Supervisors' on-script feedback comments on drafts of dissertations: socialising students into the academic discourse community

References

• Benesch, S. 2000. Critical English for Academic Purposes: Theory, Politics and Practice. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Bitchener, J., and H. Basturkmen. 2006. “Perceptions of the Difficulties of Postgraduate L2 Thesis Students Writing the Discussion Section”. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 5: 4–18.
   Google Scholar
• Bitchener, J., H. Basturkmen, and M. East. 2010. “The Focus of Supervisor Written Feedback to Thesis/Dissertation Students”. International Journal of English Studies 10 (2): 79–99.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, P., and S. C. Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carless, D. 2006. “Differing Perceptions in the Feedback Process”. Studies in Higher Education 31 (2): 219–233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chanock, K. 2000. “Comments on Essays. Do Students Understand What Tutors Write?” Teaching in Higher Education 5 (1): 95–105.
   Google Scholar
• Cornforth, S., and L. B. Claiborne. 2008. “Supervision in Educational Contexts: Raising the Stakes in a Global World”. Teaching in Higher Education 13 (6): 691–701.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cotterall, S. 2011. “Doctoral Students Writing: Where's the Pedagogy?” Teaching in Higher Education 16 (4): 413–425.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duff, P. A. 2008. “Problematising Academic Discourse Socialisation.” Discourse and the Discourses of Learning, edited by H. Marriot, T. Moore, and R. Spence-Brown, 1.1–1.18. Melbourne: Monash University Press.
   Google Scholar
• East, M., J. Bitchener, and H. Basturkmen. 2012. “What Constitutes Effective Feedback to Postgraduate Research Students? The Students' Perspective”. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice 9 (2): 7.
   Google Scholar
• Engebretson, K., K. Smith, D. McLaughlin, C. Seibold, G. Teret, and E. Ryan. 2008. “The Changing Reality of Research Education in Australia and Implications for Supervision: A Review of the Literature”. Teaching in Higher Education 13 (1): 1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernsten, L. A. 2011. “Helping Student Meet the Challenges of Academic Writing”. Teaching in Higher Education 16 (2): 171–182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferris, D. 2003. Response to Student Writing. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Franke, A., and B. Arvidsson. 2011. “Research Supervisors' Different Ways of Experiencing Supervision of Doctoral Students”. Studies in Higher Education 36 (1): 7–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gulfidan, C. 2009. ““A Model for Doctoral Students' Perceptions and Attitudes Towards Written Feedback””. Doctoral thesis, Utah State University.
   Google Scholar
• Higgens, R., P. Hartely, and A. Skelton. 2001. “Getting the Message Across: The Problem of Communicating Assessment Feedback”. Teaching in Higher Education 6 (2): 269–274.
   Google Scholar
• Hyatt, D. F. 2005. “‘Yes, a Very Good Point!’: A Critical Genre Analysis of a Corpus of Feedback Commentaries on Master of Education Assignments”. Teaching in Higher Education 10 (3): 339–353.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyland, F. 1998. “The Impact of Teacher Written Feedback on Individual Writers”. Journal of Second Language Writing 7 (3): 255–286.
   Google Scholar
• Hyland, K. 2009. Academic Discourse. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Hyland, F., and K. Hyland. 2001. “Sugaring the Pill: Praise and Criticism in Written Feedback”. Journal of Second Language Writing 10 (3): 185–212.
   Google Scholar
• Hyland, K., and F. Hyland. 2006. “Interpersonal Aspects of Response: Constructing and Interpreting Teacher Written Feedback.” In Feedback in Second Language Writing: Contexts and Issues, edited by K. Hyland and F. Hyland, 206–224. F. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hyland, K., and P. Tse. 2004. “Metadiscourse in Academic Writing: A Reappraisal”. Applied Linguistics 25 (2): 156–177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ivanic, R., R. Clark, and R. Rimmershaw. 2000. “‘What Am I Supposed to Make of This?” The Messages Conveyed to Students by Tutors’ Written Comments.” In Student Writing in Higher Education: New Contexts, edited by M. Lea and B. Stierer, 47–56. Buckingham: SRHE and Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar, V., and E. Stracke. 2007. “An Analysis of Written Feedback on a PhD thesis”. Teaching in Higher Education 12 (4): 461–470.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, S., and C. Seale. 2007. “Managing Criticism in Ph.D. Supervision: A Qualitative Case Study”. Studies in Higher Education 32 (4): 511–526.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lillis, T., and J. Turner. 2001. “Student Writing in Higher Education: Contemporary Confusion, Traditional Concerns”. Teaching in Higher Education 6 (1): 57–68.
   Google Scholar
• Pearson, M., and A. Brew. 2002. “Research Training and Supervision Development”. Studies in Higher Education 27 (2): 135–150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramsden, P. 2003. Learning to Teach in Higher Education. 2nd ed. London: Routledge Falmer.
   Google Scholar
• San Miguel, C., and C. D. Nelson. 2007. “Key Writing Challenges of Practice-Based Doctorates”. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 6 (1): 71–86.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, J. 1995. Meaning in Interaction: An Introduction to Pragmatics. London: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Tsui, A. 1992. “A Functional Description of Questions.” In Advances in Spoken Discourse Analysis, edited by M. Coulthard, 89–110. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wisker, G., G. Robinson, V. Trafford, M. Warnes, and E. Creighon. 2003. “From Supervisory Dialogues to Successful PhDs: Strategies Supporting and Enabling the Learning Conversations of Staff and Students at Postgraduate Level”. Teaching in Higher Education 8 (3): 383–397. doi: 10.1080/13562510309400
   Google Scholar