The other side of a magic mirror: exploring collegiality in student and staff partnership work

References

• Bingham, R., and R. Ottewill. 2001. “Whatever Happened to Peer Review? Revitalising Contribution of Tutors to Course Evaluation.” Quality Assurance in Education 9 (1): 2–39. doi:10.1108/09684880110381319.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., and V. Clarke. 2006. “Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology.” Qualitative Research in Psychology 3 (2): 77–10. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
   Google Scholar
• Brookfield, S. 2006. The Skillful Teacher: On Technique Trust and Responsiveness in the Classroom. 2nd ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Buckley, A. 2018. “The Ideology of Student Engagement Research.” Teaching in Higher Education 28 (6): 718–732. doi:10.1080/13562517.2017.1414789.
   Google Scholar
• Burnes, B., P. Wend, and R. By. 2014. “The Changing Face of English Universities: Reinventing Collegiality for the Twenty-First Century.” Studies in Higher Education 39: 6. doi:10.1080/03075079.2012.754858.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cliffe, A., A. Cook-Sather, M. Healey, R. Healey, E. Marquis, K. E. Matthews, L. Mercer- Mapstone, A. Ntem, V. Puri, and C. Woolmer. 2017. “Launching a Journal About and Through Students as Partners.” International Journal for Students as Partners 1: 1. doi: 10.15173/ijsap.v1i1.3194
   Google Scholar
• Cook-Sather, A. 2002. “Authorizing Students’ Perspectives: Toward Trust, Dialogue and Change in Education.” Educational Researcher 31 (4): 3–14. doi: 10.3102/0013189X031004003
   Google Scholar
• Cook-Sather, A. 2009. “From Traditional Accountability to Shared Responsibility: The Benefits and Challenges of Student Consultants Gathering Midcourse Feedback in College Classrooms.” Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 34: 231–241. doi: 10.1080/02602930801956042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook-Sather A. 2015. “Dialogue Across Differences of Position, Perspective and Identity: Reflective Practice in/on a Student–Faculty Pedagogical Partnership Program.” Teachers College Record 117: 1–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook-Sather, A., and Z. Alter. 2011. “What is and What Can be: How a Liminal Position Can Change Learning and Teaching in Higher Education.” Anthropology and Education Quarterly 42 (1): 37–53. doi:10.1111/j.1548-1492.2010.01109 doi: 10.1111/j.1548-1492.2010.01109.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook-Sather, A., C. Bovill, and P. Felten. 2014. Engaging Students as Partners in Learning and Teaching: A Guide for Faculty. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Cook-Sather, A., and P. Felten. 2017. “Ethics of Academic Leadership: Guiding Learning and Teaching.” In Cosmopolitan Perspectives on Academic Leadership in Higher Education, edited by F. Su, and M. Wood, 175–191. London: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, E. 2005. “For Better, For Worse: the Matching Process in Formal Mentoring Schemes.” Mentoring and Tutoring: Partnership in Learning 13 (3): 403–414. doi:10.1080/13611260500177484.
   Google Scholar
• Crawford, K. 2012. “Rethinking the Student/Teacher Nexus: Students as Consultants on Teaching in Higher Education.” In Towards Teaching in Public: Reshaping the Modern University, edited by H. Stephenson, L. Bell, and M. Neary, 52–67. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Dwyer, A. 2018. “Toward the Formation of Genuine Partnership Spaces.” International Journal for Students as Partners 2 (1): 11–15. doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v2i1.3503.
   Google Scholar
• Felten, P. 2017. “Emotion and Partnerships.” International Journal for Students as Partner 1: 2. doi: 10.15173/ijsap.v1i2.3070
   Google Scholar
• Felten, P., J. Gardner, C. Schroder, L. Lambert, and B. Barefoot. 2016. The Undergraduate Experience: Focusing Intuitions on What Matters Most. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Fielding, M. 1999. “Radical Collegiality: Affirming Teaching as an Inclusive Professional Practice.” Australian Educational Researcher 26 (2): 1–34. doi: 10.1007/BF03219692
   Google Scholar
• Fielding, M. 2004. “Transformative Approaches to Student Voice: Theoretical Underpinnings, Recalcitrant Realities.” British Educational Research Journal 30 (2): 295–311. doi: 10.1080/0141192042000195236
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fielding, M. 2012. “Education as if People Matter: John Macmurray, Community and the Struggle for Democracy.” Oxford Review of Education 38 (6): 675–692. doi: 10.1080/03054985.2012.745044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, R. 2013. “Student Engagement in Practice: Ideologies and Power in Course Representation Systems.” In The Student Engagement Handbook: Practice in Higher Education, edited by E. Dunne, and D. Owen, 587–600. Bingley: Emerald Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Gosling, D. 2002. Models of Peer Observation of Teaching. York: LTSN Generic Centre Learning and Teaching Support Network.
   Google Scholar
• Gosling, D., and K. Mason O'Connor. 2009. Beyond the Peer Observation of Teaching. London: SEDA Paper 124.
   Google Scholar
• Green, W. 2019. “Stretching the Cultural-Linguistic Boundaries of “Students as Partners.” International Journal for Students as Partners 3 (1), https://mulpress.mcmaster.ca/ijsap/article/view/3791. doi: 10.15173/ijsap.v3i1.3791
   Google Scholar
• Green, U., and J. Scoles. 2016. “Pioneering a Peer Review Initiative: Students as Colleagues in the Review of Teaching Practices.” Teaching and Learning Together in Higher Education 19.
   Google Scholar
• Harding, S. 1993. “Rethinking Standpoint Epistemologies: What Is ‘Strong Objectivity’?” In Feminist Epistemologies, edited by E. Alcoff, and L. Potter, 49–82. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hargreaves, A., and R. Dawe. 1990. “Paths of Professional Development: Contrived Collegiality, Collaborative Culture, and the Case of Peer Coaching.” Teaching and Teacher Education 6 (3): 227–241. doi: 10.1016/0742-051X(90)90015-W
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, D., and H. Anthony. 2001. “Collegiality and Its Role in Teacher Development: Perspectives from Veteran and Novice Teachers.” Teacher Development 5 (3): 371–390. doi:10.1080/13664530100200150 doi: 10.1080/13664530100200162
   Google Scholar
• Healey, M., A. Flint, and K. Harrington. 2014. Students as Partners in Learning and Teaching in Higher Education. York: Higher Education Academy. https://www.heacademy.ac.uk/system/files/resources/engagement_through_partnership.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Healey, M., and A. Jenkins. 2009. Developing Undergraduate Research and Inquiry. Higher Education Academy. https://www.heacademy.ac.uk/knowledge-hub/developing-undergraduate-research-and-inquiry.
   Google Scholar
• Hendry, G., and G. Oliver. 2012. “Seeing is Believing: The Benefits of Peer Observation.” Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice 9 (1): 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• hooks, bell. 1989. Talking Back: Thinking Feminist, Thinking Black. Boston, MA: South End Press.
   Google Scholar
• Huxham, M., J. Scoles, U. Green, S. Purves, Z. Welsh, and A. Gray. 2017. “‘Observation Has Set In’: Comparing Students and Peers as Reviewers of Teaching.” Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 42 (6): 887–899. doi:10.1080/02602938.2016.1204594.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Intemann, K. 2010. “25 Years of Feminist Empiricism and Standpoint Theory: Where Are We Now?” Hypatia 25 (4): 778–796. doi: 10.1111/j.1527-2001.2010.01138.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iqbal, I. 2014. “Don’t Tell it Like it is: Preserving Collegiality in the Summative Peer Review of Teaching.” Canadian Journal of Higher Education 44 (1): 108–124. doi: 10.47678/cjhe.v44i1.183625
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, K., and E. Bennett. 2016. “Enhancing Teaching and Learning Through Dialogue: a Student and Staff Partnership Model.” International Journal of Academic Development 21 (1): 41–53. doi: 10.1080/1360144X.2015.1113537
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaur, A., R. Awang-Hashim, and M. Kaur. 2019. “Students’ Experiences of co-Creating Classroom Instruction with Faculty – A Case Study in Eastern Context.” Teaching in Higher Education 24 (4): 461–477. doi:10.1080/13562517.2018.1487930.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenny, A., E. Mitchell, D. N. Chróinín, E. Vaughan, and E. Murtagh. 2014. “‘In Their Shoes’: Exploring a Modified Approach to Peer Observation of Teaching in a University Setting.” Innovations in Education and Teaching International 51 (2): 218–229. doi.10.1080/14703297.2013.771971.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kligyte, G., and S. Barrie. 2014. “Collegiality: Leading us Into Fantasy – the Paradoxical Resilience of Collegiality in Academic Leadership.” Higher Education Research and Development 33 (1): 157–169. doi: 10.1080/07294360.2013.864613
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambert, C. 2009. ““Pedagogies of Participation in Higher Education: A Case for Research-Based Learning.” Pedagogy, Culture and Society 17: 295–309. doi:10.1080/14681360903194327.
   Google Scholar
• Little, J. W. 1990. “Teachers as Colleagues.” In Schools as Collaborative Cultures: Creating the Future Now, edited by A. Lieberman, 165–193. New York: Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Macfarlane, B. 2016. “Collegiality and Performativity in a Competitive Academic Culture.” Higher Education Review 48 (2): 31–50.
   Google Scholar
• Massy, W., A. Wilger, and C. Colbeck. 1994. “Departmental Cultures and Teaching Quality: Overcoming “Hollowed” Collegiality, Change.” Change 26 (4): 11–20. doi:10.1080/00091383.1994.9938496.
   Google Scholar
• Matthews, K. 2016. “Students as Partners as the Future of Student Engagement.” Student Engagement in Higher Education Journal 1: 1.
   Google Scholar
• Matthews, K. 2017. “Five Propositions for Genuine Students as Partners Practice.” International Journal for Students as Partners 1: 2. doi:10.15173/ijsap.v1i2.3315.
   Google Scholar
• Mercer-Mapstone, L., and G. Mercer. 2018. “A Dialogue Between Partnership and Feminism: Deconstructing Power and Exclusion in Higher Education.” Teaching in Higher Education 23 (1): 137–143. doi:10.1080/13562517.2017.1391198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministry of Education, Aotearoa/New Zealand (MoE). 2011. “New Zealand curriculum guides.” https://seniorsecondary.tki.org.nz/The-arts/Pedagogy/Culturally-responsive-learning-environments/Manaakitanga.
   Google Scholar
• Neary, M. 2013. ““Student as Producer: Radicalising the Mainstream in Higher Education.” In The Student Engagement Handbook: Practice in Higher Education, edited by E. Dunne, and D. Owen, 587–600. Emerald: Bingley.
   Google Scholar
• Pounder, S., E. Ho, and J. Groves. 2015. “Faculty–student Engagement in Teaching Observation and Assessment: A Hong Kong Initiative.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 41 (8): 1193–1205. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2015.1071779.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• QAA. 2012. “Chapter B5: Student Engagement.” UK Quality Code for Higher Education, 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Rolin, K. 2006. “The Bias Paradox in Feminist Standpoint Epistemology.” Episteme; Rivista Critica Di Storia Delle Scienze Mediche E Biologiche 3 (1–2): 125–136.
   Google Scholar
• Speirs, A., Z. Welsh, J. Jung, and J. Scoles. 2015. “Rethinking Peer, Rethinking Review: Students’ Transition to Colleagues.” Poster Presented at QAA’s International Conference on Enhancement and Innovation in Higher Education, Crowne Plaza Hotel, Glasgow, 9 June 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Tapper, T., and D. Palfreyman. 2000. Oxford and the Decline of the Collegiate Tradition. London: Woburn Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tight, M. 2010. “The Golden age of Academe: Myth or Memory?” British Journal of Educational Studies 58: 105–116. doi: 10.1080/00071000903516502
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tinto, V. 1987. Leaving College: Rethinking the Causes and Cures of Student Attrition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wegerif, R. 2013. Dialogic: Education for the Internet Age. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Werder, C., and E. Skogsberg. 2013. “Trusting Dialogue for Engaging Students.” In The Student Engagement Handbook: Practice in Higher Education, edited by E. Dunne, and D. Owen, 133–144. Emerald: Bingley.
   Google Scholar
• Wylie, A. 2003. ““Why Standpoint Matters”.” In Science and Other Cultures: Issues in Philosophies of Science and Technology, edited by R. Figueroa, and S. Harding New, 26–48. York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Zipke, N. 2015. “Student Engagement and Neoliberalism: Mapping an Elective Affinity.” International Journal of Lifelong Education 34 (6): 696–709. doi: 10.1080/02601370.2015.1096312
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar