Adaptive master’s dissertation supervision: a longitudinal case study

References

• Anderson, C., K. Day, and P. McLaughlin. 2006. “Mastering the Dissertation: Lecturers’ Representations of the Purposes and Processes of Master’s Level Dissertation Supervision.” Studies in Higher Education 31: 149–168. doi: 10.1080/03075070600572017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnes, B. J., and A. E. Austin. 2009. “The Role of Doctoral Advisors: A Look at Advising from the Advisor’s Perspective.” Innovative Higher Education 33: 297–315. doi: 10.1007/s10755-008-9084-x
   Google Scholar
• Brown, G., and M. Atkins. 1988. Effective Teaching in Higher Education. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• de Kleijn, R. A. M., P. C. Meijer, M. Brekelmans, and A. Pilot. 2015. “Adaptive Research Supervision: Exploring Expert Thesis Supervisors’ Practical Knowledge.” Higher Education Research & Development 34: 117–130. doi: 10.1080/07294360.2014.934331
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delamont, S., P. Atkinson, and O. Parry. 2000. The Doctoral Experience: Success and Failure in Graduate School. London: Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Duff, P. A. 2008. Case Study Research in Applied Linguistics. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Dysthe, O. 2002. “Professors as Mediators of Academic Text Cultures: An Interview Study with Advisors and Master’s Degree Students in Three Disciplines in a Norwegian University.” Written Communication 19: 493–544. doi: 10.1177/074108802238010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gatfield, T. 2005. “An Investigation into PhD Supervisory Management Styles: Development of a Dynamic Conceptual Model and Its Managerial Implications.” Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management 27: 311–325. doi: 10.1080/13600800500283585
   Google Scholar
• Ginn, F. 2014. “‘Being Like a Researcher’: Supervising Masters Dissertations in a Neoliberalizing University.” Journal of Geography in Higher Education 38: 106–118. doi: 10.1080/03098265.2013.836746
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant, B. M. 2008. “Agonistic Struggle: Master—Slave Dialogues in Humanities Supervision.” Arts & Humanities in Higher Education 7: 9–27. doi: 10.1177/1474022207084880
   Google Scholar
• Grant, B. M. 2010. “Fighting for Space in Supervision: Fantasies, Fairytales, Fictions and Fallacies.” International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education 18 (3): 337–354. doi: 10.1080/09518390500082483
   Google Scholar
• Harwood, N., and B. Petrić. 2017. Experiencing Master’s Supervision: Perspectives of International Students and Their Supervisors. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hockey, J. 1994. “Establishing Boundaries: Problems and Solutions in Managing the PhD Supervisor’s Role.” Cambridge Journal of Education 24: 293–305. doi: 10.1080/0305764940240211
   Google Scholar
• Hockey, J. 1997. “A Complex Craft: United Kingdom PhD Supervision in the Social Sciences.” Research in Post-Compulsory Education 2: 45–70. doi: 10.1080/13596749700200004
   Google Scholar
• Lee, A. 2012. Successful Research Supervision: Advising Students Doing Research. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, A. 2018. “How Can We Develop Supervisors for the Modern Doctorate?” Studies in Higher Education 43: 878–890. doi: 10.1080/03075079.2018.1438116
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason, J. 2002. Qualitative Researching. 2nd ed. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., and A. M. Huberman. 1994. Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, N. 2009. “Research Supervision: Matches and Mismatches.” International Journal of Electrical Engineering Education 46 (3): 295–306. doi: 10.7227/IJEEE.46.3.7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowarth, J., and I. Cornforth. 2005. “A Fluid Model for Supervision.” In Supervising Postgraduate Research: Contexts and Processes, Theories and Practices, edited by P. Green, 154–162. Melbourne: RMIT University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Salmon, P. 1992. Achieving A PhD – Ten Students’ Experience. Stoke-on-Trent: Trentham Books.
   Google Scholar
• Smagorinsky, P. 2008. “The Method Section as Conceptual Epicenter in Constructing Social Science Research Reports.” Written Communication 25: 389–411. doi: 10.1177/0741088308317815
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vilkinas, T. 2005. “The Supervisor’s Role as Manager of the PhD Journey.” In Supervising Postgraduate Research: Contexts and Processes, Theories and Practices, edited by P. Green, 163–177. Melbourne: RMIT University Press.
   Google Scholar