Calling out ‘alternative facts’: curriculum to develop students’ capacity to engage critically with contradictory sources

References

• American Library Association. 2000. Information Literacy Competency Standards for Higher Education. http://www.ala.org/Template.cfm?Section=Home&template=/ContentManagement/ContentDisplay.cfm&ContentID=33553.
   Google Scholar
• American Library Association. 2015. Framework for Information Literacy for Higher Education. http://www.ala.org/acrl/standards/ilframework.
   Google Scholar
• Andretta, S. 2007. “Phenomenography: A Conceptual Framework for Information Literacy Education.” Aslib Proceedings 59 (2): 152–168. doi: 10.1108/00012530710736663
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnett, R., and K. Coate. 2005. Engaging the Curriculum in Higher Education. Maidenhead: Open University Press and McGraw Hill Education.
   Google Scholar
• Bundy, A. 2004. Australian and New Zealand Information Literacy Framework Principles, Standards and Practice. http://www.caul.edu.au/content/upload/files/info-literacy/InfoLiteracyFramework.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Burke, P. J. 2015. “Re/Imagining Higher Education Pedagogies: Gender, Emotion and Difference.” Teaching in Higher Education 20 (4): 388–401. doi: 10.1080/13562517.2015.1020782
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cadwalladr, C. 2018. “Cambridge Analytica’s Ruthless Bid to Sway the Vote in Nigeria.” Guardian, March 22.
   Google Scholar
• Cadwalladr, C., and E. Graham-Harrison. 2018. “How Cambridge Analytica Turned Facebook ‘Likes’ into a Lucrative Political Tool.” Guardian, March 18.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, S. 2008. “Defining Information Literacy in the 21st Century.” In Information Literacy: International Perspectives, edited by J. Lau, 17–26. München: International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions.
   Google Scholar
• Conway, K. (Writer). 2017. “Trump Presidency Begins with Defense of False ‘Alternative Facts’: Kellyanne Conway Denies Trump Press Secretary Lied: ‘He Offered Alternative Facts’ – Video.” Meet the Press. NBC.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, T. 2002. “Why Student Retention Fails to Assure Quality.” In Quality Conversations: 2002 Annual International Conference of the Higher Education Research and Development Society of Australasia, edited by A. Goody, J. Herrington, and M. Northcote, Vol. 25, 152–158. Canberra: Higher Education Research and Development Society of Australasia.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, T. 2012. On-line Youth Work Major: Document to Inform Planning Processes. Perth: Edith Cowan University.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, T. 2017. “Curriculum Renewal: Barriers to Successful Curriculum Change and Suggestions for Improvement.” Journal of Education and Training Studies 5 (11): 115. doi: 10.11114/jets.v5i11.2737
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, T., J. Bessant, R. Broadbent, J. Couch, and K. Edwards. 2014. Australian Youth Work Education: Curriculum Renewal and a Model for Sustainability for Niche Professions. Canberra: Australian Learning and Teaching Council. https://ro.ecu.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=&httpsredir=1&article=3334&context=ecuworkspost2013.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, T., and R. Scriven. 2017. “Communities of Inquiry in Curriculum Approach to Online Learning: Strengths and Limitations in Context.” Australasian Journal of Educational Technology. doi:10.14742/ajet.3026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. 2013. Qualitative Inquiry: Choosing Amongst Five Approaches. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, S. L. 2005. “Panning for Gold: Influencing the Experience of Web-Based Information Searching.” PhD, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane. WorldCat.org database.
   Google Scholar
• Freire, P. 1972. Pedagogy of the Oppressed. New York: Herder and Herder.
   Google Scholar
• Fullard, A. 2016. “Using the ACRL Framework for Information Literacy to Foster Teaching and Learning Partnerships.” South African Journal of Libraries and Information Science 82 (2): 46–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giroux, H. 2011. Critical Pedagogy. New York: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Hinman, L. M. (2013). Ethics: A Pluralistic Approach to Moral Theory. 5th ed. Belmont: Thomson Wadsworth.
   Google Scholar
• Hope, A., and S. Timmel. 1997. Training for Transformation: A Handbook for Community Workers. Gweru: Mambo Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kosinski, M., D. Stillwell, and T. Graepel. 2013. “Private Traits and Attributes are Predictable from Digital Records of Human Behavior.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 110 (15): 5802–5805. doi:10.1073/pnas.1218772110.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luckett, K., and S. Shay. 2017. “Reframing the Curriculum: A Transformative Approach.” Critical Studies in Education 1–16. doi:10.1080/17508487.2017.1356341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lupton, D. 2013. Risk. 2nd ed. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lupton, M., and C. Bruce. 2010. “Windows on Information Literacy Worlds: Generic, Situated and Transformative Perspectives.” In Practising Information Literacy: Bringing Theories of Learning, Practice and Information Literacy Together, edited by A. Lloyd and S. Talja, 3–27. Wagga Wagga: Charles Sturt University.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, J., R. Land, and C. Bailie. 2010. Threshold Concepts and Transformational Learning. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, H., and H. J. Parkinson. 2018. “Cambridge Analytica Scandal: The Biggest Revelations So Far.” Guardian, March 23.
   Google Scholar
• Parker, J. 2013. “Imaging, Imagining Knowledge in Higher Education Curricula: New Visions and Troubled Thresholds.” Teaching in Higher Education 18 (8): 958–970. doi: 10.1080/13562517.2013.827650
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedler, M., and R. Evans. 2011. ABC of Action Learning. Farnham: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Reynolds, L., A. Willenborg, S. McClellan, R. H. Linares, and E. A. Sterner. 2017. “Library Instruction and Information Literacy 2016.” Reference Services Review 45 (4): 596–702. doi: 10.1108/RSR-08-2017-0028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, M. 2013. “The Pedagogical Balancing Act: Teaching Reflection in Higher Education.” Teaching in Higher Education 18 (2): 144–155. doi: 10.1080/13562517.2012.694104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savin-Baden, M., and C. Howell. 2004. Foundations of Problem-Based Learning. Berkshire: McGraw-Hill Education.
   Google Scholar
• Scager, K., S. F. Akkerman, A. Pilot, and T. Wubbels. 2017. “Teacher Dilemmas in Challenging Students in Higher Education.” Teaching in Higher Education 22 (3): 318–335. doi: 10.1080/13562517.2016.1248392
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solbrekke, T. D., and K. Helstad. 2016. “Student Formation in Higher Education: Teachers’ Approaches Matter.” Teaching in Higher Education 21 (8): 962–977. doi: 10.1080/13562517.2016.1207624
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Špiranec, S., and M. Banek Zorica. 2010. “Information Literacy 2.0: Hype or Discourse Refinement?” Journal of Documentation 66 (1): 140–153. doi: 10.1108/00220411011016407
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, A., and H. A. Dalal. 2017. “Gender and Information Literacy: Evaluation of Gender Differences in a Student Survey of Information Sources.” College & Research Libraries 78 (1): 90–113. doi: 10.5860/crl.78.1.90
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walton, G., and M. Hepworth. 2013. “Using Assignment Data to Analyse a Blended Information Literacy Intervention: A Quantitative Approach.” Journal of Librarianship and Information Science 45 (1): 53–63. doi: 10.1177/0961000611434999
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinstein, K. 1998. Action Learning: A Practical Guide. Abingdon: Ashgate Publishing.
   Google Scholar