Against ‘teaching excellence’: ideology, commodification, and enabling the neoliberalization of postsecondary education

References

• Apple, M. 2004. Ideology and Curriculum. New York: Routledge Falmer.
   Google Scholar
• Astin, A. W. 1985. Achieving Educational Excellence. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Astin, A. W., and A. L. Antonio. 2012. Assessment for Excellence: The Philosophy and Practice of Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Baudrillard, J. 2000. The Vital Illusion. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baudrillard, J. 2008. Fatal Strategies. Los Angeles, CA: Semiotext(e).
   Google Scholar
• Baudrillard, J. 2010. The Agony of Power. Los Angeles, CA: Semiotext(e).
   Google Scholar
• Blanco Ramírez, G. 2013. “Studying Quality Beyond Technical Rationality: Political and Symbolic Perspectives.” Quality in Higher Education 19 (2): 126–141. doi: 10.1080/13538322.2013.774804
   Google Scholar
• Blanco Ramírez, G. 2014. “Trading Quality Across Borders: Colonial Discourse and International Quality Assurance Policies in Higher Education.” Tertiary Education and Management 20 (2): 121–134. doi: 10.1080/13583883.2014.896025
   Google Scholar
• Brink, C. 2010. “Quality and Standards: Clarity, Comparability and Responsibility.” Quality in Higher Education 16: 139–152. doi: 10.1080/13538322.2010.487698
   Google Scholar
• Brookfield, S. D. 1995. Becoming a Critically Reflexive Teacher. San Francisco: Jossey- Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, W. 2015. Undoing the Demos: Neoliberalism’s Stealth Revolution. Brooklyn, NY: Zone Books.
   Google Scholar
• Brule, E. 2004. “Going to Market: Neoliberalism and the Social Construction of the University Student as an Autonomous Consumer.” In Inside the Corporate U: Women in the Academy Speak Out, edited by M. Reimer, 255–281. Toronto, ON: Sumach Press.undefined
   Google Scholar
• Brøgger, K. 2016. “The Rule of Mimetic Desire in Higher Education: Governing Through Naming, Shaming and Faming.” British Journal of Sociology of Education 37 (1): 72–91. doi: 10.1080/01425692.2015.1096191
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chalmers, D., R. Cummings, S. Elliot, S. Stoney, B. Tucker, R. Wicking, and T. Jorre de St Jorre. 2014. “Australian University Teaching Criteria and Standards Project.” Accessed http://uniteachingcriteria.edu.au/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/Draft-SP12-2335-Project-Final-Report-21-July-2014.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Chang, G., and J. Osborn. 2005. “Spectacular Colleges and Spectacular Rankings.” Journal of Consumer Culture 5 (3): 338–364. doi: 10.1177/1469540505056794
   Google Scholar
• Colyvas, J. A. 2012. “Performance Metrics as Formal Structures and Through the Lens of Social Mechanisms: When Do They Work and How Do They Influence?” American Journal of Education 118 (2): 167–197. doi: 10.1086/663270
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Department of Business Innovation & Skills. 2015. “Fulfilling our Potential: Teaching Excellence, Social Mobility and Student Choice.” Accessed https://www.timeshighereducation.com/sites/default/files/breaking_news_files/green_paper.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Eagleton, T. 2007. Ideology: An Introduction. New York: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Erkkilä, T. 2014. “Global University Rankings, Transnational Policy Discourse and Higher Education in Europe.” European Journal of Education 49 (1): 91–101. doi: 10.1111/ejed.12063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gildersleeve, R. E. 2016. “The Neoliberal Academy of the Anthropocene and the Retaliation of? the Lazy Academic.” Cultural Studies – Critical Methodologies. doi:10.1177/1532708616669522
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, L. 2004–2016. “Analytic Quality Glossary.” Accessed http://www.qualityresearchinternational.com/glossary/.
   Google Scholar
• Hazelkorn, E. 2011. Rankings and the Reshaping of Higher Education: The Battle for World-Class Excellence. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Lemke, T. 2001. “The Birth of Bio-politics”: Michel Foucault’s Lecture at the College de France on Neo-liberal Governmentality. Economy and Society 30 (2): 190–207. doi: 10.1080/03085140120042271
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyotard, J. F. 1984. The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marginson, S., and M. van der Wende. 2007. “To Rank or to Be Ranked: The Impact of Global Rankings in Higher Education.” Journal of Studies in International Education 11: 306–329. doi: 10.1177/1028315307303544
   Google Scholar
• Marx, K. 1976. Capital Volume I. New York: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• McArdle-Clinton, D. 2008. The Consumer Experience of Higher Education: The Rise of Capsule Education. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Mirowski, P. 2013. Never Let a Serious Crisis Go to Waste: How Neoliberalism Survived the Financial Meltdown. New York: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Naidoo, R. 2015. “The Competition Fetish in Higher Education: Varieties, Animators and Consequences.” British Journal of Sociology of Education 37 (1): 1–10. doi: 10.1080/01425692.2015.1116209
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ng, C. J. W. 2014. “‘We Offer Unparalleled Flexibility’: Purveying Conceptual Values in Higher Educational Corporate Branding.” Discourse & Communication 8 (4): 391–410. doi: 10.1177/1750481314537576
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Readings, B. 1997. The University in Ruins. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Saunders, D. B. 2014. “Exploring a Customer Orientation: Free-Market Logic and College Students.” The Review of Higher Education 37 (2): 197–219. doi: 10.1353/rhe.2014.0013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saunders, D. B. 2015. “Resisting Excellence: Challenging Neoliberal Ideology in Postsecondary Education.” Journal of Critical Education Policy Studies 13 (2): 391–413.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Secretaría de Educación Pública. 2016. “Lineamientos 2016 del Programa Carrera Docente en UPES.” Accessed http://www.uaa.mx/direcciones/dgdp/fep/descargas/lineamientos_UPES_040_carrera_docente_2016.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Sellar, S. 2015. “A Feel for Numbers: Affect, Data and Education Policy.” Critical Studies in Education 56 (1): 131–146. doi: 10.1080/17508487.2015.981198
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shahjahan, R. A., and C. Morgan. 2016. “Global Competition, Coloniality, and the Geopolitics of Knowledge in Higher Education.” British Journal of Sociology of Education 37 (1): 92–109. doi: 10.1080/01425692.2015.1095635
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slaughter, S, and G Rhoades. 2004. Academic Capitalism and the New Economy: Markets, State and Higher Education. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Times Higher Education. 2016. “World University Rankings 2016–2017 Methodology.” Accessed https://www.timeshighereducation.com/world-university-rankings/methodology-world-university-rankings-2016–2017.
   Google Scholar
• Titus, J. J. 2008. “Student Ratings in a Consumerist Academy: Leveraging Pedagogical Control and Authority.” Sociological Perspectives 51 (2): 397–422. doi: 10.1525/sop.2008.51.2.397
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Education. 2016. “College Scorecard.” Accessed https://collegescorecard.ed.gov.
   Google Scholar
• University Grants Commission. 2016. “Minimum Qualifications for Appointment of Teachers and other Academic Staff in Universities and Colleges and Measures for the Maintenance of Standards in Higher Education.” Accessed http://ugc.ac.in/ugc_notices.aspx?id=1435.
   Google Scholar
• Winston, G. C. 1999. “Subsidies, Hierarchy and Peers: The Awkward Economics of Higher Education.” The Journal of Economic Perspectives 13 (1): 13–36. doi: 10.1257/jep.13.1.13
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar