A diffractive reading of dialogical feedback through the political ethics of care

References

• Barad, K. 2007. Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boud, D., and E. Molloy. 2013a. “What is the Problem with Feedback?” In Feedback in Higher and Professional Education: Understanding it and Doing it Well, edited by D. Boud, and E. Molloy, 1–10. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Boud, D., and E. Molloy. 2013b. “Rethinking Models of Feedback for Learning: The Challenge of Design.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 38 (6): 698–712. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2012.691462
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bower, M. 2008. “Affordance Analysis–Matching Learning Tasks with Learning Technologies.” Educational Media International 45 (1): 3–15. doi: 10.1080/09523980701847115
   Google Scholar
• Bozalek, V., W. Mcmillan, D. Marshall, M. November, A. Daniels, and T. Sylvester. 2014. “Analysing the Professional Development of Teaching and Learning at UWC from a Political Ethics of Care Perspective.” Teaching in Higher Education 19 (5): 447–458. doi: 10.1080/13562517.2014.880681
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carless, D. 2013. “Trust and its Role in Facilitating Dialogic Feedback.” In Feedback in Higher and Professional Education: Understanding it and Doing it Well, edited by D. Boud, and E. Molloy, 90–103. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dolphijn, R., and I. Van Der Tuin. 2012. New Materialism: Interviews & Cartographies. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Library, Open Humanities Press.
   Google Scholar
• Falchikov, N. 2005. Improving Assessment through Student Involvement: Practical Solutions for Aiding Learning in Higher and Further Education. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. 2000. How Like a Leaf: An Interview with Thyrza Nichols Goodeve. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hultman, K., and H. Lenz Taguchi. 2010. “Challenging Anthropocentric Analysis of Visual Data: A Relational Materialist Methodological Approach to Educational Research.” International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education 23: 525–542. doi: 10.1080/09518398.2010.500628
   Google Scholar
• Jolly, B., and D. Boud. 2013. “Written Feedback. What it is Good for and How Can We Do it Well?” In Feedback in Higher and Professional Education: Understanding it and Doing it Well, edited by D. Boud, and E. Molloy, 104–124. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ladyshewsky, R. K. 2013. “The Role of Peers in Feedback Processes.” In Feedback in Higher and Professional Education: Understanding it and Doing it Well, edited by D. Boud, and E. Molloy, 174–189. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lerman, L., and J. Borstel. 2003. Liz Lerman’s Critical Response Process: A Method for Getting Useful Feedback on Anything You Make, From Dance to Dessert. Liz Lerman Dance Exchange.
   Google Scholar
• Lillis, T. 2011. “Legitimizing Dialogue as Textual and Ideological Goal in Academic Writing for Assessment and Publication.” Arts and Humanities in Higher Education 10 (4): 401–432. doi: 10.1177/1474022211398106
   Google Scholar
• Maclure, M. 2013. “Researching without Representation? Language and Materiality in Post-qualitative Methodology.” International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education 26 (6): 658–667. doi: 10.1080/09518398.2013.788755
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. C., J. H. Davis, and F. D. Schoorman. 1995. “An Integrative Model of Organizational Trust.” Academy of Management Review 20 (3): 709–734.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molloy, E., and D. Boud. 2013. “Changing Conceptions of Feedback.” In Feedback in Higher and Professional Education: Understanding it and Doing it Well, edited by D. Boud, & E. Molloy, 11–33. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Nicol, D. 2013. “Resituating Feedback from the Reactive to the Proactive.” In Feedback in Higher and Professional Education: Understanding it and Doing it Well, edited by D. Boud, and E. Molloy, 34–49. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rowe, M., V. Bozalek, and J. Frantz. 2013. “Using Google Drive to Facilitate a Blended Approach to Authentic Learning.” British Journal of Educational Technology 44 (4): 594–606. doi: 10.1111/bjet.12063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sevenhuijsen, S. 1998. “Too Good To Be True? Feminist Considerations about Trust and Social Cohesion.” Institute for Human Studies. IWM Working Paper No. 3, Vienna.
   Google Scholar
• Sevenhuijsen, S. 2002. “Steps Towards an Ethic of Attention.” Paper presented at the conference on Gender, Sexuality and the Law, Keele University, June 28–30.
   Google Scholar
• Sevenhuijsen, S. 2003. “Principle Ethics and the Ethic of Care: Can They Go Together?” Social Work/Maatskaplike Werk 39 (4): 393–399.
   Google Scholar
• Sevenhuijsen, S. 2014. “Care and Attention.” Paper presented at the conference on A Meaningful Life in a Just Society. Investigating Wellbeing and Democratic Caring, Utrecht, Universiteit Voor Humanistiek, January 30–31.
   Google Scholar
• Tronto, J. C. 1993. Moral Boundaries: A Political Argument for an Ethic of Care. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Tronto, J. C. 2013. Caring Democracy Markets, Equality, and Justice. New York: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tronto, J. C. 2015. Who Cares? How to Reshape a Democratic Politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weil, S. 1973. Waiting for God. New York: Harper and Row.
   Google Scholar
• Weurlander, M., M. Söderberg, M. Schejac, H. Hult, and A. Wernerson. 2012. “Exploring Formative Assessment as a Tool for Learning: Students’ Experiences of Different Methods of Formative Assessment.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 37 (6): 747–760. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2011.572153
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zembylas, M., V. Bozalek, and T. Shefer. 2014. “Tronto’s Notion of Privileged Irresponsibility and the Reconceptualisation of Care: Implications for Critical Pedagogies of Emotion in Higher Education.” Gender and Education 26 (3): 200–214. doi: 10.1080/09540253.2014.901718
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar