Students as consumers? A counter perspective from student assessment as a disciplinary technology

References

• Allen, A. 2011. “The Idea of a World University: Can Foucauldian Research Offer a Vision of Educational Futures?” Pedagogy, Culture & Society 19 (3): 367–383. doi:10.1080/14681366.2011.607840.
   Google Scholar
• Bansel, P. 2015. “The Subject of Policy.” Critical Studies in Education 56 (1): 5–20. doi:10.1080/17508487.2015.971839.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnett, R. 2011. Being a University. Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Becker, H. S., B. Geer, and E. Hughes. 1968. Making the Grade. The Academic Side of College Life. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Besley, T., and M. A. Peters. 2007. Subjectivity and Truth. Foucault, Education and the Culture of Self. New York: Peter Lang Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Bloxham, S., P. Boyd, and S. Orr. 2011. “Mark My Words: The Role of Assessment Criteria in UK Higher Education Grading Practices.” Studies in Higher Education 36 (6): 655–670. doi:10.1080/03075071003777716.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradley, C. 1993. “Sex Bias in Student Assessment Overlooked?” Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 18 (1): 3–8. doi:10.1080/0260293930180101.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, J. 1997. The Psychic Life of Power: Theories in Subjection. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Canaan, J. E., and W. Shumar. 2008. “Higher Education in the Era of Globalization and Neoliberalism.” In Structure and Agency in the Neoliberal University, edited by J. E. Canaan, and W. Shumar, 1–30. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Competition and Markets Authority. 2015. “Higher Education Providers: Consumer Law. 60-Second Summary.” Accessed February 9, 2018. https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/411392/HE_providers_60ss.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Dean, M. 2013. The Signature of Power. Sovereignty, Governmentality and Biopolitics. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• ENQA. 2009. “Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European Higher Education Area.” Accessed March 20, 2016. http://www.enqa.eu/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/ESG_3edition-2.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, A. M. 2011. “Governing Student Assessment: Administrative Rules, Silenced Academics and Performing Students.” Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 36 (2): 213–223. doi:10.1080/02602930903277727.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N. 1992. Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N. 2001. Language and Power. 2nd ed. Essex: Pearson Education Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N. 2003. Analysing Discourse. Textual Analysis for Social Research. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fanghanel, J. 2012. Being an Academic. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. 1972. “History, Discourse and Discontinuity.” Salmagundi 2: 225–248.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. 1973. “Truth and Juridical Forms.” In Power. Essential Works of Foucault 1954–1984, edited by J. D. Faubion, 1–89. London: Penguin Group.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. 1975. Discipline and Punish. The Birth of the Prison. London: Penguin Group.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. 1982. “The Subject and Power.” In Power. Essential Works of Foucault 1954–1984, edited by J. D. Faubion, 326–348. London: Penguin Group.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. 1983. “The Risks of Security.” In Power. Essential Works of Foucault 1954–1984, edited by J. D. Faubion, 365–381. London: Penguin Group.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. 1984. “The Ethics of the Concern of the Self as a Practice of Freedom.” In Ethics. Essential Works of Foucault 1954–1984, edited by P. Rabinow, 281–301. London: Penguin Group.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. 2004. The Birth of Biopolitics: Lectures at the College de France, 1978–1979. New York: Picador USA.
   Google Scholar
• Gipps, C. 1999. “Socio-Cultural Aspects of Assessment.” Review of Research in Education 24: 355–392.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giroux, H. A. 2009. “Beyond the Corporate Takeover of Higher Education: Rethinking Educational Theory, Pedagogy, and Policy.” In Re-Reading Education Policy. A Handbook Studying the Policy Agenda of the 21st Century, edited by M. Simons, M. Olssen, and M. A. Peters, 458–477. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Gourlay, L., and J. Stevenson. 2017. “Teaching Excellence in Higher Education: Critical Perspectives.” Teaching in Higher Education 22 (4): 391–395. doi:10.1080/13562517.2017.1304632.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, L. J. 2011. “The Product of Text and ‘Other’ Statements: Discourse Analysis and the Critical Use of Foucault.” Educational Philosophy and Theory 43 (6): 663–674. doi:10.1111/j.1469-5812.2010.00698.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant, B. 1997. “Disciplining Students: The Construction of Student Subjectivities.” British Journal of Sociology of Education 18 (1): 101–114. doi:10.1111/j.1469-5812.2010.00698.x doi: 10.1080/0142569970180106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamann, T. H. 2009. “Neoliberalism, Governmentality, and Ethics.” Foucault Studies 6: 37–59. doi: 10.22439/fs.v0i0.2471
   Google Scholar
• Harman, K., and L. McDowell. 2011. “Assessment Talk in Design: The Multiple Purposes of Assessment in HE.” Teaching in Higher Education 16 (1): 41–52. doi:10.1080/13562517.2010.507309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hay, S., and C. Kapitzke. 2009. “‘Smart State’ for a Knowledge Economy: Reconstituting Creativity Through Student Subjectivity.” British Journal of Sociology of Education 30 (2): 151–164. doi:10.1080/01425690802700206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jankowski, N., and S. Provezis. 2014. “Neoliberal Ideologies, Governmentality and the Academy: An Examination of Accountability Through Assessment and Transparency.” Educational Philosophy and Theory 46 (5): 475–487. doi:10.1080/00131857.2012.721736.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laughlin, R., and J. Broadbent. 1994. “The Managerial Reform of Health and Education in the UK: Value for Money or a Devaluing Process.” The Political Quarterly 65 (2): 152–167. doi:10.1111/j.1467-923X.1994.tb00442.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leach, L., G. Neutze, and N. Zepke. 2000. “Learners’ Perceptions of Assessment: Tensions Between Philosophy and Practice.” Studies in the Education of Adults 32 (1): 107–119. doi:10.1080/02660830.2000.11661424.
   Google Scholar
• Lehn-Christiansen, S. 2011. “Health Promotion Viewed as Processes of Subjectification in the Education of Danish Social and Healthcare Workers.” Journal of Social Work Practice: Psychotherapeutic Approaches in Health, Welfare and the Community 25 (3): 311–322. doi:10.1080/02650533.2011.597178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mampaey, J., and J. Huisman. 2015. “Defensive Stakeholder Management in European Universities: An Institutional Logics Perspective.” Studies in Higher Education. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/03075079.2015.1029904.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manuel, J., and C. Llamas. 2006. “Technologies of Disciplinary Power in Action: The Norm of the ‘Good Student’.” Higher Education 52 (4): 665–686. doi:10.1007/s10734-004-1449-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris, D. 2017. “Be It Enacted: The Higher Education and Research Act (2017).” Wonkhe. Accessed Ferbuary 9, 2018. http://wonkhe.com/blogs/be-it-enacted-the-higher-education-and-research-act-2017/.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, R. 2006. “Evaluating New Priorities for Assessment in Higher Education.” In Innovative Assessment in Higher Education, edited by C. Bryan, and K. Clegg, 37–47. Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Naidoo, R., and J. Williams. 2015. “The Neoliberal Regime in English Higher Education: Charters, Consumers and the Erosion of the Public Good.” Critical Studies in Education 56 (2): 208–223. doi:10.1080/17508487.2014.939098.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olssen, M. 2009. “Neoliberalism, Education, and the Rise of a Global Common Good.” In Re-Reading Education Policy. A Handbook Studying the Policy Agenda of the 21st Century, edited by M. Simons, M. Olssen, and M. A. Peters, 433–457. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, M. A., and M. Olssen. 2005. “‘Useful Knowledge’: Redefining Research and Teaching in the Learning Economy.” In Reshaping the University. New Relationships Between Research, Scholarship and Teaching, edited by R. Barnett, 37–48. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pritchard, R. 2005. “Education Staff and Students Under Neoliberal Pressure: A British-German Comparison.” Beiträge zur Hochschulforschung 4 (27): 6–29.
   Google Scholar
• Raaper, R. 2016. “Academic Perceptions of Higher Education Assessment Processes in Neoliberal Academia.” Critical Studies in Education 57 (2): 175–190. doi:10.1080/17508487.2015.1019901.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raaper, R. 2017a. “Tracing Assessment Policy Discourses in Neoliberalised Higher Education Settings.” Journal of Education Policy 32 (3): 322–339. doi:10.1080/02680939.2016.1257160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raaper, R. 2017b. “Discourse Analysis of Assessment Policies in Higher Education: A Foucauldian Approach.” SAGE Research Methods Cases. doi:10.4135/9781473975019.
   Google Scholar
• Reynolds, M., and K. Trehan. 2000. “Assessment: A Critical Perspective.” Studies in Higher Education 25 (3): 267–278. doi:10.1080/03075070050193406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell Group. 2015. About Us. Accessed February 9, 2018. http://www.russellgroup.ac.uk/about-russell-group.
   Google Scholar
• Saar, E., and R. Mõttus. 2013. “Foreword.” In Higher Education at a Crossroad: The Case of Estonia, edited by E. Saar, and R. Mõttus, 9–10. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Sabri, D. 2011. “What's Wrong with ‘the Student Experience’?” Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education 32 (5): 657–667. doi:10.1080/01596306.2011.620750.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svensson, G., and G. Wood. 2007. “Are University Students Really Customers? When Illusion May Lead to Delusion for All!.” International Journal of Educational Management 21 (1): 17–28. doi:10.1108/09513540710716795.
   Google Scholar
• Tan, K. 2004. “Does Student Self-Assessment Empower or Discipline Students?” Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 29 (6): 651–662. doi:10.1080/0260293042000227209.
   Google Scholar
• Taras, M. 2008. “Issues of Power and Equity in Two Models of Self-Assessment.” Teaching in Higher Education 13 (1): 81–92. doi:10.1080/13562510701794076.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomusk, V. 1996. “Recent Trend in Estonian Higher Education: Emergence of the Binary Division from the Point of View of Staff Development.” Minerva 34: 279–289. doi: 10.1007/BF00120328
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Universities UK. 2017. “Education, Consumer Rights and Maintaining Trust: What Students Want From Their University.” Accessed February 9, 2018. http://www.universitiesuk.ac.uk/policy-and analysis/reports/Documents/2017/education-consumer-rights-maintaining-trust-web.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Unt, M., and K. Lindemann. 2013. “From Bust to Boom and Back Again: Social Positions of Graduates During the Last Decade in Estonia.” In Higher Education at a Crossroad: The Case of Estonia, edited by E. Saar, and R. Mõttus, 307–338. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Yorke, M. 2008. Grading Student Achievement in Higher Education. Signals and Shortcomings. Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar