Using assessed blogs to enhance student engagement

References

• Almarghani, E., and I. Mijatovic. 2017. “Factors Affecting Student Engagement in HEIs – it is All About Good Teaching.” Teaching in Higher Education 22 (8): 940–956.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biggs, J. B., and C. Tang. 2011. Teaching for Quality Learning At University. 4th ed. Maidenhead: Open University Press, McGraw-Hill Education.
   Google Scholar
• Bovill, C., C. Bulley, and K. Morss. 2011. “Engaging and Empowering First-Year Students Through Curriculum Design: Perspectives from the Literature.” Teaching in Higher Education 16 (2): 197–209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brady, A. M. 2005. “Assessment of Learning with Multiple-Choice Questions.” Nurse Education in Practice 5 (4): 238–242.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Braun, V., and V. Clarke. 2006. “Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology.” Qualitative Research in Psychology 3 (1): 77–101.
   Google Scholar
• Carless, D. 2006. “Differing Perceptions in the Feedback Process.” Studies in Higher Education 31 (2): 219–233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carless, D. 2015. “Exploring Learning-Oriented Assessment Processes.” Higher Education 69 (6): 963–976.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook, I. 2000. “Nothing can Ever be the Case of ‘Us’ and ‘Them’ Again: Exploring the Politics of Difference Through Border Pedagogy and Student Journal Writing.” Journal of Geography in Higher Education 24 (1): 13–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Everett, M. 2015. “Fostering First Year Students’ Engagement and Well-Being Through Visual Narrative.” Studies in Higher Education 42 (4): 623–635.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falchikov, N. 2005. Improving Assessment Through Student Involvement: Practical Solutions for Aiding Learning in Higher and Further Education. London: Routledge Falmer.
   Google Scholar
• Forrest, K., K. Judd, and J. Davison. 2012. “Coming to Know Within ‘Healthy Uncertainty’: An Autoethnography of Engagement and Transformation in Undergraduate Education.” Teaching in Higher Education 17 (6): 710–721.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foster, E. J., J. McNeil, and S. Lawther. 2012. “Exploring New Students’ Conceptions of Engagement and Feedback.” In Improving Student Engagement and Development Through Assessment: Theory and Practice in Higher Education, edited by L. Clouder, C. Brougham, S. Jewell, and G. Steventon, 32–44. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gibjels, D., and F. Dochy. 2006. “Students’ Assessment Preferences and Approaches to Learning: Can Formative Assessment Make a Difference?” Journal of Educational Studies 32 (4): 399–409.
   Google Scholar
• Gourlay, L. 2015. “Student Engagement and the ‘Tyranny of Participation’.” Teaching in Higher Education 20 (4): 402–411.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herrington, A., and J. Herrington. 2006. Eds. Authentic Learning Environments in Higher Education. London: Information Science Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Holmes, N. 2015. “Student Perceptions of Their Learning and Engagement in Response to the use of a Continuous e-Assessment in an Undergraduate Module.” Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 40 (1): 1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmes, N. 2018. “Engaging with Assessment: Increasing Student Engagement Through Continuous Assessment.” Active Learning in Higher Education, doi:10.1177/1469787417723230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordan, S. 2009. “Assessment for Learning: Pushing the Boundaries of Computer-Based Assessment.” Practitioner Research in Higher Education 3 (1): 11–19.
   Google Scholar
• Kahn, P. 2014. “Theorising Student Engagement in Higher Education.” British Educational Research Journal 40 (6): 1005–1018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kidwell, J., M. Northcott, and J. Paterson. 2012. “Enhancing Student Learning Through the use of Blogs.” Proceedings of the Seventh International Blended learning Conference 7. p. 82, Seventh International Blended Learning Conference, Hertfordshire, United Kingdom, June 13–14.
   Google Scholar
• Klemencic, M. 2017. “From Student Engagement to Student Agency: Conceptual Considerations of European Policies on Student-Centred Learning in Higher Education.” Higher Education Policy 30 (1): 69–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuh, G. 2009. “The National Survey of Student Engagement: Conceptual and Empirical Foundations.” New Directions for Institutional Research 2 (1): 5–20.
   Google Scholar
• Kuh, G., J. Kinzie, J. Buckley, B. Bridges, and J. Hayek. 2007. “Piecing Together the Student Success Puzzle: Research, Propositions and Recommendations.” ASHE Higher Education Report 32: 5.
   Google Scholar
• Leung, S., E. Mok, and D. Wong. 2008. “The Impact of Assessment Methods on the Learning of Nursing Students.” Nurse Education Today 28 (6): 711–719.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCune, V., and D. Hounsell. 2005. “The Development of Students’ Ways of Thinking and Practising in Three Final Year Biology Courses.” Higher Education 49 (3): 255–289.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicol, D., and D. Macfarlane-Dick. 2006. “Formative Assessment and Self-Regulated Learning: A Model and Seven Principles of Good Feedback Practice.” Studies in Higher Education 31 (2): 199–218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ni Raghallaigh, M., and R. Cunliffe. 2013. “Creating a Safe Climate for Active Learning and Student Engagement: an Example from an Introductory Social Work Module.” Teaching in Higher Education 18 (1): 93–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, C. 2003. “Engaging Students in the Learning Process: the Learning Journal.” Journal of Geography in Higher Education 27 (2): 183–199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pascarella, E., and P. Terenzini. 2005. How College Affects Students: A Third Decade of Research. Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Purcel, B. K., and H. Xie. 2014. “Patterns and Pedagogy: Exploring Student Blog use in Higher Education.” Contemporary Educational Technology 5 (2): 96–109.
   Google Scholar
• Robothom, D., and C. Julian. 2006. “Stress and the Higher Education Student: A Critical Review of the Literature.” Journal of Further and Higher Education 30 (2): 107–117.
   Google Scholar
• Rust, C. 2002. “The Impact of Assessment on Student Learning: How Can the Research Literature Practically Help to Inform the Development of Department Assessment Strategies and Learner-Centred Assessment Practices?” Active Learning in Higher Education 3 (2): 145–158.
   Google Scholar
• Rust, C., B. O’Donovan, and M. Price. 2005. “A Social Constructivist Assessment Process Model: How the Research Literature Shows Us This Could be Best Practice.” Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 30 (3): 231–240.
   Google Scholar
• Samball, K., L. McDowell, and C. Montgomery, eds. 2012. Assessment for Learning in Higher Education. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Serafini, F. 2000. “Three Paradigms of Assessment: Measurement, Procedure and Inquiry.” The Reading Teacher 54 (4): 384–393.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shields, S. 2015. “‘My Work is Bleeding’: Exploring Students’ Emotional Responses to First-Year Assignment Feedback.” Teaching in Higher Education 20 (6): 614–624.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, R. A. 2010. “To Blog or not to Blog? Using Blogs in Assessment”. http://pops.uclan.ac.uk/index.php/ujpr/article/viewFile/106/46.
   Google Scholar
• Taras, M. 2008. “Summative and Formative Assessment: Perceptions and Realities.” Active Learning in Higher Education 9 (2): 172–192.
   Google Scholar
• Trigwell, K., R. Ellis, and F. Han. 2012. “Relations Between Students’ Approaches to Learning, Experienced Emotions and Outcomes of Learning.” Studies in Higher Education 37 (7): 811–824.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trowler, P. 2008. Cultures and Change in Higher Education: Theories and Practices. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Trowler, V. 2010. Student Engagement Literature Review. York: Higher Education Academy. https://www.heacademy.ac.uk/knowledge-hub/student-engagement-literature-review.
   Google Scholar
• Zepke, N., and L. Leach. 2010. “Improving Student Engagement: Ten Proposals for Action.” Active Learning in Higher Education 11 (3): 167–177.
   Google Scholar