1,456
Views
23
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Squaring the circle: a new alternative to alternative-assessment

Pages 565-577 | Received 06 Sep 2012, Accepted 20 Dec 2013, Published online: 10 Feb 2014

References

  • Arnold, K., and M. Pistilli. 2012. “Course Signals at Purdue: Using Learning Analytics to Increase Student Success.” In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Learning Analytics & Knowledge, edited by S. Buckingham Shum, D. Gasevic, and R. Ferguson, 267–270. New York: ACM.
  • ATC21S. 2013. Assessment & Teaching of 21st Century Skills. http://atc21s.org.
  • Baepler, P., and C. J. Murdoch. 2010. “Academic Analytics and Data Mining in Higher Education.” International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning 4 (2): 1–9.
  • Bailey, R., and M. Garner. 2010. “Is the Feedback in Higher Education Assessment Worth the Paper it is Written on? Teachers’ Reflections on Their Practices.” Teaching in Higher Education 15 (2): 187–198. doi:10.1080/13562511003620019.
  • Bienkowski, M., F. Mingyu, and B. Means. 2012. Enhancing Teaching and Learning through Educational Data Mining and Learning Analytics: An Issue Brief, Office of Educational Technology. Washington, DC: US Department of Education.
  • Biggs, J. 1996. “Enhancing Teaching through Constructive Alignment.” Higher Education 32 (3): 347–364. doi:10.1007/BF00138871.
  • Biggs, J. 1999. Teaching for Quality Learning at University. Buckingham: SRHE and Open University Press.
  • Biggs, J., and C. Tang. 2007. Teaching for Quality Learning at University: What the Student Does. 3rd ed. Maidenhead: SRHE & Open University Press.
  • Black, P., and D. Wiliam. 1998. “Assessment and Classroom Learning.” Assessment in Education 5 (1): 7–74.
  • Boud, D. 2007. “Reframing Assessment as If Learning Were Important.” In Rethinking Assessment in Higher Education, edited by D. Boud and N. Falchikov, 14–25. Abingdon: Routledge.
  • Boud, D., and Associates. 2010. Assessment 2020: Seven Propositions for Assessment Reform in Higher Education. Sydney: Australian Learning and Teaching Council.
  • Brennan, J., and R. Williams. 2004. Collecting and Using Student Feedback: A Guide to Good Practice. York, UK: The Higher Education Academy.
  • Brew, A. 2003. “Teaching and Research: New Relationships and Their Implications for Inquiry-based Teaching and Learning in Higher Education.” Higher Education Research & Development 22 (1): 3–18. doi:10.1080/0729436032000056571.
  • Brown, G. T. L. 2010. “The Validity of Examination Essays in Higher Education: Issues and Responses.” Higher Education Quarterly 64 (3): 276–291. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2273.2010.00460.x.
  • Bryman, A. 1988. Quantity and Quality in Social Research. London: Routledge.
  • CMU. 2012. Open Learning Initiative. Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie Mellon University.
  • Coleman, R., and B. Bekhradnia. 2011 Higher Education Supply and Demand to 2020. Oxford: Higher Education Policy Institute.
  • Crozier, G., D. Reay, J. Clayton, L. Colliander, and J. Grinstead. 2008. “Different Strokes for Different Folks: Diverse Students in Diverse Institutions – Experiences of Higher Education.” Research Papers in Education 23 (2): 167–177. doi:10.1080/02671520802048703.
  • Deignan, T. 2009. “Enquiry-Based Learning: Perspectives on Practice.” Teaching in Higher Education 14 (1): 13–28. doi:10.1080/13562510802602467.
  • Dyment, J. E., and T. O'Connell. 2011. “Assessing the Quality of Reflection in Student Journals: A Review of the Research.” Teaching in Higher Education 16 (1): 81–97. doi:10.1080/13562517.2010.507308.
  • Educause. 2012. “Analytics Examined.” Educause Channel, You Tube. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4rMvOwCNZQI&feature=relmfu.
  • Elton, L., and B. Johnston. 2002. Assessment in Universities: A Critical Review of Research. York, UK: Learning and Teaching Support Network.
  • Ferguson, R. 2012. The State of Learning Analytics in 2012: A Review and Future Challenges. Technical Report KMI-12-0, Knowledge Media Institute. Milton Keynes: The Open University.
  • Fritz, J. 2011. “Classroom Walls that Talk: Using Online Course Activity Data of Successful Students to Raise Self-Awareness of Underperforming Peers.” The Internet and Higher Education 14 (2): 89–97. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2010.07.007.
  • Gibbs, G. 2006. “Why Assessment is Changing.” In Innovative Assessment in Higher Education, edited by C. Bryan and K. Clegg, 11–22. Abingdon: Routledge.
  • Gibbs, G., and C. Simpson. 2004. “Conditions under Which Assessment Supports Students’ Learning.” Learning and Teaching in Higher Education 1: 3–31.
  • Gulikers, J. T. M., T. Bastiaens, and P. Kirschner. 2004. “A Five-dimensional Framework for Authentic Assessment.” Educational Technology Research and Development 52 (3): 67–86. doi:10.1007/BF02504676.
  • HEA. 2012. PDP – Personal Development Planning. York, UK: The Higher Education Academy.
  • Kolowich, S. 2012. “Paying for Performance.” Inside Higher Ed, June. http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2012/06/06/mcgraw-hill-wgu-announce-deal-would-shift-accountability-content-provider.
  • Kandlbinder, P. 2007. “Writing about Practice for Future Learning.” In Rethinking Assessment in Higher Education, edited by D. Boud and N. Falchikov, 159–166. Abingdon: Routledge.
  • Khan Academy. 2012. “Khan Academy Organization Website.” http://www.khanacademy.org/.
  • Klein, S., L. Hamilton, D. McCaffrey, and B. Stecher. 2000. What Do Test Scores in TEXAS TELL US? RAND Education Issue Paper 202. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation.
  • Knight, P. T. 2002. “Summative Assessment in Higher Education: Practices in Disarray.” Studies in Higher Education 27 (3): 275–286. doi:10.1080/03075070220000662.
  • Knight, P. 2007. “Grading, Classifying and Future Learning.” In Rethinking Assessment in Higher Education, edited by D. Boud and N. Falchikov, 72–86. Abingdon: Routledge.
  • Kulik, C.-L. C., J. Kulik, and R. Bangert-Drowns. 1990. “Effectiveness of Mastery Learning Programs: A Meta-analysis.” Review of Educational Research 60 (2): 265–299. doi:10.3102/00346543060002265.
  • Long, P., and G. Siemens. 2011. “Penetrating the Fog: Analytics in Learning and Education.” Educause Review 46 (5): 31–40.
  • Maclellan, E. 2004. “How Convincing Is Alternative Assessment for Use in Higher Education?” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 29 (3): 311–321. doi:10.1080/0260293042000188267.
  • Maguire, D. 2013. Flexible Learning: Wrapping Higher Education around the Needs of Part-Time Students. Oxford: Higher Education Policy Institute.
  • NARN. 2012. National Action Research Network. Wigan: Centre for Recording Achievement.
  • OECD. 2010. Decade ends with Record Student Numbers. Education today. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
  • Palmer, M., P. O'Kane, and M. Owens. 2009. “Betwixt Spaces: Student Accounts of Turning Point Experiences in the First-year Transition.” Studies in Higher Education 34 (1): 37–54. doi:10.1080/03075070802601929.
  • Preston, D. 2001. Technology, Managerialism and the University. Glenrothes: Glenrothes Publications.
  • Price, M., J. Carroll, B. O'Donovan, and C. Rust. 2008. “Assessment Standards: A Manifesto for Change.” Brookes eJournal of Learning and Teaching 2 (3).
  • Prineas, M., and M. Cini. 2011. Assessing Learning in Online Education: The Role of Technology in Improving Student Outcomes. Occasional Paper #12. Champaign, IL: National Institute for Learning Outcomes Assessment.
  • Prospects. 2012. Graduate Prospects. http://www.prospects.ac.uk/
  • Redecker, C., and Ø. Johannessen. 2013. “Changing Assessment – Towards a New Assessment Paradigm Using ICT.” European Journal of Education 48 (1): 79–96. doi:10.1111/ejed.12018.
  • Sambell, K., L. McDowell, and C. Montgomery. 2013. Assessment for Learning in Higher Education.” Abingdon: Routledge.
  • Savin-Baden, M. 2003. Facilitating Problem-based Learning in Higher Education: Illuminating Perspectives. Buckingham: SRHE/Open University.
  • Schön, D. 1983. The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. New York: Basic Books.
  • Sharpe, R., G. Benfield, G. Roberts, and R. Francis. 2006. The Undergraduate Experience of Blended e-Learning: A Review of UK Literature and Practice. York, UK: The Higher Education Academy.
  • SNAPP. 2011. About SNAPP – Social Networks Adapting Pedagogical Practice. Wollongong, NSW: University of Wollongong.
  • Taras, M. 2002. “Using Assessment for Learning and Learning from Assessment.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 27 (6): 501–510. doi:10.1080/0260293022000020273.
  • Tisani, N. 2008. “Challenges in Producing a Portfolio for Assessment: In Search of Underpinning Educational Theories.” Teaching in Higher Education 13 (5): 549–557. doi:10.1080/13562510802334830.
  • Torrance, H. 1995. Evaluating Authentic Assessment: Problems and Possibilities in New Approaches to Assessment, edited by Open University Press. Buckingham: Open University Press.
  • UCAS. 2013. Demand for Full-time Undergraduate Higher Education (2013 Cycle, March Deadline). Cheltenham: Universities and Colleges Applications Service.
  • van Schalkwyk, S. 2010. “Early Assessment: Using a University-wide Student Support Initiative to Effect Real Change.” Teaching in Higher Education 15 (3): 299–310. doi:10.1080/13562511003740874.
  • Waterfield, J., and M. Parker. 2003. “Addressing Student Retention by Developing Alternative Forms of Assessment.” Conference paper for Enhancing student retention: Using international research to improve policy and practice, Amsterdam, November.
  • Williams, P. 2008. “Assessing Context Based Learning: Not Only Rigorous But Also Relevant.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 33 (5): 395–408. doi:10.1080/02602930701562890.
  • Yorke, M. 2009. Trends in Honours Degree Classifications, 1994–95 to 2006–07, for England, Wales and Northern Ireland, Evidence Net. York, UK: The Higher Education Academy.
  • Yorke, M. 2011. “Summative Assessment: Dealing with the ‘Measurement Fallacy’.” Studies in Higher Education 36 (3): 251–273. doi:10.1080/03075070903545082.
  • Zepke, N., and L. Leach. 2010. “Beyond Hard Outcomes: ‘Soft’ Outcomes and Engagement as Student Success.” Teaching in Higher Education 15 (6): 661–673. doi:10.1080/13562517.2010.522084.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.