Exploring of new models of research pedagogy: time to let go of master-apprentice style supervision?

References

• Biggs, M., and D. Büchler. 2009. “Supervision in an Alternative Paradigm.” TEXT: The Journal of Writers and Writing Courses 13 (2). Accessed August 5, 2013. http://www.textjournal.com.au/speciss/issue6/content.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Bohm, D., D. Factor, and P. Garrett. 1991. Dialogue: A Proposal. Accessed August 5, 2013. http://www.david-bohm.net/dialogue/dialogue_proposal.html.
   Google Scholar
• Boud, D. J., and A. Lee. 2005. “Peer Learning as Pedagogic Discourse for Research Education.” Studies in Higher Education 30 (5): 501–516. doi:10.1080/03075070500249138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bresler, L. 2009. “Research Education Shaped by Musical Sensibilities.” British Journal of Music Education 26 (1): 7–25. doi:10.1017/S0265051708008243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bridgstock, R., and G. Hearn. 2012. “A Conceptual Model of Capability Learning for the 21st Century Knowledge Economy.” In Handbook on the Knowledge Economy, edited by D. Rooney, G. Hearn, and A. Ninan, 105–118. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Brien, D. L., and R. Williamson. 2009. “Supervising the Creative Arts Research Higher Degree: Towards Best Practice.” TEXT: The Journal of Writers and Writing Courses 13 (2). Accessed April 29, 2013. http://www.textjournal.com.au/speciss/issue6/content.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Burnett, P. C. 1999. “The Supervision of Doctoral Dissertations Using a Collaborative Cohort Model.” Counselor Education and Supervision 39: 46–52. doi:10.1002/j.1556-6978.1999.tb01789.x.
   Google Scholar
• Burwell, K. 2005. “A Degree of Independence: Teachers’ Approaches to Instrumental Tuition in a University College.” British Journal of Music Education 22 (3): 199–215. doi:10.1017/S0265051705006601.
   Google Scholar
• Carey, G., R. Bridgstock, E. McWilliam, P. Taylor, and C. Grant. 2013. “Characterising One-to-one Conservatoire Teaching: Some Implications of a Quantitative Analysis.” Music Education Research 15 (3): 357–368. doi:10.1080/14613808.2013.824954.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carey, G., and C. Grant. ( Forthcoming). “Student and Teacher Perspectives on One-to-one Pedagogy: Practices and Possibilities.” British Journal of Music Education.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cargill, M. 2000. “Intercultural Postgraduate Supervision Meetings: An Exploratory Discourse Study.” Prospect 15 (2): 28–38.
   Google Scholar
• Carter, P. D. 2010. “Using Action Methods in Post-graduate Supervision.” International Journal of Education & the Arts 11 (1): 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Cumming, J., M. Kiley, M. Thomas, L. Hort, M. Pike, E. Evans, and A. Main. 2009. Research Graduate Skills Project [Final Report]. Accessed April 30, 2013. http://www.gradskills.anu.edu.au.
   Google Scholar
• Draper, P,. and S. Harrison. 2010. “Through the Eye of a Needle: The Emergence of Practice-led Doctorates in Music.” British Journal of Music Education 28 (1): 87–102. doi:10.1017/S0265051710000434.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dysthe, O. 2002. “Professors as Mediators of Academic Text Cultures.” Written Communication 19 (4): 493–544. doi:10.1177/074108802238010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dysthe, O., A. Samara, and K. Westrheim. 2006. “Multivoiced Supervision of Master's Students: A Case Study of Alternative Supervision Practices in Higher Education.” Studies in Higher Education 31 (3): 299–318.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emmerson, S. 2013. “No Two Are the Same”: A Narrative Account of Supervising Two Students through a Doctor of Musical Arts Program in Harrison, S Research and Research Education in Music Performance and Pedagogy (181–196). Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Engebretson, K., K. Smith, D. McLaughlin, C. Seibold, G. Terrett, and E. Ryan. 2008. “The Changing Reality of Research Education in Australia and Implications for Supervision: A Review of the Literature.” Teaching in Higher Education 13 (1): 1–15. doi:10.1080/13562510701792112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, M., and E. Gandolfo. 2009. “Collaborating with the Enemy.” TEXT: The Journal of Writers and Writing Courses 13 (2). Accessed August 5, 2013. http://www.textjournal.com.au/speciss/issue6/content.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Gaunt, H. 2011. “Understanding the One-to-one Relationship in Instrumental/Vocal Tuition in Higher Education: Comparing Student and Teacher Perceptions.” British Journal of Music Education 28 (2): 159–179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gee, J. 2004. Situated Language and Learning: A Critique of Traditional Schooling. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gurr, G. M. 2001. “Negotiating the ‘Rackety Bridge’ – A Dynamic Model for Aligning Supervisory Style with Research Student Development.” Higher Education Research & Development 20: 81–92.
   Google Scholar
• Harrison, S. 2011. “There's a Fine Line between Pleasure and Pain: Why Students Enrol in Higher Degrees in Music and Music Education.” Australian Journal of Music Education 2011 (1): 66–75. Accessed September 30, 2013. Informit database.
   Google Scholar
• Harrison, S. D. 2013a. Pro-active Music Higher Degrees: Promoting, Acting on and Evaluating QualityTeaching and Learning in Music Higher Degrees. [Report]. http://www.olt.gov.au/resources/good-practice.
   Google Scholar
• Harrison, S. D., ed. 2013b. Research and Research Education in Music Performance and Pedagogy. Dordrecht: Springer
   Google Scholar
• Harrison, S. D., and R. Dwyer. 2014. “Alleviating Isolation: Research in the Conservatoire.” Music Education Research 17 (2): 201–210. doi:10.1080/14613808.2014.930115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hecq, D. 2009. “Interactive Narrative Pedagogy as a Heuristic for Understanding Supervision of Practice-led Research.” New Writing: The International Journal for the Practice and Theory of Creative Writing 6 (1): 40–50. doi:10.1080/14790720802598647.
   Google Scholar
• Hockey, J., and J. Allen-Collinson. 2000. “The Supervision of Practice-Based Research Degrees in Art and Design.” Journal of Art and Design 19 (3): 345–355. doi:10.1111/1468-5949.00237.
   Google Scholar
• Lave, J., and Wenger, E. 1991. Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, A. 2008. “How Are Doctoral Students Supervised? Concepts of Doctoral Research Supervision.” Studies in Higher Education 33 (3): 267–281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, A. 2012. Successful Research Supervision: Advising Students Doing Research. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Manathunga, C., and J. Goozée, 2007. “Challenging the Dual Assumption of the “Always/already” Autonomous Student and Effective Supervisor.” Teaching in Higher Education 12 (3): 309–322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, N. 2009. “Research Supervision: Matches and Mismatches.” International Journal of Electrical Engineering Education 46 (3): 295–306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearson, M., and A. Brew. 2002. “Research Training and Supervision Development.” Studies in Higher Education 27: 135–150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Persson, R. 1994. “Concert Musicians as Teachers: On Good Intentions Falling Short.” European Journal for High Ability 5: 79–91.
   Google Scholar
• Platow, M. J. 2012. “PhD Experience and Subsequent Outcomes: A Look at Self Perceptions of Acquired Graduate Attributes and Supervisor Support.” Studies in Higher Education 37 (1): 103–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Presland, C. 2005. “Conservatoire Student and Instrumental Professor: The Student Perspective on a Complex Relationship.” British Journal of Music Education 22 (3): 237–248.
   Google Scholar
• Samara, A. 2006. “Group Supervision in Graduate Education: A Process of Supervision Skill Development and Text Improvement.” Higher Education Research & Development 25 (2): 115–129.
   Google Scholar
• Shacham, M., and Y. Od-Cohen. 2009. “Rethinking PhD Learning Incorporating Communities of Practice.” Innovations in Education and Teaching International 46 (3): 279–292.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinclair, M. 2004. The Pedagogy of ‘Good’ PhD Supervision: A National Cross-disciplinary Investigation of PhD Supervision. Canberra: Australian Government, Department of Education, Science and Training.
   Google Scholar
• “Supervision.” 2013, June. Oxford English Dictionary Online. Oxford University Press. Accessed August 5, 2013, from OED database.
   Google Scholar
• Webb, J., D. Brien, and S. Burr. 2011. “Leading the Leaders: Enhancing the Examination of Creative Arts Doctoral Degrees.” Text: Journal of Writing and Writing Courses, Special Issue 12 15 (2): 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Wenger, E. 1998. Communities of Practice, Learning, Meaning and Identity. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Westerlund, H., and S. Karlsen. 2013. “Designing the Rhythm for Academic Community Life: Learning Partnerships and Collaboration in Music Educational Doctoral Studies. In Collaborative Learning in Higher Education, edited by H. Gaunt and H. Westerlund, 87–100. Surrey: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Wisker, G. 2005. The Good Supervisor: Supervising Postgraduate and Undergraduate Research for Doctoral Theses and Dissertations. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Yeatman, A. 1995. “Making Supervision Relationships Accountable: Graduate Student Logs.” Australian Universities’ Review 2, 9–11.
   Google Scholar