University students’ understanding of the concepts empirical, theoretical, qualitative and quantitative research

References

• Belia, S., F. Fidler, J. Williams, and G. Cumming. 2005. “Researchers Misunderstand Confidence Intervals and Standard Error Bars.” Psychological Methods 10: 389–396. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.10.4.389
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broers, N. J. 2002. “Selection and Use of Propositional Knowledge in Statistical Problem Solving.” Learning and Instruction 12: 323–344. doi: 10.1016/S0959-4752(01)00025-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chi, M. T. H., and R. D. Roscoe. 2002. “The Processes and Challenges of Conceptual Change.” In Reconsidering Conceptual Change: Issues in Theory and Practice, edited by M. Limon, and L. Mason, 3–27. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Deem, R., and L. Lucas. 2006. “Learning About Research: Exploring the Learning and Teaching/Research Relationship Amongst Educational Practitioners Studying in Higher Education.” Teaching in Higher Education 11 (1): 1–18. doi: 10.1080/13562510500400040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Earley, M. A. 2013. “A synthesis of the Literature on Research Methods Education.” Teaching in Higher Education 19 (3): 242–253. doi:10.1080/13562517.2013.860105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eppler, M. J. 2006. “A Comparison Between Concept Maps, Mind Maps, Conceptual Diagrams, and Visual Metaphors as Complementary Tools for Knowledge Construction and Sharing.” Information Visualization 5: 202–210. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.ivs.9500131
   Google Scholar
• Gal, I., and J. B. Garfield. 1997. “Curricular Goals and Assessment Challenges in Statistics Education.” In The Assessment Challenge in Statistics Education, edited by I. Gal, and J. B. Garfield, 1–13. Amsterdam: IOS Press.
   Google Scholar
• Garfield, J. B., and A. Ahlgren. 1988. “Difficulties in Learning Basic Concepts in Probability and Statistics: Implications for Research.” Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 19 (1): 44–63. doi: 10.2307/749110
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, R. B., and A. J. Onwuegbuzie. 2004. “Mixed Methods Research: A Research Paradigm Whose Time has Come.” Educational Researcher 33 (7): 14–26. doi: 10.3102/0013189X033007014
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, D., K. Iordanou, M. Pease, and C. Wirkala. 2008. “Beyond Control of Variables: What Needs to Develop to Achieve Skilled Scientific Thinking?” Cognitive Development 23: 435–451. doi: 10.1016/j.cogdev.2008.09.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leech, N. L., A. J. Onwuegbuzie, M. Murtonen, M. Mikkilä-Erdmann, and J. Tähtinen. 2007. “Researcher Workshop for Student Teachers – An Example of a Mixed Methods Learning Environment.” In Learning and Teaching of Research Methods at University, edited by M. Murtonen, J. Rautopuro, and P. Väisänen, 205–226. Research in Educational Sciences: 30. Turku: Finnish Educational Research Association.
   Google Scholar
• Lehtinen, E. 2007. “Methodology Learning From the Point of View of Learning Sciences. A Commentary.” In Learning and Teaching of Research Methods at University, edited by M. Murtonen, J. Rautopuro, and P. Väisänen, 241–249. Research in Educational Sciences: 30. Turku: Finnish Educational Research Association.
   Google Scholar
• Malin, A., J. Rautopuro, and P. Väisänen. 2007. “Towards Methodological Competence in Quantitative Research Methods Education.” In Learning and Teaching of Research Methods at University, edited by M. Murtonen, J. Rautopuro, and P. Väisänen, 163–184. Research in Educational Sciences: 30. Turku: Finnish Educational Research Association.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, J. H. F., M. P. Shanahan, and R. C. Laugksch. 2005. “Students’ Conceptions of Research: I – A Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis.” Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 49 (3): 225–244. doi: 10.1080/00313830500109535
   Google Scholar
• Murtonen, M. 2005. “University Students’ Research Orientations - Do Negative Attitudes Exist Toward Quantitative Methods?” Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 49 (3): 263–280. doi: 10.1080/00313830500109568
   Google Scholar
• Murtonen, M., and E. Lehtinen. 2003. “Difficulties Experienced By Education and Sociology Students in Quantitative Methods Courses.” Studies in Higher Education 28 (2): 171–185. doi: 10.1080/0307507032000058064
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murtonen, M., and K. Merenluoto. 2001. “Novices’ and Experts’ Knowledge on Statistics and Research Methodology.” Proceedings of the 25th PME conference 2001 3: 391–398.
   Google Scholar
• Murtonen, M., E. Olkinuora, P. Tynjälä, and E. Lehtinen. 2008. Do I Need Research Skills in Working Life? – University Students’ Motivation and Difficulties in Quantitative Methods Courses. Higher Education 56: 599–612. doi: 10.1007/s10734-008-9113-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Novak, J. D., and D. B. Govin. 1984. Learning How to Learn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Onwuegbuzie, A. J., N. L. Leech, M. Murtonen, and J. Tähtinen. 2010. “Utilizing Mixed Methods in Teaching Environments to Reduce Statistics Anxiety.” International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches 4 (1): 28–39. doi: 10.5172/mra.2010.4.1.028
   Google Scholar
• Schau, C., and Mattern, N. (1997). Assessing Students’ Connected Understanding of Statistical Relationships. In The Assessment Challenge in Statistics Education, edited by I. Gal, and J. B. Garfield, 91–104. Amsterdam: IOS Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schweizer, K., M. Steinwascher, H. Moosbrugger, and S. Reiss. 2011. “The Structure of Research Methodology Competency in Higher Education and the Role of Teaching Teams and Course Temporal Distance.” Learning and Instruction 21: 68–76. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw, K., A. Holbrook, and S. Brouke. 2013. “Student Experience of Final-year Undergraduate Research Projects: An Exploration of ‘Research Preparedness’.” Studies in Higher Education 38 (5): 711–727. doi: 10.1080/03075079.2011.592937
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoddart, T., R. Abrams, E. Gasper, and D. Canaday. 2000. “Concept Maps as Assessment in Science Inquiry Learning – A Report of Methodology.” The International Journal of Science Education 22 (12): 1221–1246. doi: 10.1080/095006900750036235
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tashakkori, A., and C. Teddlie. 2003. Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioral Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Vosniadou, S. 1994. “Capturing and Modelling the Process of Conceptual Change.” Learning and Instruction 4: 45–69. doi: 10.1016/0959-4752(94)90018-3
   Google Scholar
• Wagner, C., M. Garner, and B. Kawulich. 2011. “The State of the Art of Teaching Research Methods in the Social Sciences: Towards a Pedagogical culture.” Studies in Higher Education 36 (1): 75–88. doi: 10.1080/03075070903452594
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, D. A. 2010. “A Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the Attitudes Toward Research Scale.” Multiple linear regression viewpoints 36 (1): 18–27.
   Google Scholar
• Zaidan, A., Z. Ismail, Y. M. Yusof, and H. Kashefi. 2012. “Misconceptions in Descriptive Statistics Among Postgraduates in Social Sciences.” Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 46: 3535–3540. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.100
   Google Scholar