Understanding Master’s students’ peer feedback practices from the academic discourse community perspective: A rethinking of postgraduate pedagogies

References

• Aitchison, C. 2014. “Learning from Multiple Voices: Feedback and Authority in Doctoral Writing Groups.” In Writing Groups for Doctoral Education and Beyond: Innovations in Practice and Theory, edited by C. Aitchison and C. Guerin, 51–64. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ashwell, T. 2000. “Patterns of Teacher Response to Student Writing in a Multiple-Draft Composition Classroom: Is Content Feedback Followed by form Feedback the Best Method?” Journal of Second Language Writing 9 (3): 227–257. doi: 10.1016/S1060-3743(00)00027-8
   Google Scholar
• Barnard, R., R. de Luca, and J. Li. 2015. “First-year Undergraduate Students’ Perceptions of Lecturer and Peer Feedback: A New Zealand Action Research Project.” Studies in Higher Education 40 (5): 933–944. doi: 10.1080/03075079.2014.881343
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basturkmen, H., M. East, and J. Bitchener. 2014. “Supervisors’ on-Script Feedback Comments on Drafts of Dissertations: Socialising Students Into the Academic Discourse Community.” Teaching in Higher Education 19 (4): 432–445. doi: 10.1080/13562517.2012.752728
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bitchener, J., H. Basturkmen, and M. East. 2010. “The Focus of Supervisor Written Feedback to Thesis/Dissertation Students.” International Journal of English Studies 10 (2): 79–97. doi: 10.6018/ijes/2010/2/119201
   Google Scholar
• Carson, J. G., and G. L. Nelson. 1996. “Chinese Students’ Perceptions of ESL Peer Response Group Interaction.” Journal of Second Language Writing 5 (1): 1–19. doi: 10.1016/S1060-3743(96)90012-0
   Google Scholar
• Chen, C. W. Y. 2010. “Graduate Students’ Self-Reported Perspectives Regarding Peer Feedback and Feedback from Writing Consultants.” Asia Pacific Education Review 11 (2): 151–158. doi: 10.1007/s12564-010-9081-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duff, P. A. 2008. “Problematizing Academic Discourse Socialization.” In Discourse and the Discourses of Learning, edited by H. Marriot, T. Moore, and R. Spence-Brown, 1–18. Melbourne: Monash University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Duff, P. A. 2010. “Language Socialization Into Academic Discourse Communities.” Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 30: 169–192. doi: 10.1017/S0267190510000048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis, R. 2008. “A Typology of Written Corrective Feedback Types.” ELT Journal 63 (2): 97–107. doi: 10.1093/elt/ccn023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engebretson, K., K. Smith, D. McLaughlin, C. Seibold, G. Terrett, and E. Ryan. 2008. “The Changing Reality of Research Education in Australia and Implications for Supervision: A Review of the Literature.” Teaching in Higher Education 13 (1): 1–15. doi: 10.1080/13562510701792112
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• French, A. 2018. “‘Fail Better': Reconsidering the Role of Struggle and Failure in Academic Writing Development in Higher Education.” Innovations in Education and Teaching International 55 (4): 408–416. doi: 10.1080/14703297.2016.1251848
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasrati, M. 2005. “Legitimate Peripheral Participation and Supervising Ph.D. Students.” Studies in Higher Education 30 (5): 557–570. doi: 10.1080/03075070500249252
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hattie, J., and H. Timperley. 2007. “The Power of Feedback.” Review of Educational Research 77 (1): 81–112. doi: 10.3102/003465430298487
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, G. 2005a. “Using Peer Review with Chinese ESL Student Writers.” Language Teaching Research 9 (3): 321–342. doi: 10.1191/1362168805lr169oa
   Google Scholar
• Hu, G. 2005b. “Contextual Influences on Instructional Practices: A Chinese Case for an Ecological Approach to ELT.” TESOL Quarterly 39 (4): 635–660. doi: 10.2307/3588525
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, G., and S. T. E. Lam. 2010. “Issues of Cultural Appropriateness and Pedagogical Efficacy: Exploring Peer Review in a Second Language Writing Class.” Instructional Science 38 (4): 371–394. doi: 10.1007/s11251-008-9086-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyatt, D. F. 2005. “‘Yes, a Very Good Point!’: a Critical Genre Analysis of a Corpus of Feedback Commentaries on Master of Education Assignments.” Teaching in Higher Education 10 (3): 339–353. doi: 10.1080/13562510500122222
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyland, K. 2004. “Disciplinary Interactions: Metadiscourse in L2 Postgraduate Writing.” Journal of Second Language Writing 13: 133–151. doi: 10.1016/j.jslw.2004.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyland, K. 2009. Academic Discourse. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Hyland, F., and K. Hyland. 2001. “Sugaring the Pill: Praise and Criticism in Written Feedback.” Journal of Second Language Writing 10 (3): 185–212. doi: 10.1016/S1060-3743(01)00038-8
   Google Scholar
• Hyland, K., and F. Hyland. 2006. “Feedback on Second Language Students’ Writing.” Language Teaching 39 (2): 83–101. doi: 10.1017/S0261444806003399
   Google Scholar
• Kumar, V., and E. Stracke. 2007. “An Analysis of Written Feedback on a PhD Thesis.” Teaching in Higher Education 12 (4): 461–470. doi: 10.1080/13562510701415433
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kyung, K. 2018. “Academic Socialization of Doctoral Students Through Feedback Networks: a Qualitative Understanding of the Graduate Feedback Landscape.” Teaching in Higher Education 47: 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Lave, J., and E. Wenger. 1991. Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, N. F., and D. Carless. 2006. “Peer Feedback: The Learning Element of Peer Assessment.” Teaching in Higher Education 11 (3): 279–290. doi: 10.1080/13562510600680582
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, J., and J. G. Hansen. 2002. Peer Response in Second Language Writing Classrooms. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Man, D., Y. Xu, and J. M. O’Toole. 2018. “Understanding Autonomous Peer Feedback Practices among Postgraduate Students: a Case Study in a Chinese University.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 43 (4): 527–536. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2017.1376310
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Min, H. T. 2006. “The Effects of Trained Peer Review on EFL Students’ Revision Types and Writing Quality.” Journal of Second Language Writing 15 (2): 118–141. doi: 10.1016/j.jslw.2006.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, G. L., and J. M. Murphy. 1992. “An L2 Writing Group: Task and Social Dimensions.” Journal of Second Language Writing 1 (3): 171–193. doi: 10.1016/1060-3743(92)90002-7
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, M. M., and C. D. Schunn. 2009. “The Nature of Feedback: How Different Types of Peer Feedback Affect Writing Performance.” Instructional Science 37 (4): 375–401. doi: 10.1007/s11251-008-9053-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicol, D., A. Thomson, and C. Breslin. 2014. “Rethinking Feedback Practices in Higher Education: a Peer Review Perspective.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 39 (1): 102–122. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2013.795518
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Odena, O., and H. Burgess. 2017. “How Doctoral Students and Graduates Describe Facilitating Experiences and Strategies for Their Thesis Writing Learning Process: A Qualitative Approach.” Studies in Higher Education 42 (3): 572–590. doi: 10.1080/03075079.2015.1063598
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poverjuc, O., V. Brooks, and D. Wray. 2012. “Using Peer Feedback in a Master’s Programme: A Multiple Case Study.” Teaching in Higher Education 17 (4): 465–477. doi: 10.1080/13562517.2011.641008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price, M., K. Handley, and J. Millar. 2011. “Feedback: Focusing Attention on Engagement.” Studies in Higher Education 36 (8): 879–896. doi: 10.1080/03075079.2010.483513
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruegg, R. 2018. “The Effect of Peer and Teacher Feedback on Changes in EFL Students’ Writing Self-Efficacy.” The Language Learning Journal 46 (2): 87–102. doi: 10.1080/09571736.2014.958190
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Séror, J. 2011. “Alternative Sources of Feedback and Second Language Writing Development in University Content Courses.” Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics 14 (1): 118–143.
   Google Scholar
• Stracke, E., and V. Kumar. 2014. “Realising Graduate Attributes in the Research Degree: the Role of Peer Support Groups.” Teaching in Higher Education 19 (6): 616–629. doi: 10.1080/13562517.2014.901955
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swales, J. 1990. Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Setting. England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thorne, S. L. 2004. “Cultural Historical Activity Theory and the Object of Innovation.” In New Insights Into Foreign Language Learning and Teaching, edited by Oliver St John, Kees van Esch, and Eus Schalkwijk, 51–70. Frankfurt, Germany: Peter Lang Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. 1978. Mind in Society. England: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Xu, Y., and J. Liu. 2010. “An Investigation Into Anonymous Peer Feedback.” Foreign Language Teaching and Practice 3: 44–49.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, M., R. Badger, and Z. Yu. 2006. “A Comparative Study of Peer and Teacher Feedback in a Chinese EFL Writing Class.” Journal of Second Language Writing 15 (3): 179–200. doi: 10.1016/j.jslw.2006.09.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, Shulin. 2015. “What Factors Shape the Collaborative Pattern of Group Interaction during Peer Feedback in the L2 Writing Classroom?” Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics 28 (2): 618–640.
   Google Scholar
• Yu, S., and G. Hu. 2017a. “Understanding University Students’ Peer Feedback Practices in EFL Writing: Insights from a Case Study.” Assessing Writing 33: 25–35. doi: 10.1016/j.asw.2017.03.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, S., and G. Hu. 2017b. “Can Higher-Proficiency L2 Learners Benefit from Working with Lower Proficiency Partners in Peer Feedback?” Teaching in Higher Education 22 (2): 178–192. doi: 10.1080/13562517.2016.1221806
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, S., and I. Lee. 2013. “Understanding Supervisors’ Commentary Practices in Doctoral Research Proposal Writing: A Hong Kong Study.” Asia-Pacific Education Researcher 22 (4): 473–483. doi: 10.1007/s40299-012-0046-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, S., and I. Lee. 2014. “An Analysis of Chinese EFL Students' Use of First and Second Language in Peer Feedback of L2 Writing.” System 47: 28–38. doi: 10.1016/j.system.2014.08.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, S., and I. Lee. 2016a. “Peer Feedback in Second Language Writing (2005–2014).” Language Teaching 49 (4): 461–493. doi: 10.1017/S0261444816000161
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, S., and I. Lee. 2016b. “Exploring Chinese Students' Strategy Use in a Cooperative Peer Feedback Writing Group.” System 58: 1–11. doi: 10.1016/j.system.2016.02.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, H. 2010. “Investigating Learners’ use and Understanding of Peer and Teacher Feedback on Writing: A Comparative Study in a Chinese English Writing Classroom.” Assessing Writing 15 (1): 3–17. doi: 10.1016/j.asw.2010.01.002
   Google Scholar