‘Towards an effective supervisory relationship in research degree supervision: insights from attachment theory’

References

• Ainsworth, Mary D. Salter, Mary C. Blehar, Everett Waters, and S. Wall. 1978. Patterns of Attachment: A Psychological Study of the Strange Situation. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, Jean L. 1988. “The Supervisory Process in Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology.” Ear and Hearing 9 (4): 223.
   Google Scholar
• Bastalich, Wendy. 2017. “Content and Context in Knowledge Production: A Critical Review of Doctoral Supervision Literature.” Studies in Higher Education 42 (7): 1145–1157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, Susanne, Jonathan Mohr, Karlynn BrintzenhofeSzoc, and Loretta Vitale Saks. 2008. “General and Supervision-Specific Attachment Styles: Relations to Student Perceptions of Field Supervisors.” Journal of Social Work Education 44 (2): 75–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boberg, Alice L, and Sheryl A Monis-Khoo. 1992. “The Delphi Method: A Review of Methodology and an Application in the Evaluation of a Higher Education Program.” The Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation 7 (1): 27.
   Google Scholar
• Bowden, John, and Pamela Green. 2019. “Completion Mindsets and Contexts in Doctoral Education: Pursuing Efficiency and Quality with Integrity.” In Playing the PhD Game with Integrity. Understanding Teaching-Learning Practice, edited by John Bowden and Pamela Green, 77–99. Singapore: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Bowlby, John. 1969. Attachment and Loss, Volume I Attachment. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Bowlby, J. 1982. Attachment and Loss: Vol. 1. Attachment. 4th ed. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Bowlby, John. 1988. A Secure Base. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, Nancy L. 1996. “Working Models of Attachment: Implications for Explanation, Emotion, and Behavior.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 71 (4): 810.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, N. L., and S. J. Read. 1994. “Cognitive Representations of Attachment: The Structure and Function of Working Models.” In Advances in Personal Relationships, Vol. 5. Attachment Processes in Adulthood, edited by K. Bartholomew and D. Perlman, 53–90. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Davidovitz, Rivka, Mario Mikulincer, Phillip R Shaver, Ronit Izsak, and Micha Popper. 2007. “Leaders as Attachment Figures: Leaders’ Attachment Orientations Predict Leadership-Related Mental Representations and Followers’ Performance and Mental Health.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 93 (4): 632.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeMarco, T. C., and A. K. Newheiser. 2019. “When Groups do not Cure: Group Esteem Moderates the Social Cure Effect.” European Journal of Social Psychology 49 (7): 1421–1438.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deuchar, Ross. 2008. “Facilitator, Director or Critical Friend?: Contradiction and Congruence in Doctoral Supervision Styles.” Teaching in Higher Education 13 (4): 489–500.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dickson, Joanne M, Nicholas J Moberly, Yehuda Marshall, and James Reilly. 2011. “Attachment Style and its Relationship to Working Alliance in the Supervision of British Clinical Psychology Trainees.” Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy 18 (4): 322–330.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foster, J. T., A. D. Heinen, J. W. Lichtenberg, and A. D. Gomez. 2006. “Supervisor Attachment as a Predictor of Developmental Ratings of Supervisees.” American Journal of Psychological Research 2 (1): 28–39.
   Google Scholar
• Foster, Joel T, James W Lichtenberg, and Vicki Peyton. 2007. “The Supervisory Attachment Relationship as a Predictor of the Professional Development of the Supervisee.” Psychotherapy Research 17 (3): 343–350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frazier, M. Lance, Janaki Gooty, Laura M. Little, and Debra L. Nelson. 2015. “Employee Attachment: Implications for Supervisor Trustworthiness and Trust.” Journal of Business and Psychology 30 (2): 373–386.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gatfield, Terry. 2005. “An Investigation into PhD Supervisory Management Styles: Development of a Dynamic Conceptual Model and its Managerial Implications.” Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management 27 (3): 311–325.
   Google Scholar
• Gillath, Omri, and Gery Karantzas. 2019. “Attachment Security Priming: A Systematic Review.” Current Opinion in Psychology 25: 86–95.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillath, Omri, Amanda K Sesko, Phillip R Shaver, and David S Chun. 2010. “Attachment, Authenticity, and Honesty: Dispositional and Experimentally Induced Security can Reduce Self-and Other-Deception.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 98 (5): 841.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant, B. 1999. “Walking on a Rackety Bridge: Mapping Supervision.” HERDSA Annual International Conference.
   Google Scholar
• Green, Pam. 2005. Supervising Postgraduate Research: Contexts and Processes, Theories and Practices. Melbourne: RMIT University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gruzdev, Ivan, Evgeniy Terentev, and Zibeyda Dzhafarova. 2019. “Superhero or Hands-Off Supervisor? An Empirical Categorization of PhD Supervision Styles and Student Satisfaction in Russian Universities.” Higher Education. doi:10.1007/s10734-019-00437-w.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guerin, C., H. Kerr, and I. Green. 2015. “Supervision Pedagogies: Narratives from the Field.” Teaching in Higher Education 20 (1): 107–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunn, Joshua E., and Carole M. Pistole. 2012. “Trainee Supervisor Attachment: Explaining the Alliance and Disclosure in Supervision.” Training and Education in Professional Psychology 6 (4): 229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gurr, Geoff M. 2001. “‘Negotiating the’ Rackety Bridge’—A Dynamic Model for Aligning Supervisory Style with Research Student Development.” Higher Education Research & Development 20 (1): 81–92.
   Google Scholar
• Halbert, Kelsey. 2015. “Students’ Perceptions of a ‘Quality’advisory Relationship.” Quality in Higher Education 21 (1): 26–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halse, C., and J. Malfroy. 2010. “Retheorizing Doctoral Supervision as Professional Work.” Studies in Higher Education 35 (1): 79–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, E. Wayne. 1992. “Marital and Family Therapy Supervision: A Relational-Attachment Model.” Contemporary Family Therapy 14 (2): 115–125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinojosa, Amanda S, Kelly Davis McCauley, Brandon Randolph-Seng, and William L Gardner. 2014. “Leader and Follower Attachment Styles: Implications for Authentic Leader–Follower Relationships.” The Leadership Quarterly 25 (3): 595–610.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huber, Anna, Catherine A McMahon, and Naomi Sweller. 2015a. “Efficacy of the 20-Week Circle of Security Intervention: Changes in Caregiver Reflective Functioning, Representations, and Child Attachment in an Australian Clinical Sample.” Infant Mental Health Journal 36 (6): 556–574.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huber, Anna, Catherine McMahon, and Naomi Sweller. 2015b. “Improved Child Behavioural and Emotional Functioning After Circle of Security 20-Week Intervention.” Attachment & Human Development 17 (6): 547–569.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutchings, Maggie. 2017. “Improving Doctoral Support Through Group Supervision: Analysing Face-to-Face and Technology-Mediated Strategies for Nurturing and Sustaining Scholarship.” Studies in Higher Education 42 (3): 533–550.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kafetsios, Konstantinos, Maria Athanasiadou, and Nafsika Dimou. 2014. “Leaders’ and Subordinates’ Attachment Orientations, Emotion Regulation Capabilities and Affect at Work: A Multilevel Analysis.” The Leadership Quarterly 25 (3): 512–527.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamler, Barbara, and Pat Thomson. 2014. Helping Doctoral Students Write: Pedagogies for Supervision. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Keller, Tiffany, and Ron Cacioppe. 2001. “Leader-Follower Attachments: Understanding Parental Images at Work.” Leadership & Organization Development Journal 22 (2): 70–75.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, Anne. 2008. “How are Doctoral Students Supervised? Concepts of Doctoral Research Supervision.” Studies in Higher Education 33 (3): 267–281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, Anne. 2018. “How can we Develop Supervisors for the Modern Doctorate?” Studies in Higher Education 43 (5): 878–890.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, Anne, and Rowena Murray. 2015. “Supervising Writing: Helping Postgraduate Students Develop as Researchers.” Innovations in Education and Teaching International 52 (5): 558–570.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindsay, Siân. 2015. “What Works for Doctoral Students in Completing Their Thesis?” Teaching in Higher Education 20 (2): 183–196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mainhard, Tim, Roeland Van Der Rijst, Jan Van Tartwijk, and Theo Wubbels. 2009. “A Model for the Supervisor–Doctoral Student Relationship.” Higher Education 58 (3): 359–373.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marmarosh, C. L., and R. D. Markin. 2007. “Group and Personal Attachments: Two is better than One When Predicting College Adjustment.” Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice 11 (3): 153–164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayseless, Ofra, and Micha Popper. 2019. “Attachment and Leadership: Review and new Insights.” Current Opinion in Psychology 25: 157–161.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCallin, Antoinette, and Shoba Nayar. 2012. “Postgraduate Research Supervision: A Critical Review of Current Practice.” Teaching in Higher Education 17 (1): 63–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKibben, W. Bradley, and Wesley B Webber. 2017. “Investigating the Impact of Supervisee Attachment System Activation on the Supervisory Relationship.” The Clinical Supervisor 36 (2): 324–339.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mikulincer, Mario, and Phillip R. Shaver. 2007a. Attachment in Adulthood: Structure, Dynamics, and Change. New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mikulincer, M., and P. R. Shaver. 2007b. “Attachment, Group–Related Processes, and Psychotherapy.” International Journal of Group Psychotherapy 57 (2): 233–245.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mikulincer, Mario, Phillip R Shaver, and Dana Pereg. 2003. “Attachment Theory and Affect Regulation: The Dynamics, Development, and Cognitive Consequences of Attachment-Related Strategies.” Motivation and Emotion 27 (2): 77–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mikulincer, Mario, Phillip R Shaver, and Eldad Rom. 2011. “The Effects of Implicit and Explicit Security Priming on Creative Problem Solving.” Cognition and Emotion 25 (3): 519–531.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, Mary Lee, Kristin L Barnes, Amelia L Evans, and Patrick J Triggiano. 2008. “Working with Conflict in Clinical Supervision: Wise Supervisors’ Perspectives.” Journal of Counseling Psychology 55 (2): 172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orellana, Martha L, Antònia Darder, Adolfina Pérez, and Jesús Salinas. 2016. “Improving Doctoral Success by Matching PhD Students with Supervisors.” International Journal of Doctoral Studies 11: 87–103.
   Google Scholar
• Pistole, M. Carole, and Watkins C. Edward Jr. 1995. “Attachment Theory, Counseling Process, and Supervision.” The Counseling Psychologist 23 (3): 457–478.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popper, Micha, Ofra Mayseless, and Omri Castelnovo. 2000. “Transformational Leadership and Attachment.” The Leadership Quarterly 11 (2): 267–289.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renfro-Michel, Edina L, and Carl J Sheperis. 2009. “The Relationship Between Counseling Supervisee Attachment Orientation and Perceived Bond with Supervisor.” The Clinical Supervisor 28 (2): 141–154.
   Google Scholar
• Richards, David A, and Rick D Hackett. 2012. “Attachment and Emotion Regulation: Compensatory Interactions and Leader–Member Exchange.” The Leadership Quarterly 23 (4): 686–701.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riggs, Shelley A, and Karen M Bretz. 2006. “Attachment Processes in the Supervisory Relationship: An Exploratory Investigation.” Professional Psychology: Research and Practice 37 (5): 558.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roach, Alex, Bruce K. Christensen, and Elizabeth Rieger. 2019. “The Essential Ingredients of Research Supervision: A Discrete-Choice Experiment.” Journal of Educational Psychology 111 (7): 1243–1260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robertson, Jennifer L., Angela M. Dionisi, and Julian Barling. 2018. “Linking Attachment Theory to Abusive Supervision.” Journal of Managerial Psychology 33 (2): 214–228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, Jennifer L, Melissa Luke, Dennis D Gilbride, and Kristopher M Goodrich. 2019. “Supervisee Attachment, Cognitive Distortions, and Difficulty with Corrective Feedback.” Counselor Education and Supervision 58 (1): 18–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rom, E., and M. Mikulincer. 2003. “Attachment Theory and Group Processes: The Association Between Attachment Style and Group-Related Representations, Goals, Memories, and Functioning.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 84 (6): 1220.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sibley, Chris G, and Nickola C Overall. 2008. “Modeling the Hierarchical Structure of Attachment Representations: A Test of Domain Differentiation.” Personality and Individual Differences 44 (1): 238–249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, E. R., J. Murphy, and S. Coats. 1999. “Attachment to Groups: Theory and Management.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 77 (1): 94.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spronken-Smith, Rachel, C. Cameron, and R. Quigg. 2018. “Factors Contributing to High PhD Completion Rates: A Case Study in a Research-Intensive University in New Zealand.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 43 (1): 94–109. doi:10.1080/02602938.2017.1298717.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vitae. 2011. “Researcher Development Framework.” Accessed 10 September 2019. https://www.vitae.ac.uk/vitae-publications/rdf-related/researcher-development-framework-rdf-briefing-postgraduate-researcher-vitae-2011.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Watkins Jr, C Edward, and Shelley A Riggs. 2012. “Psychotherapy Supervision and Attachment Theory: Review, Reflections, and Recommendations.” The Clinical Supervisor 31 (2): 256–289.
   Google Scholar
• White, Victoria E, and John Queener. 2003. “Supervisor and Supervisee Attachments and Social Provisions Related to the Supervisory Working Alliance.” Counselor Education and Supervision 42 (3): 203–218.
   Google Scholar
• Wollast, Robin, Gentiane Boudrenghien, Nicolas Van der Linden, BenoÃŽt Galand, Nathalie Roland, Christelle Devos, MikaÃĢl De Clercq, Olivier Klein, Assaad Azzi, and Mariane Frenay. 2018. “Who Are the Doctoral Students Who Drop Out? Factors Associated with the Rate of Doctoral Degree Completion in Universities.” International Journal of Higher Education 7 (4): 143–156.
   Google Scholar
• Wrape, Elizabeth R, Jennifer L Callahan, Troy Rieck, and C. Edward Watkins Jr. 2017. “Attachment Theory Within Clinical Supervision: Application of the Conceptual to the Empirical.” Psychoanalytic Psychotherapy 31 (1): 37–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, Toni, and Ray Cochrane. 2000. “Factors Influencing Successful Submission of PhD Theses.” Studies in Higher Education 25 (2): 181–195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, Chia-Huei, and Sharon K Parker. 2017. “The Role of Leader Support in Facilitating Proactive Work Behavior: A Perspective From Attachment Theory.” Journal of Management 43 (4): 1025–1049.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, Chia-Huei, Sharon K Parker, and Jeroen PJ De Jong. 2014. “Feedback Seeking From Peers: A Positive Strategy for Insecurely Attached Team-Workers.” Human Relations 67 (4): 441–464.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wubbels, Th, Mieke Brekelmans, Perry den Brok, and J. W. F. Van Tartwijk. 2006. “An Interpersonal Perspective on Classroom Management in Secondary Classrooms in the Netherlands.” In Handbook of Classroom Management: Research, Practice, and Contemporary Issues, edited by C. Evertson, and C. Weinstein, 1161–1191. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Yaholkoski, Amber, Kylee Hurl, and Jennifer Theule. 2016. “Efficacy of the Circle of Security Intervention: A Meta-Analysis.” Journal of Infant, Child, and Adolescent Psychotherapy 15 (2): 95–103.
   Google Scholar
• Yip, Jeffrey, Kyle Ehrhardt, Hunter Black, and Dayna O Walker. 2018. “Attachment Theory at Work: A Review and Directions for Future Research.” Journal of Organizational Behavior 39 (2): 185–198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar