Borders, paths and orientations: assembling the higher education research field as doctoral students and supervisors

References

• Ahmed, S. 2006. “Orientations: Toward a Queer Phenomenology.” GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies 12 (4): 543–574.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmed, S. 2019. What’s the Use? On the Uses of Use. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Akkerman, S. F., and A. Bakker. 2011. “Boundary Crossing and Boundary Objects.” Review of Educational Research 81 (2): 132–169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andzaldúa, G. 1987. Borderlands / La Frontera. San Francisco: Spinsters/Aunt Lute.
   Google Scholar
• Ashwin, P. 2012. “How Often are Theories Developed Through Empirical Research into Higher Education?” Studies in Higher Education 37 (8): 941–955.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnacle, R. 2005. “Research Education Ontologies: Exploring Doctoral Becoming.” Higher Education Research & Development 24 (2): 179–188.
   Google Scholar
• Barrie, S., T. Peseta, K. Trigwell, P. McCallum, L. Partridge, J. Graffam, J. Fyffe, and A. Kwan. 2018. Reframing the PhD for Australia’s Future Universities: Final Report. Office of Learning Teaching Project: Australian Commonwealth Government. Accessed 17 November, 2020. http://reframingphd.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/OLT-reframing-the-PhD-final-report.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Bartlett, L., J. Knight, and B. Lingard. 1992. “Restructuring Teacher Education in Australia.” British Journal of Sociology of Education 13 (1): 19–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bosanquet, A., L. Mantai, and V. Fredericks. 2020. “Deferred Time in the Neoliberal University: Experiences of Doctoral Candidates and Early Career Academics.” Teaching in Higher Education 25 (6): 736–749.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boud, D., and A. Lee2009. Changing Practices of Doctoral Education. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bramley, E. V. 2018. “Desire Paths: The Illicit Trials that Defy Urban Planners.” The Guardian, October 5. https://www.theguardian.com/cities/2018/oct/05/desire-paths-the-illicit-trails-that-defy-the-urban-planners.
   Google Scholar
• Bramley, E.V. 2018. Desire paths: the illicit trails that defy urban planners.The Guardian, 5 October 2018. Accessed 30/12/2020. https://www.theguardian.com/cities/2018/oct/05/desire-paths-the-illicit-trails-that-defy-the-urban-planners
   Google Scholar
• Brew, A., and T. Peseta. 2008. “Supervision Development and Recognition in a Reflexive Space.” In Changing Practices of Doctoral Education, edited by D. Boud, and A. Lee, 126–139. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Brook, J., S. Catlin, C. DeLuca, C. Doe, A. Huntly, and M. Searle. 2010. “Conceptions of Doctoral Education: the PhD as Pathmaking.” Reflective Practice 11 (5): 657–668.
   Google Scholar
• Clegg, S. 2012. “Conceptualising Higher Education Research and/or Academic Development as ‘Fields’: A Critical Analysis.” Higher Education Research & Development 31 (5): 667–678.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clough, P. 2002. Narratives and Fictions in Educational Research. Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cousin, G. 2006. “Threshold Concepts, Troublesome Knowledge and Emotional Capital: An Exploration Into Learning About Others.” In Overcoming Barriers to Student Understanding: Threshold Concepts and Troublesome Knowledge, edited by J. H. F. Meyer, and R. Land, 134–147. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cumming, J. 2010. “Doctoral Enterprise: A Holistic Conception of Evolving Practices and Arrangements.” Studies in Higher Education 35 (1): 25–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cutcher, L. 2020. “Conversations with the Self and Others: Practising Reflexive Researcher Identity Work.” In The Oxford Handbook of Identities in Organizations, edited by A. Brown, 311–325. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Daenekindt, S., and J. Huisman. 2020. “Mapping the Scattered Field of Research on Higher Education. A Correlated Topic Model of 17,000 Articles, 1991–2018.” Higher Education 80: 571–587.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deem, R. 2011. “The Contested Nature of the Field of Higher Education Research and the Implications for Newer Researchers.” In SRHE Donald Bligh Collaborative Seminar Series, Intellectual Biographies and Written Task, Seminar One, edited by A. Raddon, and L. McAlpine, 53–56. Oxford, 13th–14th December.
   Google Scholar
• Fox, A., and J. Allan. 2014. “Doing Reflexivity: Moments of Unbecoming and Becoming.” International Journal of Research and Method in Education 37 (1): 101–112.
   Google Scholar
• Golde, C., and G. Walker. 2006. Envisioning the Future of Doctoral Education: Preparing Stewards of the Discipline–Carnegie Essays on the Doctorate. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Grant, B, and L S Giddings. 2002. “Making sense of methodologies: A paradigm for the novice researcher.” Contemporary Nurse 13 (1): 10–28.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Guerin, C., H. Kerr, and I. Green. 2015. “Supervision Pedagogies: Narratives from the Field.” Teaching in Higher Education 20 (1): 107–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halse, C. 2011. “‘Becoming a Supervisor’: The Impact of Doctoral Supervision on Supervisors’ Learning.” Studies in Higher Education 36 (5): 557–570.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hancock, S, S Clegg, B Crossouard, P Kahn, and S Weller. 2016. “Who is the newer researcher into higher education? Locating ourselves in shifting terrains.” Higher Education Research and Development 35 (2): 282–295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harland, T. 2012. “Higher Education as an Open-Access Discipline.” Higher Education Research & Development 31 (5): 703–710.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keefer, J. 2015. “Experiencing Doctoral Liminality as a Conceptual Threshold and How Supervisors Can Use It.” Innovations in Education and Teaching International 52 (1): 17–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiley, M. 2009. “Identifying Threshold Concepts and Proposing Strategies to Support Doctoral Candidates.” Innovations in Education and Teaching International 46 (3): 293–304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Land, R., J. Rattray, and P. Vivian. 2014. “Learning in the Liminal Space: A Semiotic Approach to Threshold Concepts.” Higher Education 67: 199–217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, A., and S. Danby. 2012. Reshaping Doctoral Education: International Approaches and Pedagogies. Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, A., and B. Green. 2009. “Supervision as Metaphor.” Studies in Higher Education 34 (6): 615–630.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macfarlane, B. 2012. “The Higher Education Research Archipelago.” Higher Education Research & Development 31 (1): 129–131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macfarlane, B., and D. Burg. 2019. “Legitimation, Professionalisation and Accountability in Higher Education Studies: An Intergenerational Story.” Studies in Higher Education 44 (3): 459–469.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macfarlane, B., and B. Grant. 2012. “The Growth of Higher Education Studies: From Forerunners to Pathtakers.” Higher Education Research & Development 31 (5): 621–624.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peseta, T., and S. Barrie. 2017. “Stewardship as Practice: ‘Learning on-the-Job’ for the Academic Development Newcomer.” In Theorising Learning to Teach in Higher Education, edited by B. Leibowitz, V. Bozalek, and P. Kahn, 110–123. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pillow, W. 2003. “Confession, Catharsis, or Cure? Rethinking the Uses of Reflexivity as Methodological Power in Qualitative Research.” International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education 16 (2): 175–196.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, L., and E. A. St. Pierre. 2005. “Writing: A Method of Inquiry.” In The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research, edited by N. K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln, 959–978. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Tight, M. 2019. Higher Education Research: The Developing Field. London: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Whitchurch, C. 2013. Reconstructing Identities in Higher Education: The Rise of Third Space Professionals. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar