of teaching evaluation instruments used in accounting departments, Issues in Accounting Education, February, 15–30.
   Google Scholar
• Greenwald , A and Gilmore , G . 1997 . Grading leniency is a removable contaminant of student ratings . American psychologist , 52 (11) : 1209 – 1217 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hackman JR Oldham GR Work redesign, Addison-Wesley Reading MA 1980
   Google Scholar
• Hand , L and Rowe , M . 2001 . Evaluation of student feedback . Accounting Education , 10 (2) : 147 – 160 .
   Google Scholar
• Johnson , R . 2000 . The authority of the student evaluation questionnaire . Teaching in Higher Education , 5 (4) : 419 – 434 .
   Google Scholar
• Kluger , AN and De Nisi , A . 1996 . The effects of feedback interventions on performance: historical review, a meta-analysis and a preliminary feedback intervention theory . Psychological Bulletin , 119 : 254 – 284 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, A. (1999) Enhancing the motivation for good teaching with an improved system of evaluation, Financial Practice and Education, Fall/Winter, 100–104.
   Google Scholar
• Ory , JC . 1991 . Changes in evaluating teaching in higher education . Theory into Practice , 30 (1) : 30 – 36 .
   Google Scholar
• Perry WG Different worlds in the same classroom Improving learning: new perspectives Ramsden P. (ed.) Kogan Page London 1988
   Google Scholar
• Radmacher , SA and Martin , DJ . 2001 . Identifying significant predictors of student evaluations of faculty through hierarchical regression analysis . The Journal of Psychology , 135 (3) : 259 – 268 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stockham , SL and Amann , JF . 1994 . Facilitated student feedback to improve teaching and learning . Journal of Veterinary Medical Education , 21 (2) : 51 – 55 .
   Google Scholar
• Tomasco , AT . 1980 . Student perceptions of instructional and personality characteristics of faculty: a canonical analysis . Teaching of Psychology , 7 : 79 – 82 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitworth, J. E., Price, B. A. & Randall, C. H. (2002) Factors that affect business student opinion of teaching and learning, Journal of Education for Business, May/June, 282–289.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson , KL , Lizzo , A and Ramsden , P . 1997 . The development, validation and application of the Course Experience Questionnaire . Studies in Higher Education , 22 (1) : 33 – 54 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar